tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4945172325208465122024-03-13T01:10:30.115-07:00Rock The TruthThis Blog is dedicated to the Truth Movement with news analysis and commentary.Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.comBlogger12407125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-92116212592896909412015-10-23T15:00:00.000-07:002015-10-23T15:15:44.368-07:00All a Rich Man's Trick<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="305" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/U1Qt6a-vaNM" width="460"></iframe><br />
<br />
--<a class="ytp-title-link yt-uix-sessionlink" data-sessionlink="feature=player-title" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM" tabindex="13" target="_blank"><b>source</b></a>--"Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-72186966695205769772015-07-01T17:50:00.001-07:002015-07-01T17:50:09.482-07:002+2 Does Equal 5 In 2015"The Emergence of Orwellian Newspeak and the Death of Free Speech<br />
<br />
by John W. Whitehead<br />
The Rutheford Institute<br />
June 30, 2015<br />
<br />
<i>“If you don’t want a man unhappy politically, don’t give him two sides
to a question to worry him; give him one. Better yet, give him none. Let
him forget there is such a thing as war. If the government is
inefficient, top-heavy, and tax-mad, better it be all those than that
people worry over it…. Give the people contests they win by remembering
the words to more popular songs or the names of state capitals or how
much corn Iowa grew last year. Cram them full of noncombustible data,
chock them so damned full of ‘facts’ they feel stuffed, but absolutely
‘brilliant’ with information. Then they’ll feel they’re thinking,
they’ll get a sense of motion without moving. And they’ll be happy,
because facts of that sort don’t change.”</i> ― Ray Bradbury, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451673310/ref=as_sl_pd_tf_lc?tag=lewrockwell&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=1451673310&adid=1WHVVQK38N964A4J1DXB&&ref-refURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F%3Fpost_type%3Darticle%26p%3D553334%26preview%3Dtrue"><em>Fahrenheit 451</em></a><br />
<br />
How do you change the way people think? You start by changing the words they use.<br />
<br />
In totalitarian regimes—a.k.a. police states—where conformity and compliance are enforced at the end of a loaded gun, the government dictates what words can and cannot be used. In countries where the police state hides behind a benevolent mask and disguises itself as tolerance, the citizens censor themselves, policing their words and thoughts to conform to the dictates of the mass mind.<br />
<br />
Even when the motives behind this rigidly calibrated reorientation of societal language appear well-intentioned—discouraging racism, condemning violence, denouncing discrimination and hatred—inevitably, the end result is the same: intolerance, indoctrination and infantilism.<br />
<br />
It’s political correctness disguised as tolerance, civility and love, but what it really amounts to is the chilling of free speech and the demonizing of viewpoints that run counter to the cultural elite.<br />
<br />
As a society, we’ve become fearfully polite, careful to avoid offense, and largely unwilling to be labeled intolerant, hateful, closed-minded or any of the other toxic labels that carry a badge of shame today. The result is a nation where no one says what they really think anymore, at least if it runs counter to the prevailing views. Intolerance is the new scarlet letter of our day, a badge to be worn in shame and humiliation, deserving of society’s fear, loathing and utter banishment from society.<br />
<br />
For those “haters” who dare to voice a different opinion, retribution is swift: they will be shamed, shouted down, silenced, censored, fired, cast out and generally relegated to the dust heap of ignorant, mean-spirited bullies who are guilty of various “word crimes.”<br />
<br />
We have entered a new age where, as commentator Mark Steyn <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/article/366896/age-intolerance-mark-steyn">notes</a>,
“we have to tiptoe around on ever thinner eggshells” and “the forces of
‘tolerance’ are intolerant of anything less than full-blown celebratory
approval.”<br />
<br />
In such a climate of intolerance, there can be no freedom speech, expression or thought.<br />
<br />
Yet what the forces of political correctness fail to realize is that
they owe a debt to the so-called “haters” who have kept the First
Amendment robust. From <a href="http://www.jthttp//www.jta.org/2013/06/20/news-opinion/the-telegraph/nazis-marching-through-skokie">swastika-wearing Neo-Nazis</a> marching marching through Skokie, Illinois, and underaged <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2002/LAW/11/15/findlaw.analysis.hilden.cross.burning/index.html">cross burners</a> to <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2002/LAW/11/15/findlaw.analysis.hilden.cross.burning/index.html">“God hates fags” protesters assembled near military funerals</a>,
those who have inadvertently done the most to preserve the right to
freedom of speech for all have espoused views that were downright
unpopular, if not hateful.<br />
<br />
Until recently, the U.S. Supreme Court has reiterated that the First
Amendment prevents the government from proscribing speech, or even
expressive conduct, because it disapproves of the ideas expressed.
However, that long-vaunted, Court-enforced tolerance for “intolerant”
speech has now given way to a paradigm in which the government can
discriminate freely against First Amendment activity that takes place
within a government forum. Justifying such discrimination as “government
speech,” the Court ruled that the <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/walker-v-texas-division-sons-of-confederate-veterans-inc/">Texas Dept. of Motor Vehicles could refuse to issue specialty license plate designs featuring a Confederate battle flag</a>. Why? Because it was deemed offensive.<br />
<br />
The Court’s ruling came on the heels of a shooting in which a <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/06/19/charleston-shooting-confederate-flag/28990095/">21-year-old white gunman killed nine African-Americans during a Wednesday night Bible study</a>
at a church in Charleston, S.C. The two events, coupled with the fact
that gunman Dylann Roof was reportedly pictured on several social media
sites with a Confederate flag, have resulted in an emotionally charged
stampede to sanitize the nation’s public places of anything that smacks
of racism, <a href="http://www.richmond.com/news/local/michael-paul-williams/article_3edc3670-9d34-54f9-a988-1d55e98f9691.html">starting with the Confederate flag and ballooning into a list that includes the removal of various Civil War monuments</a>.<br />
<br />
These tactics are nothing new. This nation, birthed from puritanical roots, has always struggled to balance its love of liberty with its moralistic need to censor books, music, art, language, symbols etc. As author Ray Bradbury notes, “There is more than one way to burn a book. And the world is full of people running about with lit matches.”<br />
<br />
Indeed, thanks to the rise of political correctness, the population of book burners, censors, and judges has greatly expanded over the years so that they run the gamut from left-leaning to right-leaning and everything in between. By eliminating words, phrases and symbols from public discourse, the powers-that-be are sowing hate, distrust and paranoia. In this way, by bottling up dissent, they are creating a pressure cooker of stifled misery that will eventually blow.<br />
<br />
For instance, the word “Christmas” is now taboo in the public schools, as is the word “gun.” Even childish drawings of soldiers result in detention or suspension under rigid zero tolerance policies. On college campuses, trigger warnings are being used to alert students to any material they might read, see or hear that might upset them, while free speech zones restrict anyone wishing to communicate a particular viewpoint to a specially designated area on campus. Things have gotten so bad that comedians such as Chris Rock and Jerry Seinfeld refuse to perform stand-up routines to college crowds anymore.<br />
<br />
Clearly, the country is undergoing a nervous breakdown, and the news media is helping to push us to the brink of insanity by bombarding us with wall-to-wall news coverage and news cycles that change every few days.<br />
<br />
In this way, it’s difficult to think or debate, let alone stay focused on one thing—namely, holding the government accountable to abiding by the rule of law—and the powers-that-be understand this.<br />
<br />
As I document in my book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1590793099/ref=as_sl_pd_tf_lc?tag=lewrockwell&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=1590793099&adid=1K3Q06V8N9QRBPV479PG&&ref-refURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F2015%2F06%2Fjohn-w-whitehead%2Fdid-the-supremes-do-something-good-for-a-change%2F"><em>Battlefield America: The War on the American People</em></a><em>, </em>regularly
scheduled trivia and/or distractions keep the citizenry tuned into the
various breaking news headlines and entertainment spectacles and tuned
out to the government’s steady encroachments on our freedoms. These
sleight-of-hand distractions and diversions are how you control a
population, either inadvertently or intentionally, advancing a political
agenda agenda without much opposition from the citizenry.<br />
<br />
Professor Jacques Ellul studied this phenomenon of overwhelming news, short memories and the use of propaganda to advance hidden agendas. “One thought drives away another; old facts are chased by new ones,” wrote Ellul.<br />
<br />
<i>Under these conditions there can be no thought. And, in fact, modern man does not think about current problems; he feels them. He reacts, but he does not understand them any more than he takes responsibility for them. He is even less capable of spotting any inconsistency between successive facts; man’s capacity to forget is unlimited. This is one of the most important and useful points for the propagandists, who can always be sure that a particular propaganda theme, statement, or event will be forgotten within a few weeks.</i><br />
<br />
Already, the outrage over the Charleston shooting and racism are fading from the news headlines, yet the determination to censor the Confederate symbol remains. Before long, we will censor it from our thoughts, sanitize it from our history books, and eradicate it from our monuments without even recalling why. The question, of course, is what’s next on the list to be banned?<br />
<br />
It was for the sake of preserving individuality and independence that James Madison, the author of the Bill of Rights, fought for a First Amendment that protected the “minority” against the majority, ensuring that even in the face of overwhelming pressure, a minority of one—even one who espouses distasteful viewpoints—would still have the right to speak freely, pray freely, assemble freely, challenge the government freely, and broadcast his views in the press freely.<br />
<br />
This freedom for those in the unpopular minority constitutes the ultimate tolerance in a free society. Conversely, when we fail to abide by Madison’s dictates about greater tolerance for all viewpoints, no matter how distasteful, the end result is always the same: an indoctrinated, infantilized citizenry that marches in lockstep with the governmental regime.<br />
<br />
Some of this past century’s greatest dystopian literature shows what
happens when the populace is transformed into mindless automatons. In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451673310/ref=as_sl_pd_tf_lc?tag=lewrockwell&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=1451673310&adid=1WHVVQK38N964A4J1DXB&&ref-refURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F%3Fpost_type%3Darticle%26p%3D553334%26preview%3Dtrue">Ray Bradbury’s <em>Fahrenheit 451</em></a>,
reading is banned and books are burned in order to suppress dissenting
ideas, while televised entertainment is used to anesthetize the populace
and render them easily pacified, distracted and controlled.<br />
<br />
In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0060850523/ref=as_sl_pd_tf_lc?tag=lewrockwell&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=0060850523&adid=1V36T3S6F1M3P4YY41NB&&ref-refURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F%3Fpost_type%3Darticle%26p%3D553334%26preview%3Dtrue">Aldous Huxley’s <em>Brave New World</em></a>,
serious literature, scientific thinking and experimentation are banned
as subversive, while critical thinking is discouraged through the use of
conditioning, social taboos and inferior education. Likewise,
expressions of individuality, independence and morality are viewed as
vulgar and abnormal.<br />
<br />
And in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0451524934/ref=as_sl_pd_tf_lc?tag=lewrockwell&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=0451524934&adid=174KSJE32WYYVNYN3ZCV&&ref-refURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F%3Fpost_type%3Darticle%26p%3D553334%26preview%3Dtrue">George Orwell’s <em>1984</em></a>,
Big Brother does away with all undesirable and unnecessary words and
meanings, even going so far as to routinely rewrite history and punish
“thoughtcrimes.” In this dystopian vision of the future, the Thought
Police serve as the eyes and ears of Big Brother, while the Ministry of
Peace deals with war and defense, the Ministry of Plenty deals with
economic affairs (rationing and starvation), the Ministry of Love deals
with law and order (torture and brainwashing), and the Ministry of Truth
deals with news, entertainment, education and art (propaganda). The
mottos of Oceania: WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS
STRENGTH.<br />
<br />
All three—Bradbury, Huxley and Orwell—had an uncanny knack for realizing the future, yet it is Orwell who best understood the power of language to manipulate the masses. Orwell’s Big Brother relied on Newspeak to eliminate undesirable words, strip such words as remained of unorthodox meanings and make independent, non-government-approved thought altogether unnecessary. To give a single example, as psychologist Erich Fromm illustrates in his afterword to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0451524934/ref=as_sl_pd_tf_lc?tag=lewrockwell&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=0451524934&adid=174KSJE32WYYVNYN3ZCV&&ref-refURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F%3Fpost_type%3Darticle%26p%3D553334%26preview%3Dtrue"><em>1984</em></a>:<br />
<br />
<i> The word free still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be used in such statements as “This dog is free from lice” or “This field is free from weeds.” It could not be used in its old sense of “politically free” or “intellectually free,” since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed as concepts….</i><br />
<br />
Where we stand now is at the juncture of OldSpeak (where words have meanings, and ideas can be dangerous) and Newspeak (where only that which is “safe” and “accepted” by the majority is permitted). The power elite has made their intentions clear: they will pursue and prosecute any and all words, thoughts and expressions that challenge their authority.<br />
<br />
This is the final link in the police state chain.<br />
<br />
Having been reduced to a cowering citizenry—mute in the face of elected officials who refuse to represent us, helpless in the face of police brutality, powerless in the face of militarized tactics and technology that treat us like enemy combatants on a battlefield, and naked in the face of government surveillance that sees and hears all—we have nowhere left to go. Our backs are to the walls. From this point on, we have only two options: go down fighting, or capitulate and betray our loved ones, our friends and our selves by insisting that, as a brainwashed Winston Smith does at the end of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0451524934/ref=as_sl_pd_tf_lc?tag=lewrockwell&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=0451524934&adid=174KSJE32WYYVNYN3ZCV&&ref-refURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F%3Fpost_type%3Darticle%26p%3D553334%26preview%3Dtrue">Orwell’s <em>1984</em></a>, yes, 2+2 does equal 5.<br />
<br />
--<a href="https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/06/john-w-whitehead/the-final-link-in-the-chain-around-your-neck/"><b>MORE</b></a>--"Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-21979844211557179532015-06-19T10:44:00.002-07:002015-06-19T10:44:50.384-07:00The Way Forward in 2015"The Only Way Forward In 2015<br />
<br />
by Brandon Turbeville<br />
Friday, June 19, 2015<br />
<br />
In the year 2015, America and the rest of the world finds itself at a crossroads. The time is fast approaching when the world’s population will receive the final choice between a move toward true freedom or the clampdown of total oppression. Throughout recorded history, tyrannies have arisen and morphed into other forms with the end result being the creation and maintenance of a permanent worldwide oligarchy that is attempting to ensure the end of all independent thought and action.<br />
<br />
This oligarchy has maintained its control by a number of different methods, the concept of “divide and conquer” being one of the most important in its arsenal. Throughout history, the divisions of race, religion, national borders, and class have all been cleverly used to keep the many from rightly viewing the few as the enemy.<br />
<br />
In the past, there have been times where the façade has shown cracks and there have been individuals who have shown their perception of the obstacle of division and subsequently made strides to overcome it. Those individuals did their best but were promptly silenced or murdered for their efforts. The murders of JFK, RFK, MLK, and others are all testaments to this idea. Particularly with Martin Luther King Jr., the danger to the oligarchy was not so much his fight for civil rights for black Americans, his opposition to the Vietnam war, and his concerns for labor that posed a threat to the oligarchy individually, it was his ability to unify those varied interests – blacks and black civil rights activists, white war protesters, and blue collar workers – that represented the greatest threat.<br />
<br />
In 2015, however, after experiencing decades of declining political interest and knowledge on the part of the general public and a few short years of increasing political awareness thanks to the alternative media, the tide has seemingly turned yet again in the downward direction.<br />
<br />
In 2015, the presence of “traditional” activists has dramatically declined due to the general lack of interest in political affairs amongst the general public. Even among the alternative media and “awake” activists, the focus has become one of money and self-promotion rather than a cause. The rally cry is “come to MY website!” “listen to MY radio show!” instead of a cry to bring more individuals into the movement as a whole. The focus is now on stealing listeners and readers from other radio shows and websites as opposed to stealing empty heads away from the oligarchy.<br />
<br />
Political divisions have taken America down to the lowest depths of division seen in decades. Religious tensions are reaching a new height. Racial tension is increasing as is tension between genders and those of other sexual orientations. With racial movements like “#Black Lives Matter being promoted by the Soros-funded left, radical Christian “conservative” “draw Muhammed” contests and anti-Muslim protests being promoted from notorious Neo-Con networks, and a number of other agitational movements, America is as divided as it has ever been.<br />
<br />
Those few concerned with political developments are siphoned off into Republican vs. Democrat debates and Liberal vs. Conservative ideologies. Any issue that arises of any substance is quickly pushed off into one of the two camps. Support the Second Amendment? You must be a crazed right wing white Republican. Support workers' rights and labor protections? You must be a socialist Liberal Democrat. Oppose mandatory vaccination? You must be an anti-science Republican. Oppose police brutality? You must be black and anti-white. Oppose war? You must be an anti-American commie. Have opinions that don’t fit into the mold? You are a crazy conspiracy theorist.<br />
<br />
Even among the alternative media and the activist community, political pedigrees have become major obstacles with Libertarians fighting with socialists, conservatives fighting with liberals, anarchists fighting with everyone including themselves, and so on. Groups have allowed egos and minor differences to stand between them and their ultimate goals.<br />
<br />
For instance, pro-gun groups may not interact with other pro-gun groups, even within their own state, simply because of minor differences. White gun groups and proponents do not interact with black gun groups and proponents. Likewise with any other issue – economics, vaccines, war, etc. This is not to imply racism as the reason, but it does demonstrate a true disconnect.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, it is a disconnect that we cannot afford.<br />
<br />
An example can be seen in recent open carry protests that have taken place all across the country. These protests have caused a stir due to the enormous brainwashing the American people have been subjected to regarding guns, especially when those guns are carried visibly and publicly. The overwhelming majority of these protesters were of the conservative variety. The overwhelming majority were also white.<br />
<br />
Later, the Huey P. Newton Gun Club announced a similar protest, inviting all interested parties – black and white – to attend. The end result was two protests – one black and one white. Yet there was only ever one issue! An issue that both parties agreed upon! Unfortunately, blacks did not show up for the white protests and whites did not show up to the black protest. Both absences were tragic squanderings of an opportunity for members of two different “communities” to reach out and express solidarity with one another, even if the only accomplishment was to express support for the Second Amendment and nothing more.<br />
<br />
Of course, the Second Amendment is not the only issue where the racial divide has played a part. It certainly was not the first. But it MUST be the last.<br />
<br />
Recently, in California, a gathering of protesters assembled to express their discontent with SB 277, a California bill that would have eliminated most of the vaccine exemptions for children in California. The protesters in the crowd, while mostly white (from the videos of the event), were joined by members of the black community, specifically members of the Nation of Islam.<br />
<br />
Many of the individuals of the protest movement were no doubt of various backgrounds, some conservative, some liberal, some independent. There is also little doubt that these individuals would have loved to have greater participation in their rally and more individuals fighting for their cause as well as to have involved and worked with members of the black community.<br />
<br />
That being said, the black community has largely distrusted vaccinations for decades as they were so often the guinea pigs of experimentation and extermination campaigns in the past. So many informed members of this community undoubtedly wish for their voice to be heard.<br />
<br />
So why is this so hard to accomplish? The media-provoked racial divide – growing more and more tense with each <a href="http://www.activistpost.com/2015/04/baltimore-riots-product-of-soros-machine.html">Soros-funded #BlackLivesMatter</a> campaign and Koch funded FOX racial stirring report or radical defense of brutal police – has been extremely successful in convincing members of both communities that the “other” is not to be trusted.<br />
<br />
Well, here is a newsflash. Both races have distrusted one another for decades, and for decades American activists have been fighting for the same thing. Have they achieved it? No. They have been steadily losing ground with each passing year. After the death of Martin Luther King, Americans as a whole have been moving backwards not forwards in nearly every single category.<br />
<br />
The lesson is simple: Separate isn’t working. It’s time to try something else.<br />
<br />
Finally, it appears that some activists have finally figured this out. When the Nation of Islam joined the anti-NB277 rally, it was not only expression of both communities’ willingness to work together and engage in enlightened mutual self interest, it was a message to all other activists that this is the way forward. It was also a message to the oligarchy that blacks and whites – at least the more astute ones – are tired of being played against one another.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.naturalblaze.com/2015/06/blacks-and-whites-unite-against-sb277.html" target="_blank">As Heather Callaghan described the event</a>,<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Big Pharma used every psy-weapon available to
demonize opponents of forced vaccination bills like SB277 which would
remove virtually all vaccine exemptions from California children. This
psy-op is evidenced by the <a href="http://www.activistpost.com/2015/06/4-ways-to-spot-big-pharmas-astroturfing.html">four top signs of astroturfing and media manipulation</a>. They not only used typical witch hunt lingo and painted quite the narrative to demonize opponents of <a href="http://www.activistpost.com/search/label/vaccines">vaccination</a>,
forming a "debate" where there was none - debates usually include two
willing parties and are not driven by one forceful entity - but also
twisted it up by politicizing it into a <a href="http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/left-right-paradigm-warps-vaccine-debate.html">left-right Punch and Judy show </a>which created more confusing division.<br />
<br />
Basically, the media tried to shame liberals and blame the middle-class
educated crowd for causing disease outbreaks, even though California's
children are over 97% vaccinated. They magically drove the choice over
one's body into a Right issue and painted it as uneducated, stodgy and
outdated. Then they pulled out the conservatives' only known black idols
- Drs. Ben Carson and Thomas Sowell (educated by the
Pharma/Rockefeller-funded Hoover Institute) who both suddenly came out
in glowing support of vaccines.<br /><br />But others that are beloved in the black community had something to say about vaccines...<br />
<br />
No!<br />
<br />
Louis Farrakhan and Tony Muhammad simply say No! They don't pull punches
by asking for a choice. They've drawn a line in the sand, especially
since whistleblowers came out with information of covered up data
showing that the MMR vaccine can create higher rates of autism among
young black males. Farrakhan recently spoke with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
about vaccines and asked "Am I the only one?..." Meaning the only black
man to speak out about forced vaccination as it applies to SB277.<br />
<br />
But Tony's epic under-the-radar speech shows more than just the
long-awaited ire of the black community who don't wish for another
"Tuskegee experiment" - it shows that blacks and whites are not taking
the division-bait. They are not being divided and conquered.</blockquote>
<br />
If there is to be any hope for this country and the rest of the world, it will lie in the ability for individuals who are part of the masses to put away differences and work together. This idea is not a “We Are The World” pie-in-the-sky “let’s all hold hands and love each other” ideal. It is the concept of Enlightened Self-Interest and Enlightened MUTUAL Self-Interest.<br />
<br />
Peace and harmony is the ideal. Friendship, understanding, and compassion between races is also a noble goal. But, in the absence of the ideal, we must be willing to accept a mutual understanding that our own self-interest is inextricably linked. No one is demanding that you like one another. But we must begin to recognize common interests, setting aside differences at least temporarily, before we lose everything.<br />
<br />
King understood this concept and he did what he could to implement it. It was such a threat that it got him killed. So with that in mind, we can see clearly what the system sees as a threat and what we must do bring it down or, at least, land a few blows in return.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.activistpost.com/2015/06/the-only-way-forward-in-2015.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-68650938678228638522015-04-23T05:59:00.003-07:002015-04-23T05:59:31.297-07:00As the (Green) Crow Flies...."Geopolitical Thoughts and Nightmares<br />
<br />
<span class="post-author vcard">Posted by
<span class="fn" itemprop="author" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person"><a class="g-profile" data-gapiattached="true" data-gapiscan="true" data-onload="true" href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/13085692834024590807" rel="author" title="author profile">
<span itemprop="name">green crow</span>
</a></span></span><br />
<span class="post-author vcard">April 9 2015</span><br />
<br />
People often ask me what my complete geopolitical theory looks like.
Actually, nobody ever asks me that. But some days, like today, when it
appears I might be remotely right...or at least close to the truth about
some of the conclusions I've drawn over the years, I get the urge to
expound. Ever since the events of 9/11, there exists a black hole on
planet earth...sucking in all peace, light and goodness--in big
intermittent gulps--by way of "random" toxic false flags and hoaxes.
Sometimes the grotesque outline of evil is cast against a dark
horizon...like today...a shape revealed by a bolt of lightning/insight. <br />
<br />
It's been a long hard slog for me, as it has been for most truthers,
Piecing the pieces of the puzzle together...from crumbs of evidence
dropped carelessly [or deliberately] by the perps...as they go their
mouldy way. When the pieces fit together and begin to form a
pattern...what emerges are geopolitical thoughts and
nightmares...insights into the mind of the evil ones...small pinpoints
of light into their dark machinations. It's not a pretty sight, but at
least it provides temporary relief from the numbing grief and sense of
hopelessness we truther's feel about 9/11 and all its succeeding wars
and atrocities.<br />
<br />
Nobody holds the franchise to truth. Some of us have small bits and
pieces of it but are totally clueless about other parts...this SHOULD
keep us humble and sharing...but it doesn't always. Here's what I've
come up with so far...some ideas that, for me, have survived the test of
time and efforts at disinformation and confusion:<br />
<br />
1. 9/11 was an organized coup of the American Government by <b>Ziofascist</b> globalists. The leaders of the coup have deep roots back to the Kennedy assassination<b>s and are geopolitical kin of the perps of the <a href="http://www.darkmoon.me/2015/stalins-willing-executioners-jews-hostile-elite-ussr/" target="_blank">Bolshevik</a> revolution in Russia</b>.
They are a rogue group of fanatical, insane psychopaths/parasites...who
infest/control all the institutions of American governance, military,
judicial, political, media.<br />
<br />
2. Their current US leaders are probably Dick Cheney and a close close
circle of neocons who surround him. They operate a shadow government
located in an <a href="http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?day_of_9/11=dickcheney&timeline=complete_911_timeline" target="_blank">underground bunker</a> under the East Wing of the White House where the group staged the 9/11 coup:<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"...Vice President Dick Cheney is taken by the Secret Service from
his White House office toward the Presidential Emergency Operations
Center (PEOC) below the East Wing of the White House around this time,
according to some accounts, although other accounts, including the 9/11
Commission Report, will state that he is evacuated from his office about
half an hour later. ....“his Secret Service detail grabbed him and
hurried him down to [the] PEOC..."</i></div>
<br />
The shadow government bunker is probably connected to others in the
hills of West Virginia--a huge underground city connected by
tunnels--with access to the latest military and NSA surveillance
techniques--ability to spy over the whole globe. They have <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7HKjivH6jM" target="_blank">other bunkers</a>
throughout the US and probably the world. This spying ability gives the
rogue government supreme confidence they're at least 10 steps ahead of
the weak and disorganized "opposition". They've been able to maintain
control over all the "choke" points (military, judiciary, media,
politics....where truth/justice might emerge) in the years post 9/11. <br />
<br />
3. The only potential threat/opposition now emerging is Russia/Putin. Russia is a threat <b>not</b>
because it would take the US to task for the events of 9/11 (it
wouldn't) but because it is not under their control. They are fanatical
about maintaining total control over humanity. Control is essential for
their plans (whatever these may be). 9/11 and subsequent events were
but a small part of a vast, complicated plan and these insane nutbars
are absolutely fanatical about carrying out the total plan. They have
kept all participants/victims in line so far by threats and rewards.
They make sure their fellow conspiracists know they have burned all
bridges behind them...there's no way back for any of them--and perhaps
not for humanity as we know it. I'm talking about <a href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/09/israels-addiction-to-nuclear-blackmail-and-terror/" target="_blank">nukes set up in all major cities</a> of the world. I'm talking about <a href="http://greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fukushima-dead-planet-walking.html" target="_blank">Stuxnet/Fukushima</a>
being far worse than we have been told. Fukushima was a false flag
probably worse than 9/11--against Japan. I'm talking about the potential
for more Stuxnets/Fukushima and weather/HAARP, EMP events constantly
being threatened against any opposition.<br />
<br />
4. They control NATO and the "Five Eyes". They keep them (and everyone)
in line by terrorizing, humiliating ("bitchslapping") and bullying
them. They make it crystal clear to anyone who steps out of line that
they will be the next relentless target of their far-reaching,
laser-like, brutality. They use their obvious insanity and addiction to
death and chaos--as a whip against any threats. Their targets understand
that these folks will stop at NOTHING to achieve their goals.<br />
<br />
5. <a href="http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/04/09/405484/War-games-put-US-at-Russia-doorstep" target="_blank">They are working towards a nuclear WWIII.</a>
This war is the tool they will use for their endgame of killing off
life as we know it on this planet. They believe they have enough
underground resources to survive and prevail.<i>..."The living [above ground] will envy the dead." </i>The
constant False Flags act both as a provocation and as a form of drill
to show readiness, intent and weed out any weak links (i.e. <a href="http://greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.ca/2015/03/germanwings-update-were-hollande-and.html" target="_blank">Drilling the Message</a>)<br />
<br />
How do I go about my daily life knowing and believing the above? Well, I
can tell you that I harbour great anger/resentment against the <b><i>sheeple (approximately 63% of the population)</i></b>....for
refusing to confront the truth. If the majority had faced the evidence,
both physical and logical, right after 9/11 (the laws of physics, for
example) and brought the 9/11 perps to justice...we would not be in this
situation today. The sheeple (I know and am related to some of them)
are cowards and addicted to the easy life. Now, we will all pay the far
greater price because the insane ones have become more entrenched and
have upped the ante exponentially. The most devious "achievement" of
the perps is that they have "divided and conquered" society, isolating
the critical thinkers and lowering their status in society.<br />
<br />
At the same time I am at peace. I never fell for their lies. (I know that even this Blog is controlled by them--<a href="http://rt.com/shows/going-underground/189276-assange-google-scotland-referendum/" target="_blank">-in the form of one of their assets, Google</a>). It can be shut down at any time. That doesn't bother me, in fact in some ways it would be a relief : ). No more playing "<a href="http://greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.ca/2015/01/alexa-cooking-books-could-this-also.html" target="_blank">cat and mouse'</a>
with Google. Whatever happens, at least I know I have done what I
could--and will do more if the opportunity presents. Some hopeful events
have occurred, even in the last year, that make me believe that the
crisis is moving towards resolution, one way or the other. Putin has a
rare gift of leadership. Hope and opportunity are the mortal enemies of
the evil ones...who feed off of chaos, disasters and death. Putin's
insight into this fundamental of the human condition means he's careful
never to "corner the rats" but always to provide other options and offer
"hope"...in the way of (as an example) a grand <a href="http://greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.ca/2015/03/putin-is-proposing-superhighway-from.html" target="_blank">"Super" highway</a>
from London across Siberia to New York. In past epochs...there was
always a "New World" to conquer...to prevent humanity from turning on
itself in despair and self destruction.<br />
<br />
Another understanding I get encouragement from....is the old cliche that "<i><b>sunlight is the greatest disinfectant".</b></i> This nightmare could all be over in 48 hours <b><i>if truthers prevailed...justice was allowed to take its course....</i>and the 9/11 perps (or even a few at the top---Bush/Netanyahu/Cheney/Rove) were jailed. </b>Jail for the ringleaders would leave the bunkers in disarray. So near...yet so far. <br />
<br />
--<a href="http://greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.com/2015/04/geopolitical-thoughts-and-nightmares.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<br />
<br />
<b>Flew all the way up to Canada</b>:<br />
<br />
"The Pentagon’s “Operation Jade Helm 15″: The Floodgate towards Martial Law and World War III<br />
<br />
by <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/author/hagopian" title="Posts by Joachim Hagopian">Joachim Hagopian</a><br />
Global Research, April 20, 2015<br />
<br />
<em>First we learned that Operation Jade Helm 15 is coming this
summer from mid-July through mid-September to a Southwest neighborhood
near you stretching from Texas to California. Per government sources and
their mainstream media outlets like the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/03/31/why-the-new-special-operations-exercise-freaking-out-the-internet-is-no-big-deal/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Washington Post</span></a>, it’s
nothing more than a benign massive military drill designed to test how
effectively US Special Operations forces can covertly and as seamlessly
as possible embed themselves into the civilian populace as a mere
security training exercise to keep us all safe in the future.
The Washington Post March 31<sup>st</sup> headline - “Why Operation Jade
Helm 15 is Freaking out the Internet and Why it Shouldn’t Be” - then
goes on to list several alternative news sites like <a href="http://www.infowars.com/beyond-denial-preparations-for-martial-law-in-america/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">InfoWars</span></a> making the claim that martial law in America is coming soon.</em><br />
<br />
According to last August’s <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/08/08/cnn-poll-trust-in-government-at-all-time-low-2/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><em>CNN poll, </em>an all-time high of 87%</a> of
Americans simply do not trust their own government nor mainstream media
as truthful or credible. More and more Americans are turning to
alternative news sources in an attempt to find out what’s really going
on in their world.<br />
<br />
But the rash of “sky is falling” headlines from the internet news
sources have created a media firestorm. Millions of Americans could
hardly be consoled by the <em>Washington Post</em> article encouraging
them not to worry that our government once again is up to no good.
Instead those distrusting MSM believe Jade Helm 15 is a training
exercise that will pave the way for US martial law similar to how the <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/boston-marathon-bombings-guilty-verdict-exposed-as-a-gross-travesty-of-justice/5442240" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Boston Marathon false flag</span></a> was
a litmus test for martial law imposed on a major US metropolitan city.
Except this time Jade Helm’s unprecedented size and scope covers a large
expansive area taking up the southwestern quadrant of the United
States.<br />
<br />
The US military has designated certain states like <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/03/31/why-the-new-special-operations-exercise-freaking-out-the-internet-is-no-big-deal/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Texas, Utah and part of Southern California</span></a> during
this operation as “hostile,” adding that “New Mexico isn’t much
friendlier.” That the one time reputable DC newspaper that broke
Watergate in the 70’s describes the Jade Helm operation in terms as if
it were some kind of board game like Risk or Monopoly doesn’t help its
already dubious credibility. Millions of Americans have realized their
own oligarchic government has betrayed them and their interests and
simply can no longer be trusted. So in the eyes of the feds, that would
automatically make them “hostile.” The <em>Post</em> article also list
several past covert military operations where states have been labeled
as hostile territory for purposes of the training exercises. And of
course that they went by unnoticed should give us solace the Jade’s
outcome will be no different.<br />
<br />
Now that the fascist totalitarian oligarchy posing as our federal
government has been busily expanding its military wars from the Middle
East to American soil against its own law abiding citizens, the <em>Post</em> tells us we shouldn’t worry. George W Bush once infamously proclaimed “you’re either with us or against us.”<br />
<br />
The fact that police in America armed with the same heavy weaponry
look identical to US combat troops fighting foreign wars are now
murdering unarmed US citizens at an unprecedented rate, we shouldn’t
worry? The number of Americans civilians since 9/11 killed by militant
police is closing in on the number of American soldiers killed in action
fighting in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars (<a href="http://costsofwar.org/article/us-killed-0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">as of a year ago 6802</span></a>).
Though no actual records are conveniently kept of police killing
Americans, a year and a half ago it was reported that estimates of <a href="http://www.mintpressnews.com/us-police-murdered-5000-innocent-civilians-since-911/172029/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">over 5000 Americans were killed by police since 9/11</span></a>.
Tack on the mounting numbers of police killings that have increased
exponentially in the last year and a half and it could well exceed the
KIA’s from foreign wars by now. That tells us the same counterinsurgency
wars the US has been brutally waging on foreign soil is now being
fought against us in the streets of America. As such, we stand to lose
our life <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/03/youre-55-times-likely-killed-police-officer-terrorist.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">55 times greater from our own police</span></a> than any actual terrorists. And if you happen to be an African American male, that likelihood skyrockets.<br />
<br />
As of the <a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/14120-obama-signs-2013-ndaa-may-still-arrest-detain-citizens-without-charge" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">2012 NDAA, military forces can enter our homes</span></a> without warrants or charges and lock us up indefinitely without trial or legal representation. And according to that <em>Washington Post</em> article,
apparently we should have no concerns about Special Forces showing up
at our doorstep or roaming through our neighborhoods for several months
over the summer. Our friendly state propagandist <em>Washington Post</em> says
that when the elite wing of Big Brother’s killing machine invades our
local communities, we should actually feel safer. Military spokesman <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/03/31/why-the-new-special-operations-exercise-freaking-out-the-internet-is-no-big-deal/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Army Lt. Col.</span><span style="color: #0563c1;"> </span><span style="color: #0563c1;">Mark Lastoria’s e-mail</span></a> stated,
“Training exercise Jade Helm is going to assist our Special Operations
Soldiers and leadership in refining the skills needed against an ever
changing foreign threat.” And we should all believe this because the
military has such a great track record of always telling us the truth.<br />
<br />
From the <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/boston-marathon-bombings-guilty-verdict-exposed-as-a-gross-travesty-of-justice/5442240" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Boston Marathon bombings</span></a> to <a href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/07/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Sandy Hook</span></a>, the government has been executing false flags for purposes of imposing absolute NWO control over its citizens. Ever since the <a href="http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/35537/Jeffrey-Berwick-The-Walls-Are-Crumbling-Down-Around-911-Why/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">neocons’ inside 9/11 job</span></a> the feds have used their “national security” card ad nauseam as their flimsy excuse to willfully <a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2012/01/15/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">betray our Constitution</span></a> that
they all swore oaths to uphold. And in its place treasonous governments
in the West have systematically enacted draconian Orwellian laws of
tyranny and oppression to conveniently <span style="color: #0563c1;"><a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/a-history-of-americas-war-on-whistleblowers-and-journalists-since-911/5423048" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">vilify citizens bold enough to demand their civil liberties</a> </span>and
privacy rights back. We dissidents who do not approve of our
government’s obliteration of our constitutional rights have become <a href="http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/30086-the-war-on-terrorism-targets-democracy-itself" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">the feds’ targeted enemy</span></a> and deemed potential homegrown terrorists. Even homecoming <a href="http://americaswatchtower.com/2009/04/14/homeland-security-classifies-returning-us-veterans-as-potential-terrorist-threat/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">veterans from US foreign wars are perceived as threats</span></a>.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03/15/treason-in-the-crime-syndicate-of-the-israeli-us-government/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">international criminal cabal</span></a> beholding
to the Western oligarchs has infiltrated and hijacked the governments
of Israel and the United States as well as Europe, Canada, Australia and
Japan. We have a crime syndicate that has protected the international <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/money-laundering-and-the-drug-trade-the-role-of-the-banks/5334205" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">banksters who’ve been laundering drug money</span></a> for multiple decades in its international drug trade. There’s nothing new here as the <a href="http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_world_class_criminal.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Bush crime family has been running drugs from South and Central America</span></a> since
the 1970’s. For years the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the
State Department, the CIA, the FBI, the US military and their
paramilitary private contractors have <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-us-government-and-the-sinaloa-cartel-2014-1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">been flooding America</span></a> and
especially its inner cities with drugs – crack cocaine from Latin
America and heroin from Afghanistan. High levels of the US government
have partnered with drug cartels from Mexico, Peru, Colombia, Central
America, and Dominican Republic to maintain their criminal activities.
