I'm so tired if them shoveling an agenda at us and passing it off as "news." -- especially when they won't say "We're sorry, we LIED to you, America."
You will NEVER SEE THAT, which is why you are reading this.
The AmeriKan MSM is simply TO DEEP INTO the LYING s COMPLICIT ENABLERS that it is IMPOSSIBLE for them NOT to sell the agenda and push the plan.
Check it out for yourselves:
"9/11 defendant says he wants death penalty; Alleged plotter looks forward to martyrdom" by Josh White, Washington Post | June 6, 2008
GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba - Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, calmly told a US military court yesterday that he wishes for a death sentence so that he can become "a martyr."
Admitted under TORTURE, but he can now defend himself in the military court?
..... The men are accused of being at the heart of the conspiracy that shook America on Sept. 11, 2001 - unprecedented attacks that fixed Al Qaeda as the nation's chief worldwide enemy. They are charged with orchestrating the deaths of thousands of Americans on airplanes, in New York skyscrapers, and at the Pentagon....
Mohammed quickly took center stage, railing against President Bush and his "crusades" in Iraq and Afghanistan while orchestrating a strategy that could prove a major disruption to the military commission trials...."
What a load of absolute horseshit!!
Oh, and about the TORTURE of people, MSM?
WASHINGTON - The Department of Homeland Security inspector general's office has reopened its investigation of the government's treatment of Maher Arar, a Syrian-born Canadian who, after being falsely named as a terrorist, was seized in September 2002 and sent to Syria, where he was tortured....
So why does the administration give Syria such shit when they are a "friend?"
I'm so sick of shit Zionist MSM fooleys!
Lawmakers on the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs committees criticized the Bush administration for taking four years to disclose details of the case to Congress and for trying to keep those details secret from the public...."
So WHAT ELSE won't they tell us?
Maybe this is the reason, huh?
Bush Renditions Even Uglier Than Imagined
".... It is not generally knows to the public but the U.S government now has over 30,000 (31,082 as of May 19, 2008 ) people in secret custody, all over the world.
An official U.S. program of torture and 'rendition' has been going on since before 9/11 and has never stopped. A number, estimated to be approximately 3,500, have been killed during these interrogations or have died as the result of them.
At the present time, the government, acting under specific Presidential orders, has a virtual fleet of prison ships scattered all across the globe and masked by a curtain of strict secrecy....
The legal justification for this mass torture and murder program? The office of the U.S. Attorney General has ruled that anti-torture prohibitions (deliberate murder is not a subject here) only apply within the United States and are not operational outside its geographical boundaries."
"All done with your tax dollars, and in your name.Doesn't it make you fee proud?!?" -- Mike Rivero of What Really Happened
And Arlen Specter wants to investigate football!!!!? Pfffffffttt!
"The torturous truth about Guantanamo’s 9/11 hearing"
by Jerry Mazza
Online Journal
Friday, June 6, 2008
So, here we have Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in his first public showing since his 2003 capture, a man who has to confessed to everything but the torching of the Reichstag now telling an American judge he doesn’t want his American legal team, that is, his Pentagon-appointed legal team. “I want to represent myself,” he said. How can that be?
Well, his first reason was religion. He said basically the he cannot accept any attorney who is governed by secular law, not the Lord of the law. In fact, in the face of the judge warning him he faced a death penalty, he welcomed the sentence with open arms; even said “Yes, this is what I wish, to be a martyr for a long time . . . I will, God willing, have this, by you.”
Again, for a guy whose had the masterminding of 9/11 as well as the killing of 2,973 innocents pinned on him (and his four alleged co-conspirators), that’s pretty tough talk. This while reporters from around the world were watching the hearing, with a 20-second delay, in a separate room in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in case any “classified information” erupts, or screams of rage or accusations of savage treatment slipped out. Is this why the courtroom’s soldiers must attend without weapons? We wouldn’t want any ugly flare of tempers.
Yet, Mohammed is described in a New York Times blog as wearing thick glasses, fussing with his turban or stroking his bushy gray beard, and looking noticeably thinner. Could it be the food, the tension, or the torture? Could that be the truth that would lead a man to prefer death over life, as his four cohorts do?
Here’s a guy up for conspiracy, murderer in violation of the law of war, attacking civilians, terrorism, providing material support for same. Yet, he says he’ll bite the bullet without a lawyer. And in fact, for such crimes that involved civilians, shouldn’t he be tried in a court by civilians? But then the civilian courts have presented some torturous truths in trials.
