Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Bush's Justice and the Boston Globes's Censorship

Here is the key quote:

Incredible!

ANOTHER REWRITTEN ARTICLE off the Boston Globe's web site -- with my KEY QUOTE CUT!

It's called FUCKING CENSORSHIP, and it is a big reason I hate the fucking Zionist-controlled, shit-pushing AmeriKan MSM!


Here is what the Boston Globe and AP CENSORED, readers!

"Although federal law prohibits discriminating against government job applicants based on their politics, it's unlikely that any of those involved in the hiring process will be penalized since they no longer work at the department."

Also see:
Congress to Allow Bush Subpoenas to Expire

Yup, more ELECTION YEAR FOOLEYS for YOUR CONSUMPTION, 'murka!

Because NOTHING is going to happen to these criminal shits!!!!


"Justice Dept. accused of political hiring bias; Liberals passed over for jobs, report finds" by Lara Jakes Jordan, Associated Press | June 25, 2008

WASHINGTON - Scores of highly credentialed young lawyers and law students were denied interviews for coveted positions at the Justice Department because of an illegal screening process that took political and ideological views and affiliations into account instead of merit, Justice Department investigators concluded in a report released yesterday.

In 2006, some applicants for sought-after jobs in the department honors program and summer intern program were rejected because they were members of the American Constitution Society or Planned Parenthood or because they expressed concern about gender discrimination in the military, the report found.

Other students or graduates who were brushed aside included a University of Alabama law graduate, ranked sixth in the class, who had written a paper on the detention of people under the USA Patriot Act, a Yale Law School graduate who was fluent in Arabic, and a Georgetown law student who had worked for Senator John F. Kerry's presidential campaign.

Justice Department officials told investigators the applicants were turned down for reasons of academic performance. But most, if not all, of the applicants had superior records, and those explanations were not deemed credible, according to the report.

Career staff members and other senior officials openly complained about bias in the process, but their complaints were ignored, investigators found.

The findings are contained in the first of several official reports expected on the tenure of Alberto R. Gonzales as attorney general, and allegations that the longtime friend and confidant of President Bush allowed political considerations to influence the hiring of career employees and other functions at the Justice Department.

While the report does not directly accuse Gonzales of misconduct, two Justice officials were found to have violated federal civil service law and department regulations in connection with screening applicants. Two other officials were criticized for exercising poor judgment and failing to aggressively address the issue of illegal hiring after concerns of career employees surfaced internally.

Investigators said they were unable to conclude who gave the order to start employing a political litmus test, although the report said some of the people interviewed pointed the finger at former Gonzales aide Monica Goodling, who resigned last year after acknowledging in sworn testimony that she might have violated the law in evaluating applicants for career Justice positions. Many of the records associated with the interviews were destroyed, the report said.

"Today's report confirms that the Bush administration was engaged in a deliberate effort to inject partisan politics into the administration of justice," said Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The honors and summer intern programs, he said, "were made into a recruitment firm for conservatives, rewarding ideology with career advancement."

The Justice Department last year implemented new procedures to remove the taint of politics from the hiring process. US Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey said yesterday that the department was implementing additional reforms recommended by authors of the report.

"I have . . . made clear, and will continue to make clear, that the consideration of political affiliations in the hiring of career Department employees is impermissible and unacceptable," Mukasey said."

So why do I have to go to the web and find the article that is staring me in the face?

I'm getting sick of this shit, and the time for buying the Boston Globe may rapidly be coming to an end because I am tired off this SHIT!!!!!!!

If it is just an "update," then WHY the TOTAL REWRITE, huh?

Looks like Jordan's first article pissed someone off, huh?

Do me a favor, readers: COMPARE the TWO!

"Audit: Dems, liberals passed over for Justice jobs"

"Ivy Leaguers and other top law students were rejected for plum Justice Department jobs two years ago because of their liberal leanings or objections to Bush administration politics, a government report concluded Tuesday.

That certainly is more damning towards the Bush administration than the Globe's web site copy, isn't it?

And CUI-fucking-BONO?


Even senior Justice Department officials flinched
at what appeared to be hiring decisions based - improperly and illegally - on politics, according to the internal report.

Yeah, you wouldn't want THAT OUT THERE on the WEB, would you, Globe?


As early as 2002, career Justice employees complained to department officials that Bush administration political appointees had largely taken over the hiring process
for summer interns and so-called Honors Program jobs for newly graduated law students. For years, job applicants had been judged on their grades, the quality of their law schools, their legal clerkships and other experiences.

Yup, there is SOMETHING ELSE that is CENSORED!!

As EARLY as 2002, huh?!?!

Yeah, the Globe wouldn't want Americans to know that the CRIMINAL CONDUCT of Bush's "Justice" Department began WAY BACK in 2002!!

Reminds me of something else:


Bush's Wiretapping Began BEFORE 9/11!! and the New York Times Admits Bush Administration Spying Began in December of 2000... BEFORE TAKING OFFICE!

But in 2002, many applicants who identified themselves as Democrats or were members of liberal-leaning organizations were rejected while GOP loyalists with fewer legal skills were hired.

That means that the people left over and working there are SHIT!!!

This means that OUR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT is now staffed by UNQUALIFIED ASSHOLES!!!!

This country has NO IDEA the SHIT Bush is leaving behind; they think a new man is going to come in and things are going to be fine.

They ARE NOT!

Whether it is the military and our soldiers, the environment and the economy, or the complete negligence of this administration, we are going to get FUCKED EVEN MORE in the FUTURE!!!

The political filtering of applicants ebbed for the three years between 2003 and 2005, the inquiry found, then resumed by 2006.

How much more SHIT are you going to take, DemocraPs?!

Think he's not SPYING on your CALLS?

Not that it matters: ALL BULLSHIT!

Although federal law prohibits discriminating against government job applicants based on their politics, it's unlikely that any of those involved in the hiring process will be penalized since they no longer work at the department.

Wow! That is where my Globe paper ends.

They must have had the ax out for this one!!!!

Here is WHAT they CUT!

A Justice official said the department is not considering pressing criminal charges or taking or civil actions against them.

And that settles that, doesn't it?

Democrats quickly seized on the report to bludgeon the Bush administration for playing politics with a department sworn to uphold the law fairly."

Hey, DemocraPs, come here!

Pull my finger.

Pffffffffftttttttt!

"This is the first smoking gun," said Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

A smoking gun of HOT FART MIST, 'eh, Chuck?

Yeah, thanks for recommending Mukasey, you Zionist shitter!!!!!!!!!!

And how about the Boston Globe and the rewriting of the article?

PRO-BUSH, PRO-GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP!

Yeah, and these guys are going to tell the truth about.... ??