At the same time, ever since the late 1970’s high levels within these
same US rogue crime agencies have also been <span style="color: #0563c1;"><a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/americas-global-war-on-terror-al-qaeda-and-the-islamic-state-isis/5434057" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">partnering with al Qaeda/ISIS to create their invented “war on terror.”</a></span><br />
<br />
And now if you believe many of the independent media sources, as of
this summer all these sinister elements appear to be converging to soon
cause catastrophic upheaval in the US Southwest, likely to change
America forever. According to <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/04/isis-camp-a-few-miles-from-texas-mexican-authorities-confirm/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Judicial Watch</span></a><em> </em>earlier
this week, the independent federal watchdog organization revealed that
the US government is complicit with both the Mexican government and the
Sinaloa drug cartel to be involved in joint training camp operations
with ISIS a few miles from El Paso, Texas across the border in Mexico.
Judicial Watch claims a Mexican military field grade officer and a
Mexican Federal Police Inspector are among its sources. The camp is said
to be located just eight miles from the US border. Despite the US
intelligence community being well aware of this claim that terrorists
might be currently training a few miles from our border and apparently
planning an alleged invasion of the United States, President Obama as
commander-in-chief apparently is laying low with only the already
announced plans of Jade Helm operations that neither include a false
flag war involving ISIS nor World War III as much of the <a href="http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/04/17/the-connection-between-jade-helm-and-isis-2/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">internet media is all abuzz</span></a>.<br />
<br />
Between the <a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/15533-obama-s-fast-and-furious-gun-running-scandal-grows" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">US State Department’s Fast and Furious gun smuggling operation</span></a> that was caught “inadvertently” arming drug cartels several years ago, and the feds’ funding and secret backing of <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-isis-us-empire-their-unholy-alliance-fully-exposed/5436019" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">ISIS as their proxy mercenary allies</span></a>, several independent media sites maintain that a <a href="http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/09/19/report-terrorists-captured-mexico-border-homeland-security-denies-credible-threats/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">covert operation involving ISIS’ hybrid terrorists</span></a> have
been “slipping” across the border into the United States as provocateur
forces designed to kill American citizens. Jade Helm and this latest
ISIS piece converging on the states bordering Mexico are said to be the
Obama excuse he’s been planning to implement martial law, illegally
arresting American dissidents after a false flag event where Americans
are murdered by the feds’ terrorist stooges.<br />
<br />
Even more alarming is <em>The Common Sense Show’s</em> <a href="http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2015/04/18/jade-helm-is-designed-to-take-america-directly-into-world-war-iii/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Dave Hodges most recent post</span></a> including
photos of surface to air missiles at a US Air Force base that literally
appeared overnight near Lubbock, Texas. In the designated hostile state
of Texas, Hodges believes more than just martial law will be initiated
but an actual US invasion and World War III is planned.<br />
<br />
These days it is becoming increasingly more difficult to ferret out
the truth, be it mainstream or independent media sources. A major
strategy the federal government commonly uses to discredit alternative
media is planting disinformation within its ranks. Government moles have
infiltrated the so called independent online media, intentionally
muddying the waters so murky as to obscure the facts. When alternative
sites cry out that the sky is falling and then it doesn’t, it conditions
consumers of independent media to no longer believe them either, thus
rendering all independent news outlets “whacked out conspiracy
theorists.” Through various PSYOPS the <a href="http://www.hangthebankers.com/us-and-uk-intelligence-planning-to-infiltrate-social-media-to-spread-propaganda-and-disinformation/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">US intelligence community has targeted both social media</span></a> as
well as alternative news media as viably effective outlets to spread
further disinformation and propaganda lies. Of course this malicious
agenda of the US government purposely keeping Americans uninformed in
the dark, too dumbed down and confused, not knowing who or what to
believe or trust as the actual truth, is exactly where the feds want us.<br />
<br />
After checking with their inside sources, Veterans Today editors <a href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/18/jade-helm-another-neocon-hoax/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0563c1;">Gordon Duff and Jim W. Dean</span></a> have
drawn the conclusion that the neocon feds have purposely used Jade Helm
15 to deceive and discredit independent news sources that are running
with the ISIS invasion story.<br />
<br />
This writer is uncertain of the coming events this summer. I’m
unwilling to completely rule out the dire forecast of “an ISIS invasion”
while simultaneously I’m unwilling to trust what the feds, the military
or the <em>Washington Post</em> claim Jade Helm will bring as well. It
bears in mind today to be skeptical in a healthy way toward any and all
news outlets. Unfortunately it requires some vigilance and a willingness
to do homework cross-checking sources to arrive at a more informed and
accurate assessment of what may actually be transpiring in the world. By
design the sub-standard educational system fails miserably in teaching
discriminative, critical thinking amongst our population. Many people of
course don’t have the luxury of time to invest in seeking out multiple
sources to arrive at the truth in their fast paced, muddled, upside down
world. Too many hidden agendas from both the right and the left carry
misinformation and deception, whether intended or not. Ultimately the
rule of thumb should minimally be to check the sources of whatever news
information you utilize in order to draw your own conclusions.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-pentagons-operation-jade-helm-15-the-floodgate-towards-martial-law-and-world-war-iii/5443856"><b>MORE</b></a>--"Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-46651975070241970992015-04-14T16:24:00.002-07:002015-04-14T16:24:44.220-07:00How Hitler Saved Europe<b>It astonishes and saddens me that I was taught and told such a distorted version of history all these years. That's all I can say.</b><br />
<br />
"Fourteen Days that Saved the World<br />
<br />
Paul Ballard<br />
<br />
<i>‘The Nazi command succeeded in forestalling our troops literally two weeks before the war began.’ -- </i>General S. P. Ivanov, Chief of the General Staff Academy of the Armed Forces of the USSR, 1974.<br />
<br />
The critical moment of World War Two – if not of the twentieth century – is generally regarded as Adolf Hitler’s decision in 1941 to launch an unprovoked assault upon a hitherto neutral and peaceful Soviet Union. Operation Barbarossa, as it was called, is perceived as the great tactical mistake which doomed Nazi Germany to defeat. Icebreaker, by Russian historian Victor Suvorov, exposes this scenario as nonsense. This extensively researched piece of historical revisionism provides compelling evidence that Operation Barbarossa was a reluctant pre-emptive strike against a massive Soviet military machine which was at that time poised to invade not just Germany, but the whole of Western Europe.<br />
<br />
Suvorov quotes top secret Soviet documents which make it crystal clear that Soviet military theory was based on offence and the conquest of territory “for the World revolution.” And this theoretical plan for offensive war was matched by practical preparations in every branch of the armed forces.<br />
<br />
In 1939, when Britain declared war on Germany, Hitler came into the war with a total of 3,195 tanks, fewer than the Kharkov works in the Soviet Union was producing every six months on a “peace-time” footing. The Kharkov works produced the BT high speed tank which was capable of 100km/h and had a range of 700km. Based on a design by the American tank genius J. W. Christie, these tanks had their engine and transmission systems at the rear and were twenty-five years ahead of their time. By 1936, BT tanks were fording deep rivers underwater and driving along river beds.<br />
<br />
On unmade roads the BT operated (although not very effectively) on heavy tracks, but once on good roads, the tracks were discarded and the tank raced ahead on wheels. The only real roads were to be found in western Europe, in particular the German autobahn network, for which the tanks were intended. The claim that Stalin’s tanks were not ready for war is not true; they were not ready for a defensive war.<br />
<br />
The same applied to Soviet aircraft in both numbers and quality. Communist falsifiers in the post-war period claimed that although the Soviet Union had many aircraft, they were inferior. In fact, the most heavily armed fighter in the world in 1939 was the Russian Polikarov I-16; the type 17 had two synchronised 7.62mm machine-guns and two 20mm cannons mounted on the wings, conferring a weight of fire twice that of the Messerschmitt 109E-1, and nearly three times that of the Spitfire 1.<br />
<br />
Rocket First<br />
<br />
Soviet aircraft builders created a plane, unique in the world, which had an armoured fusilage. The IL-2 was virtually a flying tank with extremely high powered weaponry, including eight rocket launchers. Soviet planes were the first in the world to use rockets in combat.<br />
<br />
The fatal weakness in this formidable airforce was that none of its pilots had been trained for dog-fights with enemy planes. The Soviet battle plan relied on a massive surprise attack to knock out the enemy airforce on the ground in the first few hours of the war. By mid-June 1941, in final preparation for such a blow, Stalin’s planes themselves presented an ideal target, packed wingtip to wingtip on temporary airstrips immediately behind the front line, rather than being dispersed several hundred miles to the rear as they would have been in preparation for a defensive war.<br />
<br />
Likewise, airborne assault troops are only useful to an aggressor. Countries concerned with defence need very few. Hitler had created only 4,000 paratroopers by 1939, but Stalin already had more than a million – 200 times more than the rest of the world, including Germany, put together. There were 10 Corps, each supported by airborne artillery and even battalions of light amphibious tanks.<br />
<br />
Soviet engineers were also hoping to land hundreds, or even thousands, of tanks in the West. Antonov, the aircraft designer, suggested that the ordinary tank be fitted with wings and a tail with its hull used as the framework. The tank crew controlled the flight by turning the turret and raising the barrel of the cannon! The entire construction of the KT was astonishingly simple. The risks of flying it even the short path between being dropped from a plane and landing on the ground were unusually great, but human life was cheap to Stalin. The idea was that just before landing the tank engine was started up and the tracks made to revolve at maximum speed. The KT then landed on its tracks and gradually braked. It is claimed that prototypes were actually flown but, like the million paratroopers, they were no use in the unexpected defensive war started by the German invasion.<br />
<br />
Once the paratroopers had seized key points and airfields, the Soviet plan then called for huge numbers of reinforcements to be flown in. As well as building massive numbers of C-47 (Dakota) heavy transport planes under licence from the U. S. government, Stalin ordered a huge glider building programme. The ten different designs included Antonov’s multi-seater assault glider the A-7 and the KZ-20, which could carry twenty soldiers.<br />
<br />
The human cost of this extravagant military expansion was horrific. Having sold Russia’s artistic treasures and vast reserves of gold, platinum and diamonds, the Bolsheviks began their notorious collectivisation programme. The peasants were driven into collective farms so that crops could be taken from them without payment. Ten to sixteen million died from the collectivisation and the resulting famine, compared with 2.5 million Russians in World War One. Yet Stalin sold five million tons of grain abroad every year.<br />
<br />
Stalin Line<br />
<br />
Some of the money was spent on the thirteen fortified regions which were built along the Soviet Union’s western frontier, in a strip of territory unofficially called the Stalin Line. A complex system of combat and supply installations, armoured and built of concrete, was constructed along the 30-50km deep zone; there were also reinforced concrete underground premises to serve as storage depots and command posts.<br />
<br />
The fortified regions were built with enormous effort and vast expense during the first two Five Year Plans. In 1938 it was decided to reinforce each region by building heavy artillery carponiers. More than a thousand combat installations a year were concreted into the region.<br />
<br />
In 1939 the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was signed. Once Poland had been partitioned there was no longer a neutral buffer zone. Stalin could have ordered the garrisons on the line to be strengthened and additional belts of fortified zones could have been constructed behind and in front of the existing line. But in fact the existing fortified regions were dismantled. Some military buildings were handed over to collective farms for vegetable storage, but most were buried or dismantled. In the spring of 1941 powerful explosions thundered across the 1,200km line as armoured firing positions were blown up.<br />
<br />
The reason was simple: Stalin had decided to spread Bolshevism westwards, and the belt of fortifications would have blocked supply routes, creating dangerous bottlenecks for the millions of tons of ammunition, food supplies and fuel needed for the offensive.<br />
<br />
Only a week after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed, Stalin played his first dirty trick. Hitler began the war with Poland as they had agreed, but Stalin claimed that he was not yet ready. Hitler found himself on his own, and immediately at war with France and Britain as well. Meanwhile, Stalin marked the conclusion of this “non-aggression” treaty by introducing general military service.<br />
<br />
A new “defensive” line was started in partitioned Poland, but although constructed very slowly and visibly, it remained a comparatively light and uncomplicated series of fortifications. Mines were removed from the vicinity of bridges and mile after mile of barbed wire was cut. Unnecessary bridges across rivers on the new frontier remained intact, and later greatly aided the German advance.<br />
<br />
In the spring of 1941, the Germans began similar preparations. Both sides erected offensive fortifications. Before launching an attack great masses of troops would have to be concentrated in very narrow sectors: German troops in the Suwalki and Lublin salients and Soviet troops in the areas of Lvov and Bialystok. In order to assemble these shock groupings the secondary sectors were denuded of troops – the lightweight fortifications prevented them from being completely exposed.<br />
<br />
With, by 1941, the last obstacles to the Red advance removed, the Soviet Union possessed thirty separate armies. This was the largest military force the world had ever seen and it could not be maintained for long without mass starvation. The plundering of neighbouring countries would have been the only means of paying for and justifying such a force.<br />
<br />
Many of the best armies were not deployed to fight Germany but to invade virtually defenceless neutral states, as Stalin had already done throughout Eastern Europe. The 9th army was concentrated on the frontier with Rumania and an assault crossing of the Danube was planned by its 14th Rifle Corps. The 12th and 18th “mountain armies” were positioned to move south-west along the Carpathian mountains to cut Germany off from the Ploesti oilfield in Rumania and west into Czechoslovakia, which would enable Stalin to cut the Rumania-Germany oil pipeline. Without this irreplaceable Rumanian oil, the tanks, lorries, submarines, battleships and planes which were massed far away to the west would simply grind to a halt.<br />
<br />
The seven armies in the Second Strategic Echelon included many thousands of men who had been released from concentration camps that spring to expiate their “guilt” by fighting for the Soviets. The generals and officers were also usually former political prisoners and were desperate to prove their worth. Their lives and those of their families were at stake. They were known as the “Black Divisions” because many still wore their black Gulag uniforms. The most powerful of the Second Echelon armies was the 19th, which was transferred from the North Caucasus to approximately 150km north of the Black Sea. It contained mountain rifle divisions which could also be used in Rumania. They were making their way to the frontier when Germany invaded.<br />
<br />
They were not alone. In the final preparations for the attack on the West, millions of soldiers were still heading for the front in trains. Very often their ammunition and heavy weapons were being transported separately. Huge supply dumps were stockpiled just a few miles from the German lines. Most of the airforce were similarly exposed. For a few critical days, Stalin’s mighty invasion force was incapable of defending itself.<br />
<br />
Stalin believed that he had convinced Hitler that the Soviet Union was truly neutral and assumed that the Germans were busy finalising an invasion of Britain. Hitler’s conquests had created an unprecedented situation in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg, Yugoslavia, France, Greece and Albania. Their armies, governments, parliaments and political parties had been destroyed. Stalin’s huge armies were in an ideal position to take over Europe, but Hitler guessed Stalin’s design so that even in 1945 the Soviets only got half of Europe, and some territory in Asia.<br />
<br />
At a Politburo meeting on 21st June 1941 G. R. U. (Military Intelligence) chief General Golikov reported that there was a massive concentration of the German airforce on the Soviet border, enormous reserves of ammunition and a regrouping of German forces. He even knew the name of the operation – Barbarossa.<br />
<br />
Frozen Wastes<br />
<br />
Yet Stalin at first refused to believe what was happening. He had established a sophisticated intelligence network to give him long advance warning of a decision by Hitler to wage war in the frozen wastes of Russia. His key indicators were breathtakingly simple. For an army to survive the winter, every man would need to possess a thick sheepskin greatcoat. Soviet agents therefore kept a close watch for a sudden rise in the demand for sheepskins and a fall in the price of mutton as slaughter was stepped up. Meanwhile, other agents scoured rifle ranges for scraps of cloth used by German soldiers to clean their weapons. Soviet chemists then analysed them in order to find out whether the Germans had developed a gun oil which would not freeze in harsh weather. There was still no sign of such an oil – or of a non-freezing engine oil – in June 1941, so Stalin was convinced that Hitler had no intention of attacking him. Hitler would have his forces concentrated in France, or even fighting in England, as the Red Army cut off their only source of fuel oil, crashed into a virtually undefended Reich and then “liberated” the whole of Western Europe.<br />
<br />
Hitler, of course, had not ordered such preparations because he had not planned on a war against Russia. Only in the spring of 1941 did intelligence reports of troop concentrations and Soviet moves to cut Germany’s oil lifeline with Rumania force Hitler to take the desperate chance of opening a second front with a hasty pre-emptive strike.<br />
<br />
Initially at least, the gamble paid off. Caught in transit or crammed together in their own start-off positions, whole Soviet armies were annihilated. Most of the airforce was destroyed on the ground. The thousands of lightly armoured assault tanks were virtually helpless, and forced to operate in the roadless wastes of Russia they were easily out-manoeuvred by the Germans’ conventional cross-country tanks.<br />
<br />
All this makes Icebreaker the definitive account of the build up to Operation Groza (“Thunderstorm”) – the Soviet conquest of Europe scheduled to begin early in the morning of Sunday 6 July 1941. Suvorov’s revelations about the massive expansion of the NKVD (the blood-soaked forerunner of the KGB) are particularly chilling: these killers would have moved behind the assault troops to liquidate “class enemies.” The Bolshevik torture chambers and death pits which claimed millions of victims in the enslaved nations of the East would have spread throughout the West as well.<br />
<br />
With Germany and France under the Soviet jackboot, Italy and Spain would quickly have fallen too. And Stalin’s one million paratroopers would have made short work of seizing the airfields of southern England to clear the way for a full-scale invasion.<br />
<br />
Lenin and his pupil Stalin never made any secret of their desire for a Second World War to establish a Communist Europe. For the fact that this monstrous plan failed, the pseudo-democrats, simpering priests and court historians have no-one to thank but Adolf Hitler. If it had not been for the man they love to hate, they would have been the first against the wall.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2015/03/more-real-history-revealed-14-days-that.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Also see: <a href="http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/2014/12/a-new-look-at-good-war.html" target="_blank">A New Look at the Good War</a> </b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Maybe the <a href="http://www.tomatobubble.com/id678.html">most evil man in world history</a> (or so I was told) wasn't all that. </b><br />
<span class="item-title">
</span>Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-9874465787512531942014-12-07T16:21:00.000-08:002014-12-08T01:53:49.984-08:00A New Look at the Good War<b>First you have to look at the Great War</b>:<br />
<br />
"Benjamin Freedman Speaks:<br />
<br />
Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.<br />
<br />
What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.<br />
<br />
Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.<br />
<br />
Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.<br />
<br />
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.<br />
<br />
I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.<br />
<br />
Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.<br />
<br />
The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.<br />
<br />
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.<br />
<br />
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.<br />
<br />
That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know.<br />
<br />
Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.<br />
<br />
That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."<br />
<br />
It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.<br />
<br />
Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."<br />
<br />
Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema 'Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.<br />
<br />
And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?<br />
<br />
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.<br />
<br />
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.<br />
<br />
Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.<br />
<br />
The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.<br />
<br />
The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.<br />
<br />
After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?<br />
<br />
In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."<br />
<br />
And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "Made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.<br />
<br />
At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "Made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth.<br />
<br />
Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.<br />
<br />
Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.<br />
<br />
The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.<br />
<br />
Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.<br />
<br />
For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.<br />
<br />
What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.<br />
<br />
What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.<br />
<br />
Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.<br />
<br />
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.<br />
<br />
What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as "Jews". I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as "so-called Jews", because I know what they are). The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves "Jews", were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.<br />
<br />
They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call "Jews".<br />
<br />
There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."<br />
<br />
But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.<br />
<br />
These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today "Jews".<br />
<br />
Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you. That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.<br />
<br />
Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.rense.com/general34/amaz.htm"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<br />
<br />
<b>Now a look at the other front of the Good War</b>:<br />
<br />
"Fall 1941: Pearl Harbor and The Wars of Corporate America<br />
<br />
<div class="author">
By <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/author/jacques-r-pauwels" title="Posts by Jacques R. Pauwels">Jacques R. Pauwels</a></div>
Global Research<br />
<br />
<i><b>Myth</b>: The US was forced to declare war on Japan after a totally unexpected Japanese attack on the American naval base in Hawaii on December 7, 1941. On account of Japan’s alliance with Nazi Germany, this aggression automatically brought the US into the war against Germany.</i><br />
<br />
<i><b>Reality</b>: The Roosevelt administration had been eager for some time to wage war against Japan and sought to unleash such a war by means of the institution of an oil embargo and other provocations. Having deciphered Japanese codes, Washington knew a Japanese fleet was on its way to Pearl Harbor, but welcomed the attack since a Japanese aggression would make it possible to “sell” the war to the overwhelmingly anti-war American public.</i><br />
<br />
An attack by Japan, as opposed to an American attack on Japan, was also supposed to avoid a declaration of war by Japan’s ally, Germany, which was treaty-bound to help only if Japan was attacked. However, for reasons which have nothing to do with Japan or the US but everything with the failure of Germany’s “lightning war” against the Soviet Union, Hitler himself declared war on the US a few days after Pearl Harbor, on December 11, 1941.<br />
<br />
<b>Fall 1941</b>. The US, then as now, was ruled by a “Power Elite” of industrialists, owners and managers of the country’s leading corporations and banks, constituting only a tiny fraction of its population. Then as now, these industrialists and financiers – “Corporate America” – had close connections with the highest ranks of the army, “the warlords,” as Columbia University sociologist C. Wright Mills, who coined the term “power elite,”[1] has called them, and for whom a few years later a big HQ, known as the Pentagon, would be erected on the banks of the Potomac River.<br />
<br />
Indeed, the “military-industrial complex” had already existed for many decades when, at the end of his career as President, and having served it most assiduously, Eisenhower gave it that name. Talking about presidents: in the 1930s and 1940s, again then as now, the Power Elite kindly allowed the American people every four years to choose between two of the elite’s own members – one labelled “Republican,” the other “Democrat,” but few people know the difference – to reside in the White House in order to formulate and administer national and international policies. These policies invariably served – and still serve – the Power Elite’s interests, in other words, they consistently aimed to promote “business” – a code word for the maximization of profits by the big corporations and banks that are members of the Power Elite.<br />
<br />
<i>As President Calvin Coolidge candidly put it on one occasion during the 1920s, “the business of America [meaning of the American government] is business.” In 1941, then, the tenant of the White House was a bona fide member of the Power Elite, a scion of a rich, privileged, and powerful family: Franklin D. Roosevelt, often referred to as “FDR”. (Incidentally, the Roosevelt family’s wealth had been built at least partly in the opium trade with China; as Balzac once wrote, “behind every great fortune there lurks a crime.”)</i><br />
<br />
Roosevelt appears to have served the Power Elite rather well, for he already managed to be nominated (difficult!) and elected (relatively easy!) in 1932, 1936, and again in 1940. That was a remarkable achievement, since the “dirty thirties” were hard times, marked by the “Great Depression” as well as great international tensions, leading to the eruption of war in Europe in 1939. Roosevelt’s job – serving the interests of the Power Elite – was far from easy, because within the ranks of that elite opinions differed about how corporate interests could best be served by the President. With respect to the economic crisis, some industrialists and bankers were pretty happy with the President’s Keynesian approach, known as the “New Deal” and involving much state intervention in the economy, while others were vehemently opposed to it and loudly demanded a return to laissez-faire orthodoxy. The Power Elite was also divided with respect to the handling of foreign affairs.<br />
<br />
The owners and top managers of many American corporations – including Ford, General Motors, IBM, ITT, and Rockefeller’s Standard Oil of New Jersey, now known as Exxon – liked Hitler a lot; one of them – William Knudsen of General Motors – even glorified the German Führer as “the miracle of the 20th century.”[2] The reason: in preparation for war, the Führer had been arming Germany to the teeth, and the numerous German branch plants of US corporations had profited handsomely from that country’s “armament boom” by producing trucks, tanks and planes in sites such as GM’s Opel factory in Rüsselsheim and Ford’s big plant in Cologne, the Ford-Werke; and the likes of Exxon and Texaco had been making plenty of money by supplying the fuel Hitler’s panzers would need to roll all the way to Warsaw in 1939, to Paris in 1940, and (almost) to Moscow in 1941. No wonder the managers and owners of these corporations helped to celebrate Germany’s victories against Poland and France at a big party in the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York on June 26, 1940!<br />
<br />
American “captains of industry” like Henry Ford also liked the way Hitler had shut down the German unions, outlawed all labour parties, and thrown the communists and many socialists into concentration camps; they wished Roosevelt would mete out the same kind of treatment to America’s own pesky union leaders and “reds,” the latter still numerous in the 1930s and early 1940s. The last thing those men wanted, was for Roosevelt to involve the US in the war on the side of Germany’s enemies, they were “isolationists” (or “non-interventionists”) and so, in the summer of 1940, was the majority of the American public: a Gallup Poll, taken in September 1940, showed that 88 percent of Americans wanted to stay out of the war that was raging in Europe.[3] Not surprisingly, then, there was no sign whatsoever that Roosevelt might want to restrict trade with Germany, let alone embark on an anti-Hitler crusade. In fact, during the presidential election campaign in the fall 1940, he solemnly promised that “[our] boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.”[4]<br />
<br />
That Hitler has crushed France and other democratic countries, was of no concern to the US corporate types who did business with Hitler, in fact, they felt that Europe’s future belonged to fascism, especially Germany’s variety of fascism, Nazism, rather than to democracy. (Typically, the chairman of General Motors, Alfred P. Sloan, declared at that time that it was a good thing that in Europe the democracies were giving way “to an alternative [i.e. fascist] system with strong, intelligent, and aggressive leaders who made the people work longer and harder and who had the instinct of gangsters – all of them good qualities”!)[5] And, since they certainly did not want Europe’s future to belong to socialism in its evolutionary, let alone revolutionary (i.e. communist) variety, the US industrialists would be particularly happy when, about one year later, Hitler would finally do what they have long hoped he would do, namely, to attack the Soviet Union in order to destroy the homeland of communism and source of inspiration and support of “reds” all over the world, also in the US.<br />
<br />
While many big corporations were engaged in profitable business with Nazi Germany, others now happened to be making plenty of money by doing business with Great Britain. That country – in addition to Canada and other member countries of the British Empire, of course – was Germany’s only remaining enemy from the fall of 1940 until June 1941, when Hitler’s attack on the Soviet Union caused Britain and the Soviet Union to become allies. Britain was desperately in need of all sorts of equipment to continue its struggle against Nazi Germany, wanted to purchase much of it in the US, but was unable to make the cash payments required by America’s existing “Cash-and-Carry” legislation. However, Roosevelt made it possible for US corporations to take advantage of this enormous “window of opportunity” when, on March 11, 1941, he introduced his famous Lend-Lease program, providing Britain with virtually unlimited credit to purchase trucks, planes, and other martial hardware in the US. The Lend-Lease exports to Britain were to generate windfall profits, not only on account of the huge volume of business involved but also because these exports featured inflated prices and fraudulent practices such as double billing.<br />
<br />
A segment of Corporate America thus began to sympathize with Great Britain, a less “natural” phenomenon than we would now tend to believe. (Indeed, after American independence the ex-motherland had long remained Uncle Sam’s archenemy; and as late the 1930s, the US military still had plans for war against Britain and an invasion of the Canadian Dominion, the latter including plans for the bombing of cities and the use of poison gas.)[6] Some mouthpieces of this corporate constituency, though not very many, even started to favour a US entry into the war on the side of the British; they became known as the “interventionists.” Of course, many if not most big American corporations made money through business with both Nazi Germany and Britain and, as the Roosevelt administration itself was henceforth preparing for possible war, multiplying military expenditures and ordering all sorts of equipment, they also started to make more and more money by supplying America’s own armed forces with all sorts of martial material.[7]<br />
<br />
If there was one thing that all the leaders of Corporate America could agree on, regardless of their individual sympathies towards either Hitler or Churchill, it was this: the war in Europe in 1939 was good, even wonderful, for business. They also agreed that the longer this war lasted, the better it would be for all of them. With the exception of the most fervent pro-British interventionists, they further agreed that there was no pressing need for the US to become actively involved in this war, and certainly not to go to war against Germany. Most advantageous to Corporate America was a scenario whereby the war in Europe dragged on as long as possible, so that the big corporations could continue to profit from supplying equipment to the Germans, the British, to their respective allies, and to America herself. Henry Ford thus “expressed the hope that neither the Allies nor the Axis would win [the war],” and suggested that the United States should supply both sides with “the tools to keep on fighting until they both collapse.” Ford practised what he preached, and arranged for his factories in the US, in Britain, in Germany, and in occupied France to crank out equipment for all belligerents.[8] The war may have been hell for most people, but for American “captains of industry” such as Ford it was heaven.<br />
<br />
Roosevelt himself is generally believed to have been an interventionist, but in Congress the isolationists certainly prevailed, and it did not look as if the US would soon, if ever, enter the war. However, on account of Lend-Lease exports to Britain, relations between Washington and Berlin were definitely deteriorating, and in the fall of 1941 a series of incidents between German submarines and US Navy destroyers escorting freighters bound for Britain lead to a crisis that has become known as the “undeclared naval war.” But even that episode did not lead to active American involvement in the war in Europe. Corporate America was profiting handsomely from the status quo, and was simply not interested in a crusade against Nazi Germany. Conversely, Nazi Germany was deeply involved in the great project of Hitler’s life, his mission to destroy the Soviet Union. In this war, things had not been going according to plan. The Blitzkrieg in the East, launched on June 1941, was supposed to have “crushed the Soviet Union like an egg” within 4 to 6 weeks, or so it was believed by the military experts not only in Berlin but also in Washington. However, in early December Hitler was still waiting for the Soviets to wave the white flag. To the contrary, on December 5, the Red Army suddenly launched a counter-offensive in front of Moscow, and suddenly the Germans found themselves deeply in trouble. The last thing Hitler needed at this point was a war against the US.[9]<br />
<br />
In the 1930s, the US military had no plans, and did not prepare plans, to fight a war against Nazi Germany. On the other hand, they did have plans war against Great Britain, Canada, Mexico – and Japan.[10] Why against Japan? In the 1930s, the US was one of the world’s leading industrial powers and, like all industrial powers, was constantly looking out for sources of inexpensive raw materials such as rubber and oil, as well as for markets for its finished products. Already at the end of the nineteenth century, America had consistently pursued its interests in this respect by extending its economic and sometimes even direct political influence across oceans and continents. This aggressive, “imperialist” policy – pursued ruthlessly by presidents such as Theodore Roosevelt, a cousin of FDR – had led to American control over former Spanish colonies such as Puerto Rico, Cuba, and the Philippines, and also over the hitherto independent island nation of Hawaii. America had thus also developed into a major power in the Pacific Ocean and even in the Far East.[11]<br />
<br />
The lands on the far shores of the Pacific Ocean played an increasingly important role as markets for American export products and as sources of cheap raw materials. But in the Depression-ridden 1930s, when the competition for markets and resources was heating up, the US faced the competition there of an aggressive rival industrial power, one that was even more needy for oil and similar raw materials, and also for markets for its finished products. That competitor was Japan, the land of the rising sun. Japan sought to realize its own imperialist ambitions in China and in resource-rich Southeast Asia and, like the US, did not hesitate to use violence in the process, for example waging ruthless war on China and carving a client state out of the northern part of that great but weak country. What bothered the United States was not that the Japanese treated their Chinese and Korean neighbours as Untermenschen, but that they turned that part of the world into what they called the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, i.e., an economic bailiwick of their very own, a “closed economy” in with there was no room for the American competition. In doing so, the Japanese actually followed the example of the US, which had earlier transformed Latin America and much of the Caribbean into Uncle Sam’s exclusive economic playground.[12]<br />
<br />
Corporate America was extremely frustrated at being squeezed out of the lucrative Far Eastern market by the “Japs,” a “yellow race” Americans in general had already started to despise during the 19th century.[13] Japan was viewed as an arrogant but essentially weak upstart country, that mighty America could easily “wipe off the map in three months,” as Navy Secretary Frank Knox put it on one occasion.[14] And so it happened that, during the 1930s and early 1940s, the US Power Elite, while mostly opposed to war against Germany, was virtually unanimously in favour of a war against Japan – unless, of course, Japan was prepared to make major concessions, such as “sharing” China with the US. President Roosevelt – like Woodrow Wilson not at all the pacifist he has been made out to be by all too many historians – was keen to provide such a “splendid little war.” (This expression had been coined by US Secretary of State John Hay in reference to the Spanish-American War of 1898; it was “splendid” in that it allowed the US to pocket the Philippines, Puerto Rico, etc.) By the summer of 1941, after Tokyo had further increased its zone of influence in the Far East, e.g. by occupying the rubber-rich French colony of Indochina and, desperate above all for oil, had obviously started to lust after the oil-rich Dutch colony of Indonesia, FDR appears to have decided that the time was ripe for war against Japan, but he faced two problems. First, public opinion was strongly against American involvement in any foreign war. Second, the isolationist majority in Congress might not consent to such a war, fearing that it would automatically bring the US into war against Germany.<br />
<br />
Roosevelt’s solution to this twin problem, according to the author of a detailed and extremely well documented recent study, Robert B. Stinnett, was to “provoke Japan into an overt act of war against the United States.”[15] Indeed, in case of a Japanese attack the American public would have no choice but to rally behind the flag. (The public had similarly been made to rally behind the Stars and Stripes before, namely at the start of the Spanish-American War, when the visiting US battleship Maine had mysteriously sunk in Havana harbour, an act that was immediately blamed on the Spanish; after World War II, Americans would again be conditioned to approve of wars, wanted and planned by their government, by means of contrived provocations such as the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Incident.) Furthermore, under the terms of the Tripartite Treaty concluded by Japan, Germany, and Italy in Berlin on September 27, 1940, the three countries undertook to assist each other when one of the three contracting powers was attacked by another country, but not when one of them attacked another country. Consequently, in case of a Japanese attack on the US, the isolationists, who were non-interventionists with respect to Germany but not with respect to Japan, did not have to fear that a conflict with Japan would also mean war against Germany.<br />
<br />
And so, President Roosevelt, having decided that “Japan must be seen to make the first overt move,” made “provoking Japan into an overt act of war the principal policy that guided [his] actions toward Japan throughout 1941,” as Stinnett has written. The stratagems used included the deployment of warships close to, and even into, Japanese territorial waters, apparently in the hope of sparking a Gulf of Tonkin-style incident that could be construed to be a casus belli. More effective, however, was the relentless economic pressure that was brought to bear on Japan, a country desperately in need of raw materials such as oil and rubber and therefore likely to consider such methods to be singularly provocative. In the summer of 1941, the Roosevelt administration froze all Japanese assets in the United States and embarked on a “strategy for frustrating Japanese acquisition of petroleum products.” In collaboration with the British and the Dutch, anti-Japanese for reasons of their own, the US imposed severe economic sanctions on Japan, including an embargo on vital oil products. The situation deteriorated further in the fall of 1941. On November 7, Tokyo, hoping to avoid war with the mighty US, offered to apply in China the principle of non-discriminatory trade relations on the condition that the Americans did the same in their own sphere of influence in Latin America. However, Washington wanted reciprocity only in the sphere of influence of other imperialist powers, and not in its own backyard; the Japanese offer was rejected.<br />
<br />
The continuing US provocations of Japan were intended to cause Japan to go to war, and were indeed increasingly likely to do so. “This continuing putting pins in rattlesnakes,” FDR was to confide to friends later, “finally got this country bit.” On November 26, when Washington a demanded Japan’s withdrawal from China, the “rattlesnakes” in Tokyo decided they had enough and prepared to “bite.” A Japanese fleet was ordered to set sail for Hawaii in order to attack the US warships that FDR had decided to station there, rather provocatively as well as invitingly as far as the Japanese were concerned, in 1940. Having deciphered the Japanese codes, the American government and top army brass knew exactly what the Japanese armada was up to, but did not warn the commanders in Hawaii, thus allowing the “surprise attack” on Pearl Harbor to happen on Sunday, December 7, 1941.[16]<br />
<br />
The following day FDR found it easy to convince Congress to declare war on Japan, and the American people, shocked by a seemingly cowardly attack that they could not know to have been provoked, and expected, by their own government, predictably rallied behind the flag. The US was ready to wage war against Japan, and the prospects for a relatively easy victory were hardly diminished by the losses suffered at Pearl Harbour which, while ostensibly grievous, were far from catastrophic. The ships that had been sunk were older, “mostly 27-year old relics of World War I,” and far from indispensible for warfare against Japan. The modern warships, on the other hand, including the aircraft carriers, whose role in the war would turn out to be crucial, were unscathed, as per chance (?) they had been sent elsewhere by orders from Washington and were safely out at sea during the attack.[17] However, things did not quite work out as expected, because a few days later, on December 11, Nazi Germany unexpectedly declared war, thus forcing the US to confront two enemies and to fight a much bigger war than expected, a war on two fronts, a world war.<br />
<br />
In the White House, the news of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor had not arrived as a surprise, but the German declaration of war exploded there as a bombshell. Germany had nothing to do with the attack in Hawaii and had not even been aware of the Japanese plans, so FDR did not consider asking Congress to declare war on Nazi Germany at the same time as Japan. Admittedly, US relations with Germany had been deteriorating for some time because of America’s active support for Great Britain, escalating to the undeclared naval war of the fall of 1941. However, as we have already seen, the US Power Elite did not feel the need to intervene in the war in Europe. It was Hitler himself who declared war on the United States on December 11, 1941, much to the surprise of Roosevelt. Why? Only a few days earlier, on December 5, 1941, the Red Army had launched a counteroffensive in front of Moscow, and this entailed the failure of the Blitzkrieg in the Soviet Union. On that same day, Hitler and his generals realized that they could no longer win the war. But when, only a few days later, the German dictator learned of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, he appears to have speculated that a German declaration of war on the American enemy of his Japanese friends, though not required under the terms of the Tripartite Treaty, would induce Tokyo to reciprocate with a declaration of war on the Soviet enemy of Germany.<br />