The torturous questions
Those questions include whether waterboarding constitutes torture. Nah, it’s a great practice for swimming, diving and surfing. Next question: how will statements gotten by coercion be handled? I would say with kid gloves, and as much avoidance of the principles of the Geneva Conventions and all human rights standards as possible.
Otherwise someone might say this is another kangaroo court, like the one Zacharias Moussaoui was pushed through, what with a stun gun under his shirt, and a slavering Giuliani ready to depict him as a guilty fiend, which in psychiatric circles is called “transference,” given Hizzoner’s performance on that day and after, enriching himself on the disaster.
Next question: are detainees so psychologically damaged that they may not be able to assist in their defense? C’mon, what are these guys, softies? Just because they had to sit for years in tiny cells of barbed wire in the grueling sun with black hoods on their heads, shackles on their wrists and ankles, and were pulled by Marines from outside to god knows where out of sight for their daily diet of torture? What, are we going soft, too?
Question: and what are the rules of the trials to be? Well, gee, we never had anything quite like this before, besides Moussaoui and a few other enemy combatants, who have no rights by law, our law, anyway. Rules are for legit soldiers who wanted to kill us, like the Nazis or North Koreans or North Vietnamese.
Those guys were straight up soldiers; even though a couple of rags qualified for a uniform with the Cong -- and they seemed to vanish or appear out of the jungle, a doorway, a village like mirages. But they got theirs, 2 million dead in nearly 11 years, including civilians who they so often resembled. How were we supposed to know one from the other?
So, how do we know enemy combatants from “real soldiers,” by their expensive camo, bullet-proof vests and standard issue weaponry? Perhaps some of this latent hypocrisy led one accused's lawyer to say the trial was a “fundamentally flawed” process. That was Colonel Steven David, who swore to “zealously identify and expose each and every” hole in the prosecution’s case.
Save your time, Steve, the whole circus is a hole, a dark hole in space, a void that’s sucking away legal ethics, morality, constitutional justice, in one long moan, which is the reaction, too, of the world. Still another military lawyer, according to Bloomberg News, said the commission was “definitely not a search for justice on the merits of the case itself.” He noticed, that the accused have been tortured to a human pulp that’s asking for death.
Yet the government claimed evidence from torture sessions wouldn’t be used. But then there’s that old gray line between when somebody’s sparking your testicles and when they stop and when they start again, like when you say what they don’t want to hear. Aw shucks, no fun. And then there’s all that “hearsay” evidence from intelligence reports whose sources you will never see in a courtroom to face any kind of cross-examination. Are those the rules? Well!
We’ve got real evidence to convict the administration
My sources tell me that the George Bush administration was behind 9/11. Here’s what really happened. Based on not just hearsay, but a massive gathering of evidence, with real names and reputable faces attached to it, I think we should indict Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Richard Myers, Tenet, and Robert Mueller for starters. And if they won’t talk, hey, send them for a little waterboarding. Nah, just kidding, or am I? Cheney in chains, Dov Zakheim and all his Mossad friends in barbed wire cages, they’ll talk, eventually. And if they don’t, we have the goods on them right now.
Then they won’t want our lawyers as well. They’ll confess to everything because the pain they will be facing will make death look like a holiday. Maybe Brigadier General Thomas W. Hartmann, a senior office in the Pentagon’s Office of Military Omissions (excuse me Commissions) will offer his vow to “follow the rule of law” when we try these criminals -- Emperor Bush and his Boyz.
And we the people will try not to rush the tribunal like Bush because his time is dwindling (you said it) like his number of days in office. No, we should take our time and enjoy sentencing the real terrorists, the real murderers of our people and our joy. We should do it like a slow dance on the killing ground, just the way they like it, when they go to meet their maker, the Maker of Law, like a group hanging in jolly old Elizabethan England that brought out the crowds for a good time. Here, here, get your souvenirs. Buttons, T-shirts, and pennants, manuals of torture, miniature pentagrams, get ‘em while they’re hot as hell.
Copyright © Infowars.net All rights reserved.
Printed from: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/060608torturous.htm
Of course, you can't tell the truth in this world.
That is probably just as deep a cut as the lying to us, folks.
Oh, right, I almost forgot the Iraq lies (just like the MSM)!
So here is the play the Globe gave it (why did they censor the New York Times piece?)
