"Dutch UN peacekeepers... assisted in separating women and children."
If they were Jewish, would the Dutch be refusing to pay?
Would the U.N.?
Case closed on that racket.
"Families of Bosnia massacre seek damages; Lawyers contend the UN, Dutch nation are liable" by Toby Sterling, Associated Press | June 19, 2008
THE HAGUE, Netherlands - The United Nations should be held liable for failing to prevent the genocide of Bosnian Muslims at Srebrenica, Bosnia, lawyers for victims' families argued in a Dutch court yesterday.
The families are seeking compensation after Serb forces killed more than 8,000 Muslim men and boys around the UN-declared safe zone of Srebrenica one week in July 1995, the worst massacre of civilians in Europe since World War II.
Dutch UN peacekeepers who were supposed to guarantee their safety were overwhelmed by the Serbs' superior force and even assisted in separating women and children as the victims were led away.
Dutch government lawyers told The Hague District Court yesterday that the UN is immune from prosecution in national courts under the UN charter, endorsed by all its members. But lawyers for the families said there was nowhere else to turn for a fair hearing of their grievances.
Then I don't want the U.N. in my country!!! Do you?
NO WONDER Burma didn't want to let them in!!!!! Globalist immunity!
Axel Hagedorn, whose firm says it represents 6,000 family members of victims in the unusual class-action lawsuit, said he believed the UN's immunity is not applicable in a genocide case.
"They may be responsible but unable to be called to account because of immunity," he said. "This is unacceptable legally, humanly, and morally."
The Mothers of Srebrenica, relatives of men and boys killed at the UN-declared safe zone, are the most vocal claimants in the civil suit seeking compensation from the UN and the Dutch state.
Victims' lawyers earlier cited a figure of $4 billion as a starting point for compensation negotiations.
Only Jewish survivors of the holohoax, er, Holocaust™ get $$$!
Bert Jan Houtzagers, representing the Dutch state, told the three-judge tribunal a ruling for the victims would have broad implications.
But not in the case of Jewish extorti, I mean, victims, Jewish victims, of the Holocaust™?
"It is not true that the United Nations believes it is over and above the law, but the question is whether a Dutch court is competent to hear a case against it," he said.
Is the court "competent?"
That's a bit of an INSULT to a member nation, no?
"Because if a Dutch court does, any court in any country could do so and that would thwart the viability of the United Nations."
I see nothing wrong with that! Get rid of the GLOBALIST U.N.!
Hagedorn said if the Dutch court refused to hear the suit, it would leave the victims with no venue for their claims, in contravention of international treaties on genocide.
Marco Gerritsen, another lawyer for the victims, said the UN and Netherlands "should not hide behind each other or each point the finger at the other" to avoid claims.
I'll bet they wouldn't be if the victims were Jews and not Muslims!
Yesterday's suit is one of several seeking to determine whether the Netherlands and United Nations can be held liable for failing to carry out a promise of protection for civilians in the UN enclave.
I see what they mean. They fail all the time, so that would really open them up!!!!
And that isn't counting the sickie sex rings!