<br />
With the bulk of the Japanese army stationed in northern China and therefore able to immediately attack the Soviet Union in the Vladivostok area, a conflict with Japan would have forced the Soviets into the extremely perilous predicament of a two-front war, opening up the possibility that Germany might yet win its anti-Soviet “crusade.” Hitler, then, believed that he could exorcize the spectre of defeat by summoning a sort of Japanese deus ex machina to the Soviet Union’s vulnerable Siberian frontier. But Japan did not take Hitler’s bait. Tokyo, too, despised the Soviet state but, already at war against the US, could not afford the luxury of a two-front war and preferred to put all of its money on a “southern” strategy, hoping to win the big prize of resource-rich Southeast Asia, rather than embark on a venture in the inhospitable reaches of Siberia. Only at the very end of the war, after the surrender of Nazi Germany, would it come to hostilities between the Soviet Union and Japan. In any event, because of Hitler’s needless declaration of war, the United States was henceforth also an active participant in the war in Europe, with Great Britain and the Soviet Union as allies.[18]<br />
<br />
In recent years, Uncle Sam has been going to war rather frequently, but we are invariably asked to believe that this is done for purely humanitarian reasons, i.e. to prevent holocausts, to stop terrorists from committing all sorts of evil, to get rid of nasty dictators, to promote democracy, etc.[19]<br />
<br />
Never, it seems, are economic interests of the US or, more accurately, of America’s big corporations, involved. Quite often, these wars are compared to America’s archetypal “good war,” World War II, in which Uncle Sam supposedly went to war for no other reason than to defend freedom and democracy and to fight dictatorship and injustice. (In an attempt to justify his “war against terrorism,” for example, and “sell” it to the American public, George W. Bush was quick to compare the 9/11 attacks to Pearl Harbor.) This short examination of the circumstances of the US entry into the war in December 1941, however, reveals a very different picture. The American Power Elite wanted war against Japan, plans for such a war had been ready for some time, and in 1941 Roosevelt obligingly arranged for such a war, not because of Tokyo’s unprovoked aggression and horrible war crimes in China, but because American corporations wanted a share of the luscious big “pie” of Far Eastern resources and markets. On the other hand, because the major US corporations were doing wonderful business in and with Nazi Germany, profiting handsomely from the war Hitler had unleashed and, incidentally, providing him with the equipment and fuel required for his Blitzkrieg, war against Nazi Germany was definitely not wanted by the US Power Elite, even though there were plenty of compelling humanitarian reasons for crusading against the truly evil “Third Reich.” Prior to 1941, no plans for a war against Germany had been developed, and in December 1941 the US did not voluntarily go to war against Germany, but “backed into” that war because of Hitler’s own fault.<br />
<br />
Humanitarian considerations played no role whatsoever in the calculus that led to America’s participation in World War II, the country’s original “good war.” And there is no reason to believe that they did so in the calculus that, more recently, led to America’s marching off to fight allegedly “good wars” in unhappy lands such as Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya – or will do so in the looming war against Iran.<br />
<br />
A war against Iran is very much wanted by Corporate America, since it holds the promise of a large market and of plentiful raw materials, especially oil. As in the case of the war against Japan, plans for such a war are ready, and the present tenant in the White House seems just as eager as FDR was to make it happen. Furthermore, again as in the case of the war against Japan, provocations are being orchestrated, this time in the form of sabotage and intrusions by drones, as well as by the old-fashioned deployment of warships just outside Iranian territorial waters. Washington is again “putting pins in rattlesnakes,” apparently hoping that the Iranian “rattlesnake” will bite back, thus justifying a “splendid little war.” However, as in the case of Pearl Harbor, the resulting war may well again turn out to be much bigger, longer, and nastier than expected.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/fall-1941-pearl-harbor-and-the-wars-of-corporate-america/28159"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<b> </b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Speaking of the next World War</b>:<br />
<br />
"The Gods of Money & Their New World Order Project: Endgame Has Begun<br />
<br />
By RICHARD K. MOORE<br />
<br />
<i>Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.</i> – Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founder of the House of Rothschild<br />
<br />
Perhaps the single most important thing to know about power in the world today is that most nations do not have control over their own currencies. Instead privately owned, for-profit central banks – such as the Federal Reserve System in the US – create money out of nothing and then loan it at interest to their respective governments. This is an incredibly profitable scam, but that’s not the worst of it.<br />
<br />
Not only do the central banks have the power to create money for free, they also have the power to set interest rates, to decide how much credit is issued, and to decide how much money is put into circulation. With this power central banks can – and do – orchestrate boom and bust cycles, enabling the super-wealthy owners of the banks to profit from investments during the booms, and buy up assets at bargain prices during the busts. And that still isn’t the whole story.<br />
<br />
The most profitable of all central bank activities has been the financing of major wars, particularly the two World Wars. When nations are engaged in warfare, with their very survival at stake, the governments stretch their resources to the limit in the competition to prevail. The struggle to get more financing becomes as important as the competition on the battlefield. Moneylenders love a desperate borrower, and vast fortunes have been made by extending credit to both sides in conflicts: the longer a war continues, the more profit for the central bankers.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>Centralised Wealth Leads to Centralised Power</b></div>
<br />
<i>Some of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere, so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.</i> – Woodrow Wilson (1856-1924), 28th President of the United States<br />
<br />
Our political systems, based on parties competing to get elected, are inherently prone to corruption. Just as the struggle for financing is important in military campaigns, so is it important in political campaigns. Wealthy donors are able to get special treatment, when it comes to legislation and regulation that affects their business interests. This kind of corruption, however, is only the tip of the iceberg.<br />
<br />
A more effective way that wealth translates into power is by the placing of agents – individuals loyal to wealthy backers – into positions of influence and power. For example, when the Rothschilds and Rockefellers joined forces to establish the Federal Reserve, they recruited an unknown professor, Woodrow Wilson, promised to make him President, and secured a return promise that he would sign the Federal Reserve bill when the time came. With their influence over party bosses, their control of newspapers, and unlimited funding, they were able to get Wilson elected. He may have later regretted his bargain with the devil, as suggested in the above quotation.<br />
<br />
A more modern example is Obama, who in 2009 was tasked by Henry Kissinger (himself a key agent of the Rockefellers) to create a “new world order.” Like Wilson, Obama appeared out of political nowhere, was rocketed into the Presidency, and proved his loyalty in office. In Obama’s case, this involved promptly turning the White House over to central-banker agents from Wall Street – Timothy Geithner and his buddies. They make the policy; Obama makes the speeches.<br />
<br />
This kind of thing has been going on for centuries, first in Europe and later in the US. What began as the placement of a few key agents has evolved over time. What we have now is an international web of control, with key agents placed in political parties, governments and their agencies, the media, corporate boards, intelligence services, and the military. At the centre of the web are the central banking dynasties – the Gods of Money – who remain mostly behind the scenes, pulling the strands of real power.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Engineering of Transformation</b></div>
<br />
<i>In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.</i> – Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945), 32nd President of the United States<br />
<br />
Have you ever daydreamed about what you would do if you had wealth and power? For some the answer might be a life of leisure and indulgence, but for many their thoughts would turn to changing the world, making the world ‘better’. An iconic example would be Bill Gates, who would rather use the bulk of his fortune for making changes in the world – primarily to do with population reduction – than devote it to amassing still more wealth.<br />
<br />
The Gods of Money are like that. They’ve had wealth and power, in great excess, for generations, and unlike you and me, they can do more than daydream. The business they have been engaged in for the past couple of centuries has not been to accumulate more wealth, rather it has been to transform the world into their own desired kind of private fiefdom. They have been accomplishing this in a series of transformational projects on a global scale. What is referred to as ‘The New World Order’ is simply the latest in this series of projects.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Great America Project: An Ideal Base of Operations</b></div>
<br />
When the American colonies achieved independence from Britain, a new nation was created that clearly had the potential to become a truly great world power. A huge continent, bigger than all of Europe, and with immense resources, was available to be conquered and exploited. If the Rothschilds could gain control of America, they could use it as a base of operations to consolidate their power globally.<br />
<br />
During the 1800s the US grew to become a formidable industrial power. We associate this rise to power with names like Carnegie, Mellon, JP Morgan, and Rockefeller, who came to be known as the ‘robber barons’. However it was Rothschild money, and Rothschild-linked banks, which played the major role in financing this industrialisation project. The Rothschilds were carefully preparing their future base of operations. JD Rockefeller was the greatest of the robber barons, and he was able to join the Gods of Money pantheon on more or less equal terms with the Rothschilds.<br />
<br />
With the US established as a major industrial power, the next step was for the Gods of Money to take firm control of this giant they helped create. As described above, this was accomplished with the usual behind the scenes manipulations through the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The World War I Project</b></div>
<br />
The next step was to play the European powers off against one another. With the backing of the Rothschilds, as described in the book Hidden History (see sidebar on page 14 of this issue of New Dawn), a secret cabal of British elites engineered the ‘Great War’ with Germany, whose industrial and financial power was beginning to eclipse that of the British Empire. The cabal’s intention was to preserve British supremacy. The Gods of Money, however, were playing a deeper game. Germany lost the war, but it was the US that emerged as the main beneficiary, not Britain.<br />
<br />
While the European powers were exhausting themselves in warfare, the US was supplying them with the means to do so, and those supplies were being paid for by loans made possible by the new Federal Reserve – which had been established just in time for that purpose. When the war ended, the European powers owed astronomical sums to the US, and the US had greatly expanded its industrial capacity in the process of supplying war materials.<br />
<br />
Before the war, the US, Britain, and Germany were more or less on a par as industrial powers. With only negligible military involvement, the US emerged from the war by far the greatest industrial power, and the world’s wealthiest nation as well. But the US was only one Great Power among many. It did not have a world-class fleet nor did it have a world-class army.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Fascism & Communism Experiments</b></div>
<br />
The Grand Project of the Gods of Money has always been, as mentioned above, to transform the world into their own private fiefdom. With their Great America project they were building the geopolitical power base that would be needed to achieve that goal. But there remained the question of how they would rule their fiefdom once attained. They want to have absolute control over the population, and they wanted to experiment with different means of exercising such control.<br />
<br />
They saw their first opportunity to experiment in the revolutionary ideas of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Leon Trotsky, and Vladimir Lenin. The Czarist regime in Russia was weakening, and had been forced, by the 1905 Revolution, to implement significant reforms. Weakened still further by defeats early in World War I, a second communist revolution had every probability of success. There was a danger, however, that the second revolution would lead to a democratic form of socialism, which would not be the kind of regime the Gods of Money wanted for their eventual fiefdom.<br />
<br />
They saw in Lenin and Trotsky leaders with autocratic ideas that suited their purposes. They arranged for Lenin to be transported from Switzerland, and Trotsky from New York – both to St. Petersburg – where they created the Bolshevik faction and took control of the revolutionary aftermath. The Gods of Money then funded the development of the Soviet Union, and thus launched an experiment with an autocratic regime based on collectivist values.<br />
<br />
The Gods of Money saw their second opportunity to experiment in the ideas of the superbly charismatic Adolf Hitler. When Hitler was arrested for leading the Beer Hall Putsch of 1923, they arranged for him to be given a comfortable jail existence where he was able to develop his ideas in his magnum opus, Mein Kampf, which articulated a manifesto proposing, among other things, to seek Lebensraum and enslave the Slavs. Hitler’s ideas centred around nationalism, expansionism, eugenics, genocide, and brutal methods of population control.<br />
<br />
If Hitler were to come to power in Germany, that would provide an opportunity to experiment with a quite different kind of autocratic regime. In addition, due to his expansionist ideas, and his hatred of communism, it would provide the means to carry out another project in geopolitical transformation, a second Great War. Hitler was also attractive to German elites, who saw in him a chance to restore Germany as a Great Power.<br />
<br />
The rest, as they say, is history. By engineering the economic collapse of the Weimar Republic, and by other means, Hitler was indeed helped into power in Germany. He was no pawn however, and much of his hatred, due in part to the fact that the Rothschilds are Jewish, was aimed at the Gods of Money themselves, whom he referred to as the ‘Gnomes of Zurich’. That hatred did not detract from the value of the Nazi experiment to the Gods of Money.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The World War II Project</b></div>
<br />
<i>If we see that Germany is winning we should help Russia and if Russia is winning we ought to help Germany and that way let them kill as many as possible.</i> – Harry S. Truman (1884-1972), 33rd President of the United States, NY Times, 24 June 1941<br />
<br />
The next step in the Great America project was to play all the other Great Powers off against one another, on a grander scale than in the first Great War. This time, however, the US was to play a major military role, so that it could emerge from the war as not just one more Great Power, but as the world’s first global super power. A major military role, yes, but a highly leveraged one, where the US suffered negligible casualties compared to the astronomical casualties of most of the other combatants.<br />
<br />
From their secure American base of operations, the Gods of Money helped arrange the rearmament of Germany and the rapid rise of Japan as a modern industrial and military power, while continuing to support the development of the Soviet Union. In this way, as they say, the ducks were all lined up in a row. The US then pretended benevolent neutrality and watched while Japan fought it out with China, and Germany fought it out with the Soviet Union.<br />
<br />
The US bided its time and waited for the most opportune moment to join the fray. When the time came, the US systematically provoked Japan, and made no attempt to defend against the attack on Pearl Harbor, even though Roosevelt knew the exact time the attack was to occur. The American people had been strongly against entering the war, and Pearl Harbor, as planned, instantly transformed public opinion, enabling the US to enter the war with the overwhelming support of its people. A ‘Day of Infamy’ indeed, but every bit as much Roosevelt’s as Japan’s.<br />
<br />
Again, the rest is history. At the end of the war the US had 40% of the world’s wealth and industrial capacity, dominance of the seven seas, permanent military bases spread around the world, and a monopoly on nuclear weapons. Every other major power was standing in rubble and drowning in debt, as intended. With the US established as the first global super power, the Gods of Money set out to create a postwar world order to be dominated by America.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Postwar Regime: Establishing the Foundations for a Globalist State</b></div>
<br />
In 1944, an international conference was convened at Bretton Woods, establishing new globalist institutions, including the United Nations, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank, according to a design that had been worked out during the war by the Gods of Money’s Council on Foreign Relations. Under the guise of establishing a regime of world peace and stability, the US arranged for the other Western powers to be emasculated militarily. For its part, the US maintained and expanded its military muscle.<br />
<br />
Whereas the Nazi experiment was terminated by the war, the Soviet Union survived as a Great Power. As the primary wartime ally of America, and in light of the professed harmonious intentions of the Bretton Woods system, the Soviets were looking forward to peaceful coexistence with the West, despite their considerable ideological differences. This was not to be, as it did not fit into the plans of the Gods of Money, as they continued with their Grand Project of global domination.<br />
<br />
America and Britain, both firmly under the thumb of the Gods of Money, invented the myth of a ‘communist threat’, and proclaimed the Cold War, which served several purposes. First, it was accompanied by a policy of containment, which aimed to prevent the Soviets, and their Chinese ideological cousins, from participating in the postwar economic boom, and also in inhibiting nations, such as Korea and Vietnam, from choosing to follow a socialist path. Second, the Cold War provided an excuse for the US to continue expanding its military might and interventionist programs.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Collective Imperialism Project</b></div>
<br />
With the US as an unrestrained super power, a Pax Americana regime prevailed in what was euphemistically called the ‘Free World’. With no need to defend their separate empires, the former European Great Powers were able to participate along with America in a grand program of neo-imperialism. This led to the greatest era of economic growth the world had ever seen.<br />
<br />
Growth became the expected norm; any episode of non-growth was considered an aberration. The expectation of growth became a structural part of national economies, leading to routine deficit financing, government borrowing, and increasing national debts – owed to the central banks. There was no Plan B: if growth faltered – a dreaded recession episode – the only recourse was to borrow still more, if an economy was to continue functioning.<br />
<br />
The postwar growth boom led to unprecedented prosperity throughout the West, as well as in Japan, which in the postwar era could be considered part of the West. In addition, sweeping programs of social reform were introduced, such as the National Health Service in the UK, and even more far-reaching welfare-state arrangements throughout Western Europe.<br />
<br />
Partly because of the dissolution of traditional empires, and partly because of the social-reform measures, there was a sense in the postwar world that democratic values were on the rise. Governments were being more responsive to the needs and wishes of the people. The Enlightenment values of personal freedom and the rights of citizens were enshrined in the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It seemed as if a new golden age of democracy and ever-improving social conditions had arrived.<br />
<br />
Economic stability plus everlasting economic growth, along with peace guaranteed by a benevolent Uncle Sam: how sweet it was! With their postwar regime the Gods of Money had seduced the ‘Free World’ into a bubble of dependency. The UN Charter guaranteed the principle of national sovereignty, and no one (exception: Charles de Gaulle) seemed to realise that when someone else is guaranteeing your sovereignty, you no longer have sovereignty. Growth became the new opiate of the people, and no one seemed to realise that everlasting growth on a finite planet is a mathematical impossibility.<br />
<br />
With most of the world willingly tied to a leash of dependency on American leadership, and with America firmly under the thumb of the Federal Reserve, the Gods of Money could now proceed to lead the world down the garden path toward total subjugation.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Global Destabilisation Project: Nixon & the Gold Standard</b></div>
<br />
For nearly 30 years, from 1944 to 1971, the Bretton Woods system operated more or less as advertised. The dollar was pegged to gold, with other currencies pegged to the dollar, providing the promised financial stability. Growth continued, providing the expected prosperity and rising living standards. However, with the US embroiled in a costly and unwinnable war in Vietnam, the American economy was beginning to falter. In 1971, in order to continue financing the war, Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard.<br />
<br />
The Cold War project had provided an opportunity to abandon the stability project. Currency values could now fluctuate, enabling currency speculation, and introducing uncertainty into the valuation of international transactions. No great harm resulted at first, but a central pillar of financial stability had been removed. Today, only a tiny percentage of currency transactions have to do with the real economy, and the rest are rampant and destabilising speculation.<br />
<br />
In 1980 the Gods of Money moved their destabilisation project into a higher gear. They arranged for their agents, Reagan and Thatcher, to take leadership in the US and UK, and a media propaganda campaign was launched to reintroduce the long-discredited doctrine of laissez-faire economics, which had created the horrific Dickensian conditions of the Victorian era.<br />
<br />
Based on a fraudulent economic analysis promulgated by Milton Friedman’s Chicago School of Economics, the claim was made that reducing corporate taxes and regulations would lead to a stronger economy and benefits would accrue to all, including even government budgets. The charismatic Ronald Reagan talked about ‘getting government off our backs’, and proclaimed that ‘government is not the solution; it is the problem’.<br />
<br />
There is of course much truth in those words, but increasing corporate power at the expense of government power was not at all a path to either prosperity or to personal freedom. One might have wondered how a career as a film actor and TV advertiser qualified someone to be President, but the mystery vanishes when one realises that the main job of the President is to tell lies convincingly to a credulous public, in support of the agendas of the Gods of Money.<br />
<br />
Along with reducing corporate taxes and regulations, the new economic policies included encouraging corporations to move their operations to low-waged countries, which led to the de-industrialisation of both America and Britain. The Bretton Woods regime was being systematically undermined, and the decline of both stability and prosperity was thus ensured.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The European Union Project</b></div>
<br />
The populations of continental Western Europe, having experienced on their own doorsteps the ravages of fascism and war, were less vulnerable to the kind of facile propaganda that succeeded so well with the more sheltered populations of Britain and America. A more nuanced campaign was required to destabilise continental Europe.<br />
<br />
The propaganda campaign to sell the Maastricht Treaty didn’t talk about ‘getting government off our backs’, which wouldn’t have gone over very well in those economies, where the welfare state was both popular and successful. Instead it was argued that a European Union would put Europe on a par with the powerful USA, and it was even argued that the EU was necessary to prevent future wars among the European powers.<br />
<br />
The reality of the EU was that it delivered Europe directly into the hands of the Gods of Money. Unlike the European nations themselves, which are governed by elected Parliaments and Prime Ministers, the Brussels regime is dominated by the European Commission, which is unelected and which the Gods of Money can easily arrange to be staffed by their own selected agents.<br />
<br />
A central part of the pro-EU propaganda campaign had been promises about ‘subsidiarity’ – decisions were allegedly to be taken at the lowest possible level, depending on the issues involved: loss of sovereignty needn’t be feared. Brussels was to make decisions only on matters that affected the EU as a whole. Once the EU was established, however, the term subsidiarity began to disappear from usage, and over time more and more power has been shifted from national governments to Brussels. Today, every aspect of life in the EU is affected by reams of unreadable EU regulations.<br />
<br />
The final nail in the coffin of European national sovereignty, and financial stability, came with the adoption of the Euro in 1999. Without the ability to control their own currencies, nations had no real control over their financial viability. Today the folly of a common currency, among nations with quite different economic circumstances, is well covered in the financial press. But the truth of this folly was there from the beginning, and the Gods of Money were well aware of it.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Neoliberal Project & the Globalisation of Poverty</b></div>
<br />
In 1994 the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed by the US, Canada, and Mexico. This treaty undermined the economies and sovereignty of all three nations. Under the guise of ‘free trade’, it was really about empowering corporations at the expense of nations – the Reagan-Thatcher revolution on steroids. Under such treaties corporations have the right to sue governments if regulations undermine corporate profits. Consumer safety, environmental protection, and worker’s rights are of little concern to the corporate-controlled World Trade Organization (WTO) process that renders judgments on such suits. Since then a number of similar ‘free trade zone’ treaties have been pursued involving various combinations of nations.<br />
<br />
The Neoliberal Project got into high gear in 1995, with the establishment of the World Trade Organization, replacing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The WTO promptly launched a systematic campaign to increase the power of corporations, by means of ‘free trade’ treaties that are binding on all members of the WTO, including of course the EU. The overall effect of the Neoliberal Project has been to lower living standards, undermine national sovereignty, destabilise national finances, and in general to destroy everything that the Bretton Woods system was designed to protect.<br />
<br />
In the so-called ‘third world’, particularly in sub-Sahara Africa, the ravages of the Neoliberal Project have been extended still further by the actions of the IMF and by other means – as documented by John Perkins in Confessions of an Economic Hitman. Governments are encouraged, or forced, to take on debts that they have no ability to repay. When the governments then turn to the IMF for relief, additional loans are granted, but they are encumbered by draconian conditions. Governments are forced to cut social services, and are required to sell off national assets, such as water rights, at bargain basement prices to corporations. It becomes illegal, to give an example of what draconian means, for people to capture rainwater, as that is deemed to be stealing from the corporations that have bought the nation’s water rights. By such means poverty has been systematically created wherever the IMF has managed to dig in its claws.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>Destabilising Enlightenment Values: The ‘War on Terror’</b></div>
<br />
On 11 September 2001 the Gods of Money arranged for the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and arranged also for that to be blamed on an imaginary Al Qaeda conspiracy to ‘destroy our freedoms’. In fact our freedoms have been destroyed – not by Al Qaeda, but by the Gods of Money themselves.<br />
<br />
The Gods of Money were applying a lesson learned from the Nazi experiment: the demolition of the World Trade Center was a replay of the Reichstag Fire, which was also a ‘false flag’ event, blamed in that case on a ‘communist conspiracy’. Just as the Reichstag Fire was followed by the Nazi’s Enabling Act, so 9/11 was followed by the Patriot Act. Both Acts destroyed all constitutional guarantees of civil liberties, leading in both cases to concentration camps, the legitimisation of torture, indefinite detention without legal recourse, and the establishment of unaccountable police-state regimes.<br />
<br />
Partly due to the psychological impact of 9/11, partly due to the hidden influence of the Gods of Money, and partly due to additional false flag events (e.g. the 7/7 bombings in London) governments everywhere have implemented ‘anti-terrorist’ legislation that seriously undermines civil liberties that had long been considered sacrosanct.<br />
<br />
Besides enabling the domestic curtailment of civil liberties, the ‘War on Terror’ also became an excuse for military interventionism – one excuse among many. In addition, we saw the emergence of ‘humanitarian’ interventions, and the fabrication of excuses such as non-existent ‘weapons of mass destruction’. Such excuses enabled the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan.<br />
<br />
Another interventionist tactic, used for example in Kosovo and Libya, has been the recruitment of mercenary terrorists to play the role of ‘domestic freedom fighters’. This then provides an excuse for ‘humanitarian’ interventions. In the case of Syria, mercenary terrorists have themselves been the primary means of destabilisation. One can hardly keep up with all the interventions. In Africa, the US has set up AFRICOM, a military command established to facilitate interventions and destabilisation throughout Africa.<br />
<br />
One can identify geopolitical and economic reasons for these various interventions, such as control over energy and mineral resources. However, from a big-picture perspective, the overall effect has been to undermine the principle of national sovereignty, and also to create a large number of ‘failed states’.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>Transforming Economics – Controlled Demolition of Capitalism</b></div>
<br />
As mentioned earlier, economic growth cannot continue forever on a finite planet. Quite clearly the capitalism/growth paradigm must come to an end sooner or later. Based on these facts, many analysts have been predicting the collapse of civilisation. Some even see this as a good thing, an opportunity to build a new society from the ground up.<br />
<br />
These analysts either don’t understand the degree to which power is centralised in today’s world, or else they assume those who have power are blind and stupid; the Gods of Money are neither. They’ve been planning the successor to the growth paradigm since the establishment of the Club of Rome in 1968, if not earlier. Rather than letting capitalism collapse of its own accord, they’ve arranged for a controlled collapse, so that they can fashion an outcome of their own choosing.<br />
<br />
The financial collapse of 2008 did not happen by accident; it was a project engineered by the Gods of Money. There will be no recovery from the collapse because a recovery is not intended. Instead of an economy based on market activity, we’re to have a globally micro-managed economy, as presaged by the widespread deployment of ‘smart meters’. Lessons learned in the Soviet experiment are to be applied globally.<br />
<br />
The foundation for the 2008 collapse project was the establishment of the ‘mark-to-market’ rule, also known as ‘Basel II’. This was an edict of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the central bank of central banks, with headquarters in Basel, Switzerland. This rule requires banks to value their assets according to what they could be sold for immediately on the markets.<br />
<br />
What this means is that a temporary slump in some asset value deflates the value of all related assets. This is of little concern in rising markets, but in any kind of serious downturn it can render a bank insolvent unnecessarily. Markets do fluctuate, and banks routinely ride out bumps in values. The mark-to-market rule means that a survivable market bump can turn into a derailment: a time bomb had been placed in the global financial system.<br />
<br />
With this bomb in place, the stage was set for the demolition project. The first step, arranged by Wall Street agents of the Gods of Money, was the repeal of the Glass–Steagall Act in the US. This gave Wall Street the freedom it needed to proceed with the rest of the project. Next, global credit lines were opened wide, creating all kinds of loans that could never be repaid, particularly in the US housing market. Those bad mortgages were then bundled into derivatives, and phony insurance was attached so that the derivatives could be given a triple-A rating. These toxic derivatives were then marketed aggressively on global markets.<br />
<br />
A housing bubble had been created; the toxic derivatives spread the risk throughout the banking system, and the time bomb ensured that when the bubble burst the banking system would be rendered insolvent. In 2008 the bubble did burst, and the planned insolvencies immediately followed. But that was not the worst of it.<br />
<br />
If a bank, or any business, becomes insolvent, the sensible thing to do is to place the business into receivership and arrange for an orderly disposition of its assets and liabilities. What this means in the case of an insolvent bank is that the bank can be closed down on a Friday, and re-opened on the Monday under state ownership. The bad loans can be handed over to the unsecured creditors, and normal banking operations can be resumed. The bank can then be operated by the state, or it can be sold back into the private sector.<br />
<br />
As if this well-known, orderly procedure didn’t exist, the Gods of Money were able to promulgate a nonsense doctrine called ‘too big to fail’. In order to help facilitate this scam, compliant officials and media claimed that the banks were suffering not from insolvency, but only from a temporary liquidity crisis. Based on this lie, an insane program of bank bailouts was launched. Because the banks were insolvent, governments could not possibly fulfil their fraudulently assumed bailout obligations. As bailout payments became due, governments were forced to borrow to fulfil them. The Gods of Money now had governments exactly where they wanted them.<br />
<br />
The outcome, as planned, was the transformation of bank insolvency into government insolvency. Governments got their needed loans, but with onerous conditions attached – the same kind of conditions the IMF had been attaching to loans to ‘third world’ countries for decades. Instead of the banks going into receivership, governments were being forced into receivership, beginning with those with the greatest bailout exposure – Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain.<br />
<br />
The Gods of Money sent their agents (troikas) into these countries, taking over control of national budgets. A regime of austerity was decreed, guaranteeing that there could be no economic recovery, and a sell-off of national assets began – at bargain basement prices. Countries like France and Germany have been economically strong enough to survive the initial assault, but as the global economy continues to deteriorate they will eventually be pulled into the trap of insolvency as well. The more they try to save the Eurozone, the more they will be mired in debt. The US is already over its head in debt, partly from bailouts, and partly for reasons of its own such as military over-extension.<br />
<br />
Throughout the West the following scenario is being created: rather than sovereign nations operating according to market forces, we’ll have nations that are owned by the Gods of Money, operating on the basis of budgets allocated by the central banks. The goal of central governance will have been in practice achieved, by means of debt, and a regime of economic micro-management will have been achieved as well, as it already has been in the weaker economies.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Endgame – De-Americanisation & the Empowerment of the UN</b></div>
<br />
<i>The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union)… Out of these troubled times a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.</i> – US President George Bush Sr., State of the Union Address, 29 January 1991<br />
<br />
In the context of multiple interventions, wars, drone strikes, etc., that the US, usually with the help of the UK, routinely engages in – with little or no concern for international law, public opinion, or consequences to civilians – it was extremely surprising that first UK Prime Minister David Cameron and then US President Obama abandoned their promise to respond to Obama’s ‘red line’ about Syria’s alleged use of chemical weapons, by referring the matter to Parliament and Congress, where ‘NO’ votes were all but certain to follow.<br />
<br />
Not everyone recognised right away that a momentous shift was signalled by this unprecedented back down, but the magnitude of the shift soon became apparent to all as subsequent events began to unfold. The first remarkable follow-on event was the sudden rise to diplomatic prominence of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Even that was eclipsed by the announcement Washington and Iran were to engage in what sounds like very promising face-to-face negotiations over the nuclear issue, to the dire chagrin of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who up until then seemed to be the tail wagging the American dog in the Middle East.<br />
<br />
Such momentous shifts on a global scale do not happen by accident, as we have seen in our whirlwind review of two centuries of history. Such events must be interpreted in the context of the agenda of the Gods of Money, and in particular with their Grand Project, to transform the world into their own private fiefdom. They’ve ‘cleared the building site’ by destabilising the world in the many ways described above, and they’ve already begun to micromanage national budgets. The time has come, apparently, to get on with the formal installation of their New World Order. Not by force, but by popular acclaim.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Sudden Emergence of Putin as a World Leader</b></div>
<br />
There has been a struggle going on for some time between the US on the one hand, and Russia, China, and the BRICS nations on the other, regarding the latter’s desire for a multipolar world, rather than a US-dominated unipolar world. The persistence of the dollar as a reserve currency, and US exceptionalism in general, have been of serious concern, and always the US has been jealous to guard what it has seen as its legitimate prerogatives.<br />
<br />
In the cases of Syria and Iran, for example, appeals for sanity from Putin and others were ignored, or responded to with traditional US arrogance. Suddenly all that’s changed. Putin in particular has been elevated to the status of respected world leader, and it would have been inconceivable only a short time ago that the US would leave Russia in charge of dismantling Syria’s chemical weapons. Putin has not changed his tune or his style; he’s saying the same things he’s always been saying. What’s changed is that he isn’t being dismissed by Washington. And the global media, controlled of course by the Gods of Money, is now featuring him in almost heroic terms. Multipolarism has become overnight a reality.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>De-Americanisation</b></div>
<br />
American interventionism, and outrage against it, is of course nothing new. But particularly since 9/11 such episodes have become more and more dangerous. With threats of war with Iran, a ‘pivot to the East’ aimed against China, and other recent moves, it seemed we were verging toward a situation that might even trigger a full-blown nuclear confrontation on a global scale – the fulfilment of the ominous ‘Project for a New American Century’.<br />
<br />
The world, as we’ve been seeing in media reports since the ‘red line’ backdown, is more than ready to embrace de-Americanisation. American leadership, widely welcomed after World War II, has long-since passed out of favour. One can almost hear a sigh of relief when reading some of the optimistic words of pundits. And who could not be relieved by the turn of events we’ve seen since Washington no longer seems to be calling all the shots? When Obama speaks, we typically hear the rhetoric of a politician; when Putin speaks, we hear the reasoned words of an astute statesman.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>The Empowerment of the UN</b></div>
<br />
<i>Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license… All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing. </i>– David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club<br />
<br />
It does not take much imagination to see where these developments are heading. Diplomacy is taking centre stage, and new voices are being heard in the discourse of the ‘international community’. Expectations are rising that long-standing tensions and long-simmering crises may finally become resolvable. As real results begin feeding into these expectations, as will happen when the Iran crisis is settled and when the media starts saying the right things, there will emerge what amounts to a public outcry to carry this progress forward, to make sure that reason and diplomacy become the norm in international relations.<br />
<br />
Out of the created crisis of American exceptionalism we will be treated with a ‘solution’ – putting teeth into the United Nations (UN) process. No more American vetoes in defiance of global sentiment! No more American (or Israeli) military adventurism! Let the UN do the job it was designed to do, we will hear, to provide a forum where issues can really be resolved, and to have the ability to carry out the resulting decisions on the ground. A ‘reformed’ UN won’t be called a world government, but the kinds of powers granted by the ‘reforms’ will amount to the same thing. The word subsidiarity may emerge again, if needed, to silence dissenting voices, but as with the EU such assurances would be meaningless.<br />
<br />
It is important to notice that these recent breakthroughs and shifts are all in the realm of geopolitics. In this push toward centralised governance all attention is being focused on war and peace issues. Everyone, presumably, wants peace and stability among nations. We are being offered an attractive wooden horse named Peace, and we’re not hearing much about what’s inside the horse. Beware of elites bearing gifts.<br />
<br />
In fact we know quite a bit about what is carried within the horse, but I’ve space here for only an example or two. Agenda 21 is one the most frightening pieces of cargo the horse carries. This agenda starts with legitimate concerns regarding sustainability, and transforms them into a Green Monster that aims to micromanage every aspect of our lives, to an extent that makes the old Soviet regime seem almost like free enterprise by comparison. Anyone not familiar with Agenda 21 would be well advised to do some research.<br />
<br />
In the realm of international relations there are some frightening indicators, in particular regarding drone strikes. One would hope those diabolic machines would be outlawed altogether if we’re moving toward a more harmonious world. But no, already the UN is considering the drone issue, and wants to set up some kind of rating system to distinguish good strikes from bad strikes.<br />
<br />
Which brings up the whole question of ‘terrorism’. As I’ve claimed above, and the evidence really is decisive, much of what is called ‘terrorism’ is really either false flag operations, or else the acts of mercenaries working for Western intelligence agencies, in the pursuit of some destabilisation or regime-change project. If the pretence is to continue – in our diplomacy-based world – that all this ‘terrorism’ is real, and that civil liberties must continue to be sacrificed, then our wooden horse isn’t as attractive as it might first appear.<br />
<br />
There are two things we can be sure of, regarding what comes with our wooden horse. First, the UN will end up micro-managing society, by means of unaccountable bureaucracies, like the IMF, IPCC, WHO, etc. Second, with so many of our traditional systems intentionally destabilised, we can expect that a ‘solution’ will be given to us, in terms of a new cultural and economic paradigm.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/articles/the-gods-of-money-their-new-world-order-project-endgame-has-begun"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Related: <a href="http://www.rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2014/12/where-journey-continues.html">Where the Journey Continues</a></b><br />
<br />
<b>NEXT DAY UPDATE</b>: <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2014/12/08/survivors-gather-remember-pearl-harbor-attack/SE4EPA78zKb9UDRrt1pTvM/story.html">Survivors gather to remember Pearl Harbor attack</a>Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-85644256322397450472014-10-16T15:45:00.001-07:002014-10-16T16:34:04.571-07:00At the Edge of Imminence"Soros, the Khmer Rouge and the Harmonica Virgins<br />
<br />
Dog Poet Transmitting.......<br />
<br />
May your noses always be cold and wet.<br />
<br />
It could be just me. Sometimes that's all it is. However... fortunately and unfortunately as well, that is not always the case, probably not even by half. There is this palpable sense of imminence in the air. It's been rising in recent days from about the level of a hummingbird's fart to an ocean roar. At the moment it's the ordinary sound of waves coming upon the beach, nothing spectacular or booming, as they sometimes are when the waves are a few meters high and come crashing upon the sand in a most convincing fashion.<br />
<div class="post-body entry-content">
<br />
This sense I'm getting is, like I said, of imminence and that implies
something that would be imminent. It's not a looming specter kind of
imminence, sometimes attended by clouds of war or... the image of ghost
rider horseman, whose black steeds are stamping on the aethers,
foretelling famine and pestilence and those other sidekicks, riding
equestrian shotgun, along with hordes of wraiths and sundry trailing in
the wake.<br />
<br />
This particular imminence has a giddy surrealism to it, as if all those
supernatural portents that have been heralded for so long and never
arrived are finally, finally about to show up. On the day that The
Harmonica Virgins arrived, I drove up and down the Hana Highway, hoping
whatever it was would catch me in the act. I felt nothing. I saw
nothing. I lack those New Age genes that make it possible for a person
to simulate occurrence, in lieu of actual occurrence, which is a pretty
nifty thing to have and which one is able to naturally manufacture, when
authenticity is secondary to appearances in ones list of priorities.