"Senate panel says White House exaggerated Iraq threat; Prewar claims not fully backed up, report asserts" by Scott Shane, New York Times News Service | June 6, 2008
WASHINGTON - In a report long delayed by partisan squabbling, the Senate Intelligence Committee accused President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney yesterday of taking the country to war in Iraq by exaggerating evidence of links between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda in the emotional aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
How many times do I have to link the FALSE-FLAG INSIDE JOB and the "Al-CIA-Duh," readers.
When you start to realize the truth, you really see what EGREGIOUS LIARS and AGENDA-PUSHERS the fucking New York Times is!!!!
"The president and his advisers undertook a relentless public campaign in the aftermath of the attacks to use the war against Al Qaeda as a justification for overthrowing Saddam Hussein," Senator Jay Rockefeller, the committee's Democratic chairman, said in a statement.
The committee's report cited some instances in which public statements by senior administration officials were not supported by the intelligence available at the time, such as suggestions that Hussein's Iraq and Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda were operating in a kind of partnership, that the Baghdad regime had provided the terror network with training, and that one of the Sept. 11 hijackers had met an Iraqi intelligence operative in Prague in 2001.
But they didn't call them LIES, did they?
Even the alleged exposure of lies is a LIE! Isn't that something??
What a GREAT PROPAGANDA RACKET!!!!!
But the report found that on several key issues - including Iraq's alleged nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs - public statements from Bush, Cheney, and other top officials before the war were generally substantiated by the best estimates of the intelligence agencies, though the statements did not always reflect the agencies' uncertainty about the evidence. Invading US troops subsequently found no unconventional weapons arsenal and little effort to build one.
Translation: Bush and Cheney DIDN'T LIE, according to the Senate.
Pffffffftttt!!!!
And how about NO EFFORT, Times?
Pfffffffffttt!
Republicans on the committee sharply dissented from some of its findings and attached a detailed minority report that listed prewar statements by Rockefeller and other Democrats describing the threat posed by Iraq.
You believed our lies, so your guilty too!!!
Of course, Dems are guilty because if I KNEW in April of 2002 the case for war was shit, then there is NO WAY they could NOT have known!!!
"The report released today was a waste of committee time and resources that should have been spent overseeing the intelligence community," said the minority report, signed by Senator Christopher S. Bond of Missouri, the committee's top Republican, and three GOP colleagues.
Or on IMPEACHMENT!
A second committee report made public yesterday detailed a series of meetings between Pentagon officials and Iranian dissidents in Rome and Paris in 2001 and 2003. It accused Steven Hadley, now the national security adviser, and Paul Wolfowitz, the former deputy defense secretary, of failing to properly inform the intelligence agencies and the State Department about the meetings.
Now, this is all ILLEGAL, and.... screw you, Times.
And this caveat in the report FURTHER PUSHES the AGENDA on IRAN, doesn't it?
Pfffffftttt!!!!
The two reports are the final parts of the committee's so-called phase two investigation of prewar intelligence on Iraq. The first phase of the inquiry, completed in July 2004, identified faults in the intelligence agencies' analysis of the threat posed by Hussein.
Why did it take SO FUCKING LONG?
In September 2006, the committee issued reports on two parts of the phase two study, one on how prewar assessments of Iraq's weapons programs and links to terrorism compared with postwar findings, and another on the intelligence agencies' use of information from the Iraqi National Congress, the controversial opposition group to Hussein.
In May 2007, the committee, now led by Democrats, put out a third part of the phase two review, this one examining prewar predictions by the intelligence agencies about post-war Iraq.
Ever hear of Times Too Little, Times Too Late?!!!!
But it would take another year to complete the look at prewar public statements by executive branch officials. In the end, the Republicans chose to issue their own dissenting report, aimed at showing that some Democrats had themselves made bellicose comments about Hussein and the threat he posed."
Yeah, so they are JUST AS BAD AS YOU, right, liars?!
Here's the Times version:
WASHINGTON — A long-delayed Senate committee report endorsed by Democrats and some Republicans concluded that President Bush and his aides built the public case for war against Iraq by exaggerating available intelligence and by ignoring disagreements among spy agencies about Iraq’s weapons programs and Saddam Hussein’s links to Al Qaeda.
They just can't say lie, can they?
And why did they take out the inflammatory aftermath of 9/11 stuff in the Globe?
Too many lies together not a good thing, huh, Times?
The report was released Thursday after years of partisan squabbling, and it represented the close of five years of investigations by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence into the use, abuse and faulty assessments of intelligence leading to the invasion of Iraq in March 2003.
That some Bush administration claims about the Iraqi threat turned out to be false is hardly new. But the report, based on a detailed review of public statements by Mr. Bush and other officials, was the most comprehensive effort to date to assess whether policy makers systematically painted a more dire picture about Iraq than was justified by the available intelligence.
