You know, I PAID for this SHIT RAG PAPER I'm quoting everyday. Isn't that enough? You don't want me using your material, AP? FINE!!!!
I, quite frankly, am sick of the AGENDA-PUSHING, DIVISIVE, DISTORTING garbage "journalism" posing as "news." Seriously, I DON'T NEED the AGGRAVATION! Why do you think I'm on her cursing, etc. Because of YOUR HORSE SHIT LIES, crappers!!!
Now, I know I'm being CENSORED on the web (yes, I look sometimes) because of my language, but I DON'T CARE! I am SO SICK of being LIED TO and having an AGENDA SHOVE DOWN MY THROAT that I DON'T GIVE A SHIT anymore!
You want me to CEASE and DESIST all AP, MSM , western-oriented, Zionist shit rag press?
YOU GOT IT; STARTING RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!
(5:23 EDT)
"AP Targets Bloggers Jun. 14th, 2008 at 9:45 AM
AP have their legal vampires chasing bloggers. I blame Hilary Rosen.
Rogers Cadenhead, founder and publisher of The Drudge Retort, has been Cease and Desisted by AP News for publishing fragments of their syndicated news articles and reports.
Adding a quote to a blog post is very much like the sampling of a hook or a beat on a song. It's why so many people were opposed to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. It's not only that albums like Beck's Odelay or Public Enemy's Fear Of A Black Planet would never had happened. Documentaries, archival works, opinion or scholarly writing would be all but non-existent if it means that now journalists, bloggers, historians and scholars would need to pay publishing houses for every single quote and/or sample they need for their work.
--MORE--
More about the AP copyright takedowns against Rogers Cadenhead
One of the things I failed to mention in my previous post was that the AP wouldn't be sending take downs if it wouldn't be hurting financially. This is all about money and all about how they go about making that money and it's absolutely related to SEO (search engine optimization) and how online media that quote them may end up ranking higher than them in searches.
Two years ago AP inked a deal with Google that basically turned Google into a content provider that instantly turned the search engine and news aggregator into a direct competitor with the very newspapers and journalism sources that Associated Press charged for the privilege of syndicating their news online. The excuse was that Google wanted to go into the content business and was partnering up with AP for the creation of new services.--MORE--"
Link addition:
"Go to Rogers' site to read the reasons given by AP"
"I'm currently engaged in a legal disagreement with the Associated Press, which claims that Drudge Retort users linking to its stories are violating its copyright and committing "'hot news' misappropriation under New York state law." An AP attorney filed six Digital Millenium Copyright Act takedown requests this week demanding the removal of blog entries and another for a user comment.
The Retort is a community site comparable in function to Digg, Reddit and Mixx. The 8,500 users of the site contribute blog entries of their own authorship and links to interesting news articles on the web, which appear immediately on the site. None of the six entries challenged by AP, which include two that I posted myself, contains the full text of an AP story or anything close to it. They reproduce short excerpts of the articles -- ranging in length from 33 to 79 words -- and five of the six have a user-created headline.
Here's one of the six disputed blog entries:
Clinton Expects Race to End Next Week
Hillary Rodham Clinton says she expects her marathon Democratic race against Barack Obama to be resolved next week, as superdelegates decide who is the stronger candidate in the fall. "I think that after the final primaries, people are going to start making up their minds," she said. "I think that is the natural progression that one would expect."
If you follow the link, you'll see that the blog entry reproduces 18 words from the story and a 32-word quote by Hillary Clinton under a user-written headline. The blog entry drew 108 comments in the ensuing discussion.
I have all the expertise in intellectual property law of somebody who's never been sued, so standard disclaimers apply. But I have difficulty seeing how it violates copyright law for a blogger to link to a news story with a short snippet of the story in furtherance of public discussion.
AP feels otherwise. In a June 3 letter, AP's Intellectual Property Governance Coordinator Irene Keselman told me:
... you purport that the Drudge Retort's users reproduce and display AP headlines and leads under a fair use defense. Please note that contrary to your assertion, AP considers that the Drudge Retort users' use of AP content does not fall within the parameters of fair use. The use is not fair use simply because the work copied happened to be a news article and that the use is of the headline and the first few sentences only. This is a misunderstanding of the doctrine of "fair use." AP considers taking the headline and lede of a story without a proper license to be an infringement of its copyrights, and additionally constitutes "hot news" misappropriation.
In another DMCA takedown, AP contends that the following user comment is a copyright violation:
Well, the oil execs just put another refinery in South Dakota. Maybe they're a bunch of retards.
Hyperion has said the project, about 60 miles south of Sioux Falls, would create 1,800 permanent jobs and another 4,500 construction jobs over a four-year period. Construction could begin in 2010.
The Hyperion Energy Center would process 400,000 barrels of thick Canadian crude oil a day, which company executives say would help the U.S. reduce its dependence on overseas oil. The company has said it will bring in the crude oil by pipeline but has announced no specific plans for that transportation link.
The user reproduced the last two paragraphs of his comment from the linked Fox News article, written by AP.
AP has filed copyright lawsuits against the VeriSign division Moreover last fall and another against the Florida company All Headline News this year.
I have no desire to be the third member of that club, but sharing links to news stories of interest has become an essential component of how millions of people read and evaluate the news today. When linking to articles, bloggers commonly include excerpts of the article for the purposes of criticism or discussion. Some AP member sites encourage this kind of reuse. Yahoo News, the source for two disputed stories, invites bloggers to use items from its RSS feeds. USA Today, the source for two others, includes a browser widget alongside articles that facilitates their submission to Digg, Mixx and other sites. Wade Duchene, the attorney who helped me win the domain name arbitration for Wargames.Com, says that what we're doing on the Retort is the "absolute definition of fair use."
The DMCA requires that the six blog entries and comment immediately be taken down, regardless of whether I think they're fair use, but users have the option to file counter-notices to AP asserting their own copyright. Because the issue affects all bloggers, I've invited Keselman to explain AP's position at more length. If she accepts I'll post it in full here on Workbench and the Retort.
Assuming I have copyright permission, of course.
More information:
Also see: Israel is pushing the U.S. to attack IranAP: Bush's Whore
AP: Israel's Whore
Pushing Israeli Propaganda
It's Official: AP an Israeli Mouthpiece
Israel Writes The New York Times News Pages
The New York Times: Israel's Mouthpiece