Regardless of that, nothing happened. Following that there was Y2K
AND... nothing happened. Then there was 2012 AND... nothing happened.
There might have been a few other signal cosmic events but none of those
happened either, so far as I know. I think it's safe to say that
nothing along these lines has yet happened. Nothing good has happened
but there have been all kinds of bad events and pandemics of excess,
just in case we were short on things to capture our attention.<br />
<br />
The reason I say that this seems to be a positive imminence is because I
am experiencing major upgrades on a positive level. Of course,
simultaneously along with this, all kinds of truly awful things can come
about. I'm thinking the whole thing is location specific and maybe, at
the same time, mucho good and mucho bad can both come about in tandem...
at a distance, except in those case where the good and the bad are
standing close together and any of this actually applies to them anyway,
which it does, which it does.<br />
<br />
On the negative end we have burning questions <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=105390">like this one</a>.
Why are these plagues appearing all of a sudden? Why are there so many
of them and why are all of them so virulent? The obvious answer is that
those in control of the government are expediting the spread of these
lab generated poisons for a particular purpose. What is that purpose?
This we do not know; not exactly. We could speculate and come up with
several purposes and intents but... is that all? I don't know.<br />
<br />
What I know is that, given what I have seen, there is nothing so vile,
craven or evil that they would hesitate a moment in performing it. Still
furthermore, <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=105492">is it all a hoax</a>? One can't help but wonder <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=105511">is it all a hoax</a>? I don't know.<br />
<br />
When The Truth takes off her clothes, the world disappears. At that
juncture one can go skinny dipping in the pools of infinity and sunbathe
on the rocks of time. In the meantime you got to slog through the mud
of materialism; sucking at your ankles and trying to climb your legs as
if it were a living thing, which, by this time it is ...in a shit golem
sort of way.<br />
<br />
*****************<br />
<br />
I bring this up because <a href="https://www.facebook.com/paz/photos/a.462264797743.253604.184431752743/10151663766552744/?type=1">I want to talk about this</a>,
once again, Mark Twain's line about statistics runs through my mind,
“There are lies, damned lies and then there are statistics. No way do I
believe that 1 in 5 women are sexually assaulted. It may not seem like a
lot but it is. Imagine how stunned I was to find that this particular
slant on the man woman dynamic was invented by a Tribe Member; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/kat6b68">Jaclyn Freidman</a>. Her article called "<a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/07/26/my-sluthood-myself/">My Sluthood, Myself</a>"
is pretty revealing. When you study the women's feminist movement you
find that the leaders are mostly Tribe members, or gay, or both. This <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavender_Menace">too is very revealing</a>.<br />
<br />
I'm sure when the Communist movement began, as all movements do from the
ideological level, what was presented turned out to be very different
from what happened. Today, that fatuous pseudo-intellectual, Bernard
Levy talks one way and means another. Sartre used to hold forth in
Parisian cafes and I'm guessing some of the upper crust of the Khmer
Rouge did too. It's interesting how things come off the drawing board,
in drawing rooms and cafes and then continue and continue until they
permeate the medium they are after. This is what happened behind the
cultural veil of Peace and Love in the '60's. Over the years I have
watched it happen. I saw those types on university campuses. These days
they are the professors; not all of them but certainly too many.
Political Correctness is the same, whether it is the Khmer Rouge or any
of the pennants that flutter and wave under the sign of it. <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/new-laws-give-houston-officials-the-right-to-examine-religious-sermons-for-discrimination-against-lgbt-people-9794973.html">Here is a contemporary example</a>. The woman's face says it all.<br />
<br />
The only reason that Political Correctness is not at the same level as
the Khmer Rouge had it is that it hasn't evolved to that level yet. It
is beyond debate who, what group, is behind these various movements and
who gives them financial support. It's similar to when they lobby for
and finance color revolutions and insurgent activity around the world.
It's not like this is any big mystery. It's not like Little Georgie
Soros is completely under the radar. Sure, 'their mass media' bought
with extorted, central banking, ghost money bypasses him and sure, it
paints all of these movements in a positive light. It's all about
conditioning. The middle mass of the population is not very smart and
possibly much less so these days. Regular media massage puts them in a
relaxed frame of mind, sufficient for brainwashing. Sometimes it is the
reverse of relaxed. Any halfway aware person can see through all of this
in a heartbeat. Still... that would be a minority in today's
intellectual climate.<br />
<br />
So... maybe I'm not very nice bringing some of these things up but... by comparison with them I am as sweet as honey. This is <a href="https://www.facebook.com/paz/photos/a.462264797743.253604.184431752743/10151663766552744/?type=1">how today's world comes across to the insightful</a>.
There is one promising note in all of this. It is visibly apparent
that the world is out of balance and getting more so by the day and of
one thing you can be absolutely certain; balance will be restored.
Depending on just how out of balance things are at any particular
location or time, upon that rests the severity of the necessary
readjustments. As Lao Tzu says, “for a time bad men may press forward
and prosper,” 'For a time'... and the whole point of all of that is to
give ample time for the susceptible to align with the downward course,
or for those whose intelligence immune system makes it possible for them
to walk the spiral in the other direction. What is is. What is not is
not. People can argue till the end of time about which is which. It
changes nothing in the most important sense. Either you draw close to
reality or you depart from it ...and as for the later, some form of self
interest is always the cause. It makes you wonder, “is that really self
interest?” In a way I suppose it is, if you're bat shit crazy. Things
will turn out right when the time comes for it.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.zippittydodah.com/2014/10/soros-khmer-rouge-and-harmonica-virgins.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<br />
<br />
"This is the time of the death of empires....<br />
<br />
In times of global decline one can tell where they are by how steep the descent is at whatever point a measurement is taken. Another sure indicator is how many barbarians are already through the gate. There are all kinds of digression markers, such as the mental and physical health of the populations; take a look around. The intelligence level of the entertainments and the entertainers is a good indicator. The level of police presence, in tandem with the level of government corruption; is... (drum roll) off the charts. I could go on but you can fill in the blanks. Now that I think about it, there are a great many blanks to be filled AND they are being filled by, what else? They are being filled by the objects of desire. There is a vast and interconnected 3D printer that is set to Turbo Shake n' Bake and it is 24/7 cracking out 57 colors of day glo shit. Real shit in, de-natured and pasteurized shit out.<br />
<br />
Anything you want goes into the hopper as raw ingredients and comes out the other end all shiny and opalescent; done up in hard plastic, shrink wrapped to where you can cut yourself and bleed to death if you're not careful. They got everything in every size and shape. They got things you can hump and things that will hump you and there are legions, legions and legions of professional voyeurs that you can hire to come in and watch you for those special youtube and Instagram moments, hashtag #humptownCharlieBrown. They got something for every need and needs that get filled before you become aware of them and then? Then you gots to have one.<br />
<br />
You can tell it's getting close to the edge, of whatever it is getting close to the edge of, when both crime and varieties of insurrection are everywhere to be found because singular moneyed interests have hung Joe Public out to dry. Well... what do you expect? Joe Public got wet and stepped on a live wire, short circuiting his brain. It looked so much like scrambled eggs that the pathologist ordered sides of hash browns and bacon before it occurred to him that he was talking into the autopsy mike. Then the shocker! “Wait a minute, this guys not even dead.” “How can he not be dead when his brains are in the weighing pan over there?” “Well... I'm guessing he hasn't had any need for them and so it made no difference when we took it out.” Okay... that makes sense.<br />
<br />
You can tell it's getting near the edge of whatever it is getting near the edge of when millions of people are being displaced around the world and most people don't give a shit one way or the other. You can tell it's getting there when those displaced people start getting whipped into armies by bankers looking to make a few bucks. Then they get faced off against whatever military is looking to test their new weaponry. You can tell it's about to roll over, into who knows what, when human life doesn't mean very much unless we're talking about your own.<br />
<br />
You can tell all kinds of things, should it so happen that you care to, though most people don't. Most people are so sidetracked, so self involved, or so riveted on some trivial pursuit or another that you kind of have to hit them on the head with a piece of lumber several times to get their attention which is only going to result in, “Whut? Whut?” Whut indeed.<br />
<br />
Armies are rising up in desolate places and marching on population zones where occupying armies protect stolen resources and applied hegemony. These armies have been cobbled together by those interests who employ the armies they fight against. Somehow this makes sense. You kind of have to be a businessman or a banker to get it. I don't. I think it's the same dynamic where Evil picks up an automatic and then shoots itself in the foot. It makes perfect sense to Evil at the time. Later on it looks like Bozo in the house! But... at the time... uh huh. This is what you get when, instead of using math as a neutral science that accurately computes whatever you're computing; should that be the effect you're after... instead of that you take the science and warp it so that it funhouse mirrors the equations the way you want them.<br />
<br />
All of this is a product of, “where there is a will, there is a way”. This is exemplified by the Israelis, whose motto is, “If if doesn't work, use force and if that doesn't work, use more force.”<br />
<br />
************<br />
<br />
You have to know that critical mass is just about as close as close can
be to taking off its clothes and dancing on the table, for however long
it takes for the EMTs to show up and take it to Bellevue. They got
undercover cops hanging out in the public toilets of NYC restrooms
looking for guys who shake their dicks before putting it back in their
pants. This is insane....<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.smoking-mirrors.com/2014/10/breast-cancer-scam-artistes-and-honky.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"</div>
Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-26862256447611363242014-10-13T23:44:00.000-07:002014-10-14T05:46:44.345-07:00Curtain Comes Down on Sideshow<b>I was curious as to why he had been away for a few weeks, and I now know the sad reason why</b>:<br />
<br />
"Kenny From "Kennysideshow" Has Passed Away!<br />
<br />
I got some very shocking news today…. A fellow REAL truth seeker, known as "Kenny" who wrote the great blog, "Kennysideshow" at www. kennysideshow.blogspot.com, passed away suddenly on September 18th, 2014…. He was 62 years old….<br />
<br />
I was not informed of Kenny's passing, and it came to my attention today thanks to Buelahman, who of course writes "Buelahman's Revolt" at www.buelahman.wordpress.com…. He wrote a short article to inform everyone of Kenny's passing, and I have it right here for everyone to see for themselves:<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>RIP Kenny</b></span><br />
<div class="entry-content clear">
<span style="color: red;"><br /></span>
One of the most insightful, gracious, and important influences on me as a blogger (and an online friend), Kenny (of <a href="http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/" sl-processed="1" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Kenny’s Sideshow</span></a>)
has passed away. He was an inspiration to me and many others. He had a
knack for being levelheaded and could research subject matter with the
best of them. He had an excellent taste in music and featured hardly-known golden nuggets often. He was inventive and
funny. He was one of my first links when I started this blog and have
featured his posts/wisdom here many times (including making<span style="color: red;"> <a href="https://buelahman.wordpress.com/2013/05/04/it-would-be-so-much-easier-if/" sl-processed="1" target="_blank">this video</a> </span>and <a href="https://buelahman.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/aching-news/" sl-processed="1" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">this video</span></a> from his imaginative side).<br />
<br />
He passed away suddenly on Sept 18. He was 62 years old.<br />
<br />
Although I never met him in person
(having only spoken with him on the phone a few times, had many email
exchanges, and the sharing of comments on each others blog), I
considered him a friend.<br />
From his obituary (I did confirm the email notification):<br />
<blockquote>
He was a wonderful man who loved his family more than
anything. He also loved his fur children, his Jack Russells, Taz and
Tessa. Kenneth enjoyed music and played guitar, mandolin and drums.</blockquote>
He will be missed.<br />
<br />
<br />
NTS Notes: Very shortly after I began this blog some 8 years ago, I came across "Kennysideshow" and found his work to be both informative and very factual…. As someone who was a fan of Kenny's work, I can say that he was truly one of the good ones in this fight against evil…..<br />
<br />
I will keep "Kennysideshow" up on the left hand column of this blog for everyone to see his work and to pay tribute to a great writer, at least for the time being… Everyone should take a look at some of Kenny's writings and his archives...<br />
<br />
Kenny, you indeed will be missed…<br />
<br />
More to come<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2014/10/kenny-from-kennysideshow-has-passed-away.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<br />
<br />
<b>Also see</b>:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCkQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cannoncourier.com%2Fkenneth-ray-kirkham-cms-12925&ei=ZsI6VPT8CYLT7QbluIAI&usg=AFQjCNHC76Wl-j7XBFizuPIeTEfBdLFEfw&sig2=qE_bEdpKZYiKndmMmNp86g&bvm=bv.77161500,d.ZGU"><b>Kenneth Ray Kirkham on The Cannon Courier</b></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"><b>kenny's sideshow</b></a><br />
<b><br /></b>
<span class="item-title"><b><a href="http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/2014/09/surging.html" target="_blank">Surging</a> </b></span><br />
<span class="item-title"><b><br /></b></span>
<b>That was his last post, and as usual he added incredible incisiveness with everything he wrote. </b><br />
<br />
<cite class="user blog-author"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/14832889157632754957" rel="nofollow" style="font-style: normal;">Kenny</a> </cite><span class="icon user blog-author"></span><span class="datetime secondary-text"><a href="http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/2014/09/surging.html?showComment=1411054513459#c4972889460236960518" rel="nofollow">September 18, 2014 at 10:35 AM</a> </span><br />
<span class="datetime secondary-text"><b><br /></b></span>
<b>His last comment, dated the day he died.</b><br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2014/10/kenny-kirkham-of-kennys-sideshow.html">KENNY KIRKHAM OF KENNY'S SIDESHOW</a> </b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://twelfthbough.blogspot.com/2014/10/kenny-has-moved.html"><b>Kenny has moved</b></a><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><a href="http://greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.com/2014/10/rip-kenny-my-friend-and-fellow-blogger.html">RIP Kenny, my friend and fellow blogger</a> </b><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #4c1130;">Kenny was someone I considered a friend. I
visited his blog, Kenny's sideshow almost daily for several years now.
Many times I added a comment and was drawn into a discussion. Kenny
was an excellent moderator...always keeping the discussion going but not
getting out of control. He had a quiet sense of humour and inner
strength that radiated out from his writing. I considered him a
mentor. He added me to his sidebar of favourite blogs and my traffic
went through the ceiling! (from "no" hits to maybe 6 a day! ; ). He was
the first one who ever added me to his sidebar.</span><br />
<span style="color: #4c1130;"></span><br />
<span style="color: #4c1130;">A few years ago I lost another blogger friend, </span><a href="http://piglipstick.blogspot.ca/"><span style="color: #4c1130;">Piglipstick</span></a><span style="color: #4c1130;">....He
was similar to Kenny....an example of the best freedom loving
"blogtivists" that American has produced. I still miss Piglipstick.
Now I imagine Kenny and Piglipstick are together up in the great
beyond, looking down and commiserating on the state of the world.
Farewell, my friend.</span><br />
<span style="color: #4c1130;"><br /></span>
<b>As I hold back the tears I will also tell you that I had never met him personally, but had interacted with him in his comments section. He even posted and linked a few posts and commentaries from my blogs, and his website provided me with many hits. I always found him to be entertaining and engaging as well as informative. That's the highest compliment I can pay him, and I hope he has found peace. May God watch over his family. From all I have seen he was a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERWREcPIoPA">good man</a>.</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>NEXT DAY UPDATE: </b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Further thoughts upon an even of reflection really emphasized to me how much Kenny will be missed, not only for his abilities and insights as a writer but also as an outstanding source of information and analysis. That's why I adjusted to the title and bumped the post time up. His death was a tremendous loss not just to his family and friends, but to the whole world. If it is any consolation, we will all be joining him in the next life at some time and I have to stop typing now because I'm starting to leak water from the corner of my eyes.</b><br />
<div>
<span style="color: red;"><a href="http://twitter.com/BuelahMan" sl-processed="1"><span style="color: red;"></span></a></span></div>
</div>
Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-17169213681146189542014-09-20T19:01:00.002-07:002014-09-20T19:01:56.795-07:00All Wars Are Bankers' Wars<br />
<div class="submitted">
</div>
<div class="content">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/p-0BPMwgKNA" width="560"></iframe></div>
Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-71409768470848863682014-09-10T21:11:00.000-07:002014-09-11T06:29:32.267-07:00Les is More<b>I wanted to put up this pairing because it was such a lift regarding the way I have been feeling regarding the 13th anniversary of 9/11 and Obummer's invasion of the Middle East which he will be announcing tonight. </b><br />
<br />
"....<br />
<br />
What if there is no third world war? What if the trend of ever
continuing exposure continues? What if the incredible buffoonery of the
pigeon toed elite goes on in that Keystone Cops format and the
identifiable outrages get more and more and more absurd?<br />
<br />
Let us consider a metaphysical truth that I have no doubt is also true
as an operational law of physics. The force of the collective belief of
the people is a powerful thing. When the mass of the aggregate reaches a
certain percentage, where enough people believe the whole terror scare
put up job is a government op, the impact of this collective belief is
something to be reckoned with. Here is an interesting example of how the
elite consider such things. In the 60's, some thousands of anti-
Vietnam war protesters met at The Pentagon grounds to perform an occult
ritual. Perhaps only a few of them knew the deeper reasoning behind it.
Whatever... suffice to say that all of these protesters began to join
hands and encircle The Pentagon with the intention of levitating it. The
police response was immediate and brutal. They took it seriously.<br />
<br />
Go to your history books and look at the results of the impact of great
faith upon world conditions. Look at what was accomplished by Mahatma
(great souled) Gandhi. Look at what Martin Luther King accomplished with
the civil rights movement. Look at the life of Rasputin and so many
others and the power they were able to demonstrate as a result of great
belief. I'm not interested in hearing about Sankar Ghose but... if you
prefer, use him as an example. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's
theories about King being an FBI operative. The way disinfo works is
that it can come at you from any angle. Of course the FBI was deeply
infiltrated into King's camp but what the literal truth of the matter is
remains inconclusive; what we have is more along the line of so and so
says such and such. If one wants to paint a certain picture, one
includes particular objects and does not include others. It's known that
the FBI was involved, one way or another in the assassination of Dr.
King, just as they were in 9/11 and a host of dirty tricks that span
decades. If he was owned and controlled, what would be the point of
killing him? The rot that permeates the Administrative, Legislative and
Judicial branches of the Zionist owned and controlled American
government emits a perfume not unlike what you get when you
inadvertently puncture the stomach of a floater that's been in the water
for ten days. It is an unmistakable statement of composition.<br />
<br />
Here's something to keep in mind that I saw over at <a href="http://whatreallyhappened.com/node/350445">What Really Happened</a>. This is impressive and this says it all:<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center">
<strong>TIMELINE OF JEWISH PERSECUTIONS</strong><br />
<br />
<iframe class="scribd_iframe_embed" data-aspect-ratio="undefined" data-auto-height="false" frameborder="0" height="600" id="doc_66038" scrolling="no" src="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/238945177/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=false" width="100%"></iframe><br /></div>
<br />
<br />
The idea that... after all of these events... this group of people are
simply victims being picked on for no reason other than unjustifiable
hatred is ludicrous. They are and have been, directly responsible for
everything that has ever come at them and this is why the term
Anti-Semitism was invented. When you are aware of your inflexible
genetic code that inspires evil in every land where you are resident,
you need every defensive mechanism you can muster. As for modern day
proof and verification of the evil these monsters do, we have only to
look at PNAC, where they were the larger representative number and then
at what the American government was manipulated into doing in
Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen and every land where such
despicable actions were carried out for the benefit of Israel. It was
provably the Zionist neo-cons and their wealthy supporters who brought
these acts of mass murder and destruction about. It has now been
irrefutably proven that they also carried out 9/11 with the assistance
of compromised intelligence services and a confused military. Nothing
more needs to be known about the lengths that this criminal nation will
go to plunge the entire world into a cauldron of mayhem and discord.
Should anyone come around to this locale and still be on the fence about
who and what went down, simply visit the link in the right hand menu
and read what you find.<br />
<br />
The nation of Israel was created for only one reason and that was to
grant sovereign nation status to a large band of psychopathic criminal
thugs. This put them out of the reach of domestic law enforcement
agencies in other lands; not that that was very effective in any case.
You may not want to hear this. Your survival instincts might not permit
you to believe any of this but I challenge anyone to convincingly refute
what is said here. I try, strenuously, to avoid making claims that I
cannot prove with hard cold facts or overwhelming circumstantial
evidence. These things are so. These things are so, just as it is so
that they owned the majority of the slave ships that brought the
Africans in chains to Charleston Bay and other locales; just as it is
irrefutably so that they sit, sometimes exclusively, on the boards of
every single alternative sexual organization and are also the primary
funding agency of each and every one. Don't like knowing this? Too bad.
It's what it is and nothing else.<br />
<br />
After the most recent massacre of women and children in Gaza, not to
mention, the destruction of the environment, the world in general is
much more aware of what terrible demons lurk among us. Publicly, the
Zionists who own the movie business and entertainment world have
threatened all working actors with painful sanctions (you'll never work
in this town again) should they mention the carnage that Israel wrought
upon Gaza, after first executed 3 of their own people through one of
their paid terror agencies, using this as a pretext to kill at will.
Along the way they had their paid agents launch bottle rockets into
empty lots in Israel to ramp up the orchestrated motivations for mass
homicide and continuing land theft. There's no counter argument that can
be made here. They did it. They do it and that's it.<br />
<br />
However, behind the scenes and inside the minds of these Morlocks the
tide has shifted. Nothing seems to be going their way. Everything they
do turns on them. Normal human hearts and minds in sad decline cannot
fathom the absence of all conscience and remorse in these creatures. How
it will come I do not know. When it will come I do not know but... come
it will and the force of justice will manifest upon these brigands and
beasts. It is only a mater of time. That millions and millions of the
indifferent and gullible will follow them into perdition is unfortunate
but given they are magnetized by lies they shall go with the pull of
destiny in every case.<br />
<br />
These things need be said at intervals along the way. The most massive
public relations machine the world has ever known is tirelessly at work
to obfuscate the truth and exonerate these fiends. The counter argument
must be made by decent souls everywhere. It is one of the significant
tragedies of the time that there is such a lack of decent and courageous
souls who will state and stand behind what needs be said and so... it
has been said again.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.smoking-mirrors.com/2014/09/they-did-it-they-do-it-and-thats-it.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<br />
<br />
"....<br />
<br />
Fe Fi Fo Fum... I smell the cold sweat and fear of Kissinger,
Rockefeller and then some. Step back my friends and look at the
spectacle of appearances as they present themselves on this day. Watch
Obama babbling on with lie after lie. From behind him one can see the
arm up his ass all the way to the shoulder. The hand is making his lips
move. There is no shame anywhere; in Congress, in the Judiciary, in the
Administrative wing. Across the waters, Christine Lagarde, Catherine
Ashton, David Cameron, Ed Miliband, Satanists all, are pressing their
agendas, while exposures of their crimes continue alongside their doomed
efforts. These are all friends of Jimmy Saville. Just imagine the level
of corruption in The House of Lords. You know what you know but what is
it that you do not know, shudder... a great deal. Tony Blair gets the
GQ Philanthropists Award. What has GQ got to do with philanthropy?
Aren't they in the business of inseams and false fronts, not to mention
rolled socks in the underwear?<br />
<br />
Here's <a href="https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=corruption+synonym">what Google has to say about synonyms for corruption</a>.
If you take that term and transfer it into the building trade, it might
mean your house is riddled with termites. You can stand outside the
house and look at it and at first glance you see none of the devastation
that has taken place at the woods interior. Maybe on closer inspection
you might see mounds of particles on the ground that indicate something
has been ground to powder. This is a perfect metaphor for the state of
the times. The house looks fine but... it's not. It can crumble at any
moment and this has happened any number of time; a seemingly sound
house, seen from the street, falls apart. It's all about inner rot and
that is the case with the interior being of all of the names mentioned
here today. They represent systems that are totally corrupt and it
stands to reason that, as representatives of this system, they are also
thoroughly corrupt. They seem okay on the outside, if you don't look to
closely at what they've been up to but... only the purpose of
demonstration is holding them together at this point.<br />
<br />
And the media? The Zio-Satanic media populated now by nothing but
whores... “You walk into the room with your pen in your hand. You see
somebody naked and you say, 'who is that man?' You try so hard but you
just don't understand, what it is you'll say when you get home and...
you know something's happening but you don't know what it is; do you,
Mr. Jones?” Obviously everything is held in place by a mysterious force
because... otherwise, people in all walks of life, who have seen first
hand what awful and unjust things are taking place, would be shouting
from the rooftops about it but... they are constrained. They are
restrained. The reporters go on being reporters except they no longer
observe and report. They simply repeat what they are told to say.
Chomsky goes on pontificating, occasionally looking down at his clay
feet cooking in the kiln. Rachel Madow keeps talking out of the side of
her mouth. Abby Martin goes on felating the people she really works for
and no one seems to remember what she said about Russia. The twin
Zio-crones from Kalifornia squeal about fabricated nonsense and no one
seems to mind. Look to the left and right, look ahead and behind. Look
down and look up. Do you see a politician anywhere whose conscience just
took a lightning bolt and are now singing like a canary? Look into the
media, entertainment... where is that necessary cabal of the righteous?
We get Cruz and Bardem and not much else. We got Miley Cyrus twerking
with her brow all scrunched up as she contemplates The Riddle of the
Sphincter.<br />
<br />
Truly... it is all under control and it looks to me like people can't
step out of character. They're locked in for the purpose of
demonstration. It defies any logical computation of 'the odds'. The odds
say that a reasonable portion of people from all walks of life, at this
point... at this point, should be coming forth and declaring. Their
humanity demands it but... nada. It's silent all round. It's quiet...
too quiet (grin).<br />
<br />
To paraphrase an ancient text; “Let those who are however they are go on
being however they are and let those who are otherwise be otherwise.
Those without justice, let them go on being unjust and those who are
filthy, let them continue.” It's clear that some all containing force
has got the whole thing choreographed and scripted for reason known only
to that force about which we know less than nothing to begin with. You
can get an idea of something that, in it's totality is incomprehensible
and indefinable by watching how it operates. You can get a clue as to
what is appreciated and not appreciated by how the observations of
everything impact upon you because you house that mysterious force from a
personalized perspective and it so happens that most of us share a
common view on what is right and what is wrong. That we may not always
adhere to it in practice is the result of fear and bad influences but...
that takes nothing away from what we instinctively know at the heart of
our being. All of us house this force or we wouldn't even be animate.
You're listening to the world outside you or you are listening in an
interior manner. You're guided by one thing or you are driven by
another. That is just how it is.<br />
<br />
In the end, reason triumphs over passion but... the greatest impact of
enduring reason always manifests itself through a vehicle of great
passion. It appears we are all locked in at the moment. I suspect a
time, fast in approach where the restraints are suddenly lifted at the
same time that we are made capable of seeing what really is. The
determining feature of this event is whether you continue to see from
that point or whether you consciously close your eyes. We'll see... or
not.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.zippittydodah.com/2014/09/fee-fi-fo-fum-more-dead-lizards-and.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>NEXT DAY UPDATE: </b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>I never do that on this side, but....</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
"We Celebrate the Anniversary of the Israeli Attack on the USA. USA! USA! USA!!!<br />
<br />
Dog Poet Transmitting.......<br />
<br />
May your noses always be cold and wet.<br />
<br />
Today is here and today is the 13th anniversary of Israel's 9/11 attack on the United States. If it happened in 2001 and this is 2014, it would be 13 anniversaries, correct? Ah... the number 13. Today we celebrate many things. We celebrate the incredible corruption of the American government, following 9/11. It was bad before that but it got much, much worse. We celebrate the transparent and obvious fact that Israel controls American foreign and domestic policy, via their control of the money supply and control of the fluctuations of that money supply, in order to control the state of the culture and the basic elements of life. Today we celebrate the transition of a domestic police force that has been turned into a military force, designed and developed by agents of Israel, in order to strike fear into the hearts of the populace and to both control and frustrate the movement of ordinary people no matter what direction they may seek to travel in.<br />
<br />
Today we celebrate the incredible and mind blowing ignorance of the American public, not only their ignorance but also their cowardice and arrogant sense of entitlement. We celebrate the many wars generated by the dual national Israeli neo-cons who used the lies woven around 9/11 in order to justify attacking one country after another in the Middle East to fulfil their Ersatz Israel Zionista fantasies. Millions have died and millions more displaced. There was no reason for these wars because these wars all came out of a ridiculous presumption that a handful of stone age Arabs had masterminded this colossal event, when, in fact, it was masterminded and carried out by agents of Israel and compromised and corrupt intelligence agencies.<br />
<br />
Today we celebrate denial and we celebrate indifference. We celebrate the dumb gentile who sends his children to die in Israeli engineered wars and who also expose (as military combatants) them to the performance of cold blooded murder against various peoples who had nothing to do with this attack and no connection to any terror organizations. The only terror organizations killing and torturing and operating with impunity around the world are Israeli constructs and are funded by the governments of the west.<br />
<br />
Today we celebrate the reassuring knowledge that the same people who did 9/11 are also planning yet another enormous terror action against some unsuspecting part of America and possibly also other locations in the west. They are doing this to further their ambitions of destroying Syria and Iran. They are fomenting turmoil in The Ukraine and certain tiny countries that border on Russia because it is also their intention to destroy both Russia and China as well. They are monsters whose hearts and minds have been co-opted and possessed by ancient demonic entities. The mass of them are being manipulated in various ways, that spell nothing positive for the human race, by the Chosen People of The Prince of Darkness.<br />
<br />
Today we celebrate the truly remarkable disconnect in the minds of all the useful idiots who somehow, beyond the reach of all common sense, somehow believe there is a profit to be realized by them in serving certain forces who consider them completely expendable and will ruin or destroy them at the drop of a hat. We celebrate the legions of deluded and clueless fools who have made all of these things possible by being... well, by being deluded and clueless.<br />
<br />
Today, we celebrate the extreme (timewise) downward slide of the American Empire. It seems that it will be accomplished in less than a generation. Today we celebrate confusion, turmoil, disorder and porn. It used to be that porn was something that involved explicit sexual activity but today... porn is something that involves everything. In fact, you would be hard pressed these days to find something that has not been rendered pornographic.<br />
<br />
Today we celebrate all the tomorrows that are now guaranteed to be like today. We celebrate all of the yesterdays that have been rewritten so that they no longer bear any resemblance to what they were. Today we celebrate the ability to look right at something and not see what it is we are looking at but actually see something else because someone else told them they were seeing something else and they bought it. Who you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?<br />
<br />
Today we celebrate the rise of the corporations over the needs of the public and we celebrate the corporations paying nearly zero taxes so that the burden falls on the public. We celebrate all those things that only a moron would celebrate, such as clapping when it is announced that they will be shot at dawn. We <a href="http://henrymakow.com/2014/09/dutch-royalty-notables-accused.html">celebrate things like this</a> (please flash back to all that has been said earlier in the post) and
regardless of hard proof, other than the testimony of someone reputed
to be in possession of this knowledge, we know these things are true.
We celebrate <a href="http://www.today.com/style/vogues-anna-wintour-reveals-one-thing-shed-never-wear-answers-1D80137350?lite&lite=obinsite">the celebration of absolute triviality</a> over things once
more important but now... not even remembered. We celebrate <a href="http://www.today.com/travel/killer-heels-puts-high-heeled-shoes-fashion-spotlight-1D80135471">the coronation of crap</a> as the essence of the meaning of
life.Yes... we celebrate <a href="http://www.today.com/books/guinness-world-records-2015-longest-tongue-biggest-afro-among-best-1D80137346">the veneration ofthe pointless</a>.<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>We celebrate the rise of Satanism as
the logical outcome of the triumph of materialism over human
consciousness.</b> We celebrate in the midst of this madness, the
fortitude and determination of those courageous and unintimidated
souls who press on and press on <a href="http://www.thedailysheeple.com/giant-video-billboard-of-wtc7s-destruction-placed-in-times-square-for-911-anniversary_092014">and look what you get.</a> We celebrate the fire and force of the human spirit in those few who
are not yet brain dead or cellphone thumb junkies.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The writing is on the wall everywhere
and <a href="http://www.duffelblog.com/2013/11/lee-harvey-oswald-quietly-added-cia-memorial-wall/#%212uMcC">the lunacy is off the charts</a>; on the wall and off the charts
We celebrate what has to be the certain knowledge that the largest
percentage of the human race are on rails. They are like trams moving
through time on city streets, hardwired into the Cradle to Grave
Express. Nothing moves them. They go on and on and on until they
disappear into the unknown from which they previously emerged
unknown. “Stop that train, I want to get off!”
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
We are born dying and at the same time
incapable of life in any meaningful sense. We shop without any
particular item in mind. We cannot see and we cannot hear. We are
blind to the truth and deaf to reason AND... we celebrate that.
“Celebrate! Celebrate! Dance to the delusion!” Yeah Baby! Nero is
fiddling, Obama is diddling. Have another round of Bread and Circuses
on the house! Disappear into the Big Box with teeth for your big box
comfort of living life on the cheap. Celebrate as you disappear! I celebrate <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/watch/nbc-news-channel/woman-crashes-car-impales-buttocks-after-texting-while-driving-324080195932">the incredible replicating irony of life</a> defining life as
life is presently defined... as life?</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I celebrate the influx of undocumented
aliens, who by Shake and Bake instant law; just add water... are not
to be checked for health concerns and <a href="http://investmentwatchblog.com/pilot-flying-ebola-patients-to-u-s-says-lots-more-sick-people-brought-to-u-s-than-being-reported">we celebrate the influx ofEbola</a> into mainland USA with only one possible intention
<a href="http://investmentwatchblog.com/pilot-flying-ebola-patients-to-u-s-says-lots-more-sick-people-brought-to-u-s-than-being-reported/">/</a>
We need more electronic billboards like the ones for WTC 7 but they
should be flashing; “WTF!!! WTF!!!”. They should be everywhere!
They should be joined by other flashing led statements like, “Help
us!!! Help us!!!”</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
On this day when we celebrate an attack
on the United States by the people who have also looted it down to
the nails in the two by fours behind the sheetrock, let me take this
moment to say how proud I am of all of you. Let me celebrate how
proud I am that it was possible for you to dumb yourself down to the
point that you were able to convince yourself that Bin Laden, living
in a cave in Afghanistan, orchestrated these attacks and carried them
out with people who couldn't fly planes and were armed with
boxcutters. That! That is fucking impressive! Israel did 9/11 people.
They did it with the help of critical individuals in critical
agencies that they paid off with money they looted from the public
coffers via their control of The Central Banks and... by extension
their control of the currency printing presses. If you are so
incurious that you won't check the hard cold facts that prove
this... I celebrate that! If you are such a coward that you will not
accept responsibility for knowing what is so and prefer to believe
what is not so... I celebrate that! If you are indifferent... I
celebrate that. You will not be here much longer and I celebrate that
too. You can have no part other than compost in this coming age which
requires... curiosity, courage and an absence of indifference. It is
an age of universal brotherhood or... haven't you heard?</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Today we celebrate Israel being exposed
for her heinous crimes against not only her alleged best friend but
also against humanity around the world. We celebrate an end to
ignorance and denial. We celebrate a universal awareness of this
Satanic entity that preys on all other life forms. We celebrate the
coming of the light into this vast theater of darkness. We celebrate
the work of Mr. Apocalypse in uncovering what must be revealed to the
eyes of the world. The clock is ticking and all the plots and
convoluted agendas at work are all working toward the definite and
certain demise of those so involved. We celebrate that. We do...</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
We await this next false flag that is
front and center in the Event Horizon because we know they will be
caught out at it. They know this too but their madness is so extreme
they are incapable of reigning themselves in. So it is that all of
the multitude of bewildering obfuscation is taking place in an
attempt to fog up the landscape while they set about yet more murder
and mayhem. Their time has come.</div>
<br />
--<a href="http://www.smoking-mirrors.com/2014/09/we-celebrate-anniversary-of-israeli.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-81481488260144282022014-09-09T09:11:00.000-07:002014-09-09T09:11:18.660-07:00Why Isn't My Blog Being Updated By Blogger?<b>Couldn't be the content, could it? </b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Rock The Truth</a><br />
<div class="blog-content">
<div class="item-content">
<span class="item-title">
<a href="http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/2014/09/ding-dong-witch-is-dead.html" target="_blank">
Ding-Dong! The Witch is Dead</a>
</span>
-
<span class="item-snippet">
I normally wouldn't feel that way about a person (for lack of a better
word); however, she said some wicked things that were not funny at all, and
one cann...