Unfrikkin real! Then WHERE YOU BEEN, Times?
I've been waiting FIVE YEARS!!!
Of course, you STILL SHOVELED the LIES fast and furious on your FRONT-PAGES!!!!
The 170-page report accuses Mr. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other top officials of repeatedly overstating the Iraqi threat in the emotional aftermath of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Its findings were endorsed by all eight committee Democrats and two Republicans, Senators Olympia J. Snowe of Maine and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska.
In a statement accompanying the report, Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, the West Virginia Democrat who is chairman of the intelligence panel, said, “The president and his advisers undertook a relentless public campaign in the aftermath of the attacks to use the war against Al Qaeda as a justification for overthrowing Saddam Hussein.”
Dana Perino, the White House spokeswoman, on Thursday called the report a “selective view” and said that the Bush administration’s public statements were based on the same faulty intelligence given to Congress and endorsed by foreign intelligence services. Senator Christopher S. Bond of Missouri, the committee’s top Republican, called the report a “waste of committee time and resources.”
The presidential campaigns of Senators John McCain and Barack Obama had not responded by Thursday night to requests for comment on the Senate report.
The report on the prewar statements found that on some important issues, most notably on what was believed to be Iraq’s nuclear, biological and chemical weapons programs, the public statements from Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney and other senior officials were generally “substantiated” by the best estimates at the time from American intelligence agencies. But it found that the administration officials’ statements usually did not reflect the intelligence agencies’ uncertainties about the evidence or the disputes among them.
In a separate report released Wednesday, the intelligence committee provided new details about a series of clandestine meetings in Rome and Paris between Pentagon officials and Iranian dissidents in 2001 and 2003. The meetings included discussions about possible covert actions to destabilize the government in Tehran, and were used by the Pentagon officials to glean information about rivalries in Iran and what was thought to be an Iranian “hit” team intending to attack American troops in Afghanistan, the report said.
After a while, you just get tired of the shit!!!!
Yeah, we are ALREADY DOING COVERT ACTIONS against Iran and HAVE BEEN FOR YEARS!!!!
And Iranian hit teams in Afghanistan? Ha-ha-ha-ha!!!
Right, SHIITE IRAN is going to help SUNNI Taliban that they almost went to war with in the late 1990s.
Uh-huh!!!!
The report concluded that Stephen J. Hadley, now the national security adviser, and Paul D. Wolfowitz, who was then the deputy defense secretary, “acted within their authorities” to send the Pentagon officials to Rome. But the report criticized the meetings as ill advised, and accused Mr. Hadley and Mr. Wolfowitz of keeping the State Department and intelligence agencies in the dark about the meetings, which the report portrayed as part of a rogue intelligence operation.
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!
Right, they were part of a ROGUE INTELLIGENCE OP!
Well, that would be the WHOLE ADMINISTRATION!!!
How about Doug Feith and his Office of Special Plans, huh?
Is that in the report?
The two reports were the final parts of the committee’s so-called Phase 2 investigation of prewar intelligence on Iraq and related issues. The first phase of the inquiry, begun in the summer of 2003 and completed in July 2004, identified grave faults in the C.I.A’s analysis of the threat posed by Mr. Hussein.
What threat?
The report on Iraq on Thursday was especially critical of statements by the president and vice president linking Iraq to Al Qaeda and raising the possibility that Mr. Hussein might supply the terrorist group with unconventional weapons. “Representing to the American people that the two had an operational partnership and posed a single, indistinguishable threat was fundamentally misleading and led the nation to war on false premises,” Mr. Rockefeller wrote.
So, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT, Jay?
Mr. Bond and four other Republicans on the committee sharply dissented from the report’s findings and suggested that the investigation was a partisan smoke screen to obscure the real story: that the C.I.A. failed the Bush administration by delivering intelligence assessments to policy makers that have since been discredited.
Pffft!
In a detailed minority report, four of those Republicans accused Democrats of hypocrisy and of cherry picking, namely by refusing to include misleading public statements by top Democrats like Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and Mr. Rockefeller.
The American public hasn't forgotten Ms. Clinton's stance on the war!
As an example, they pointed to an October 2002 speech by Mr. Rockefeller, who declared to his Senate colleagues that he had arrived at the “inescapable conclusion that the threat posed to America by Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction is so serious that despite the risks, and we should not minimize the risks, we must authorize the president to take the necessary steps to deal with the threat.”
