Thursday, November 27, 2008

Following the Script

"following the script

Mumbai is ablaze. This attack is huge. My guess is that over a hundred people are involved. All of the people in on this plot ran on a well laid out schedule. Whatever the fuck is going on has been well organised. And whatever it was the organisers intended to achieve, they've achieved it.

Sure enough, it's Muslims. Or so the media tells me. Apparently the terrorists are unhappy with the treatment of Muslims in India. Their plan, as best I can tell, is to kill Indians and foreigners indiscriminately, set fire to major pubic buildings, and take hostages and refuse to release them until Muslims are treated better. Good thinking. Am I alone in wondering at this disconnect?

Between me and the media, it sure looks like it. But it's early days yet. Me, I confidently look forward to the members of the media stating the obvious and saying, 'This doesn't make any sense at all. Who in their right mind would expect that a huge Muslim murder spree would improve the lot of Muslims? How will this achieve anything but having Hindus and Muslims at each other's throats? How would this be in the interest of Muslims?'

Just joking - those questions will never be asked. But if they were I imagine the answer would be that these people are not in their right mind. They're nuts. Nuts who can pull off a coordinated 100 man attack. When it comes to the 'how' they're rational, but on the subject of 'why', they are insane. Um, okay.

Sorry, but between the two prospects of madmen seeking one thing and achieving the obvious and inevitable opposite, and perfectly rational people seeking discord by way of lies and dupes, and succeeding admirably, I'm going to put my money on the latter.

The difference between me and the media is that I have a smattering of history. I know that in 1954 Israeli agents pretending to be Muslims blew up American targets in Cairo in the hopes of prompting the US to attack Egypt. They didn't succeed because the bombers were caught and spilled all the beans. I know that they did it again in 1967 when they attempted to sink the USS Liberty with the loss of all hands and blame it on the Egyptians. The nuke-laden skyhawks were already on their way to Cairo before LBJ and McNamara realised that the Israelis had failed to sink the most lightly armed boat in the US navy and called them back. Oops.

Clearly the Israelis decided that their previous lies had been too modest and on the 11th of September 2001, they attacked multiple US targets and killed 3000. Finally success! Christians and Muslims, at each other's throats. High fives all round. Confirmation indeed that they were precisely as great as they thought they were.

The media obviously doesn't do history. Not unless it's Nazis, that is. Anyway, who in the media has time for history? They can be barely keep up with the script on the autocue, never mind all that boring history stuff about who bombed who whilst pretending to be Muslims. As they say in the media - Don't think, just read the script! And are the words, 'false-flag', 'Israeli agents', or 'overpaid media whores' in the script? Of course not.

Nor should one ask who writes the script. Whoever they are, they're very clever. Without them how would we know that Muslims are irrational murderous motherfuckers who will kill us in spite of the fact that it will advance their interests in no way, shape, or form.


With comment

Frank said...

Nobody: GREAT stuff, and me up this late to catch it just after post... ouch.

(The USA has a holiday today but us PEASANTS have to work it.)

One thing.

You mention the USS Liberty? I was in the US Navy 1968-72 and NEVER HEARD MENTION OF IT. Except the official "we hit the wrong tub, but that's war for you." But otherwise, nothing.

We've been locked down LOTS longer than some of our optimists seem to think. Started with the Patriot Act after 911? Foo. If it was tight as a drum in '67, it was tight before then too. Why do I think November 1963 might fit into this?

Anyway, any sailor reading the USS Liberty back then just figured the usual: American sailors can't shoot worth shit. There's a REASON allies steer clear of us and it ain't respect. Why should Israeli sailors shoot any better?

So typical of lower-class US: We make excuses for the other guy when he kills us.

But your right about this thing, the false flags and the worldwide crap about Muslims especially. If Islam were nothing but natural-born psychos they'd have incinerated at least Boston by now. Have they? I rest my case.

nobody said...

Hey Frank,
Well I'll be honest with you, it was reading about the Liberty (however many years ago now) that did my head in and tipped me over the edge. What those Liberty guys went through was the equivalent of anything any US sailor ever went through. Hellish. And McCain's old man threatened them with death if they ever told. (Speaking of McCain, ha ha, it looks like he was personally responsible for the Forrestal fire in 1973).

BTW. This never gets mentioned anywhere (not even at but nukes got strapped to skyhawks and launched, in spite of the fact the Liberty hadn't told anyone who'd attacked them. The logic is unavoidable. LBJ and McNamara were in on the gag way before it happened. I'm prepared to bet that the Liberty was sent to the Levant for no other reason than to be sunk. All those servicemen serving their country? Their country ain't interested in serving them. Not unless it's on a platter to their Ashkenazi masters.

PS Have you seen the BBC docomentary Liberty - Dead In The Water? It's on google video. They discuss the nukes. Worth watching.

PPS Now that I think about it, have you seen another BBC effort, Sacrifice At Pearl Harbour? Pearl Harbour was about as much a surprise as tax day.

nobody said...

Back to Mumbai now, I just found this from a link at wrh. It's from the Times of London -

"Western intelligence services have been expecting an al-Qaeda spectacular terrorist attack in this crucial period between the end of President George Bush’s administration and the succession of Barack Obama."

Perfect. More of that 'chatter' I expect. I'd love to know what this chatter is comprised of. It's always enough to have us all terrified but not quite enough for the security services to be able to stop it. Mind you, why would they stop it after they spent so much time and money setting it all up? "What and ruin a perfectly good false flag?"