</span>
<br />
<div class="item-time">
4 days ago </div>
<div class="item-time">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div class="item-time">
<b>That's odd because<a href="http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/2014/09/the-911-triple-cross.html"> I put a post above</a> that one at the same time. </b></div>
<div class="item-time">
<br /></div>
<div class="item-time">
<b>--<a href="http://www.rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/">sou</a>r<a href="http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/">ces</a>--" </b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Let's sit back and wait. I'll check later.</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>UPDATE: </b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<li style="display: block;">
<div class="blog-content">
<div class="blog-title">
<a href="http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">
Rock The Truth</a>
</div>
<div class="item-content">
<span class="item-title">
<a href="http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/2014/09/why-isnt-my-blog-being-updated-by.html" target="_blank">
Why Isn't My Blog Being Updated By Blogger?</a>
</span>
-
<span class="item-snippet">
*Couldn't be the content, could it? *
Rock The Truth
Ding-Dong! The Witch is Dead - I normally wouldn't feel that way about a
person (for lack of a better ...
</span>
<div class="item-time">
31 minutes ago<b> </b></div>
<div class="item-time">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div class="item-time">
<b>I haven't checked <a href="http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/">Kenny's scroll</a> yet so maybe you should.</b></div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-78512414888476328212014-09-04T23:19:00.000-07:002014-09-08T06:34:51.975-07:00The 9/11 Triple Cross"The 9/11 Triple Cross<br />
<div addthis:title="The 9/11 Triple Cross " addthis:url="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2014/08/31/the-911-triple-cross/" class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style">
<div class="atclear">
</div>
</div>
<h1>
<em><img alt="911a" class="lazy alignright size-full wp-image-109821 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/911a.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/911a.jpg" height="256" style="display: block;" width="342" /></em></h1>
<h1>
<span style="font-size: small;">
The “reversible false flag” scheme and the “hijacked plot” hypothesis</span></h1>
<h1>
<span style="font-size: small;">
A new paradigm in 9/11ology</span></h1>
<h1>
<span style="font-size: small;">by <a href="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/author/laurent/">Laurent Guyénot</a></span></h1>
<span style="font-size: 12pt;"><strong>Three major thesis are in competition concerning the culprit of the 9/11 attacks:</strong></span><br />
<blockquote>
<strong> 1. <em>Islam </em>Job: the official conclusion of the 9/11 Commission, blaming Muslim terrorists in general, and Osama bin Laden in particular;</strong> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<strong> 2. <em>Inside</em> Job: the dominant thesis within the
so-called 9/11 Truth movement, which accuses the American government, or
a faction within the American Deep State;</strong> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<strong> 3. <em>Mossad</em> Job: the rising alternative thesis within
the community of truth seekers, which claim that the masterminds were a
Zionist network close to the Israeli Likud.</strong></blockquote>
<strong>There are variations on each thesis and middle grounds
between them, but three camps can clearly be distinguished: the first
ridicule the second as “conspiracy theorists”, while the second loath
the third as anti-Semites.</strong> Each thus justifies its refusal to
weigh the evidence produced by the other. Acknowledging this reality, by
renouncing the bipolar vision of an information warfare between
official liars and 9/11 truthers, and paying attention to the debate (or
absence of the debate) between <em>Inside-jobbers </em>and <em>Mossad-jobbers,</em> is the first step toward a paradigm shift in “9/11ology”.<br />
<br />
<strong><img alt="JFK 911" class="lazy alignright size-full wp-image-509732 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/JFK-911.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/JFK-911.jpg" height="346" style="display: block;" width="241" /></strong><br />
<strong>This
article takes the view of the third thesis. The author belongs to those
who, after thousands of hours of research, came to the conclusion that
the 9/11 false flag operation was planned by a Zionist network, with the
aim of dragging the United States into a “war on terror” of their
invention, of which the only ultimate beneficiary will be Israel, as
Netanyahu well understood from the very day: “It’s very good […], it
will generate immediate sympathy […], strengthen the bond between our
two peoples.”[1]</strong><br />
<br />
I have already listed the evidence against Israel in a previous article and in my book <em>JFK-9/11 </em>(<a href="http://www.amazon.com/JFK-9-11-Years-Deep-State-ebook/dp/B00GSF6GRM">Progressive Press, 2014</a>).
The subject of this article is not the truth on 9/11—who did what and
how—, but the media war on 9/11: who says what and why. Nevertheless,
such an approach requires that we are able to weigh the credibility of
each claim, and we will do that on a few key points.<br />
<br />
We can notice from the outset that theses 1 and 3 each accuse a foreign power, unlike thesis 2. <strong>Before even looking at the evidence, it is obvious that an <em>Outside Job</em> thesis is more credible than the <em>Inside Job </em>thesis</strong>.
There is something monstrous in the idea that a government can deceive
and terrorize its own citizens by killing thousands of them, just for
starting a series of wars which are not even in the nation’s interest.
By comparison, a foreign power attacking the US under the false flag of a
third power almost seems like fair play. This is an important remark,
because it makes us wonder how and why the 9/11 Truth movement has been
led to endorse massively the outrageous thesis 2 without even
considering the more likely thesis 3. This is one of the questions I
will tackle here.<br />
<br />
The thesis that the masterminds of 9/11 worked for Israel does not
mean that the Bush administration is innocent. Thesis 3 admits that
thesis 2, unlike thesis 1, is not completely false and rests on hard
evidence pointing to US complicity. But it claims that thesis 2
overrates that evidence while ignoring the evidence pointing to Israel.
The question is to what extent it does so intentionally, that is, to
what extent thesis 2 is a “controlled opposition” intended to cover up
the truth of thesis 3.<br />
<br />
Asking this type of question does not mean suspecting anyone who
defends an erroneous or incomplete theory of being a hypocrite. Most
people defending one theory or the other do so sincerely, based on the
information they have access to. I have myself been a believer in thesis
1 for 7 years, and in thesis 2 for 2 years, before progressively moving
on to thesis 3 from 2010. On the other hand, we can assume that those
who lead masses into error on a long term, are not just mistaken but
lying —they may also be lying to themselves, i.e., engaged in
self-deception. In any case, it is legitimate to investigate the
background and the means of opinion makers, and when they are caught
lying or distorting the truth, we can ponder about their motivation.<br />
<br />
This is what we will do in the first part, so as to demonstrate that
liers are not confined to the official storytellers’ camp. It is not
enough that someone challenges the official Big Lie for us to believe
him blindly; his arguments and allegations should be judged by the same
standard. The purpose of the two following examples is, firstly, to show
the need for a critical mind when listening to dissenting theses, and,
secondly, to show the need for a new paradigm taking into account the
several layers of lies stacked on top of the truth. We will outline this
new paradigm in a second part, in the form of a working hypothesis.
Then, in a third part, we will see if this new paradigm is consistent
with certain technical issues currently dividing 9/11 truthers.<br />
<h2>
<span style="font-size: small;">
I. phony whistleblowers and the ControlLed opposition</span></h2>
<h3>
<span style="font-size: small;">
Example n°1: Bob Graham</span></h3>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" id="attachment_509733" style="width: 214px;">
<img alt="Senator Bob Graham (FL) -- Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee on 9/11" class="lazy wp-image-509733 size-medium data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Bob-Graham-calls-for-re-investigation-of-911-coverup-204x320.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Bob-Graham-calls-for-re-investigation-of-911-coverup-204x320.jpg" height="320" style="display: inline;" width="204" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
<br />
Senator Bob Graham (FL) —<br />
Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee on 9/11<br />
<br />
As I said, the three theses are not totally incompatible.</div>
</div>
<br />
It is easy to bridge thesis 2 and 3 by imagining American interests in cahoots with Israel.<br />
Likewise, it is possible to make theses 1 and 2 overlap by blaming bin Laden while accusing the US administration of complicity.<br />
<br />
Let’s see a couple of examples of this later stand, which we may call the “soft opposition”.<br />
<br />
It rests strongly on the testimony of senator Bob Graham, who, in his capacity of <strong>Chairman of the <em>Senate Intelligence Committee, </em>was asked to join the 9/11 Commission. In his book </strong><em><strong>Intelligence Matters:</strong> The CIA, the FBI, Saudi Arabia, and the Failure of America’s War on Terror </em>(Random
House, 2004),and in articles, conferences and interviews, Graham claims
that the Commission was informed of evidence that members of the Saudi
royal family financed Al-Qaeda, but that the government censorship of 28
pages of the Commission’s report dealing with this issue, because of
“the special personal friendship between the [Saudi] royal family and
the highest levels of our national government [meaning the
President].”[2]<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/nVvOQ7mnuEs" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVvOQ7mnuEs" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<br />
Anyone who believes that the story of bin Laden’s responsibility in
9/11 is a lie must logically conclude that the story of the Sauds’
complicity with bin Laden is another lie —one lie inside another. Since
the 9/11 Commission report is a scam, it doesn’t make any difference if
the censored 28 pages — which Graham has never leaked anyway — do exist
or not; they are part of the scam. Let us stress, however, that even
within the theory of bin Laden’s responsibility, the Sauds’ complicity
make no sense at all. The Sauds have stripped Osama bin Laden of his
citizenship in April 1994, exasperated by his nagging accusations for
their acceptance of US military presence on the holy ground of Islam.<br />
In
a 1996 declaration, bin Laden called for the overthrow of the Saudi
monarchy, and in 1998, he admitted his role in the November 13, 1995
attack against the National Guard headquarters in Riyadh. Osama bin
Laden, anathematized by his own family, is the sworn enemy of the Sauds,
who have put a price on his head. Why would the royal family help him
strike their longtime US ally? “The answer I have come to”, writes
Graham, “is survival—survival of the state and survival of the House of
Saud.” What he means is that the Saudi princes were forced to help bin
Laden strike the United States under “the threat of civil unrest against
the monarchy, led by Al-Qaeda.”[3] Anyone trying to convince people of
such absurdity can only be a disinformation agent. Far from being the
courageous whistleblower who refuses to play the part the government
asked him to, Graham is playing exactly the role he was hired for. The
question is: Who wrote his script? That is an easy question: Bob Graham
is the brother-in-law of Katharine Graham, heir of her father Eugene
Meyer’s <em>Washington Post, </em>a major Zionist propaganda machine in the US. By claiming on <em>PBS</em>
in December 2002, that there is “evidence that there were foreign
governments involved in facilitating the activities of at least some of
the terrorists in the United States”[4], Graham is diverting suspicion
away from the only “foreign government” whose links with the terrorist
suspects of Hollywood, Florida, are out in the open: Israel (an enemy of
Saudi Arabia, as it happens).<br />
<br />
<div class="wp-caption alignright" id="attachment_509736" style="width: 126px;">
<img alt=" Neocon David Wurmser" class="lazy size-full wp-image-509736 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/David-Wurmser-Picture_14.png" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/David-Wurmser-Picture_14.png" height="160" style="display: inline;" width="116" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>Neocon David Wurmser</strong></div>
</div>
<br />
The indictment of Saudi Arabia is a phony dissension. The plan to
accuse and threaten Saudi Arabia was clearly built in the 9/11 false
flag scenario, by the decision to include 15 Saudis in the phony list of
the 19 hijackers. Why such a choice, if not to make sure that the Sauds
could be targeted as a prime suspect and therefore pressured and
threatened? But why would the perpetrators target specially Saudi
Arabia, the oldest and most loyal ally of the United States in the
Middle East?[5] Who is trying to damage that relationship by portraying
the Sauds as traitors? That is, again, an easy question: just like the
ludicrous idea of Saddam Hussein’s complicity in 9/11, the no less
ludicrous idea of the Sauds’ complicity is a neoconservative invention.
David Wurmser first opened fire in the <em>Weekly Standard</em> in
October 2001 with an article titled “The Saudi Connection: Osama bin
Laden’s a lot closer to the Saudi royal family than you think”,
pretending that, ultimately, the Saudi royal family was behind the
attack.[6] Long before 9/11, the <em>Hudson Institute</em>, a bastion of neoconservative doctrine (co-founded by Max Singer, now at the <em>Institute for Zionist Strategies </em>in Jerusalem), had been involved in a campaign to demonize the Saudi dynasty. And on July 10<sup>th</sup>, 2002, longtime member Laurent Murawiec explained before Richard Perle’s <em>Defense Policy Board </em>that
Saudi Arabia represented “the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most
dangerous opponent”, recommended that the US army invade it, occupy it
and dismember it.[7] In their 2003 book, <em>An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror, </em>Richard Perle and David Frum (Bush’s speech<em>-</em>writer)
write that “The Saudis qualify for their own membership in the axis of
evil”, and ask President Bush to “tell the truth about Saudi Arabia”,
meaning that Saudi princes finance Al Qaeda.[8]<br />
<br />
That not-so-subtle accusation against President Bush is proof enough
that a media war is being waged between the neocons and the White House
during the whole of Bush II’s term. By claiming that the Saudi trail has
been covered up because of the Bushs’ friendship with the Sauds, Graham
and the neocons are pushing the president into the defensive, under the
threat of unleashing a major scandal. The business partnership forged
by the Bushs with Saudi princes is notorious. It may go back to 1976,
when CIA Director George H. W. Bush first traded with the bin Mahfouzs
and the bin Ladens,[9] but it was broadened during the Gulf War, when
the elder President Bush was posing as protector of Saudi Arabia. Since
that time, the Bushs are notoriously close to Bandar bin Sultan Al Saud
(nicknamed Bandar Bush), a member of the royal family, ambassador in
Washington from 1983 to 2005.[10] The Carlyle Group, of which George
H. W. Bush is a major shareholder, played a central role in the Bushs’
ties with the Sauds, including a nephew of King Fahd. A scandal broke
out in March 2001, during one of Bush’s visits to Saudi Arabia, as
acting head of the Carlyle Group. The nature of his meeting with King
Fahd raised questions: was this a diplomatic meeting, private business
travel, or both? On the same occasion, the former President also met the
bin Laden family, in business with Carlyle since 1990.<br />
<br />
Because of this business connection, it seems highly improbable that
the Bushs were consulted for the choice of Osama bin Laden as the patsy
for 9/11. And it is just as highly improbable that they were consulted
for the date, because September the 11<sup>th</sup> happened to be the
date scheduled for the yearly assembly of the Carlyle Group in
Washington. On that day, Bush senior would be meeting Shafig bin Laden
(Osama’s half-brother), among dozens of other Saudi investors, as
Michael Moore revealed in his award-winning film <em>Fahrenheit 9/11</em>.
In the following week, in violation of the flight ban maintained by the
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), a Boeing 747 from Saudi Arabian
Airlines was allowed to leave the United States, carrying 140 Saudis,
including Shafig bin Laden and twenty members of his family.[11]These
news caused considerable embarrassment for the Bush family in the
aftermath of 9/11. It is quite obvious that the date was chosen, not in
spite of the Carlyle meeting on Bush’s agenda, but because of it, with
the purpose of putting the President’s family under some form of
blackmail. Is it possible that 9/11 was set up in such a way as to not
only openly incriminate bin Laden, but also to potentially incriminate
the Bushs?<br />
<br />
Before we look into the deeper roots of that test of strength between
the neocons and the Bush clan, let’s ask which media relayed the neocon
accusation against the Sauds. Curiously, it is not Fox News but rather
the opposite end of the spectrum: Graham is interviewed by <em>Democracy Now</em>,
the very respectable Internet channel founded by Amy Goodman, icon of
the radical, antiwar left, whose maternal grandfather, Wikipedia informs
us, was an Orthodox rabbi, and whose most regular guest is Noam
Chomsky, the gatekeeper par excellence.<br />
<br />
Let’s recap: If you once were gullible and trusted mainstream media,
you believed the invasion of Iraq was motivated by Saddam’s Weapons of
Mass Destruction, and/or that the US got militarily involved in the
Middle East in order to fight a “war on terror”. If you are now
skeptical and prefer to trust alternative Internet journalism such as
Amy Goodman’s <em>Democracy Now — </em>or Paul Jay’s <em>The Real News, </em>or Russ Baker’s <em>WhoWhatWhy</em> <em>— </em>you
believe that the US is “reshaping” the Middle East in the interest of
Big Oil, the Military-Industrial Complex, or some other American
interest including the Bush dynasty. In both cases, you have been
fooled. This is the “double lie” principle, the media equivalent of the
psychological “double bind” which paralyses freethinking. When you break
free from the lies of mainstream news, you find yourself in another
world of lies; and your trust for those who pulled you out of the first
lie by showing you a portion of the truth, makes it even harder for you
to see that second lie. You now feel above the crowd, and unless you are
a genuine truth-seeker, you feel fine there.<br />
<br />
<div class="wp-caption alignright" id="attachment_224968" style="width: 130px;">
<img alt="Noam Chomsky" class="lazy size-full wp-image-224968 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Noam-Chomsky.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Noam-Chomsky.jpg" height="160" style="display: inline;" width="120" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
Noam Chomsky</div>
</div>
<br />
The opposition of the <em>Democracy Now </em>type is phony: it
accepts the 9/11 official story — the Big Lie — only to cast suspicions
on the Sauds, the Bushs, the Pentagon, the military industry, the oil
lobby… never the Zionists. It is a “controlled opposition”, designed to
engage in a false debate with mainstream propaganda. The idea is
comparable to wrestling: the roles are prearranged. The more violent the
figth appears, the better, but the violence is mostly faked: all is
fair, as long as it doesn’t seriously hurt. What is important is to keep
people watching the show, and not being distracted by the real issue.
The real issue today is Zionist supremacism and its role in world wars
past, present, and future. This is the issue that must not be addressed.<br />
<br />
Keeping America’s bad conscience constantly in a neurotic state, this
controlled opposition makes sure that Israel’s crimes can always be
blamed on America: after all, Israel is the 51<sup>st</sup> American
State, Washington’s beachhead in the Middle East, according to Chomsky.
This makes Zionist expansionism look like a local manifestation of
American imperialism. Since 2001, this crypto-Zionist left also
justifies all the real or imaginary crimes of Islamic terrorism,
including 9/11, by legitimate resentment against America. Between the
mainstream mediaholding Arabs and Muslims directly responsible for all
evils in the world, and this so-called alternative journalism holding
America indirectly responsible for the same evils, American public
opinion is squeezed between the two jaws of a pair of mental pliers. At
the other end, it is ultimately the same power holding both jaws, as is
well illustrated by those Trotskyists turned neoconservatives.<br />
<br />
This controlled opposition is a “soft” opposition, in the sense that
it will not challenge the 9/11 Big Lie. When questioned on that issue,
Howard Zinn, like Noam Chomsky, will answer that the question is not who
perpetrated the attacks, but why does bin Laden hates America so
much.[12] Armed with a better understanding of media warfare strategy,
let’s now move one level below, into the 9/11 Truth movement.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/ElSJTXHELd8" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElSJTXHELd8" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>Example n°2: Aaron Russo</strong><br />
<br />
Let’s go directly to Alex Jones’s <em>Infowars.com</em> and <em>PrisonPlanet.com</em>, comparable in audience to Amy Goodman’s <em>Democracy Now</em>.
In the beginning of 2007, Jones interviewed Aaron Russo, a Hollywood
producer. Russo pretended to have been befriended by Nicholas
Rockefeller, who then forewarned him about the 9/11 attacks and its
aftermaths eleven months before it happened, and attributed them to a
conspiracy fomented at the heart of the <em>Council on Foreign Relations</em> by the financial elite of which he was part<em>. </em>The
ultimate aim of the false flag operation, Nick Rockefeller allegedly
told Russo, was to establish a New World Order based on the enslavement
of all mankind for the benefit of a global elite. Among other
“revelations”, Nick explained that the women’s liberation movement was
invented by this elite as a way to transform women into taxpayers, and
that the next step would be the implantation of a microchip into every
human being.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/LxC9lrLEVNI" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxC9lrLEVNI" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<br />
Is Aaron Russo’s amazing testimony reliable? No. There does exist a
Californian lawyer by the name of Nick Rockefeller, but he is nowhere to
be found in the family tree of the famous Rockefeller dynasty. At best,
he is only a minor and distant member of the family. The probability
that he would know such a secret, let alone share it with a small
Hollywood producer, is totally preposterous. Yet Russo’s claim has had
tremendous success on the net. Russo died six months after his
“revelation”, of a cancer he had been battling for seven years.[13]<br />
<br />
Alex Jones (husband to a Jewish wife, the daughter of Edmund Lowe
Nichols and Sandra Kay Heiligman) is to the 9/11 Truthmovementwhat Amy
Goodman is to the liberal left: he disseminates half-truths and
sometimes full lies, with the purpose of diverting attention from the
core truth of 9/11. His obsession is the New World Order, a concept so
broad that it may be attached to any form of power, real or fantasized.
Two family names, however, are attached to that concept in Alex Jones’
paradigm: Rockefeller and Bush. Rockefeller, mostly because of David
Rockefeller’s founding role in the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral
Commission; Bush, because of George H.W.’s famous speech (on September
11<sup>th</sup>, 1990, as it happens) before Congress, in which he
announced “an era in which the nations of the world, East and West,
North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. […] A world in which
nations recognize the shared responsibility of freedom and justice. A
world where the strong respect the rights of the weak…”[14]. What sense
does it make to read in that totally demagogical speech, a secret plan
to enslave mankind? “A new world order” is just a phrase, it can mean
anything you like; repeating it every time something weird is going on
does not make investigative journalism. Pay close attention, for
example, to the real content of <em>Invisible Empire </em>(2010), the latest film by Jason Bermas (author of the <em>Loose Change </em>series),
produced by Alex Jones: is there any hard evidence of anything in
there? It is a collection of conflations, rumors and slogans, a salad of
all the commonplace on the New World Order, with, of course, the
leading roles given to the Bushs and the Rockefellers. Brainwashing
stuff.<br />
<br />
<img alt="Alex Jones 1" class="lazy aligncenter wp-image-509737 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Alex-Jones-1-640x360.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Alex-Jones-1-640x360.jpg" height="310" style="display: block;" width="550" /><br />
<strong>It is hard to say precisely what the New World Order is for
Alex Jones, Jason Bermas and the likes, but it is easy to say what it is
not: Zionism. You won’t even hear from them that the neocons are
Jewish. Ever. In fact, they may call you an anti-Semite if you say so.</strong><br />
<br />
“Bush” and “Rockefeller” can be taken, in this context, as kinds of
false flags. Which name could, by contrast, best serve as the flag of
the real perpetrators? Perhaps the name of the dynasty whose wealth is
estimated at 50 trillion dollars,[15] which Alex Jones will never utter.
Let me give you a clue with another misuse of the name Rockefeller:
that famous quote where David Rockefeller thanks the <em>Washington Post</em>, the <em>New York Times</em>
and other publications for having “respected the promises of discretion
for almost forty years” on the Trilateral Commission’s project for a
“supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers.”
That quote, disseminated throughout the Internet like a virus, is
another hoax. Of course the Rockefellers do not control the <em>Washington Post</em> and the <em>New York Times</em>!We know very well who do. It would be more credible if a Rothschild (a heir to Lord Rothschild of the <em>English Zionist Federation, </em>to
whom was addressed the Balfour Declaration in 1917)[16] would
congratulate the Grahams and the Sulzbergers (hereditary directors of
the <em>Washington Post </em>and the <em>New York</em> <em>Times </em>respectively)
for their discretion of seventy years on the crimes and deceptions of
Israel, wouldn’t it? Let’s face it: the Rockefellers and their New World
Order are Alex Jones’s false flag for the Rothschilds and their Empire
of Zion.<br />
<br />
Let’s recap, again: If you are credulous and trust the government,
you believe that 9/11 is the work of Al-Qaeda. If you are skeptical and
trust Alex Jones and other related 9/11 Truth investigators such as
Jason Bermas of <em>Loose Change </em>or Luke Rudkowski of <em>WeAreChange.com</em>, you believe 9/11 was an <em>inside job,</em>
perpetrated by a New World Order conspiracy which includes the Bushs
and the Rockefellers (Big Oil, Wall Street, etc.). In both cases, you
are being fooled.It is important to recognize that the dominant voices
in the 9/11 Truth movement are partly engaged in disinformation, with
the obvious intent to divert suspicions from Israel. It is important to
be aware of their occasional deceptions and not repeat them
uncritically. It is important to expose them, and to build an
alternative third way. These “half-truthers” want us to continue
chanting <em>“9/11 is an inside job”, </em>and will never even hint at
the evidence pointing to Israel; they will even feign to ignore that the
neocons are an almost exclusively Jewish Zionist ideological network.
To this “mainstream” 9/11 Truth movement belong the most visible films
produced so far, including the recent fiction by Art Olivier, <em>Operation Terror </em>(2012) and the upcoming docu-thriller by David Hooper, <em>The Anatomy of a Great Deception </em>(2014).[17]<br />
<br />
This new controlled opposition is not necessarily leftwing (Alex
Jones, a fervent defender of the Fifth Amendment, is rather seen as a
rightwing, patriotic libertarian). Nevertheless, it agrees on many
points with the more “traditional” controlled opposition discussed
above. While they interpret 9/11 differently, both levels of controlled
opposition target Saudi Arabia, and both cry foul on the Bushs and the
Rockefellers. Ultimately, both hold US imperialism directly or
indirectly responsible for 9/11. But more importantly, both shield
Israel from suspcicion, just like the official story. In this way, the
Zionist crime is buried under three layers of media lies. If there is a
lesson to learn from the examples above, it is that an efficient quest
for truth is primarily a hunt for lies.<br />
<br />
Among the lies shared by both levels of controlled opposition is the
claim that the US Middle East wars are for oil. “Of course it was Iraq’s
energy resources. It’s not even a question,” says Noam Chomsky,[18]
(echoed by Alan Greenspan, who repeats “what everyone knows: the Iraq
war is largely about oil”)[19]. In fact, as James Petras has
convincingly shown,“‘Big Oil’ not only did not promote the invasion, but
has failed to secure a single oil field, despite the presence of
160,000 US troops, 127,000 Pentagon/State Department paid mercenaries
and a corrupt puppet régime.”[20] Oil companies are perfectly happy to
deal with dictatorships. What they need is stability, not democracy. And
what they have always lobbied for is the lifting of sanctions that
prohibited dealing with Saddam’s Iraq — the same they are asking for
Iran. Like your typical Chomskian dissenter, the average 9/11 truther
takes for granted that the ultimate purpose of 9/11 was Middle East oil
(although there is no oil in Afghanistan), and conveniently exempts
himself from the need to prove his claim: “I personally believe that
there is a deep relationship between the events of 9/11 and peak oil,
but it’s not something I can prove,” admits Richard Heinberg, a
specialist in energy depletion, in the documentary <em>Oil, Smoke and Mirrors</em>.[21]<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/NNu_dwrREPQ" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNu_dwrREPQ" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>II. The reversible false flag and the Hijacked plot</strong><br />
<br />
<b>The reversible false flag</b><br />
<br />
In some way, the Inside Jobtheoryexposes 9/11 as a false flag
operation, yet still functions as a false flag itself, since by
directing public outrage against the US government, it fails to
designate the masterminds of the operation. It trades one false flag for
another, although of course, the US flag is, in that matter, not 100
percent false. This basic observation leads us to formulate a new
paradigm for understanding 9/11, one which takes into account the two
false flags — one sewed behind the other — designed within the plot.<br />
<br />
One of the purposes of having a US false flag sewed or hidden under
the Al-Qaeda false flag, is to force the US leaders to pretend they
believe in the bin Laden fairy tale, knowing full well that lifting the
bin Laden mask will make Uncle Sam’s face appear under it. Since they
know they don’t have control of the media, they also know they would not
be able to lift that second mask to expose Israel. They would be
politically dead before even trying.<br />
<br />
But it is not enough to control mainstream and alternative media.
Those who orchestrated 9/11 must also control the 9/11 Truth movement.
As I will show, this movement was not just infiltrated and contaminated
by people with another agenda than “truth”, but largely led from the
beginning by such people. While corporate media stick to the official
Al-Qaeda thesis, the dominant stream of the 9/11 Truth movement defends
exclusively the Inside Job thesis. Despite their outward disagreement,
both are basically Israel-friendly. This puts the US officials in an
impossible dilemma, and forces them to cover Israel’s crime to save
their own ass. If one day, under mounting pressure from public opinion
or for some other strategic reason, the mainstream media abandons the
official story, the well-rehearsed slogan “9/11 was an inside job” will
have prepared Americans to turn against their own government, while the
neocon Zionists will remain legally untouchable. And God knows what will
happen, if the government has not by then succeeded to disarm its
citizens through Sandy Hook-types psy-ops. Government officials have
little choice but to stick to the Al-Qaeda story, at least for the next
fifty years.<br />
<br />
By formulating this “reversible false flag” or “double lie” paradigm,
I do not claim to bring a Copernican revolution in 9/11ology. The
concept is no more than a standing point from where to grasp apparently
contradictory phenomena in a complex media world. But it also provides a
plausible reconstruction of the pattern on which the 9/11 plot was
masterminded. Imagine that a Zionist network wants to orchestrate a
false flag operation to attract the United States into its “war of
civilization” in the Middle East, unwinnable by Israel alone. Do they
have the means to deceive the huge American Intelligence machine? No.
But they have both the means to deceive public opinion, and the means to
force enough people in the White House, the Pentagon, the State
Department, the National Security Council and the Intelligence
community, to go along with their lie. At least for some time. One way
is to carefully place the US flag under the false flag of Al-Qaeda, so
that anyone trying to pull the veil of the official story will disclose
American involvement — and even risk seeing his own face — before having
a chance to expose Israel. It would be like opening Pandora’s box. The
Bushs certainly understand this. The controlled opposition of the first
type (Amy Goodman) and the controlled opposition of the second type
(Alex Jones) constantly remind them that their portrait lies just under
bin Laden’s portrait. This explains why incriminating evidence against
President Bush and his family, as well as against the Pentagon, the CIA
and other government institutions, have been built in the scenario.