Gee, look at the Times pick up the ball for the Republican defenders of lies!!!!!
Oh, I'm sorry. The Times is defending itself!!!!
The report about the Bush administration’s public statements offers some new details about the intelligence information that was available to policy makers as they built a case for war. For instance, in September 2002 Donald H. Rumsfeld, then the defense secretary, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that “the Iraq problem cannot be solved by airstrikes alone,” because Iraqi chemical and biological weapons were so deeply buried that they could not be penetrated by American bombs.
Two months later, however, the National Intelligence Council wrote an assessment for Mr. Rumsfeld concluding that the Iraqi underground weapons facilities identified by the intelligence agencies “are vulnerable to conventional, precision-guided, penetrating munitions because they are not deeply buried.”
Look at this!!! The Times is ACTING AS IF SADDAM HAD WMD!!!!
Yeah, ONE LIE is OUTED by ANOTHER LIE -- and never the TRUTH shall meet.
Hey, Times, he DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING and WE ALL KNEW IT BEFORE THE INVASION!!!!!
So, readers, what does the report really say?
These "accounts" by the SAME LIARS who LIED US IN THERE are TOTALLY SELECTIVE BULLSHIT!!!
I mean, I JUST READ THEM WITH YOU!!!!!
On Thursday, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, a Democratic member of the intelligence committee, said that Congress had never been told about the National Intelligence Council’s assessment."
So what, no blood on your hands? Pfffffffftttt!!!!
And the questions the MSM won't respond t0 (God Bless the BLOGS):
"Okay, here is where the rubber meets the road; what is the Senate going to DO about it? And when the Senate fails to do anything about it, what will YOU do?
Because if you do not do something about a President who lied us into Iraq (and is trying to lie us into Iran) then all future Presidents will feel they have the right to lie us into more wars with impunity.
We can win a future of peace for all the worlds by tarring and feathering just one lying fink and the enablers in the media and government who helped him do it.
Or we can condemn our children and grandchildren to endless wars and privations.
It is time to decide." -- Mike Rivero of What Really Happened
I say tar and feather them all. I'm ready to.
Report: Bush Misrepresented Iraq Intel"
"Enough with the euphemisms! I am sick of words like "Misused" and "misrepresented!" Where are the people with the courage to call a lie a lie? Who will denounce Bush and the government for having lied (for that is the correct word) us all into a pointless war of conquest?
Where is the righteous anger? Where are the families of our war dead, murdered with that lie? Why do they remain silent?
You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things! O you hard hearts, you cruel men of America, Knew you not the truth? (Apologies to Bill Shakespeare)" -- Mike Rivero of What Really Happened
I've got tons of anger, dude. Gets worse everyday, especially being LIED TO by the MSM like we are!
And they just keep on lying.
How come I don't see these stories in my Zionist War Dailies?
"A secret deal being negotiated in Baghdad would perpetuate the American military occupation of Iraq indefinitely, regardless of the outcome of the US presidential election in November.
The terms of the impending deal, details of which have been leaked to The Independent, are likely to have an explosive political effect in Iraq. Iraqi officials fear that the accord, under which US troops would occupy permanent bases, conduct military operations, arrest Iraqis and enjoy immunity from Iraqi law, will destabilise Iraq's position in the Middle East and lay the basis for unending conflict in their country.
But the accord also threatens to provoke a political crisis in the US. President Bush wants to push it through by the end of next month so he can declare a military victory and claim his 2003 invasion has been vindicated...."
Un-fucking-real!
And if the Iraqis don't go along, well, they get what anyone else would who doesn't obey U.S. orders:
US issues threat to Iraq's $50bn foreign reserves in military deal
US negotiators are using the existence of $20bn in outstanding court judgments against Iraq in the US, to pressure their Iraqi counterparts into accepting the terms of the military deal, details of which were reported for the first time in this newspaper yesterday.
Iraq's foreign reserves are currently protected by a presidential order giving them immunity from judicial attachment but the US side in the talks has suggested that if the UN mandate, under which the money is held, lapses and is not replaced by the new agreement, then Iraq's funds would lose this immunity...."
Translation: Bush will STAB them in the BACK!!!
"What's happening here can be summed up in two words: economic blackmail." -- Mike Rivero of What Really Happened
YUP!
Oh, and here are some videos to watch!!!
"We Should Not Let Them Back into Polite Society" - Richard Clarke on GWB and His Cronies
Think the LYING, COMPLICIT, ENABLING MSM will report THAT?
