Thursday, August 28, 2008

Secretary of State Kerry?

I'm not opposed to getting him out of my state.

You want him, you can have him!!!!


"Convention Perspective: Room for Kerry at State Department" by Peter Canellos, Boston Globe Washington Bureau Chief | August 27, 2008

DENVER -- With Biden, the current chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, out of the running, John Kerry almost certainly becomes the most likely Democratic senator in the running to be Secretary of State.

And check out this work:

The Tigris River has been flowing through John Kerry's drawing room since 2002, when he voted to authorize the president to go to war in Iraq. It was a fateful decision. Many of Kerry's liberal supporters, noting that he had voted against authorizing the 1991 Gulf War, thought he was caving in to political expediency. He has claimed the opposite -- that he knew the vote would hurt him among anti-war Democrats but believed it was necessary to get tough with Saddam Hussein.

Sigh. Bad enough when Republicans have to stick to their lies; DemocraPs lose everything when they do it!

Only ONE PARTY NOW -- the USraeli WAR PARTY!!!

Whatever Kerry's ultimate motivation, the vote probably cost him the presidency in 2004, not because anti-war Democrats opposed him, but because Republicans used it to cast him as a flip-flopper, an uncertain figure in a time of war.

Nothing infuriates Kerry more than that charge, but like many candidates who've narrowly lost the presidency, he takes some of the blame on himself: If only he had devised a better response, he -- and not George W. Bush -- would have been in the White House these last four years working to bring about a peaceful end to the war.

Another DELUSION from Kerry!!!

Ummm, Johnny, they STOLE IT from you!!!

So when you have your spine removed, Kerry?

And if the DemocraPs are going to accept the narrative of lies, really, what good are they?

As a Vietnam veteran who ended up protesting that war, Kerry remains attuned to the plight of soldiers endangering their lives for an uncertain cause. The fate of people in Iraq is, at this point, a personal issue for him. Whether he feels responsible, or merely sympathetic, or some combination of both, nothing would satisfy him more than to be able to bring the war to a smooth ending.

First of all, HE IS RESPONSIBLE for voting and approving this pack of lies for political reasons, and secondly, what shit about ending the war!

Fuck you, Kerry! Where were you in '03 when WE ALL KNEW it was ALL BULLSHIT?

There are, of course, other Democrats being mentioned for Secretary of State. Richard Holbrooke, the former United Nations ambassador, has long coveted the post, but he backed Hillary Clinton in the primaries; it is not clear whether Obama would hold it against him.

Anthony Lake, the former national security adviser under President Clinton, backed Obama early. He's clearly qualified to be Secretary of State, but he has a low-key presence that might be better suited to the back rooms of power.

Yes, the BACK ROOMS of POWER -- where the GLOBALIST MASTERS give them their ORDERS!!!

You know, "change" you can "believe" in!

--more--"