Followers of the Inside Job theory take this evidence at face value,
without realizing the enormity of the mistakes they suppose on the part
of the Bush family in particular.<br />
<br />
To sum up, the reversible false flag is handled in a threefold way:
the mainstream media show only the Al-Qaeda side, the controlled 9/11
Truth movement exposes the US side, and the alternative (chomskian)
media show mostly the Al-Qaeda side but occasionally flip some corners
to hint at US complicity)<br />
<br />
<b>Israel in the wider sense</b><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>Having drawn the general outline of our new paradigm, we need
to clarify certain points. First, when we say that Israel orchestrated
9/11, what do we mean by “Israel”?</strong><br />
<br />
Like “Jewishness” — is it a
religious faith, or an ethnic heritage? —, “Israel” is an ambivalent
concept. Until 1947, Israel was commonly used (interchangeably with
Judea) to designate the worldwide community of all Jewish people; for
example when the British <em>Daily Express</em> of March 24, 1933
published a front-page article headlined “Judea Declares War on
Germany,” announcing that “The whole of Israel throughout the world is
uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany.”[22] But in
May 1948, the Zionists decided to name their self-proclaimed “Jewish
nation” in Palestine, Israel, thus giving it a second meaning. These two
notions largely overlap, from a Jewish point of view, since every Jew
is virtually an Israeli citizen: he just has to ask to become one
officially. Moreover, recent surveys show that Israel is the second most
important idea to which American Jews attach their “sense of being
Jewish”, after the Holocaust, before God and the Torah.[23]<br />
<br />
In the larger sense, common among Jews, Israel includes all those who
feel strongly attached to the State of Israel. Israel is a loyalty
rather than a legal citizenship. But when we say that Israel
orchestrated 9/11, we use Israel in an intermediate sense between the
restrictive sense and the wider sense: we do not include the Jewish
community at large, but only their financial and cultural elites, and
above all, their self-proclaimed representatives. <strong>That includes the 52 national Jewish American organizations and lobbies, and their coordinating structure the <em>Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations</em>,
who are actively and overtly defending Israel’s interests, even when
they are fighting anti-Zionism by calling it anti-Semitism.</strong><br />
<strong>In this sense, Israel has two world capitals: Tel Aviv and New York.</strong>
Jacob Neusner compares “American Jewry” to the community of exiles in
Babylon, which was the center of universal Judaism for one millennium
(and the birthplace of the Babylonian Talmud). The history of the
relationship between American Jews and Zionist immigrants in Palestine
is well known: in the first half of the 20<sup>th</sup> century,
although the Yiddish press had espoused the Zionist cause, the majority
of American Jews showed little support for it, believing that Israel was
doing fine in the form of a Diaspora, and having no desire to emigrate
to Palestine as Zionists claimed every Jew should do. Then, in the
1950s, “an accommodation was reached between the Jewish state in Israel
and the Jewish state in America”, in the words of Benjamin Ginsberg.[24]
The 1967 Arab/Israeli war a turning point: “the immediate reaction of
American Jewry to the crisis was far more intense and widespread than
anyone could have foreseen,” writes Arthur Hertzberg in <em>Being Jewish in America </em>(1979),
and many American Jews could identify with the statement of Rabbi
Abraham Joshua Heschel, that until that time, “I had not known how
Jewish I was,” adds Charles Silberman in <em>A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today </em>(1985).[25]Zionists, from their side, recognized the legitimacy of serving Israel while residing in “the nations”.<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>Today, among political, financial and cultural elites, there
is hardly any difference between American and Israeli Jews from the
point of view of their loyalty to the “Jewish State”. Many have dual
citizenship, and reside alternatively in the US and in Israel. Benjamin
Netanyahu is a case in point: the son of Ben Zion Netanyahu (born
Mileikowsky in Warsaw), he lived, studied and worked in the United
States from 1960 to 1978, except for his military service. He published
in English in the 1980s (<em>International Terrorism: Challenge and Response </em>in 1982 and <em>Terrorism: How the West can Win </em>in 1986), and in the 1990s, he was a familiar face on CNN, a master of <em>hasbara</em>
who helped turn CNN into a Zionist propaganda machine.[26] Conversely,
many American neoconservatives, who hold high positions in the federal
administration, have relatives in Israel and/or have lived there. Many
are overtly close to the Likud party, and some have even served
officially as advisors to Netanyahu.</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<br />
<div class="wp-caption alignright" id="attachment_220318" style="width: 410px;">
<img alt="Neocon Irving Kristol — Source of America’s Wars" class="lazy wp-image-220318 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Bill-Kristol-ziocon.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Bill-Kristol-ziocon.jpg" height="267" style="display: inline;" width="400" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
Neocon Irving Kristol —<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBCxYicxTow"> Source of America’s Wars</a></div>
</div>
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>Let us not forget that neoconservatism is an intellectual movement born in the late 1960s in the pages of <em>Commentary</em>, the monthly magazine of the <em>American Jewish Committee</em>.</strong>
“If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention
Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it,” writes Gal Beckerman of
<em>The Jewish Daily Forward</em> (January 6, 2006).<br />
<br />
Most redactors of <em>Commentary</em> were leftists, like its editor
in chief from 1960 to 1995, Norman Podhoretz; some were confessed
Trotskyists, like Irving Kristol.It is only in the 70s that <em>Commentary</em> became, in the words of Benjamin Balint, <em>“The Contentious Magazine that Transformed the Jewish Left into the Neoconservative Right” </em>(subtitle of his 2010 book <em>Running “Commentary”</em>),[27]
and that the leading intellectuals of this movement traded their
anti-war stance for a strong advocacy of American military hegemony.<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>Their true reason is given away by Irving Kristol in the 1973 issue of the journal of the <em>American Jewish Congress</em>:</strong><br />
<blockquote>
<strong>“Jews don’t like a big military budget, but it is
now an interest of the Jews to have a large and powerful military
establishment in the United States. [...] American Jews who care about
the survival of the state of Israel have to say, no, we don’t want to
cut the military budget, it is important to keep that military budget
big, so that we can defend Israel.”[28] Or by Norman Podhoretz who in
his book <em>Breaking Ranks </em>in 1979 wrote that American isolationism would represent “a direct threat to the security of Israel.”[29]</strong></blockquote>
The neocons’ duplicity has been clearly exposed by the translation of a Hebrew document entitled <em>A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm</em>, written in 1996 specifically for the new Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, by a team of the Israeli think tank <em>Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies</em>
(IASPS), which was led by Richard Perle and included Douglas Feith,
David Wurmser and his wife Meyrav Wurmser.[30] The same year, the same
authors signed the founding manifesto of PNAC in the US, and four years
later, they would be positioned in key posts of the US military and US
foreign policy. As its title suggests, <em>Clean Break</em> invites
Netanyahu to betray Israel’s commitment to the Oslo Accords of 1993, and
to instead “engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism”,
meaning reaffirming Israel’s right over the West Bank and the Gaza
Strip, and creating the conditions for the occupation of new
territories, until the restoration of the biblical borders.<br />
<br />
The main problem of the Inside Job paradigm is that it ignores the
neocons’ obvious loyalty to Israel. Webster Tarpley sees them as mere
“moles” of an “invisible government” controlled from Wall Street, when
in fact, they are “moles” of a foreign government (which is also, in
some way, an “invisible government”).[31] When Tarpley does mention one
foreign government as suspect, it is Great Britain: “The foreign
intelligence service which contributed the most indirect support to 9/11
was unquestionably the British MI-6,” but he fails to produce a single
piece of evidence to support that claim.[32] True, the neocons are not
all Jewish. Under Bush II, they have allies, mercenaries and moles among
the Goyim, like Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, who introduced them
into the White House and the Pentagon, or like John Bolton in the State
Department. They also employ some front intellectuals such as Samuel
Huntington, who was given credit for foretelling a <em>Clash of Civilizations </em>in
1996, only because it would have been harder to sell it under the name
of Bernard Lewis, the real inventor of this self-fulfilling
prophecy.[33] Nevertheless, it is clear today that the neocons are
crypto-Zionists who move under the mask of American imperialism, but who
are secretly working for Israel’s hegemonic plan in the Middle East. As
Bush I once explained to Bush II, the short answer to “What’s a
neocon?” is “Israel”.[34]<br />
<br />
<b>The Bushs and the “crazies”</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<img alt="Who to blame for Iraq War" class="lazy aligncenter size-full wp-image-406748 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Who-to-blame-for-Iraq-War1.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Who-to-blame-for-Iraq-War1.jpg" height="400" style="display: block;" width="380" /><br />
<br />
Understanding the neocons as crypto-Zionists and Israelis at heart is
the first step in trying to make sense of 9/11. The next step is
understanding the nature of their relationship with the Bushs. The
classic Inside Job paradigm doesn’t make any difference between these
two clans. But the historical record shows that the Bushs and the
neocons are longtime rivals. We like to see the world with all the
baddies on the same side and the goodies on the other. But the baddies
don’t necessarily like each other. And it is not necessary to feel
sympathy for the Bushs or for the neocons to understand the nature of
their rivalry.<br />
<br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_509742" style="width: 522px;">
<img alt="Former U.S. President George H. Bush and his Secretary of State James A. Baker" class="lazy size-full wp-image-509742 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Bush-I-and-his-Secretary-of-State-James-Baker.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Bush-I-and-his-Secretary-of-State-James-Baker.jpg" height="269" style="display: inline;" width="400" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
Former U.S. President George H. Bush and his Secretary of State James A. Baker</div>
</div>
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>It goes back to the Bush I presidency, which was perceived,
with good reasons, as rather hostile to Israel. Even before that, Bush
had learn to distrust the neocons: during his brief appointment as
director of the CIA in 1976, he had watched how Richard Pipes and Paul
Wolfowitz had succeeded in imposing their Team B’s apocalyptic estimates
of the Soviet threat, over the CIA’s more realistic Intelligence. When
he was Reagan’s Vice-President, Bush could witness the neocons’
influence on foreign policy; he called them “the crazies”.So when he
succeeded to Reagan, he got rid of many of them. And after Operation
Desert Stormin 1991, he stood fast against their pressure to invade
Iraq. That same year, he also resisted the pro-Israel lobby’s demand for
$10 billion to help Jews from former USSR to settle in Israel, and
complained in a televised press conference on September 12<sup>th</sup>
that “one thousand Jewish lobbyists are on Capitol Hill against little
old me”, which made the Executive Director of AIPAC declare, “September
12, 1991, is a day that will live in infamy.”[35] But above all, Bush I
and his Secretary of State James Baker ended the pro-Israel policy of
Reagan. In November 1991, just after the Gulf War, he convened the
Madrid Conference, the first serious attempt at setting a road map
toward peace in Palestine, by involving Syrian, Lebanese, Jordanian and
Palestinian representatives. In the eyes of Israeli leaders, Bush and
Baker were much too receptive to Arab proposals. As a result, the
Israeli lobby and Zionist media sabotaged his chances for a second term
and supported the Democrat candidate Bill Clinton, whose government
became so “full of warm Jews”, in the words of a prominent Washington
rabbi, that “the term ‘government of goyim’” has become “an outdated
term in the US.”[36]</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>Not only did Bush I appear anti-Israel to the neocons, but, to make things worse, he was decidedly pro-Saud.</strong>
Saudi Arabia had always been the most troublesome enemy of Israel,
precisely because it was the most loyal US ally in the Middle East, and
therefore the Arab State that US foreign policy would always protect, no
matter what. No “Arab Spring” would ever reach it. It is true that
Israel has managed to use to its advantage the Wahhabi brand of Islam
exported from Saudi Arabia. It is also true that the Saudis have always
played a very ambiguous roles in the Middle East, often more intend to
harm its Muslim rivals, Egypt or Iran, than Israel. And there is a lot
of talk today about a warming relationship between Saudi Arabia and
Israel. But this recent and fragile development is the result of more
than a decade of geopolitical upheaval since 9/11. Fundamentally, and at
least until 2001, Saudi Arabia and its sponsored jihadists were
fundamentally anti-Israel. Israel and Saudi Arabia, the self-proclaimed
holy lands of Judaism and Islam, had remained irreconcilable enemies
ever since Truman betrayed Roosevelt’s promise to King Ibn Saud by
recognizing unilaterally Israel in 1948. The assassination of King
Faisal in 1975 did bring into power a more conciliatory king, but
Israeli leaders have always understood that corroding the US-Saudi
alliance was the only way to be able to stand one day in the privileged
position of being the only American ally in the Middle East.<br />
<br />
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" id="attachment_509745" style="width: 220px;">
<img alt="Isser Harel, founder of Israeli secret services" class="lazy wp-image-509745 size-medium data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Isser-Harel-Mossad-210x320.gif" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Isser-Harel-Mossad-210x320.gif" height="320" style="display: inline;" width="210" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
Isser Harel, founder of Israeli secret services</div>
</div>
<br />
It is interesting here to quote what Isser Harel, the “father of
Israeli intelligence”, told author Michael Evans in a 1980 interview,
which Evans recalled in a <em>Jerusalem Post</em> editorial on September 30th, 2001<em>, </em>then
again in an interview with Deborah Caldwell in 2004: “He told me that
America had developed an alliance between (sic) two countries, Israel
and Saudi Arabia, and that the alliance with Saudi Arabia was dangerous
and would develop a tolerance for terror among Americans. He said if the
tolerance continued that Islamic fundamentalists would ultimately
strike America. I said ‘Where?’ He said, ‘In Islamic theology, the
phallic symbol is very important. Your biggest phallic symbol is New
York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will
hit.’” By relating this conversation 21 years later, Evans, a Christian
Zionist, hoped to pass Harel as a prophet, but less mystical readers
may conclude otherwise (especially if they have any notion of Islamic
theology).[37]<br />
<br />
Because President Bush Sr. had tried to strengthen the Saudi
alliance, and took up the leadership of the pro-Saud camp in Washington,
he became a target of the pro-Israel lobby. After the defeat of Saddam
in 1991, the Bush clan and the neocon Zionists both developed very
different visions of the New World Order to come: for Bush, it should be
based on a strengthened Washington-Riyadh axis, while neocons wanted it
based on a Washington-Tel Avid axis. Besides, let us not forget that
Bush spoke about a New World Order after having liberated Kuwait and
refused to invade Iraq: he was posturing as the protector of national
sovereignties, whereas the neocons’ project is founded on the
destruction of the Seven Nations. We don’t know who convinced Bush to
use the phrase “New World Order” before Congress on September 11<sup>th</sup>, 1990. But we know that it had been coined in 1957 by geopolitician Robert Strausz-Hupé, in the first issue of his review <em>Orbis</em>,
one of the early crucibles of neoconservatism, later directed by
Richard Pipes. Strausz-Hupé identifies the coming New World Order as
“the American universal empire,” destined to “to bury the
Nation-States”: “The American empire and mankind will not be opposites
but merely two names for the universal order under peace and happiness. <em>Novus orbis terrarum</em> (New World Order).”<sup><sup>[38]</sup></sup>Now
that we see more clearly into the double game of the neocons, we
understand the ironic duplicity of such language. The whole neocon
machiavelian craftinessis about riding of the back of US imperialism to
build its own imperial basis in the Middle East, until one day the
American horse will collapse of exhaustion, leaving Israel in control.
With this intend the neocons have preferred to rename their project the
“New American Century” in 1996. But in the Jerusalem Summit of 2003,
attended by Richard Perle, they enshrined in a solemn declaration their
hope of making Israel “the center of the new unity of the nations, which
will lead to an era of peace and prosperity, foretold by the
Prophets.”[39] “New American Century” and “New World Order” are the
false flags under which Zionism will conquer the world — or disappear.<br />
<br />
Given the reciprocal hostility between Bush Sr. and the neocons, how
can we explain the ubiquity of the neocons in the administration of Bush
Jr.? The short answer is Dick Cheney: it is said that, after choosing
himself as Vice-President, he had no difficulty to bring his neocon
sponsors through the back door, George W. being quite happy to let him
in charge and take some vacation.[40] More important is the question:
How did the neocons manage to control Bush Jr., to the point of
isolating him from his own clan? I don’t know, but 9/11 certainly was a
crucial factor. The humiliating situation in which the President found
himself at the time of the attacksdramatically illustrates how he was
removed from direct control of ongoing operations. Those ten minutes
made memorable by Michael Moore’s <em>Fahrenheit 9/11, </em>when Bush kept reading <em>My Pet Goat </em>with
primary schoolchildren after being informed that the second tower had
been hit, could be the equivalent to the Zapruder film for Kennedy: the
moment when the President was neutralized, while the Vice-President was
taking over effective government. Bush’s ensuing arraignment alongside
the Saudis indicates that he was held hostage by the neocons.[41]<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/D_0dMRzTbzQ" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_0dMRzTbzQ" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<br />
It is clear that, from the day of 9/11, Bush Sr. and his political
family lost their influence on Bush Jr. To reporter Bob Woodward, the
President said he didn’t even ask for his father’s advice: “He is the
wrong father to appeal to for advice. […] There’s a higher Father that I
appeal to.”[42] The Good Lord must be a neocon, then, for Bush Jr.
started speaking and acting just like one. His neocon advisers took a
spectacular revenge on the father by forcing the son to invade Iraq. In
2007 again, George W. did exactly the opposite of what the congressional
<em>Iraq Study Group,</em> initiated by his father’s friends (and
chaired by James Baker), recommended; he followed instead the
recommendations of the neocon pro-Surge lobby <em>Freedom’s Watch, </em>and
announced the deployment of 20,000 additional troops. Thomas Neumann,
Executive Director of the JINSA, could then praise Bush Jr.’s
administration as “the best administration for Israel since Harry
Truman.”[43]<br />
<br />
<b>The hijacked plot</b><br />
<br />
With a better understanding of the power struggle within the Bush II
administration, we have a better chance of understanding how 9/11 was
schemed. In its classic form, the Inside Job thesis assumes some
collusion between several groups with converging interests: the
operation, we are led to believe, was conceived partly for oil, partly
for the military-industrial complex, with Halliburton profiting from
both; it involved the Bushs, the Rockefellers and other Wall Street
executives, as well as some Pentagon generals, not to forget the
powerful Saudi lobby. With such a paradigm, we can even find place for a
Mossad involvement and have the satisfaction of not having to choose
between thesis 2 (<em>Inside Job</em>) and thesis 3 (<em>Mossad Job</em>). This
is not a credible scenario. Such a complex operation as 9/11 can only
be orchestrated by a highly cohesive, single-minded group, bound by a
unique goal and absolute loyalty. They must hold strategic positions,
but also be able to rely on a larger group of loyal collaborators who
will give a hand without asking questions. The neocons and the wider
Zionist elite, with the help of a network of influential and devoted New
York <em>sayanim</em>, fit that description. I can’t think of any other candidate.<br />
<br />
The idea that the Bushs had willingly collaborated to such a
conspiracy with the neocons is hard to believe. In general, the idea
that the plotters include at the highest level an opportunistic alliance
between rival clans, or even different clans, seems to me unrealistic.
On the other hand, it is likely, and even certain, that the plotters
drew a number of high officials to some degree into their scheme, by
corruption or other means, not only because they needed their practical
cooperation, but also because they needed to control them after the
operation. It is of crucial importance that a sufficient number of
highly placed people have a strong interest in keeping the truth buried,
knowing full well that the Big Lie is their only protection. And, of
course, the one man the plotters needed to control was the President.<br />
<br />
The simplest application of this basic principle is the hijacking of a
war game to create a false flag attack. Once the war game is in action,
one or two parameters can be changed to make it appear real, and sell
it as such to the media. Those who do that need not be the designers of
the drill; they may have simply infiltrated it. Those who participate,
anyway, are military personnel who are used to obey without questions,
and who know the price they would have to pay for speaking out after
realizing what they have contributed to. On September 11<sup>th</sup>,
2001, NORAD was occupied with five military exercises, three of which,
under the names of Vigilant Guardian, Global Guardian, and Vigilant
Warrior, were simulated hijackings, both with real and virtual flights.
Consequently, according to Colonel Robert Marr, head of NEADS, as many
as twenty-nine “hijacked planes” were on the radar screens at NORAD on
that day.<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>These NORAD exercises are only one of keys to 9/11 truth.</strong>
They only explain a small part of the plot. But the idea of hijacking a
minor secret operation to transform it into something much bigger, with
consequences unforeseen by the original planners, can be applied on
another scale. Let’s say, as a working hypothesis, that the American
government, or part of it, organized a false flag operation of limited
scope, with few or no real victims, and with a well defined limited
goal. The network of neocons, who may or may not have launched
themselves this operation with White House approval, secretly decide to
maximize its effect for the benefit of Israel. Because they are merely
parasitizing an undisclosable operation of the government, the Zionists
can force the government to play their game until the end, under fear of
being exposed. The idea is to get into a boat that nobody can leave,
and take over the helm to change direction. This scenario, which we may
call the “hijacked plot”, or “one conspiracy inside another”, is a
practical means to set up an operation under “double false flag”, as
9/11 seems to have been planned. It would explain how efficiently the
neocon Zionists have forced the President and his administration to play
their script of a world war on terror. They possess the proofs of a
State crime and a State lie, and the media means to blow the scandal of
the century, and they use this information both to blackmail State
officials and to hide their own crime and lie. The government
involvement is the shield preventing their own involvement to be
exposed.<br />
<br />
Imagine, for example, that under neocon advice, the White House
(George W. Bush), the State Department (Colin Powell) and the National
Security Council (Condoleezza Rice) have agreed to rid Afghanistan of
the Taliban régime, by falsely blaming their guest Osama bin Laden of a
terror attack. They can even get some support from the Saud royal family
for such an operation. In order to justify such a limited war, under
the pretext of a manhunt in Afghanistan, one plane hijacked by suicidal
terrorists and crashed on the Pentagon will be enough. (As a secondary
goal, to kill two birds with one stone, the attack, simulated by a
missile, will kill the 34 financial experts of the <em>Resource Services Washington</em>
who, in the eastern side of the Pentagon, were trying to find out who
had stolen the $2.3 trillion vanished from the accounts of the
Department of Defense; and, as a show of <em>chutzpah</em>, one of them, Bryan Jack, will be said to have died at his office… because he was in Flight AA77 which crashed onto it).[44]<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>The neocons are not really interested in bin Laden. What they
want is to finish up Iraq, then the rest of the “seven nations”
(Afghanistan not being part of them). So, with the help of their New
York super-<em>sayanim</em>, they will give the operation a much bigger
impact, enough to con Americans into supporting their insane plan. To
start a war on the Islamic civilization, one plane crashed on the
Pentagon and a few dozen dead will not suffice. What is needed is a more
dramatic and tragic event, such as the explosion of the Twin Towers and
victims by the thousands. Larry Silverstein, Frank Lowy and Lewis
Eisenberg will gladly oblige:</strong> this will be a golden opportunity
for their New York gang to solve the bothersome asbestos problem of the
Twin Towers at a much lower cost than the regular procedure, estimated a
billion; even at a profit, thanks to a smart insurance policy.[45] With
the cooperation of the major news media, the neocons take the
administration by surprise and win the day. The little-weight plotters
(Bush, Powell and Rice) can only try to save face, unwillingly embarked
into a gigantic geopolitical scheme. Bush is forced to approve the
invasion of Iraq that his father had refused ten years earlier, to the
day. An attack against Iran, under the same false pretext of Weapons of
Mass Destruction, is also on the new agenda laid on his desk.<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>Every Goy in the administration is taken by surprise, except perhaps Cheney.</strong> (I doubt if Rumsfeld would have chosen to announce the missing $2.3 billion on September 10<sup>th</sup>,
if he had known that the investigators in charge would die the next
day; I rather suspect this coincidence was planned to embarrass him and
put him under a media blackmail). The fooled high officials have no time
to think, since the Zionist-controlled media are already playing along
with the neocon tune of the war on civilization. As a telling
illustration of that, let us listen again to (Lewis) Paul Bremer
speaking on NBC in the early afternoon of 9/11.[46] <strong>Bremer was the Chairman of the <em>National Commission on Terrorism.</em></strong><strong>He
was also on the Board of Directors of Marsh & McLennan, a worldwide
insurance company chaired by Jeffrey Greenberg, which occupied the 93<sup>rd</sup> to 100<sup>th</sup>
floors of the North Tower, precisely where Flight AA11 “cut a gash that
was over half the width of the building and extended from the 93<sup>rd</sup> floor to the 99<sup>th</sup>
floor”, according to the NIST report.[47] On NBC, Bremer, seemingly
unaffected by the death of his employees (officially 295), designated
bin Laden as the prime suspect (script n°1), but immediately added Iraq
and Iran (script n°2): “He certainly has to be a prime suspect.</strong> <strong>But
there are others in the Middle East, and there are at least two States,
Iran and Iraq, which should at least remain on the list as essential
suspects.”[48] In 2003, Bremer would be promoted Administrator of the <em>Coalition Provisional Authority</em>
(CPA), in charge of the dismantling of the Iraqi State. Under his
leadership, 9 billion dollars would disappear in fraud, corruption and
embezzlement.[49]</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/RYrv4f6P_Ig" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYrv4f6P_Ig" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>III. mini-nukes and ghost-planes</strong><br />
<br />
As I explained in the introduction, there is much evidence that
Israel (in the larger sense) orchestrated 9/11. However, there are
apparent technical objections to that hypothesis: even if we assume that
Israel infiltrated every body of the federal administration, including
the Air Force, it is hard to imagine that a Zionist network could have
had the technical means to crash two planes into the Twin Towers and
wire their controlled demolition, both highly complex operations. In
this third part, I will answer these objections. I could have started
with that part, but the technical questions that we are going to examine
will give us the opportunity to check the validity of our new paradigm
of the double false flag.<br />
<h3>
<span style="font-size: small;">
Controlled demolition or mini-nukes</span></h3>
<img alt="wtc-7-neverforget" class="lazy alignright size-full wp-image-509663 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/wtc-7-neverforget.gif" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/wtc-7-neverforget.gif" height="284" style="display: block;" width="320" /><strong><br /></strong><br />
<strong>The
murder weapon classically leads to the murderer. And so the technical
means used to destroy the Twin Towers is crucial in identifying the
ultimate culprit of the 9/11 mass-murder. </strong><br />
<strong>According to the dominant 9/11 Truth thesis, the method can
be deduced by looking at the collapse of WTC7, a neighboring 47-story
skyscraper that collapsed at 5:20 pm. Its fall, which can be viewed on
the Internet from multiple angles, occurred at the speed of free fall
within seven seconds, in a perfectly symmetrical and vertical manner,
exactly like a standard “controlled demolition.”</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>The mass media remained so discreet about this third tower that few people have heard of its collapse.</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>FEMA barely mentions it in its 2002 report, only to state
that office fires must have caused the collapse, in a way which “remain
unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises
contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low
probability of occurrence”,[50] a sentence which sounds as the near
admission of a lie?</strong><br />
<br />
The controlled demolition of a steel-framed skyscraper like WTC7
requires months, or at least weeks of preparation by a team of experts.
Tens of thousands of tons of energetic materials are needed, to be
attached in a precise manner on the steel columns, and the sequence of
their ignition must be electronically calculated. Who could have done
that? Certainly not a team of secret agents from the Mossad. Therefore
the controlled demolition of WTC7 is proof of an “inside job”
implicating, at the least, New York authorities.<br />
<br />
Scientific confirmation of the use of explosives came in February
2009, when an international team of chemists led by professors Niels
Harrit of Copenhagen University and Steven Jones of Brigham Young
University (Utah), after having examined wreckage dust materials from
the WTC, published an article in the scholarly journal <em>Open Chemical Physics Journal</em>,
entitled: “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9-11
World Trade Center Catastrophe.” The thermite (a high-tech incendiary
capable of cutting through steel beams) found in the WTC dust is the
product of sophisticated nanotechnology.<br />
<br />
From these two elements — the images of the collapse of WTC7, and the
discovery of nanothermite on the site of the WTC — the core 9/11
Truthmovement concludes that the Twin Towers were also pulled down by
controlled demolition using nanothermite. There is a huge problem with
that theory, though: anyone looking at the images on YouTube can see
that the destruction of the Twin Towers and the destruction of Tower 7
are completely different. This is what Danish demolition expert Danny
Jowenko declared without hesitation, when shown the film of the collapse
of WTC7, before knowing it happened on September 11<sup>th</sup>.[51]
For one thing, the collapse of the Twin Towers starts from the top,
while the collapse of WTC7 starts from the bottom, like any controlled
demolition. Secondly, the word “collapse” is inadequate for the Twin
Towers: we can see them literally explode, floor by floor. The pile of
rubble left on their footprint looks nothing like what is seen after a
controlled demolition. One may wonder why the differences, so obvious,
are lost on most 9/11 Truth sites.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/X6tikZimCQc" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6tikZimCQc" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<br />
There are, however, dissenters within the movement who claim that
nanothermite can in no way explain the force of the explosions witnessed
in the Twin Towers. Technically, nanothermite is an incendiary, not an
explosive. It may have been enough to “pull” WTC7, from bottom to top
with no horizontal projection and little dust produced, but it fails to
explain the very different destruction of the Twin Towers, from top to
bottom, and the pulverization into very fine dust of almost all their
concrete — not to mention the eleven hundred bodies never recovered.
Nanothermite doesn’t explain the temperatures of 600 to 1,500 °F at
Ground Zero for six months after 9/11.[52]The pyroclastic dust that
flooded through the streets at high speed after the collapse, not unlike
the dust from a volcano, indicates a high temperature mixture of hot
gazes and relatively dense solid particles, a phenomenon impossible from
a simple collapse caused by nanothermite.[53]<br />
<br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_509743" style="width: 650px;">
<img alt="What kind of “controlled” demolition is that?" class="lazy wp-image-509743 size-large data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Pyroclastic1-640x414.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Pyroclastic1-640x414.jpg" height="258" style="display: inline;" width="400" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>Pyroclastic! What kind of “controlled” demolition is that?</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>For these reasons and more, a growing number of scientists
are now rejecting the nanothermite</strong><br />
<strong>thesis and believe that small neutron
bombs had been planted near the core columns of the buildings.</strong><strong>[54] </strong><strong>The
thesis is coherent with the high percentage of residuals of nuclear
fusion/fission reactions in the rubble (barium, strontium, thorium,
uranium, lithium, lanthanum, yttrium, chromium, tritium), and with the
high rate of rare cancers (thyroid cancer, leukemia, and multiple
myeloma) among Ground Zero workers, typical of radiation exposure.</strong><br />
<br />
The use of such mini-nuclear bombs, or “micro-nukes,” is fully
consistent with other evidence implicating Israel: contrary to the
United States, Israel has never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and
its nuclear arsenal is not subject to inspection or control of any
kind.[55] Moreover, this is not the only case where Israel is suspected
to have used nukes in a false flag bombing. On October 12, 2003, an
explosion destroyed an Australian nightclub in Bali, Indonesia, killing
187 people and injuring more than 300 others. The bombing, blamed on
Islamists, stopped a movement of protest in Australia against the Iraq
war. The device was planted in a monsoon drain approximately five feet
under the road nearby. According to Australian investigator Joe Vialls,
the force of the blast, which set some 27 buildings on fire, is
indicative of a micronuclear technology using enriched uranium. So is
the fact that 30 people were totally vaporized by the explosion, while
many around the blast received severe flash burns of a kind which
Australian surgeons declared having “never seen before.” Vialls
concludes to the use of a plutonium fission bomb, which leaves only
alpha radiations behind, “invisible” to a standard Geiger counter. And
he points the finger at Israeli secret services.[56]<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>In the case of the WTC, just a few individuals working two or
three days would have been needed to place easily disguised micro-nukes
no bigger than apples within the buildings, every five to ten floors,
and the same people could have detonated the explosive sequence. Scott
Forbes, a director of Fiduciary Trust, whose offices were in the South
Tower, reported that during the weekend prior to the attacks, the power
was cut for 36 hours from the 48<sup>th</sup> floor upward, supposedly
to replace the tower’s wiring. Nothing like it had ever been necessary
since the towers’ construction; “Without power there were no security
cameras, no security locks on doors, and many, many ‘engineers’ coming
in and out of the tower.”[57] In contrast, to plan the demolition of the
Twin Towers with nanothermite would have required hundreds of people,
months of work and a lot of highly visible masonry work to reach the
steel column. Professor Neils Harrit has actually estimated the amount
of nanothermite needed to blow the Twin Towers between 29,000 and
144,000 metric tons. Just to unload the lowest estimate would have
required 1,500 tractor trailer loads with a crew working 24 hours a day
for 300 days non-stop. That seems inconceivable for a foreign power. In
fact, it is inconceivable altogether. Exit the nanothermite theory.</strong><br />
<br />
Yet the nanothermite theory remains the most widely accepted
explanation for the destruction of the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Truth
movement. Jim Fetzer, a Veteran in 9/11 research and founder of <em>Scholars for 9/11 Truth</em>,
has been unfairly attacked and ostracized by influential 9/11 Truth
groups since he has endorsed the mini-nuke theory and pointed the finger
at Israel,[58] while Steven Jones, co-founder of the same organization,
has received the broadest support after parting from Fetzer and
founding the competing <em>Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice</em>,
which support the nanothermite theory. Moreover, as the shortcomings of
this nanothermite theory are becoming increasingly known, a new theory
has recently appeared, which circumvents the simple mini-nuke theory
with an extremely complicated alternative which points back to the US
military-industrial complex rather than to Israel: according to
professor Judy Wood, the most zealous exponent of this new theory, the
“dustification” of the Twin Towers can only be explained by the use of a
yet unknown “directed energy weapons” possibly “Star Wars beam weapons”
shooting from orbital stations.[59] Wood can offer no evidence of the
existence of such weapons.[60]<br />
<br />
<b>The real mystery of WTC7</b><br />
<br />
The controlled demolition of WTC7 is indeed the proof of an “inside
job”, because it cannot have been secretly wired by any foreign
organization or government. But it is also an enigma, because the
purpose of this demolition cannot be explained within the Inside Job
paradigm. If the collapse of the Twin Towers was meant to shock public
opinion and prepare for the “war or terror”, what was the purpose of the
collapse of Tower 7, which was ignored by the media? Some 9/11
investigators conjecture that Tower 7 had to be destroyed because it had
been home to the technical center of the plot: indeed, its offices
housed the Emergency Command Center of New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani,
as well as government agencies such as the Department of Defense, the
CIA and the Secret Service. But destroying the traces of a conspiracy in
such conspicuous way is a contradiction. WTC7 also housed the Internal
Revenue Service and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which held
the records of the investigation on Enron, the biggest financial scandal
in history. Enron had also been the biggest contributor to Bush Jr.’s
campaign, so it is conceivable that the destruction of WTC7 served the
interests of the Bushs. What can only be said with certainty so far is:
1. it did not serve the same purpose as the destruction of the Twin
Towers; 2. it became the smoking gun for inside-jobbers. In other words,
it was hidden by mainstream media because it didn’t fit the Al-Qaeda
theory, but it was made sufficiently visible for the 9/11 Truth movement
to use it as proof an inside job.</div>
</div>
<br />
<div class="wp-caption alignright" id="attachment_509747" style="width: 330px;">
<img alt=" Footage broadcast 20 minutes before Building 7 fell shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of WTC 7 ..." class="lazy wp-image-509747 size-medium data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/BBC-Footage-broadcast-20-minutes-before-Building-7-fell-320x240.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/BBC-Footage-broadcast-20-minutes-before-Building-7-fell-320x240.jpg" height="240" style="display: inline;" width="320" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
Footage broadcast 20 minutes before Building 7 fell shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of WTC 7 …</div>
</div>
<br />
The visibility was increased by the timing of the collapse of WTC7,
seven hours after the Twin Towers. Was it scheduled for the morning, so
as to be rendered invisible by the dust cloud from the Twin Towers, but
delayed by a flaw in the wiring?This would be consistent with the
testimony of two New York City police officers, Michael Hess and Barry
Jennings, who felt a series of explosions in Tower 7 at 9:15 am.[61] Is
this why some television networks reported its collapse before it even
took place, starting with CNN correspondent Alan Dodds who reported by
telephone at 11:07 am that a firefighter had just told him that a third
building of fifty floors had collapsed, and culminating with BBC World
correspondent Jane Standley, announcing the collapse of WTC7 at 4:54 pm,
while it was still seen standing behind her (a “mistake” attributed to
“the chaos and confusion of the day” by the director of information at
BBC World)?[62]<br />
<br />
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" id="attachment_509746" style="width: 310px;">
<img alt="Larry Silverstein famously known for making a profit of over $1.1 billion on purchasing the leases for the WTC complex in less than 6 weeks before 9/11." class="lazy size-full wp-image-509746 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/LARRY-SILVERSTEIN.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/LARRY-SILVERSTEIN.jpg" height="269" style="display: inline;" width="300" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
Larry
Silverstein famously known for making a profit of over $1.1 billion on
purchasing the leases for the WTC complex in less than 6 weeks before
9/11.</div>
</div>
<br />
Then there is the damning testimony of Larry Silverstein, owner of
the WTC7, who somehow hinted at the responsibility of the New York Fire
Department, under Mayor Giuliani. Interviewed for the PBS documentary <em>America Rebuilds </em>in September 2002, Silverstein said about Tower 7:<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>“I remember getting a call from the Fire Department
commander, telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able
to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life,
maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision
to pull and we watched the building collapse.”[63]</strong><br />
<br />
This adds up to a lot of anomalies connected to the collapse of WTC7
which itself stands out as an anomaly in the false flag scheme. In the
framework or our “reversible false flag” paradigm, the suspicion arises
that these anomalies are intentional.<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>The collapse of WTC7 was kept out of the mainstream news,
because it didn’t support the Big Lie and was therefore not meant for
the general audience</strong>. But is was made sufficiently visible to
serve as the major argument of the 9/11 Truth movement’s demand to
reopen the case. In other words, it does not carry the banner of
Al-Qaeda, but instead the secondary false banner of the Inside Job. As
proof that a controlled demolition was used on 9/11, it is used to claim
that the Twin Towers must also have been destroyed by controlled
demolition, which is obviously a flawed reasoning. As proof that 9/11 is
partly “inside job”, it is used to claim that 9/11 is completely
“inside job”.<strong> The controlled demolition of WTC7 therefore
functions like a smoking gun laid intentionally on the crime scene by
the murderer, with the fingerprints of a secondary false culprit for
those who don’t buy bin Laden’s faked fingerprints</strong>. It serves
two purposes: first, it is a bait and a rallying sign for 9/11 truthers.
Secondly, it is a sword of Damocles hanging over a few heads, starting
with Giuliani’s. That is how it is used by the Zionist mainstream media,
who will cover the story at very small dose, just enough to lift a
corner of the Al-Qaeda veil, with the implicit threat to lift it all and
create a constitutional crisis and perhaps a civil war in the US.<br />
<br />
The perfect illustration is the Fox News program <em>Geraldo at Large</em>
aired on November 13, 2010. Anchorman Geraldo Rivera devoted a major
part of his program to 9/11. His guests were the father of a victim of
9/11, and a member of <em>Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth</em>,
who dispute the official version. Rivera appeared supportive of their
view. The focus was on WTC7, with images of its collapse (shown twice),
as well as of Silverstein’s famous “pull it” interview. Rivera
emphasized that WTC7 housed “Mayor Giuliani’s bunker” and made sure that
his guest expressed his suspicion of a government conspiracy.[64]<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/y85C1JkFo_c" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y85C1JkFo_c" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a><br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
This program was welcomed by 9/11 truthers around the world as a
decisive breakthrough,and it raised high hopes that other channels would
follow in the same vein.Yet four years later, nothing has changed. Why?
Before we answer this question, let’s ask another one: How come such a
program was aired by Fox News, the spearhead of Rupert Murdoch’s<em>News Corporation, </em>which,
more than any other, had served as propaganda machine for the neocons’
Iraq war, and so far had shown only contempt for 9/11 truthers. It is
unconceivable that this could have been a blunder; Rivera was not fired
or even sanctioned. We are not surprised to learn from Wikipedia that
his mother, Lillian Friedman, was of Ashkenazi Russian Jewish descent,
and that he was raised “mostly Jewish”.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Let’s recap once more: if you are credulous, you believe that the
Twin Towers collapsed because two planes crashed into them, and you
accuse bin Laden and Al-Qaeda. If you are skeptical and visit 9/11 Truth
websites (perhaps inspired by Geraldo of Fox News), then you believe
they have been destroyed by controlled demolition, and you naturally
turn against your own government, shouting “inside job!”. In both cases,
you have been fooled: the Twin Towers neither collapsed because of the
planes, nor were they destroyed by controlled demolition. Only an
unyielding determination to seek the truth, together with the
willingness to pay the price, can lead you to realize that the Twin
Towers were blown to Kingdom come by Israeli nuclear bombs.</div>
</div>
<h3>
<span style="font-size: small;">
Ghost planes</span></h3>
We are now going to tackle the second technical question dividing the
community of 9/11 truthers. And since we just mentioned Fox News, let
us begin by another program of the same network. On the 4<sup>th</sup> of March, 2001, Fox TV broadcast the first episode of the series <em>The Lone Gunmen, </em>watched
by 13 million Americans: computer hackers working for a secret cabal
within the government take remote control of a commercial jet and intend
to crash it into one of the Twin Towers, while making it appear to have
been hijacked by Islamic terrorists. The purpose of the failed
operation was to trigger a world war under the pretext of fighting
terrorism.[65]<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/TP4ro6eoHMk" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP4ro6eoHMk" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<br />
How can we interpret the amazing coincidence of this scenario with
the most common explanation among 9/11 truthers of what happened six
months later? Did an insider infiltrate Fox scenarists in order to blow
the whistle? Unlikely! Could this be some kind of psychological
“vaccine,” meant to denigrate in advance conspiracy theories? It would
be a rather risky gamble to give to millions of Americans the key to
solve 9/11, just to be able to then dismiss them under the pretext that
“they watch too much TV”. Or was it meant to condition in advance the
9/11 Truth movement toward the hypothesis of the remote controlled
planes? Because the passenger lists have proven largely fictitious, the
hypothesis that Flight AA11 and UA175 were remotely hijacked has now
given way to the hypothesis that they had been replaced by disguised
military drones, but that is a minor change: the 9/11 Truth movement is
still in its majority working within the drone hypothesis<em>.</em> But that hypothesis has its detractors.<br />
<br />
Any correctly reinformed person knows that no plane crashed on the Pentagon on September 11<sup>th</sup>
2001, nor in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. But some go further and claim
that no plane crashed on the Twin Towers either. Professor Morgan
Reynolds was one of the first to make this claim in 2005: according to
him, the aluminum planes shown to penetrate the steel towers without
resistance, like a knife in hot butter, defy physical laws and therefore
must be video artifacts.The majority of 9/11 truthersconsider this
claim ridiculous and suspect that it is meant precisely to attract
contempt on the 9/11 Truth movement. Indeed, it is with that purpose in
mind that Fox News invited Professor Reynolds in 2005. I myself have
long taken this no-plane theory as a hoax. That was before I watched Ace
Baker’s groundbreaking film <em>9/11 American Psy Opera</em>, and then looked deeper into this issue.<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>It is impossible to summarize here the arguments of the
no-plane theory, for they rely on a careful analysis of the images of
the planes crashing into the towers. One must watch and study chapters
6, 7 and 8 of Baker’s film to get an overview of the demonstration. One
will see, for example, what Baker calls “Pinocchio’s nose”: the plastic
nose of UA175 emerging intact from the steel-structured South Tower
after having entered its opposite side, in the images filmed from a
chopper by Kai Simonsen, an expert in video compositing hired by Fox.
