Monday, June 23, 2008

The George W. Bush Effect: How Obama Loses in November

Let me ask you something: Why wouldn't the Globe's web site post the map for you (and me)?

Please, help me out on this one. I mean, I'M LOOKING AT IT!

Wouldn't they want you to see what the hell the guy is talking about?

Why not on web?

And what until you see the criterion this guy uses for his analysis; destroys any credibility he might have had.

"Obama's risky electoral strategy" by Robert David Sullivan | June 23, 2008

Robert David Sullivan, a guest columnist, is the managing editor of CommonWealth magazine.

"Obama is certainly not conceding historically Democratic states where George Bush made significant gains in 2004, but he is signaling a preference to fight in places where the GOP showed signs of slippage in the last election....

Who cares about GEORGE BUSH'S GAINS in 2004?!

Also see: Stolen Elections (Part 2)

That was a LIFETIME AGO NOW, and the public SEES THAT SOB for the LYING, LAW-BREAKING MASS-MURDERING CRIMINAL HE IS!!!!

Obama is concentrating on Colorado, North Carolina, and Virginia....

Those three states contain significant splotches of the lighter shading on the map above, which does not show the familiar red vs. blue breakdown of the United States, but instead shows how voting patterns changed between Bush's first and second election. (Darker areas are where Bush enjoyed a significant boost; lighter areas are where he received little or no benefit from running as the incumbent.)

Where is the MAP?! Why didn't the Globe put it up on the web, huh?

And at this point in our history, after the last four years, what possible relevance could Bush's standing have -- other than to highlight his RECORD DISAPPROVAL!!!!

The American people are TIRED of the Clinton/Bush crime syndicate, and THAT'S ALL THEY NEED TO KNOW!!!

One striking aspect about the map is how closely it resembles the results of the Democratic primaries and caucuses this year. Obama ran best on the mid-Atlantic coast and in the northern reaches of the West Coast, the Rocky Mountain states, and the Midwest, where the beginnings of a backlash against the GOP could be discerned four years ago. He was weaker in the Appalachians, the New York City area, and southern California, where Bush had flexed the most muscle in 2004 and where Democrats may be the most nervous about their chances of taking the White House back this year....

It would be ironic if Obama snatched Colorado and even such traditionally Republican states as Montana and North Dakota but still lost the election because New Jersey floated away from the Democrats....

So THERE is YOUR SCENARIO for a McCain victory come election night in November!!!!

Also see: Obama extending lead over McCain

The Boston Times: Why Obama Blows Out McCain... and How the Republicans Plan to Stop Him

States Swinging Toward Obama