Baker, himself expert in video compositing, convincingly demonstrates
the techniques used to add, in a few seconds, a plane into images where
only an explosion had occurred.[66]Baker has been criticized on points
of detail, but no effort has been successful at debunking the core of
his demonstration.</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/hkd4rScKR_E" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkd4rScKR_E" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>One major objection to the no-plane theory is that thousands
of witnesses had their eyes on the Twin Towers when the second one was
hit. If there had been no plane, they would have spoken out. Answering
that objection requires some deep thinking into the level of mind
control reached by television today, and the masses’ willingness to
believe what they see on television more than what they didn’t see
directly. After all, what do those few thousands direct eyewitness count
for, compared to the more than 2 billion people in the world who saw
the second plane hit the South Tower live on mondiovision? Even a few <em>sayanim </em>telling
in front of cameras that they saw the plane far outweight the very few
among the direct witnesses who stubborning insist that they didn’t see
any. Take, for example, pseudo-Mark Walsh interviewed by Fox News on the
ground, pronouncing the very terms destined to become the official
narrative: “I saw this plane come out of nowhere and just ream right
into the side of the Twin Tower exploding through to the other side, and
then I witnessed both towers collapse, the first, and then the second,
mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too
intense.”[67] How many crisis actors like him can be hired in New York?</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/azAnUSp3cLI" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azAnUSp3cLI" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>If no real planes hit the Twin Towers any more than the
Pentagon or Shanksville, a totally different paradigm for understanding
9/11 is needed. For in that case, the operation required very few
accomplices in the military, perhaps none. On the other hand, it
required a very tight control of the major news outlet. And we know
which organized community has that kind of power: the same to which
belongs Larry Silverstein, (Lewis) Paul Bremer and the rest of the New
York gang who coordinated the blowing of the Twin Towers. The reason for
the marginalization of the no-plane theory within the 9/11 Truth
movement then becomes clear.</strong><br />
<br />
If the planes are video composites, then the passenger lists are
faked, discussions on the failures of US air defenses can be counted as
diversions, and so can speculations on the military origin of the
planes, such as in Dave von Kleist and William Lewis’s film <em>In Plane Site </em>(2004).[68]
The authors focus on a “pod” visible at the bottom of the second plane,
and on a flash visible at the instant of the impact of both planes,
which they explain as a missile shot into the tower a fraction of a
second before the plane penetrates into it. This is a diversion from the
more obvious inconsistency which is to be found in the following
images, where “the aluminum airplane disappeared completely into the
steel and concrete tower without bending, breaking, twisting, or slowing
down. Not one piece of shattered airplane debris is seen of the
images”, in the words of Ace Baker.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the “military drone” hypothesis has been insinuated by
Fox News itself, through the testimony of another “Fox employee” by the
name of Mark Burnback, who declared by phone around 9:20 am that the
plane crashing into the South Tower “definitely did not look like a
commercial plane. I did not see any windows on the side. […] it was not a
normal flight that I have ever seen at an airport.”[69] So we see Fox
launching both the primary lie of the hijacked planes (Mark Walsh), and
the secondary lie of the military drone (Mark Burnback).<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/uH78TRSIb_A" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH78TRSIb_A" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<br />
The famous <em>Loose Change </em>series (first version 2005), which
did more than any other film or book to stir the 9/11 Truth movement
toward the drone hypothesis and the guilt of the US military-industrial
complex, must also be counted as part of the 9/11 controlled opposition.
One of the smartest ideas of its three Jewish producers (Dylan Avery,
Corey Rowe, and Jason Bermas) was to draw a parallel between 9/11 and
Operation Northwoods, in the very opening sequence of their film.
Operation Northwoods was a false flag operation designed to create a <em>casus belli</em>
against Cuba. It was presented to Kennedy’s Defense Secretary Robert
McNamara in March 1962, and rejected. The project consisted in a wave of
terrorist acts falsely attributed to Cuba, culminating in the explosion
of a plane allegedly carrying vacationing American students over Cuban
waters. The explosion would have been preceded by distress radio
communications indicating an attack by a Cuban fighter. The actual
passengers would be secretly transferred to another plane, and a state
funeral would be held in their remembrance.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/kBJFNDtIrG4" height="395" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBJFNDtIrG4" title="YouTube">YouTube - Veterans News Now -</a>
</div>
<br />
The Top-Secret memo detailing Operation Northwoods was revealed to
the public by James Bamford in May 2001 in his book on the NSA, <em>Body of Secrets</em>[70]<em>.</em> It
proves that, already in 1962, the National Security State was capable
of such turpitude as 9/11. Or does it? The timeliness of the Northwoods
revelation four months before 9/11, and its immediate coverage by <em>ABC News</em>,
actually raise suspicion. Random House informs us that, to write his
book, Bamford — an ex-Navy employee who turned journalism after
Watergate, just like Bob Woodward — was granted “unprecedented access to
Crypto City (the NSA campus in Ft. Meade, MD), senior NSA officials,
and thousands of NSA documents,” by none other than NSA director Michael
Hayden.[71] In other words, Hayden provided Bamford with all his
sources. Since Bamford doesn’t tell us where he found the Northwoods
memo, we must assume he got it from Hayden too.[72] But that memo is
supposed to be the only remaining copy, found in the personal papers of
Lemnitzer. How did Hayden get it? A better question, perhaps, is: Who is
Michael Hayden? After moving to the CIA, he retired as a principal at
the Chertoff Group, the security consultancy founded by former Secretary
for Homeland Security Michael Chertoff (son of a rabbi and a Mossad
pioneer). Since he was so generous in 2001 with Bamford with classified
material, it is surprising to learn (from Wikipedia) that in 2013 he was
a fervent advocate of imprisoning journalists who leaked classified
material.<br />
<br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_509761" style="width: 550px;">
<img alt="former Secretary for Homeland Security Michael Chertoff" class="lazy wp-image-509761 data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Michael-Chertoff-VNN-640x244.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Michael-Chertoff-VNN-640x244.jpg" height="152" style="display: inline;" width="400" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
former Secretary for Homeland Security Michael Chertoff</div>
</div>
<br />
There is a good chance that the Northwoods revelation just before
9/11 was calculated to predispose truth seekers toward the hypothesis of
a US rather than Israeli false flag operation, just like the <em>Lone Gunmen </em>episode on Fox TV. Bermas and Avery’s heavy use of it in <em>Loose Change </em>made a major impact (by contrast, they make no mention of the <em>USS Liberty </em>incident,
which, unlike Northwoods, really happened). There is even a reasonable
chance that the document is a forgery, as Carol Valentine has suggested
by pointing out a few anachronistic British colloquialisms.[73] After
all, the National Security Archive team of scholars and activists had
never heard of Operation Northwoods until Bamford or Hayden provided
them with a copy. And, when asked about it by David Talbot, Robert
McNamara, the supposed recipient of this outrageous memo, declared: “I
have absolutely zero recollection of it.”[74]<br />
<br />
Let’s recap again: if you are credulous, you believe that commercial
jets hijacked by Al-Qaeda crashed into the Twin Towers. If you are
skeptical, you watch closely <em>In Plane Site</em> and you now see
military airplanes with a suspicious pod. You then shout “Inside Job!”
In both cases, you have been fooled. The truth is elsewhere, hidden
under those two false banners. To find it, you will have to delve into
the unfathomable mystery of psy-ops and the manipulation of the masses.<br />
<br />
<b>IV – Conclusion </b><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></strong>
<strong><span style="font-size: small;">In this article, we have made several assertions. Some are
solidly grounded, while others can be taken as a working hypothesis,
which still needs to be discussed.</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></strong>
<strong><span style="font-size: small;">What I hold as certain is the existence of a “controlled
opposition” to the official 9/11 story, operating on two levels: at the
soft level, we have “alternative” media which accept the core bin Laden
myth but confront the US government on the side with the accusation of
covering up part of the truth, and “using 9/11 as an excuse for war”, in
Howard Zinn’s terms; at the “hard” level, we have the dominant trend in
the 9/11 Truth movement which considers 9/11 as an “inside job”. Lies
and manipulations are found in both camps, which are sometimes so close
as to overlap. Our investigation therefore resembles a well-made
thriller in which neither the first suspect, nor the second, is the
culprit.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>The concept of the “reversible false banner” stems directly
from our empirical conclusion that the 9/11 Truth movement is largely a
controlled opposition:</strong> it simply assumes that the “inside job”
trail was built into the plot from the start, in order to lead the 9/11
Truth movement to suspect the US rather than Israel. It provides a
viewpoint from which the interrelated roles of the different levels of
disinformation (the official story and the inside job theory) can be
understood. It is just a concept, but it might be one of the concepts
that the plotters worked from.<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>The notion of a “hijacked plot” is more speculative, and will remain so until a proper criminal investigation is opened.</strong>
It goes beyond the model of “double false banner” by providing a
plausible explanation of how the secondary “inside job” banner has been
built into the plot, and how Israel uses it to keep the American
government hostage. The way Israel has managed in the last decades to
gain almost total control of American foreign and military policy is
truly amazing; obviously, 9/11 is one of the leaches by which Israel now
leads America where it wishes, and the “hijacked plot” is an attempt to
understand how it works. Although it is conjectural, the idea that
Israel hijacked a secret operation is consistent with other observations
of how the Machiavellian Zionists manipulate events, government policy,
and public opinion.<br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>After researching the Kennedy assassination for some years, I
have come to the conclusion that the pattern of the “hijacked plot” can
solve many of its mysteries, while the “reversible false flag” model
can explain many puzzling oddities of JFK research. Gary Wean, a
detective sergeant for the Los Angeles Police Department, has laid the
foundation for such a new paradigm in JFKology, in his book <em>There’s a Fish in the Courthouse </em>(1987),
ignored by all JFK researchers but Michael Collins Piper.Relying on a
well-informed source in Dallas (identified as Republican Senator John
Tower in a 1996 second edition), Weanargues that the Dallas coup was “a
double-cross of fantastic dimensions”, in which a failed assassination
attempt staged by the CIA had been hijacked by what he refers to as the
Mishpucka (<em>the Family, </em>in Hebrew), the Russian Jewish Mafia, whose evil power reaching into the highest spheres Wean had been investigating for years.</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>I will follow this trail and expound a full-blown theory of
the JFK hijacked plot in a follow-up article. But here it is in a
nutshell:</strong><br />
<blockquote>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" id="attachment_509769" style="width: 230px;">
<img alt="Former President Lyndon Johnson" class="lazy wp-image-509769 size-full data-lazy-ready" data-lazy-src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Lyndon_Johnson_3x4.jpg" data-lazy-type="image" src="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Lyndon_Johnson_3x4.jpg" height="293" style="display: inline;" width="220" /><br />
<div class="wp-caption-text">
Former President Lyndon Johnson </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<strong>The CIA and their sponsored Cuban exiles had schemed a false
flag assassination attempt intended to spare Kennedy’s life but force
him to retaliate against Castro. Israel, on the other hand, wanted
Kennedy dead. So did Lyndon Johnson, who had been forced on Kennedy’s
ticket by Israel.[75]Together, the Jewish mafia and Johnson’s men in
Dallas turned the CIA operation into a successful assassination. Seconds
after the CIA sniper missed on purpose from the School Book Depository,
the Johnson-Zion killers (from Murder Incorporated?) blew Kennedy’s
brain from the grassy knoll.</strong> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<strong> </strong><br />
<strong>Jacob Rubenstein (<a href="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2014/08/31/the-911-triple-cross/The%20Zionist%20Criminal%20Network%20Behind%20the%20Cover-Ups">aka Jack Ruby</a>),
a Johnson operative[76] finished up the job two days later, mistakenly
believing he would be pardonned by Johnson. He would die in prison in
1967, after calling Johnson “a Nazi in the worst order”[77] and telling
both his lawyer and his rabbi having killed Oswald “for the Jews.”<sup><sup>[78]</sup></sup>
Once in power, Johnson was able to blackmail the CIA into renouncing
their pro-Castro conspiracy hoax, and go for the lone nut theory (he
would calm the Military-Intelligence’s frustration by offering them
Vietnam instead of Cuba). Arlen Specter, “an unswerving defender of the
Jewish State,”[79] would have no difficulty selling his “magic bullet”
to the compliant media, while Mark Lane (born Levin) steered the JFK
Truth movement on the CIA’s trail with a groundbreaking article a mere
four weeks after the assassination. And for 5 years, Johnson would do so
much for Israel, especially with his support for their 1967 aggression
and expansion (despite the <em>USS Liberty</em> fiasco), that <em>The </em><em>5 Towns Jewish Times, </em>delving into his ancestry, would conclude: “There is little doubt that he was Jewish.”[80]</strong></blockquote>
<hr />
<h3 style="padding-left: 30px;">
Notes</h3>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[1] <em>New York Times, </em>September 12, 2001: www.nytimes.com/2001/09/12/us/day-terror-israelis-spilled-blood-seen-bond-that-draws-2-nations-closer.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[2]“Saudi Arabia: Friend or Foe?” <em>The Daily Beast, </em>July 11, 2011: www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/11/saudi-arabia-fried-or-foe-asks-senator-bob-graham.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[3]“Saudi Arabia: Friend or Foe?”, <em>op. cit.</em></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[4] Quoted by Justin Raimondo, <em>The Terror Enigma: 9/11 and the Israeli Connection</em>, iUniversal, 2003<em>, </em>p. 64.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[5] To be precise, a similar attempt to
implicate Pakistan, another US ally, can be documented, especially by
the “revelation” that <em>“$100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohamed
Atta from Pakistan by [ISI agent] Ahmed Omar Said Sheikh at the instance
of [ISI director] General Mahmud”, </em>leading to Mahmud’s eviction(<em>The Times of India,</em> October 9, 2001, 911review.org/Sept11Wiki/Ahmad,GeneralMahmud.shtml</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[6] “The Saudi Connection: Osama bin Laden’s a lot closer to the Saudi royal family than you think”, <em>The Weekly Standard, </em>October 29, 2001, www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/000/393rwyib.asp</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[7] Thomas E. Ricks, “Briefing Depicted Saudis as Enemies Ultimatum Urged To Pentagon Board”, <em>The Washington Post, </em>August 6, 2002.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[8]Stephen Sniegoski, <em>The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel, </em>Enigma Edition, 2008, p. 204.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[9] Russ Baker, <em>F</em><em>amily of Secrets: </em><em>The Bush Dynasty, America’s Invisible Government, and the Hidden History of the Last Fifty Years,</em>Bloomsbury Press,2009, p. 280-98.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[10] Bandar bin Sultan took the head of the Saudi secret services in 2012, before resigning in 2014.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[11] See also Éric Laurent, <em>La Face cachée du 11 Septembre, </em>Plon, 2004, p. 119-22.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[12] Listen to Howard Zinn on <em>The Real News: </em>www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElSJTXHELd8invstigating</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[13] www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal.htm</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[14] Watch on YouTube, “Bush Before a Joint Session of Congress (September 11, 1990)”, www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iUX3yP9M8g</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[15] Read the first chapter of Hongbing Song’s classic book <em>Currency War</em>.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[16] For an insider’s view of this deal, read Benjamin Freedman on rense.com/general34/amaz.htm</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[17] www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-anatomy-of-a-great-deception.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[18]Sniegoski, <em>The Transparent Cabal, op. cit., </em>p. 333.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[19]Alan Greenspan, <em>The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World, </em>Penguin Press<em>, </em>2007.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[20]James Petras, <em>Zionism, Militarism and the Decline of US Power,</em> Clarity Press, 2008, p. 18.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[21]In <em>Oil, Smoke and Mirrors, </em>documentary by Ronan Doyle, 2007.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[22]Alison Weir, <em>Against Our Better Judgment: The hidden history of how the U.S. was used to create Israel, </em>2014, kindle pos. 3280-94</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[23] Kevin MacDonald, <em>Separation and Its Discontent: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism, </em>Praeger, 1998,kindle format, 2013, pos. 4675-86.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[24]Benjamin Ginsberg, “Dilemmas of Jewish Leadership in America”, in L. Sandy Maisel, ed. <em>Jews in American Politics: Essays, </em>Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, p. 2-27, (p. 22).</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[25] Charles Silberman, <em>A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today, </em>New York Summit Books, 1985, p. 184, quoted in Kevin MacDonald, <em>Separation and Its Discontents: Toward and Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism</em>, 2013, kindle pos. 6343-50.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[26] Max Blumenthal, <em>Goliath</em>, Nation Books, 2013, p. 28-31.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[27] Benjamin Balint, <em>Running Commentary: the Contentious Magazine That Transformed the Jewish Left into the Neoconservative Right, </em>Public Affairs, 2010.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[28]<em>Congress Bi-Weekly, </em>quoted by Philip Weiss on <em>Mondoweiss.net, </em>May 23, 2007: mondoweiss.net/2007/05/30_years_ago_ne.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[29]<em>Breaking Ranks, </em>1979, quoted by Philip Weiss on <em>Mondoweiss.net, </em>April 24, 2007: mondoweiss.net/2007/04/norman_podhoret.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[30] The full text ison the IASPS website: www.iasps.org/strat1.htm</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[31]Webster Tarpley, <em>9/11 Synthetic Terror Made in USA</em>, Progressive Press, 2008.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[32]Tarpley, <em>9/11 Synthetic Terror, op. cit.,</em> p. 324</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[33] Bernard Lewis, <em>What Went Wrong? The Clash between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East, </em>Harper Perennial, 2003.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[34]Andrew Cockburn, <em>Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy, </em>Scribner, 2011, p. 219.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[35]Alexander Cockburn, ed., <em>The Politics of Anti-Semitism, </em>AK Press, 2003, p. 104.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[36]Avinoam Bar-Yosef, “The Jews Who Run Clinton’s Court”, <em>Maariv</em>, September 2, 1994, translated by Israel Shahak in <em>Open Secrets: Israeli nuclear and foreign policies</em>, Pluto Press, 1997.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[37]Christopher Bollyn, <em>Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, </em>2012, p. 71.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[38]Robert Strausz-Hupé, “The Balance of Tomorrow”, <em>Orbis, </em>1957, quoted in Meyssan, <em>L’Effroyable imposture II,</em> <em>op. cit., </em>p. 217-8.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[39] The “Jerusalem Declaration” is on the Jerusalem Summit’s official website: www.jerusalemsummit.org/eng/declaration.php</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[40] Read Lou Dubose and Jake Bernstein, <em>Vice: Dick Cheney and the Hijacking of the American Presidency</em>, Random House, 2006.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[41] On the plotters’ control of president Bush, read Tarpley, <em>9/11 Synthetic Terror, op. cit., </em>p. 272-301.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[42] Sniegoski, <em>Transparent Cabal, op. cit., </em>p. 324.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[43] Quoted by Jonathan Cook, <em>Israel and the Clash of Civilizations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East, </em>Pluto Press, 2008, p. 33.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[44]<strong>In the words of the <em>Washington Post</em>:
“Bryan C. Jack was responsible for crunching America’s defense budget.
He was a passenger on American Airlines Flight 77, bound for official
business in California when his plane struck the Pentagon, where, on any
other day, Jack would have been at work at his computer” (</strong>“Remembering: The Pentagon Victims”: www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/specials/attacked/victims/v_235.html).</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[45] 911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/asbestos.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[46]www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2pW6WZhZrQ</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[47] www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=909236, p. 20.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[48]www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2pW6WZhZrQ</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[49] Read on CNN.com, “Audit: US lost
track of $9 billion in Iraq funds”, January 31, 2005,
edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/01/30/iraq.audit/</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[50] “FEMA’s Investigation”, <em>9-11 Research</em>, 911research: 911research.wtc7.net/wtc/official/fema.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[51] See on YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zHHvo6U4lA</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[52] See for example: gcn.com/articles/2002/09/09/handheld-app-eased-recovery-tasks.aspx</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[53] See the photos published by the online journal <em>9-11 Research</em>, “Twin Towers’s Dust Clouds”, 911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/dust.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[54] Read Jeff Prager, <em>9/11 America Nuked, </em>freely
downloadable on:
911scholars.ning.com/profiles/blogs/jeff-prager-9-11-america-nuked-free-downloadable-ebook.
Read also on Veterans Today the article by Don Fox, Jeff Prager and Ed
Ward, “Mystery Solved: The WTC was Nuked on 9/11”:
www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/01/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[55] See Jim Fetzer on YouTube, “Midwest
9/11 Truth Conference Part 2”:
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZAEvw2CjAYQ#t=2611,
and his article with Don Fox’s article, “2 + 2 = Israel nuked the WTC on
9/11”:
www.veteranstoday.com/2013/08/28/2-2-israel-nuked-the-wtc-on-911/</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[56] Joe Vialls, “Bali Micro Nuke – Lack
of Radiation Confuses
‘Experts’”: web.archive.org/web/20030210220533/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/nuke/bali_micro_nuke.htm</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[57]911review.com/errors/wtc/forbes.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[58] See his article co-authored by Don
Fox, “2 + 2 = Israel nuked the WTC on 9/11”:
www.veteranstoday.com/2013/08/28/2-2-israel-nuked-the-wtc-on-911/</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[59] Judy Woods, <em>Where Did the Towers Go ? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11, </em>The New Investigation, 2010.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[60] For a harsh critic of Wood as a
“gatekeeper” of 9/11, see:
donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/dr-judy-wood-911-gatekeeper-extraordinaire/</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[61] Visit the blog dedicated to
Jennings, who died in 2008 of undisclosed causes, two days before the
release of the NIST report on Tower 7 : barryjenningsmystery.blogspot.fr</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[62]YouTube, “BBC Reports Collapse of WTC
Building 7 Early”: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI. Porter’s
comments is on
www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[63] David Ray Griffin, <em>9/11 Contradictions, </em>Arris Books, 2008<em>,</em> p. 263. YouTube, “Larry Silverstein admits WTC7 was pulled down on 9/11”: www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5DMjnbmhXo</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[64] www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ryb7UOkouVA</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[65] See on YouTube, www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP4ro6eoHMk</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[66] See on: www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEA05F393EC843D80.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[67]YouTube, “Fox News – Rick Leventhal interviews 9/11 WTC witness, Mark Walsh”: www.youtube.com/watch?v=07hJhmiWZSY</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[68] See the critical review on
911research.wtc7.net/essays/baker1.html. Check critical reviews of other
films on: 911review.com/articles/ashley/pentacon_con.html and
911review.com/reviews/911eyewitness/</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[69] www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH78TRSIb_A</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[70]James Bamford, <em>Body of Secrets: How America’s NSA and Britain’s GCHQ Eavesdrop on the World, </em>Century, 2001, p. 84-90.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[71] Bamford’s profile on Random House’s website: www.randomhouse.com/features/bamford/author.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[72]Seamus Coogan, “Who is James Bamford and what was he doing with ARRB?”, août 2010, sur le site de <em>Citizens for Truth about the Kennedy Assassination</em> : www.ctka.net/2010/OpNorthwoods.html. Lire aussi Jim DiEugenio sur l’éditeur de Bamford : www.ctka.net/posner_jd4.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[73] Carol Valentine on: www.public-action.com/911/northwds.html</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[74]David Talbot, <em>Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years</em>, Simon & Schuster, 2007, p. 107.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[75] Alan Hart, <em>Zionism, the Real Enemy of the Jews, </em>vol. 2: <em>David Becomes Goliath, </em>Clarity Press, 2009<em>, </em>p. 250-257.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[76]dailycaller.com/2014/03/14/why-jack-ruby-was-probably-part-of-the-kennedy-conspiracy/#ixzz2ywPjg9zr</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[77]Phillip Nelson, <em>LBJ: The Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination,</em> XLibris, 2010, p. 604-607.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[78]William Kunstler, <em>My Life as a Radical Lawyer</em>, Carol Publishing, 1994, p. 158; Steve North, “Lee Harvey Oswald’s Killer ‘Jack Ruby’ Came From Strong Jewish Background”, <em>The Jewish Daily Forward</em>, November 17, 2013, http://forward.com/articles/187793/lee-harvey-oswalds-killer-jack-ruby-came-from-stro/?p=all#ixzz2oUwQ6vpx</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[79] www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/prominent-jewish-american-politician-arlen-specter-dies-at-82-1.469977</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
[80]Morris Smith, “Our First Jewish President Lyndon Johnson? – an update!!”, <em>5 Towns Jewish Times, </em>April 11, 2013: 5tjt.com/our-first-jewish-president-lyndon-johnson-an-update/<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2014/08/31/the-911-triple-cross/"><b>SOURCE</b></a>--"</div>
Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-74496482585653778602014-09-04T12:23:00.002-07:002014-09-04T12:23:26.037-07:00Ding-Dong! The Witch is DeadI normally wouldn't feel that way about a <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/2014/09/04/comedian-joan-rivers-dies/7QS6RyKkW8B7Q5R6eizHHK/story.html">person</a> (for lack of a better word); however, <a href="http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/joan-rivers-shocking-rant-palestinian-civilians-deserve-to-be-dead/story-fnk822dn-1227018142731">she said</a> some wicked things that were not funny at all, and one cannot help but think that great God Karma in the sky took note.Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-48038331395832345632014-08-07T06:35:00.002-07:002014-08-07T06:35:20.567-07:00At the Zenith of His Powers"The force of evil is at its zenith. It cannot remain there. Having reached the height of the expression of its powers, it is passing into decline.<br />
<br />
*****************<br />
<br />
As I like to say, 'believe what you like'. The truth is the truth regardless of the collective belief of all the worlds inhabitants. A simple and correct definition of the truth might be, 'without artifice'. This means that embellishments of any sort in, respect of anything, are a departure from the truth, no matter to what it applies, be that relative or absolute. You might ask how something with no truth in it that gets embellished could be a departure from the truth. Everything possesses essential nature and that is what is most true of it and moving away from that... is the less true. The important thing is that the truth is absolutely unaffected by any actions directed at it except within the minds of those seduced into believing what is not true.<br />
<br />
*****************<br />
<br />
I, like you, must consider myself lucky when misfortune calls. Our distresses may come and go but there is an end in sight and we are more and more purified by our suffering as we go. If we do not cease in the pursuit of our noble objective, the impetus to continue will not desert us and though we may, at times, be swirling in confusion and though pain may be in constant residence, we make it through; stronger and lighter. It ain't easy but in the end, upon reflection, it turns out that every alternative, no matter its appearance at first...<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.smoking-mirrors.com/2014/08/they-came-and-then-they-were-gone.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>I'm glad he's back.</b>Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-24637287764185291892014-08-04T06:34:00.003-07:002014-08-04T06:34:41.775-07:00War With Russia Will Be Nuclear"If Nuclear War Doesn’t Exterminate Us Ebola Virus Might<br />
<br />
08/02/14<br />
<div class="post-text">
<div class="bText">
<a href="http://www.a-w-i-p.com/index.php?s=Paul+Craig+Roberts&sentence=sentence&in_blogs=6">Paul Craig Roberts</a><br />
<div class="floatright">
<br /></div>
<strong>Obama’s White House Press Conference</strong><br />
<br />
I just heard on National Public Radio two things that have totally
destroyed what tiny bit of belief I still had in American leadership. I
have concluded that the term “intelligent American” is an oxymoron.<br />
<br />
American elites have decided that Americans are not sufficiently
threatened by war and economic chaos, so they are bringing the ebola
virus to America. National Public Radio reported that two people
infected with the ebola virus, which cannot be cured and is usually
deadly, are being brought to Emory University Hospital in Atlanta,
Georgia.<br />
<br />
Allegedly the ebola carriers will be quarantined in special rooms. But we already know that American hospitals <a href="http://rt.com/usa/177408-nightmare-bacteria-antibiotic-southeast/">cannot even contain staph infections</a>.
What happens to the utensils, plates, cups, and glasses with which the
ebola infected persons eat and drink? And who gets to clean the bed
pans? One slip-up by one person, one tear in a rubber glove, and the
virus is loose. All it takes is one cough, one sneeze, one drop of
saliva, and the virus is loose in one of the main transportation centers
of the US.<br />
<br />Pandemic anyone? Little doubt but that most of the world would emit a great sigh of relief to be rid of Washington.<br />
<br />
If we don’t die from ebola, we still have to dodge nuclear war. I heard part of Obama’s press conference. Obama accused Putin of doing everything that only Obama is doing.<br />
<br />
If Obama believes what he told the press, he is utterly disinformed by his advisors. If he doesn’t believe the crude propaganda that he speaks, he is consciously leading the drive to war with Russia which probably means war with China as well and the end of us all.<br />
<br />
Keep in mind that after eight years the US military was unable to successfully occupy Iraq and that after 13 years the US is unable to defeat a few thousand lightly armed Taliban in Afghanistan. Russia and China are not Iraq, Libya, or Afghanistan.<br />
<br />
War with Russia will be nuclear. Washington has prepared for it. Washington has abandoned the ABM treaty, created what it thinks is an ABM shield, and changed its war doctrine to permit US nuclear first strike. All of this is obviously directed at Russia, and the Russian government knows it. How long will Russia sit there waiting for Washington’s first strike?<br />
<br />
Russia hasn’t done anything except get in the way, belatedly, of Washington’s lies that Washington uses to start wars. Russia (and China) went along with Washington’s lies about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Russia (and China) went along with Washington’s lies that Washington’s 13-year attempted conquest and occupation of Afghanistan had to do with finding Osama bin Laden. Washington (and China) fell for Washington’s deception that a UN resolution establishing a no-fly zone over Libya was for the purpose of preventing Gaddafi’s air force from bombing his own people, only to discover that Washington misused the resolution to send the NATO air force to overthrow the Libyan government.<br />
<br />
When Washington drew a “red line” in the sand with regard to the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons against the outside forces that Washington had organized and sent into Syria to overthrow the government, all the while pretending that these Islamists mercenaries were the true spokesmen for democracy in Syria, most of the world knew that Washington was about to organize a chemical attack and blame Assad. When the Washington orchestrated attack happened on schedule, this time Russia and China did not fall for it. And neither did the British Parliament. Washington was unable to produce any evidence for the charges that Washington made and hoped would bring in at least the British to support Washington’s military assault on Syria. Russia, however, was able to produce evidence, and the evidence foiled Washington’s plot against Syria.<br />
<br />
Russia’s intervention angered Washington, as did Russia’s intervention that blocked Washington’s plot to attack Iran. Washington, devoid of all evidence and in contradiction to the reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency from inspectors on the ground in Iran that there was no diversion of uranium from the legal energy program to a weapons program, had Iran set up for attack. Iran was surrounded by about 40 US military bases and two of Washington’s fleets off its coast.<br />
<br />
But in stepped Russia and worked out a deal, which Washington had to accept, that kept Iranian uranium enrichment at the low level used for energy, a level far below weapons requirements.<br />
<br />
Two black marks agains Russia whose government prevented wars that Washington wanted. Russia (and China) were supposed to endorse Washington’s lies like the puppet states of Europe, Canada, Australia, and Japan, countries that long ago gave up their sovereignty to Washington.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately for Russia, Russia demonstrated that Russia had achieved sufficient power and influence to block Washington’s war plans and, thereby, brought into action against Russia the Wolfowitz Doctrine. I have cited this doctrine in recent columns, but you can google it and read it for yourself. The doctrine is the basis for Washington’s foreign policy and declares that the principle goal of Washington’s foreign policy is to prevent the rise of any country that could serve as a check on Washington’s hegemony over the world. (The doctrine explicitly mentions Russia but also applies to China.)<br />
<br />
Washington is disturbed that Russia has twice foiled Washington’s war intentions and that the Parliament of the US Puppet State of Great Britain voted with the Russians. Washington is also concerned with the growing economic and political relations between Washington’s EU puppet states and Russia. EU countries, especially Germany, have numerous and profitable economic connections with Russia, and all of Europe is dependent on Russian supplied energy.<br />
<br />
Washington concluded that Washington was in danger of losing its control over Europe. While the Russian government was asleep at the switch enjoying the Olympics, Washington pulled off its coup in Kiev.<br />
<br />
Neoconservative Victoria Nuland, appointed by Obama as Assistant Secretary of State, announced at a press conference last December that Washington had spent $5 billion purchasing fifth column Ukrainian NGOs that can be put into street demonstrations to destabilize a government and on grooming and purchasing Ukrainian politicians who will serve as Washington’s stooges. Nuland, of course, described Washington’s purchase of Ukraine as “furthering democracy” in Ukraine.<br />
<br />
Washington’s coup against a democratically elected government brought to power extreme elements that proclaimed their hatred of Jews and Russians. These elements destroyed Russian war memorials erected to remember Russia’s liberation of Ukraine from the Third Reich, passed legislation outlawing Russian as an official language, and engaged in violent physical attacks on the Russian speaking population.<br />
<br />
Ukraine has always been an area of changing borders. As some have put it, “Ukraine is a country in search of borders.” When Ukraine was a Soviet province, Soviet leaders attached, for various reasons, traditional Russian provinces to the Ukraine Socialist Soviet Republic. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, pressure from Washington on a weak Russia resulted in the separation of Ukraine from Russia and this included Crimea, a part of Russia since the 1700s and Russia’s warm water port.<br />
<br />
The Russian populations in the former Russian territories that Soviet leaders foolishly attached to Ukraine were alarmed by the extreme Russophobia of the government that Washington established in Kiev. The former Russian territories voted to rejoin their mother country and to depart the Russophobic US puppet state established in Kiev.<br />
<br />
The Russian government accepted the request from Crimea, but not the requests from the other former Russian provinces in order to demonstrate to Europe that Russia was not provocative and not the source of the crisis. Putin even had the Russian Duma rescind his power to intervene militarily in Ukraine in order to protect the secessionist provinces.<br />
<br />
This restraint hurt rather than helped the Russian government’s position. Washington used its propaganda machine to label self-determination by Crimeans as “invasion and annexation by Russia of Crimea.”<br />
<br />
Russia’s restraint with regard to requests to rejoin Russia from the other former Russian provinces resulted in a Washington encouraged military attack by its puppet government in Kiev against the separatist provinces that Russia refused to accept. Washington’s propaganda then succeeded in blaming Russia for the war that Washington launched on the separatist provinces.<br />
<br />
Washington is not interested in the truth, and Russia cannot win a propaganda war with Washington which controls the world language, which is English, the language of Washington’s propaganda. The Western media consists of idiots who are enabling Washington’s drive toward war and the extermination of life on earth.<br />
<br />
If the Russian government had accepted the separatist provinces request, there would be no war. The Ukrainian government is demented and controlled by Washington, but it is not going to attack territories acknowledged by Russia as its territory.<br />
<br />
By showing restraint, Russia has convinced Washington that Russia is weak, and Washington has increased the pressure. Russia has convinced Europe that there is no cost from Russia to Europe’s complying with Washington’s sanctions. By relying on good will, reasonableness, truth and evidence, Russia has misread Washington and its craven European puppets.<br />
<br />
What Obama meant in his White House Press Conference today (August 1) when he said that Putin should use diplomacy–which Putin has been using to no effect–is that Putin should hand Crimea, over the objection of Crimeans and the Russian people, to Washington’s puppet government in Kiev so that Washington can evict Russia from its warm weather port and access to the Mediterranean Sea, thus making redundant Russia’s naval base at Tartus, Syria. Obama also wants Putin to send into the separatist areas of Ukraine, areas that traditionally were part of Russia, Russian military forces to subdue the breakaway territories for Washington’s puppet government in Kiev.<br />
<br />
This is Washington’s “diplomatic” position. Only a totally demented person could regard Obama’s position as realistic.<br />
<br />
As a person who is considered fair-minded by world media and who arrives at reasonable conclusions independently of Washington’s propaganda, I am often interviewed by foreign as well as US independent media organizations. As of late, the Russian media has turned to me on a number of occasions. What I have learned is that the Russian media is perplexed by Washington’s hostility to Russia.<br />
<br />
Russia is not operating in the old Confederate South trying to turn the American South against Washington for Washington’s rapine, murder, and destruction of the Southern culture, but Washington is operating in the Russian South trying to turn Ukraine, long a part of Russia, against Russia.<br />
<br />
As Russians, except perhaps for the government, are unaware of the Wolfowitz Doctrine, they do not know that the main goal of Washington is to prevent the rise of all other powers that could limit Washington’s role as sole Unipower, Hegemon over Earth.<br />
<br />
Instead of realizing the real threat, Russian media organizations ask me if the Russian budget can stand responding to sanctions from Washington and the EU by cutting off the energy supply to Europe.<br />
<br />
Each time I hear this question I am astonished. Russia can shut down much of European industry and deprive the Europeans of heat in winter, and Russian media ask me if Russia can afford it?<br />
<br />
Can Russia afford to be demonized by lies, to be driven into the ground by propagandistic sanctions that will hurt Europe and some US corporations, to convey the image that Russia is so weak as to be helpless in the face of Western sanctions as to accept the sanctions without demonstrating the cost to Europe and the US? Does Washington even have Russians brainwashed?<br />
<br />
I am concerned about the crisis that Washington has orchestrated, because I believe it is leading to war, which will be nuclear. Are you ready to be destroyed over Washington’s lies about one Malaysian airliner? I am convinced that Washington is behind the destruction of MH-17, because Washington’s propaganda show was already ready and was instantly in performance. That Washington is responsible is the reason that Washington will not release its satellite photos of the area during the moment of the airliner’s destruction. That Washington is responsible is the reason that Washington replies to Russian hard evidence with lies and propaganda. It is Obama and Obama’s stooges in Kiev that refuse to negotiate, not Russia.<br />
<br />
Russia has as many nuclear warheads as Washington, and Washington’s “ABM shield” is a farce. If the insane American government drives a crisis, which Washington alone created, to war, we will all die, and for what? The answer is: for a Washington LIE. Do you want to die for a lie? Another Washington lie? If you don’t, you had better let Washington know.<br />
<br />
Russia cannot end this crisis unless it puts its foot down. I have previously made the case that Russia should take its case to the UN. Alternatively, the Russian government needs to engage Europe in two questions. One is does Europe want its energy supplies from Russia cut off, energy that Washington, despite its lies, cannot replace for 3 or more years if at all.. The other is does Europe want war with Russia and does Europe think that those idiotic countries that host Washington’s missiles won’t be nuked and exterminated?<br />
<br />
The crisis in Ukraine will continue to Russia’s and all of humanity’s cost until Russia explains to the stupid, arrogant, hubris-filled West that the West’s criminal and aggressive actions against Russia bear a real cost, and that Russia is prepared to impose the cost.<br />
<br />
The propagandized people in the West have no idea of the fate toward which their demented governments are driving them. Russia needs to make it clear to the brainwashed propagandized peoples in the West that Russia is not going to be a puppet state of the West or to accept gratuitous aggression from the White House Fool.<br />
<br />
It would help to save life on Earth if China also made this clear. The sooner the better.<br />
<br />
Unless the world reins in the demented criminals in Washington, the world has signed its own death warrant.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.a-w-i-p.com/index.php/2014/08/02/if-nuclear-war-doesn-t"><b>MORE</b></a>--"</div>
</div>
Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-28278633462432590412014-08-02T13:28:00.002-07:002014-08-02T13:29:32.117-07:00Israel Celebrates Saddam HusseinIt was on this day in 1990 that he ordered the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Israel thought they would honor it with the genocide of Gaza in 2014 -- if it stands.Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-89768431434510412102014-07-18T02:11:00.001-07:002014-07-18T02:11:03.326-07:00Is Obama Insane?"14 Reasons Obama Is Lying When He Claims The World Is ‘More Stable’ And ‘Less Violent’ Than Ever" July 17th, 2014<br />
<br />
By <a href="http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/14-reasons-obama-is-lying-when-he-claims-the-world-is-more-stable-and-less-violent-than-ever">Michael Snyder</a><br />
<br />
With a straight face, Barack Obama has been repeatedly telling us
that the world is "more stable" and "less violent" than ever. In fact,
he believes that this is the best time in history to be alive because of
how peaceful and stable everything is. And of course Obama is more
than happy to take credit for his role in bringing all of this
"stability" about. Just this week, his press secretary told the media
that this administration has "substantially improved" the "tranquility
of the global community". Apparently these guys don't think that we
will notice all of the violence, war and terrorism constantly raging all
around us. It would be wonderful if the planet actually was becoming a
more peaceful place, but instead the exact opposite is happening. The
world is becoming increasingly unstable, and if we aren't really careful
we could see World War III break out before too long. But if you listen
to Obama, he makes it sound like we are living in an emerging global
utopia. The following is an excerpt from remarks that he made during a
White House event in June...<br />
<blockquote>
[T]he truth of the matter is that for all the challenges
we face, all the problems that we have, if you had to be — if you had to
choose any moment to be born in human history, not knowing what your
position was going to be, who you were going to be, you’d choose this
time. <strong>The world is less violent than it has ever been</strong>.
It is healthier than it has ever been. It is more tolerant than it has
ever been. It is better fed then it’s ever been. It is more educated
than it’s ever been.</blockquote>
<br />
You can watch <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyyDEFbDdzM" target="_blank" title="video">video</a> of him making those remarks below...<br />
<br />
And as I mentioned above, a similar statement was made by White House press secretary Josh Earnest <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/wh-weve-substantially-improved-tranquility-global-community" target="_blank" title="on Monday">on Monday</a>...<br />
<blockquote>
"I think that there have been a number of situations in
which you’ve seen this administration intervene in a meaningful way,
that has substantially furthered American interests and substantially
improved the, uh, you know, the – the tranquility of the global
community."</blockquote>
<br />
In addition, posted below is <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xkMEir_jrE" target="_blank" title="video">video</a>
of Obama declaring that the world is "more stable" than it was five
years previously during a speech to the United Nations last year...<br />
<br />
It would be great if all of this stuff was actually true. But I
think that at this point not even Obama believes half the things that
are coming out of his mouth. He has told <a href="http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/in-his-own-words-shocking-video-of-barack-obama-telling-dozens-of-lies" target="_blank" title="dozens of major lies">dozens of major lies</a>
while he has been in the White House, and the following are 14 reasons
why Obama is lying when he claims that the world is "more stable" and
"less violent" than ever... <br />
<br />
<strong>#1</strong> The downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 has
brought Ukraine and Russia even closer to the brink of war. The
government in Kiev is blaming Russia and Russia is blaming the
government in Kiev. But Barack Obama does not seem too concerned about
it. During a speech on Thursday, he spent <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2696366/It-looks-like-terrible-tragedy-Obama-briefly-addresses-Malaysian-plane-crash-emerges-23-U-S-passengers-board.html" target="_blank" title="a mere 40 seconds">a mere 40 seconds</a> addressing the downing of the plane before he began a 16 minute speech in which he told numerous jokes. <br />
<br />
<strong>#2</strong> If it wasn't for revolutionary Ukrainian groups <a href="http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/what-is-happening-in-ukraine-is-far-more-important-than-most-people-realize" title="funded by George Soros and the U.S. government">funded by George Soros and the U.S. government</a>
(among others), the Ukrainian government may never have been violently
overthrown and there might not have been a civil war in Ukraine at all. <br />
<br />
<strong>#3</strong> Relations between the United States and Russia
are the worst that they have been since the end of the Cold War, and the
economic sanctions <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-07-17/putin-sanctions-pummel-markets-as-recession-looms-russia-credit" target="_blank" title="that Obama just slapped on Russia">that Obama just slapped on Russia</a> are not going to help matters any. <br />
<br />
<strong>#4</strong> Israel has just launched a <a href="http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/israel-launches-ground-offensive-in-gaza" target="_blank" title="major ground offensive in Gaza">major ground offensive in Gaza</a>, and many fear that a full-blown regional war in the Middle East could erupt at any moment. <br />
<br />
<strong>#5</strong> The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Civil_War" target="_blank" title="civil war in Syria">civil war in Syria</a>
has been raging for several years now. Thanks to the United States and
Saudi Arabia, those seeking to bring down the Syrian government are
very well armed. <br />
<br />
<strong>#6</strong> The civil war in Iraq continues to get even worse. ISIS has already captured vast stretches of Iraqi territory and they are <a href="http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/isis-is-taking-over-iraq-using-captured-american-weapons" title="using American weapons">using American weapons</a> to do it. <br />
<br />
<strong>#7</strong> The Kurds claim that ISIS is now <a href="http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/kurdish-forces-isis-using-chemical-weapons" target="_blank" title="using chemical weapons">using chemical weapons</a> against them. If this is true, it is really, really troubling news. <br />
<br />
<strong>#8</strong> The Iraqi government has told the United Nations that ISIS was able to steal <a href="http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/stolen-uranium-compounds-not-only-dirty-bomb-ingredients-within-isis-grasp-say-experts" target="_blank" title="88 pounds of uranium">88 pounds of uranium</a>
from Mosul University. Some experts are concerned that they may be
able to use this material to create a dirty bomb (or worse). <br />
<br />
<strong>#9</strong> Barack Obama told us that we were "liberating"
Libya, but instead we just transformed it into a war-torn wasteland that
is constantly being fought over by warring militia groups. Just this
week, one of those militia groups launched <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-28306932" target="_blank" title="a devastating attack">a devastating attack</a>
on the main airport in Tripoli. And the horrible fighting in Libya has
spilled over into other nearby countries in North Africa <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuareg_rebellion_%282012%29" target="_blank" title="such as Mali">such as Mali</a>. <br />
<br />
<strong>#10</strong> Relations between the United States and Germany
are at the lowest point that they have been since the end of World War
II. German Chancellor Angela Merkel was so furious when one U.S. spy
was discovered recently <a href="http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/germany-expels-top-u-s-spy" target="_blank" title="that she expelled the top U.S. intelligence official from the country">that she expelled the top U.S. intelligence official from the country</a>.
But Germany is far from alone. The truth is that most of the rest of
the world is sick and tired of our "Big Brother" behavior. <br />
<br />
<strong>#11</strong> Islamic terror group Boko Haram continues to
cause havoc all over Nigeria. The following is from a news report about
an incident that happened <a href="http://www.punchng.com/news/b-haram-kills-45-in-fresh-borno-village-attack/" target="_blank" title="earlier this week">earlier this week</a>...<br />
<blockquote>
Suspected members of the deadly Boko Haram Islamic sect
on Monday attacked Dille village in Borno State, killed 45 people and
torched several houses and shops and forced many people to flee into
nearby hills for safety. The terrorists, it was gathered, came in a
convoy of over 20 vehicles and motorcycles. According to one of the
villagers, Njimtiku Papka, who spoke to journalists in Maiduguri on the
phone, the terrorists on arriving the village started shooting
indiscriminately at everyone in sight.</blockquote>
<strong>#12</strong> The ongoing civil war in the Central African Republic has forced <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_African_Republic_conflict_%282012%E2%80%93present%29" target="_blank" title="hundreds of thousands of people">hundreds of thousands of people</a> out of their homes. <br />
<br />
<strong>#13</strong> There is horrible fighting going on <a href="http://shabelle.net/?p=25639" target="_blank" title="inside Somalia right now">inside Somalia right now</a>...<br />
<blockquote>
A fierce and violent conflict erupted on the outskirts of
Qoryoley district in Lower Shabelle between joint African Union Mission
in Somalia (AMISOM) troops and Somali National Army soldiers (SNA)
against Al-Shabaab. The terrorist insurgents attacked an SNA and AMISOM
military sitting in the town just outside Qoryoley when the battle
initiated. Locals have reported to Shabelle that the fight also affected
towns in the district like Maanyo Mudug, Farhanle and Abdi Ali.</blockquote>
<strong>#14</strong> Things are not even stable in North America.
Horrific gang violence and warring between drug cartels in Central
America and Mexico has been one of the factors that has caused millions
of <a href="http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/tag/illegal-immigrants" target="_blank" title="illegal immigrants">illegal immigrants</a>
to come pouring toward the United States. Today, Honduras has the
highest murder rate on the entire planet, and the Mexican drug war has
claimed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War" target="_blank" title="more than 120,000 lives">more than 120,000 lives</a> since 2006.<br />
<br />
Of course this is just a partial list. The truth is that there are
dozens of other conflicts that are happening all over the globe right
now that could be added to this list.<br />
<br />
So what would you add to this list? <br />
<br />
--<a href="http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/14-reasons-obama-is-lying-when-he-claims-the-world-is-more-stable-and-less-violent-than-ever"><b>MORE</b></a>--"Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-51896698411010806332014-06-11T16:48:00.002-07:002014-06-11T16:48:56.799-07:00WWIII Has Begun<b>Began years ago.... </b><br />
<br />
"World War III is already here<br />
<br />
A <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/World/WOR-01-090614.html">world</a> war between classes, not countries" by Ismael Hossein-Zadeh:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Most pundits of historical developments tend to perceive another global
war as large scale deployment of military means in pursuit of defeat,
destruction or subjugation of contending opponents. While prospects of
such an ominous scenario certainly cannot be ruled out, there is reason
to believe, however, that the much talked-about World War III may be of a
different type: more interclass than international.<br /><br />Viewed in this light, World War III is already here; it has indeed<br />been
raging on for years: the unilateral, cross-border neoliberal war of
austerity economics that is waged by the transnational class of
financial oligarchy against the overwhelming majority of world citizens,
the global 99%.<br /><br />Globalization of capital and interdependence of
world markets has reached a point where large-scale military clashes of
the magnitude of World Wars I and II could lead to financial catastrophe
for all. Not surprisingly, the network of transnational financial
elites, who often elect politicians and run governments from behind the
scenes, seem to be averse to another wholesale international war that
could paralyze worldwide financial markets.<br /><br />This explains why
imperialistic aggressions of late have often taken the form of
"soft-power" interventions: color-coded revolutions, "democratic" coups
d'etat, manufactured civil wars, economic sanctions, and the like. Of
course, military option always lurks in the background to be employed
when/if "soft-power" strategies of regime change fail or prove
insufficient.<br /><br />Even then, however, all efforts are made (by the
major capitalist powers) to make such military interventions
"controlled" or "manageable", that is, limited to local or national
levels. While "controlled" wars tend to safeguard the fortunes of war
profiteers and beneficiaries of military spending (mainly the
military-security-industrial complex and major banks), they would not
cause paralysis of international financial markets.<br /><br />This also
explains why major world powers such as China, Russia, India, and Brazil
tend to shy away from standing up more robustly to the bullying
policies of the United States. Wealthy oligarchic circles in these
countries have more in common with their elite counterparts in the US
and other core capitalist countries than their fellow countrymen at
home. "Whether they maintain primary residences in New York or Hong
Kong, Moscow or Mumbai, today's super-rich are increasingly a nation
unto themselves", points out Chrystia Freeland, global editor of
Reuters, who travels with the elites to many parts of the world.<br /><br />It
is therefore only logical to believe that a de facto alliance exists
between members of this global "nation" of the super-rich, which helps
facilitate the operations of imperialist schemes of regime change. For
example, when/if Russia is threatened by the United States and its
European allies, Russian oligarchs tend to clandestinely collaborate
with their class counterparts in the West, thereby undermining Russia's
resistance to such interference from Western powers.<br /><br />A brief look
at recent schemes of regime change in countries like Iraq and Libya, on
the one hand, and Ukraine and Iran, on the other, can help an
understanding of when or where the imperialist powers resort to direct
military action to bring about regime change (as in Iraq and Libya), and
where or when they resort to "soft-power" tactics to achieve the same
goal, as in Ukraine and Iran. Two major reasons or considerations can be
identified in this context, that is, in regard with the imperialist
choice of the means or tactics of regime change.<br /><br />The first is
related to the level of class differentiation within countries targeted
for regime change. Due to extensive (and often scandalous) privatization
of public property in both Ukraine and Iran, there have emerged quite
wealthy circles of financial oligarchs in both of these countries.<br /><br />These
Western-oriented money magnates tend to collaborate with the
interventionist forces of regime change from abroad; they are
essentially agents of regime change from within, in collaboration with
imperialist forces from without. This explains (at least partially) why
schemes of regime change in these two countries have relied primarily on
"soft-power" and color revolutions instead of direct military
intervention.<br /><br />By contrast, Saddam Hussein's Iraq and Muammar
Gaddafi's Libya lacked such influential and internationally connected
wealthy classes. While neither Saddam nor Gaddafi were paragons of
virtue or champions of democracy, they played the role of what is
sometimes called "enlightened dictators": they implemented extensive
welfare state programs, maintained strong public-sector economies,
opposed privatization of public services such as health and education,
and kept major or "strategic" industries such as energy and
banking/financial system under state ownership and control.<br /><br />Combined,
these policies prevented the rise of powerful financial elites such as
those that emerged and developed in Iran or Ukraine. This meant, among
other things, that "soft-power" and/or color revolution tactics of
regime change, which heavily rely on native or local allies, the
so-called <i>comprador bourgeoisie</i>, did not have a good chance of
success in these countries - hence the use of "hard-power" or direct
military intervention/occupation of both Iraq and Libya.<br /><br />The
second imperialist consideration in the choice of soft- versus
hard-power tactics of regime change is related to whether a war to be
waged in pursuit of regime change can be controlled and managed at the
local or national level, or whether it may spin out of control and
become regional and/or global.<br /><br />In the case of Ukraine, for
example, a direct military aggression would certainly have involved
Russia, very likely become global, with disastrous economic/financial
consequences beyond the control of imperialist powers - hence the choice
of soft-power and/or "democratic" coup d'etat in Ukraine.<br /><br />A
similar concern that an all-out war against Iran may get out of control
likewise explains why schemes of regime change in that country have (so
far) also focused primarily on economic sanctions and other soft-power
tactics, including the color-coded "green revolution" of 2009.<br /><br />By
contrast, "hard power" or sheer military force was used for regime
change in Iraq and Libya out of the near-certain knowledge that the wars
of regime change against these countries could be controlled fairly
successfully, that is, prevented from becoming regional or global."</blockquote>
--<a href="http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2014/06/world-war-iii-is-already-here.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-85720441879098868162014-05-23T15:07:00.000-07:002014-06-07T08:22:26.703-07:00Syrian Terrorists Set to Strike U.S. On Fourth of JulyIt's just a <a href="http://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2013/08/august-terror-scare.html">feeling</a> I've been <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/lot-terror-attacks-coming-nsa-chief-article-1.1797130">getting</a>. The <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/05/22/McCain-Argues-Against-Isolationism-Syrian-Terrorist-will-reach-US-Soil">Al-CIA-Duh terrorists are returning</a> home from Syria via <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2014/04/24/france-unveils-plan-stop-youths-from-fighting-syria/nMPM1oS6gELPAjm77WiZrJ/story.html">France</a> and the <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2014/04/24/british-police-appealing-women-stop-flow-would-jihadis-syria/hzcMbuPLNn9s1RyvI0CY0L/story.html">U.K.</a>, all the surveillance in the world can not <a href="http://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2012/03/nypd-now-national-police-force.html">find them</a>, and they gave the <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2014/01/10/extremist-groups-wooing-americans-syria/f0tQ4hRbCm1QKiaxpaq09N/story.html">FBI</a> the slip. The <a href="http://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2013/04/sunday-globe-special-northern-command.html">script</a> has already been written for the false flag, folks.<br />
<br />
If not that I suppose the <a href="http://www.rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2014/05/sunday-globe-special-persecuted.html">assassination of the Pope</a> will do.<br />
<br />
UPDATE: The Pope is safe for now, but <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2014/05/30/details-emerge-about-american-suicide-bomber-syria/0deXIr1EkBVdZoIRmYKMdP/story.html">something wicked this way comes</a>.Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-26645486546895345922014-05-14T10:25:00.001-07:002014-05-14T10:25:12.148-07:00NSA Can Plant Child Porn on Apple iPhone<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2013/12/30/the-nsa-reportedly-has-total-access-to-your-iphone/"><b>The NSA Reportedly Has Total Access To The Apple iPhone</b></a><br />
<br />
“DROPOUT JEEP is a software implant for the Apple iPhone that utilizes modular mission applications to provide specific SIGINT functionality. This functionality includes the ability to remotely push/pull files from the device. SMS retrieval, contact list retrieval, voicemail, geolocation, hot mic, camera capture, cell tower location, etc. Command, control and data exfiltration can occur over SMS messaging or a GPRS data connection. All communications with the implant will be covert and encrypted.”<br />
<br />
<i>"Meaning the NSA can plant child porn on your computer just seconds before the police show up with that arrest warrant, reporters in tow. This means real criminals now have reasonable doubt for evidence found on their computers. The prosecution cannot rule out NSA planting of false-evidence." -- <a href="http://whatreallyhappened.com/">source</a></i><br />
<br />
<b>I'm not going to <a href="https://discussions.apple.com/message/24321401#24321401">remove</a> the blog; however, it is noteworthy that the <a href="http://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2014/01/taotapping-at-nsa.html">TrApdOor</a> of a <a href="http://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2013/06/seeing-through-prism-of-obamas-spying.html">PRISM</a> wasn't introduced until after <a href="http://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2011/11/bite-of-boston-globe-apple.html">Jobs</a> was killed.</b>Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-52687129600541282952014-04-26T15:05:00.003-07:002014-04-26T15:05:53.586-07:00Don't Buy Ben & Jerry'sI didn't know they <a href="http://mondoweiss.net/2014/04/activists-commercial-settlements.html?utm_source=Mondoweiss+List&utm_campaign=434a98fdfe-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b86bace129-434a98fdfe-398413317">supported illegal Israeli settlements</a>, and it really spoils a <a href="http://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2013/04/globe-happy-meal.html">dear memory</a> for me since I toured the factory long ago, although it does explains the <a href="http://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2013/12/licking-pentagon.html">kiss</a>.Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-22856246524599453832014-03-13T06:37:00.004-07:002014-03-13T06:37:23.658-07:00Zion Crime Factory Closed<b>But you can open the book on it</b>:<br />
<br />
"Masters of Deception: Zionism, 9/11 and the War on Terror Hoax<br />
<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
<br />
Introduction – Unraveling the Mystery of 9/11 (Page 6)<br />
<br />
Chapter One – Terrorism: A Jewish Tradition (Page 9)<br />
<br />
Chapter Two – Cui Bono – Who Benefits? (Page 23)<br />
<br />
Chapter Three – Media Manipulation: Zionist Jews Pointing Fingers On 9/11 (Page 27)<br />
<br />
Chapter Four – The Hidden Hand of Zion Surfaces (Page 37)<br />
<br />
Chapter Five – New York City’s Zionist Insiders (Page 54)<br />
<br />
Chapter Six – Zion Incorporated: The Jewish “Security” Apparatus (Page 60)<br />
<br />
Chapter Seven – The Myth of Osama bin Laden & the Nineteen Arab Oswalds (Page 69)<br />
<br />
Chapter Eight – The Pentagon Attack: The Mysterious ‘Missing Trillions,’ Rabbi Zakheim and Remote Control (Page 85)<br />
<br />
Chapter Nine – More False-Flags After 9/11: Israel At It Again (Page 92)<br />
<br />
Chapter Ten – The Anthrax Letters: A Zionist Scare Tactic (Page 95)<br />
<br />
Chapter Eleven – The Cover-Up: Zionist Insiders in Key Positions (Page 104)<br />
<br />
Chapter Twelve – The Terrorism Industry: A Kosher Racket (Page 112)<br />
<br />
Chapter Thirteen – Netanyahu: Evil Inventor of the “Global War on Terror” (Page 122)<br />
<br />
Chapter Fourteen – Neoconservatism: A Treacherous Guild of Jewish Imperialists (Page 126)<br />
<br />
Chapter Fifteen – The Neocons and the Holocaust©: Zionism’s Big Lie (Page 157)<br />
<br />
Chapter Sixteen– Was American Intelligence Also Complicit in 9/11? (Page 168)<br />
<br />
Chapter Seventeen – Jewish Occupation: Zionism Rules America (Page 173)<br />
<br />
Chapter Eighteen – Rupert Murdoch, Zionism and Predictive Programming (Page 187)<br />
<br />
Chapter Nineteen – The 9/11 “Debunkers” Initiative: Zionist Jews at the Fore (Page 191)<br />
<br />
Chapter Twenty – 9/11 “Truth” Movement Compromised: Zionist Agents at the Helm (Page 194)<br />
<br />
Chapter Twenty-One – Experts Speak Out: “Israel Did 9/11′′ (Page 197)<br />
<br />
Chapter Twenty-Two – The Ancient Dream of Judaism: World Domination (Page 200)<br />
<br />
Conclusion – Endgame: How to Defeat the Jew World Order (Page 205)<br />
<br />
Afterword – What Happened to the Zion Crime Factory Website? (Page 207)<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://lesvisible.net/DOCS/MastersOfDeception.pdf"><b>MORE</b></a>--(w/<a href="http://www.zippittydodah.com/"><b>ht</b></a>)"Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-52763138376500942962014-03-06T11:20:00.000-08:002014-03-06T11:20:14.278-08:00Time to Hunker Down"Thursday, March 6, 2014<br />
<br />
Bringing Light into the Darkness of the Mind.<br />
<br />
Dog Poet Transmitting.......<br />
<br />
May your noses always be cold and wet.<br />
<br />
Psychopath Tribe activity is redlining of late. Here we have <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ukraine-crisis/russia-today-anchor-quits-air-over-putin-whitewash-n45451">Tribe member and media flunky, Lisa Wahl</a>, grandstanding her ‘off in a huff’ exit from RT News and Abby Martin has been outed <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/10676113/Russia-Today-host-who-criticised-Kremlin-sent-to-Crimea.html">as a disinfo shill who bites the hand that feeds her</a>.
This self righteous bimbo objects to ‘military intervention in
sovereign nations’ affairs’. What about that very thing being the cause
of the whole debacle to begin with? What about Central Banker financed
insurgency in The Ukraine, Israeli soldiers on the ground, <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=92153">professional snipers hired to fire into the crowd</a> at police and demonstrators and a duly elected president being driven from office? What about that Abby?<br />
<br />
Putin didn't actually do anything and the loss of Crimea would be a
devastating strategic blow. He has to have a presence there, otherwise
Zio-bot, Banker canon fodder waltzes, takes over and sets up various
defensive conditions and it is a much more difficult feat to for Putin
to manage after the fact. Martin has to know what’s what so... she
collaborated with her real masters and through the clever ministrations
of Mr. Apocalypse; she’s been outed as a dual loyalist. I wonder what
they offered her, or threatened her with? She painted quite a persona
for herself up to that point and typical of her previous way of
operating, she should have been exposing what caused the whole affair,
instead, she turned on her employers.<br />
<br />
People can think what they like about Vladimir Putin, I like him. I like
all kinds of things about him and I don’t generally like political
types. He walks the talk; everyone else is talking out of both sides of
their mouth. Vladimir? You make me wish I was a Russian.<br />
<br />
Here is <a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29508.htm">what you get from the forces that actually employ Abby</a>
while she pretends to work for RT lovely, huh? This is what you get
from the Israeli, Satanic Banker owned and controlled nations of the
west and their Zionist Atlantic Treaty Organization stormtroopers and
hired terrorists, who eat people’s hearts and strangle young girls on
video. This is some seriously disgusting and vile behavior; Hillary
Clinton approved.<br />
<br />
Putin isn’t stupid; <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ukraine-crisis/hit-us-sanctions-well-seize-wests-assets-russia-warns-n44706">he’s got a way to deal with the oligarch funded aggressions against him</a>.<br />
<br />
These are strange days and, apropos of that you get interesting creations popping up for the public view. For some reason <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Pf7RxPAwIs">this video wants to start at 2.29</a>. Use your mouse to bring it back to the beginning. This appears to be a new kind of vaudeville.<br />
<br />
Last night I watched a truly epic piece of shit called “<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2177771/?ref_=nv_sr_1">The Monument’s Men</a>”.
I shut it off near the end. I couldn't bear it any longer. Of course
there was a beautiful airbrushed hero named Epstein. They also discuss
The Rothschild art collection while painting Rothschild as a poor victim
of those nasty Nazis. This film is so bad... how bad? You won’t believe
it till you see it. I am surprised that the celluloid didn't
spontaneously combust from the tinder dry lies recorded on it. There is
one execrable moment after another. Were they not all totally sold out
whores, the actors should have died of embarrassment during the filming
of this crap. Heh heh, the comments at the bottom tell the story and
don’t miss the ‘Did You Know?’ section.<br />
<br />
Truly, one absurdity follows another. The air of desperation is leaking
out of the back rooms, as Mr. Apocalypse just keeps winding the crank. <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=91591">Lie after lie is being exposed</a>.
I used to have some vague and fabricated idea of how it might work out
or not work out. These days I know that I don’t know. Anything can
happen but what I want is for things to happen inside the minds of these
bloodthirsty weasels. I would love it if something like what happened
at the end of the movie “Ghost”, happened in real life, although I’m
still pissed that they didn't drag Whoopi Goldberg down through the
grate while they were at it.<br />
<br />
Want <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=92134">to know how bad it’s getting on The Left Coast?</a>.
At first, when I read the headline, I thought it said Washington D.C.
and it immediately made sense but... this is happening in Washington
State. Speaking of people born without a brain, <a href="http://www.mediander.com/connects/20632326/bear-attack/?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=connects&utm_campaign=obclick#%21/video/zusxEl_4Vv8">this fellow definitely qualifies</a>.<br />
<br />
The time is coming for some level of bunker mentality and you may be
sure that by this coming Fall, the writing on the wall is going to be
grim indeed, when it comes to foodstuffs and related things. I’m going
to be in a seldom traveled rural location and looking to the basic needs
of getting through what is sure to prove to be an epic struggle for
survival. God help the people in urban locations. The thing is,
circumstances can change very, very swiftly. Overnight the world can
descend into turmoil and it is the intention of the bankers and those
they manipulate that this should happen but really... it is the
intention of Mr. Apocalypse.<br />
<br />
You are familiar (maybe) with that phrase, “And we know that for those
who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called
according to his purpose.” As with ‘turn away’, here we have another
secreted phrase, “for his purpose”. So it is that both evil and good
were created to this purpose. Otherwise you have no contrast. This
certainly annoys many and proves a stumbling block as well but... but...
what this should do is harden your faith, knowing... knowing that there
is a purpose to it all and it is up to you how you handle your place in
the mix. You can go in any direction. You can go against the wind of
the one mind and live in resistance and at the mercy of the reactive
mind, or... you can let the wind of unbridled optimism fill your sails
and make your way across the ocean of birth and death.<br />
<br />
You MUST break the hypnotic spell of belief in appearances, not to
mention granting them control over your mind. The way things look and
the way things are is different. It takes a concerted and relentless
effort to accomplish what’s needed. It’s said that:”all magic is in the
will”. That would be, THE WILL, which is channeled. The common soul is
divided against itself because that is what those who rule over them
want. It is for the same reason that the sexual nature is not only
constantly titillated but also intentionally bent so as to compromise
one’s basic nature. This also sets you at odds with yourself because
then the conscious and subconscious minds are not in <a href="http://www.botaineurope.org/index.php?id=33">that state demonstrated in the Sixth Trump</a>, unity between the two leads <a href="http://www.botaineurope.org/index.php?id=32">directly to Triumph in the Mind</a> and that leads to <a href="http://www.botaineurope.org/index.php?id=31">a state of control over all the subhuman forces </a>seeking to prevail over our humanity AND THAT leads to the <a href="http://www.botaineurope.org/index.php?id=30">state of being apart from the uproar and confusion</a>
of the crowd, bearing the inner light for the illumination and healing
of humanity, according to the willing. Once one is in this state they
are simultaneously, directly in contact with that state in everyone else
and can do wonders but usually along the lines of, “who was that masked
man?”<br />
<br />
No other work is as important as this and that is why it is called <a href="http://altreligion.about.com/od/ritualsandpractices/a/The-Great-Work-Or-Magnum-Opus.htm">“The Great Work</a>.”
That is a superficial vignette on it but it serves for a general
outline. No other work is as important. How do you engage in and
accomplish it when you have to do all of these other things, or think
you do? You convince yourself that this is what you are doing, no matter
what it might appear that you are doing. When I used to work at
Paradise Fruits in Kihei, Maui, I always told myself that I was in the
music business, even though I was known as the Deli Lama there, in my
mind I was in the music business but really, I was engaged in The Great
Work. It took some changes for me to get back around to seeing that. I
had it wired in earlier years but living took its toll and robbed me of
the clarity of my former perspective. Still... if, regardless of your
status and your actions, you love the ineffable and though you be tossed
in a maelstrom and in a seemingly rudderless spin, you will come
through the wash and rinse cycle and you will hang on the cosmic laundry
line in the brilliant light of the spiritual sun... and then some.<br />
<br />Be unflaggingly optimistic. Be ever grateful and know that you will be
given reason to feel that way. We fail from a lack of effort and a
paucity of faith. Here is yet one more example of the power of Love.
When you Love, your way will be made before you. Make it so. Life is all
about finding out who you are and gleaming... shining with that
recognition.<br />
<br />
--<a href="http://www.smoking-mirrors.com/2014/03/bringing-light-into-darkness-of-mind.html"><b>MORE</b></a>--"Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-26236083564570442232014-03-04T09:25:00.000-08:002014-03-05T01:44:47.178-08:00Turnaround Jump Shot on TourneyI know I <span class="item-title"><a href="http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/2014/02/time-out-for-tourney.html" target="_blank">complained</a></span> about the new format earlier; however, I have completely turned around on it. It's six straight days of games with a marathon on Saturday, and the more the merrier.<br />
<br />
What happened last night was I <a href="http://highschoolsports.masslive.com/news/article/5206790911465665482/no-2-ware-advances-to-first-ever-western-mass-division-iv-girls-basketball-championship-with-42-30-victory-over-no-6-hopkind/#/0">watched one game</a> and part of <a href="http://highschoolsports.masslive.com/news/article/5206790911467665485/quaboag-bests-monson-55-49-to-advance-to-division-iv-girls-basketball-final/#/0">another</a> (maybe I should have stayed!) before leaving to play hoop myself. Didn't have the greatest game, and team got hammered a couple of times, but it was the best of both worlds. I've already decide to not play Wednesday as there is a quadruple header at the Cage that day, but will play inspired ball and <a href="http://highschoolsports.masslive.com/news/article/7614295953437986127/holyoke-runs-past-longmeadow-67-58-to-win-first-western-mass-division-i-girls-basketball-title/">never quit</a> on Sunday morning following championship Saturday.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, outside the gym the world is on fire because of certain psychopathic leaders and ethnic tribes. Same story as always; they just have deadlier weapons in their hands. What isn't the same is the received propaganda and wisdom is no longer believed.<br />
<br />
And the shot.... is good!<br />
<br />
UPDATE (3/5): Left the gym on a high last night as I saw one of the <a href="http://highschoolsports.masslive.com/news/article/2649707780001320739/keith-natales-buzzer-beater-sends-smith-academy-to-western-mass-division-iv-final/#/7">most exciting high school basketball games</a> I have ever seen. The game had everything. It was raining threes from way out, there was the ebb and flow of one team taking a lead, the other coming back to go ahead, back and forth, back and forth. What a great basketball game. The <a href="http://highschoolsports.masslive.com/news/article/2649709779979320697/hoosac-valley-boys-basketball-stuns-undefeated-renaissance-72-67-advances-to-division-iii-western-mass-finals/#/0">initial game</a> of the night was also very entertaining, while one could only marvel at the <a href="http://highschoolsports.masslive.com/news/article/2649709779978320700/emily-rosse-scores-27-points-as-hoosac-valley-girls-cruise-into-western-mass-division-iii-finals-with-71-40-win-over-granby/#/0">brutal efficiency</a> exhibited by their town's female squad. Four more games on tap tonight. It will be hard to top last night's finale, but we will see what they bring.<br />
<br />Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-494517232520846512.post-63381685120500349262014-02-26T18:23:00.000-08:002014-03-01T07:20:58.325-08:00Time Out For TourneyI wouldn't blame readership for being frustrated with this blog. I rarely ever post, I'm <a href="http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/2014/02/this-blog-headed-for-oblivion.html">not here</a>, then I'm <a href="http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/2014/02/back-from-oblivion.html">back</a>, now I'm gone again for it is that lone time of year that I'm surprised to see once again. Seems like years ago (it was) I thought life and this world would already be over.<br />
<br />
So here we are again, another year of high-school tournament action for the next two weeks with the added bonus of the local branch of the state U likely making the NCAA tournament for the first time in 15 years. I'm having mixed feelings about the high-school ball because the state finally got its way and the field has expanded from three divisions to four. Apparently western Massachusetts finally relented to state pressure.<br />
<br />
At first I thought great, more games, but then realized it upset the whole balance. For one thing, a whole chunk of central Mass. teams are now included, so what happened was what used to be a West-Central match-up in the state semis is now basically a Western Mass. championship game even thought the central teams played a totally different schedule. They are not happy, either, feeling they got screwed in the seedings and they probably did. Anyhow, that makes following the subsequent state finals less interesting to me, although it does mean an extra day of games out here.<br />
<br />
Then I checked the schedules and it's looking like there is nowhere to go this Thursday. With the expanded fields and divisions many girl's games that would have been in-region are now much further away. I could go down to Northampton again, but I'm tired of going down there every year -- especially after Pittsfield was robbed by the officials in last years quarterfinal -- and then I got to thinking, inclusion of all those central teams means potentially taking a spot in the finals away from a deserving western school. Not too happy about that, and I'm sure some of the central teams are feeling the same way. But it is what it is.<br />
<br />
So it looks like another month off from blogging here. Hope the world is still in one piece if I come back. Truth is I'm sick of saying the same things over and over and over, year after year after year. The psychopaths in charge of the planet need to do their ritual of self-destruction. The time for interventions has long passed, it's been eight years of screaming interventions with none listening. I do look forward to seeing them in hell so I can feast upon their innards, but that's a post for another time.<br />
<br />
UPDATE (Feb. 28): Should have went to the game <a href="http://highschoolsports.masslive.com/news/article/6206798911495665569/girls-basketball-no-2-northampton-survives-late-no-7-chicopee-comp-push-for-50-46-quarterfinal-victory/">last night</a>, but am <a href="http://highschoolsports.masslive.com/game/score/1987841/">going to one</a> tonight.<br />
<br />
UPDATE (Mar 1): Probably should have stayed home and listened on radio. <a href="http://www.recorder.com/home/10924048-95/hurricanes-stop-green-wave">Game</a> was one of the worst officiated games I ever saw. It wasn't just the confusion surrounding the shot, it was the inattentiveness they showed all night. I suppose referees can have an off night, too, but when it's the last game of careers for some kids and a state-sanctioned tournament.... anyhow, after those events I received a warning from police because my voice projects well and loud. I must say the policeman that came up to where I was sitting was very respectful. Told me he understood and didn't even flinch as I lightly grabbed him by the shoulders and issued my complaints and that the kids had worked so hard. Told me to calm down a bit and I told him he wouldn't be back up there. By then I was as deflated as the team. <br />
<br />
Feel bad about everything now, and it was all put aside during the ride home. After the game is over and they leave, I leave it all on the court. I don't follow people or any of that. In fact, I'm one of the first ones to get out of the gym, win or lose. I've been on the other side before and -- literally -- feared for my life at a game years ago. I applauded a shoot clock violation in the wrong section, cheering my boys' good defense, and the crowd came down on me. I'm not exaggerating things; I really was worried about getting to the car that night. Nothing happened, and no one said a word, but the steps seemed like forever. Strange thing is I have cheered for their team before and after that incident. Part of the league.<br />
<br />
I suppose what bugs me the most is you can't even get fairness or justice at a high school basketball game. Maybe you never could, but given the rank rot and corruption across all institutions in AmeriKa these days one hope it wouldn't bleed down to this level. Remarked to my friend that we do a better job policing ourselves in pick-up. He made some incisive comments about how the officials never offered an explanation for the changed call, even if it was the right one. They left us all guessing, and that only added to the frustration.<br />
<br />
There will be games every night next week and a slate of six on Saturday, but I don't know how many I will attend. Two are on nights I play basketball myself, and with the ending of my career in sight (next time could always be my last, but hopefully not, knock wood) I will likely choose to participate in an activity than spectate and observe. Maybe I should apply that philosophy to this blog.Rockerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15655642474967325867noreply@blogger.com0