Sorry, America.
Exhibit A:
"On trip to Europe, Bush will seek leaders' resolve on Iran; Aims to sway nations critical of US efforts" by Jennifer Loven, Associated Press | June 10, 2008
LJUBLJANA, Slovenia - President Bush's weeklong tour through Berlin, Rome, Paris, and London appears every bit the glamorous old-style farewell tour with a leisurely schedule, jaunts to country castles and lavish dinners.
But it's actually a high-stakes diplomatic mission, spurred by Bush's fear that Iran is an increasingly urgent threat and that Europe may not take it seriously enough.
As Bush chokes on the Zionist cock he's sucking.
Bush has never been popular in Western Europe after the US invasion of Iraq. "A lot of people like America. They may not sometimes necessarily like the president but they like America," Bush told a reporter from Slovenia.
Well, no, they now HATE US, too, because of you, asshole!
So it was puzzling that he decided to buzz through all of Western Europe's Big Four nations this week, risking large protests and pointed questions, instead of choosing, as he usually does, to stop in formerly communist, newly democratic Central and Eastern European countries where he always gets rock-star welcomes.
The AP dropping to its knees and unzipping fly here.
And about those protests, MSM?
How come they get ONE PHRASE and THAT'S IT?
Iran helps solve the mystery.
Bush started his trip yesterday in Slovenia where he will take part in the annual US-European Union summit.
Thinking of Slovenia makes me think of Laura.
He also is staying in Italy to see his old friend, Premier Silvio Berlusconi, and for his third meeting with Pope Benedict XVI, visiting Germany to chat with Chancellor Angela Merkel, spending two days in Paris with President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, going to Windsor Castle to see Britain's Queen Elizabeth II, and stopping in Belfast to hail the power-sharing agreement between Protestants and Catholics.
WTF?! All that FUEL he is burning when we have an ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS of GLOBAL WARMING?
Pffffffft! Yeah, FUCK OFF on that issue, too, agenda-pushing AmeriKan MSM!!!
But mostly, Bush is visiting nations and leaders critical to a stepped-up US effort to get new and harsher measures aimed at preventing Iran from proceeding with a suspected plan to build a nuclear bomb. Britain, Germany, and France, along with the United States, Russia, and China, are developing a package of fresh penalties and incentives aimed at reigning in Tehran's alleged atomic ambitions. Italy wants to join the effort, too, and Bush told a television interview that he was open to it.
Yeah, right, everyone is with us -- until the U.N fails to adopt, then it is useless again.
"He is going to try to stiffen European resolve on Iran," said Stephen J. Flanagan, director of the international securities program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "If anything else is going to happen . . . those are the countries that are going to deliver."
And if not, he'll bomb.
It's a high priority of Bush's, and he is running against two quickly ticking clocks.
One is his own. His presidency is set to end in a mere seven months.
Maybe. We'll see.
The other is Iran's. In defiance of the first three rounds of mostly symbolic UN Security Council resolutions, Tehran has not only continued its enrichment of uranium, producing material that could be used to power an electricity plant or make a nuclear bomb, but also has expanded and improved it. Assessments vary widely, but it is widely presumed Tehran will have enough fissile material for a weapon within a few years.
Here they go again, pushing the propaganda and the bullshit!
I'm so sick of debunking this shit! A never-ending Zionist shit stream!
A US intelligence report in December said Iran once had an active warhead program, but shelved it in 2003. But the administration believes that is nowhere near the last word on Tehran's desire for a nuclear weapon. It argues that the continuing enrichment means the military program could be restarted at any time, and without the knowledge of the outside world.
So is the AP a Bush PR outfit or what? Yeah, sure, the AmeriKan press fucked up on Iraq, but they are going to a much better job on Iran.
What HORSESHIT!
Can't you SEE the RAMP-UP PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN in the Zionist AmeriKan MSM?! And this is AP -- available ALL OVER the WORLD!!!!
Those competing to succeed Bush, Barack Obama, a Democratic senator from Illinois, and John McCain, a GOP senator from Arizona, have differences on whether to talk to Iran's leaders. But both have pledged to be as tough as Bush - including holding out the threat of force - to prevent Iran from becoming nuclear-armed.
As if that's what they want and are doing.
Oh, yeah, the "election" ain't gonna mean shit!!!! Pfffffttt!
Still, either administration will take some time after the January inauguration to gear up, both in personnel and policy development. And that is time that Bush and his administration fear cannot afford to be wasted.
Yup, HE WILL BE ATTACKING!!!
"It's just this sense of how much time can, in a sense, be lost before the Iranians do something very significant?" Flanagan said.
Something "significant? Like what?! Power some lights?
So the president is on a tour of persuasion.
They didn't add FOR ISRAEL!!!
"I will continue to work on this trip to talk about the dangers of a nuclear Iran - not civilian nuclear power, but a program that would be aimed at blackmail or destruction - and that we've got to work to stop them from learning how to enrich," Bush said in an interview with RAI TV of Italy.
First of all, as an NPT signatory (something "allies" Israel, India and Pakistan are not), Iran is LEGALLY ENTITLED to enrich uranium!!!!
Oh, and they ALREADY KNOW HOW, dumb shit fuck!!!!!
Secondly, the only BLACKMAILERS are the ISRAELI ZIONISTS and their insane agenda.
He preceded his European trip, not coincidentally, with a Washington meeting with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel. The session, with the leader of the nation most afraid of Iran and most hawkish about curtailing its influence, became a platform for tough talk on Iran by Bush.
And CUI BONO? But Israel isn't calling the shots or anything.
The president promised that the United States takes seriously the "existential threat to peace" that Iran poses. And his national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, spoke cryptically afterward about whether Olmert had asked for the promise of military action. "All I can say, really, is that we've talked a lot about Iran and about the options that are available," Hadley said."
Oh, IT'S ON!!! But when they attack they will claim they did everything in their power to avoid such eventualities.
And the papers will dutifully report such statements. Pfffffttt!!!!!
More MSM bullshit shoveling:
"President Bush... will use the time to talk... about the Middle East, energy security and, above all, Iran’s nuclear program....
“Everybody’s concentrating on the incoming president and not on the president in office, which I think is a mistake,” said Karsten D. Voigt, the coordinator of German-American cooperation in the Foreign Ministry. “Especially in the field of foreign and security policy, an American president is president until the last day.”
High on the security agenda is Iran, whose nuclear program increasingly worries the Europeans, the United States and, particularly, Israel....
Few European leaders had dared tell Mr. Bush what they thought about the camp at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba...."Why? What are they afraid of?
I mean, they are our friends, right?
Also see: Israel Writes The New York Times News Pages
The New York Times: Israel's Mouthpiece
And here is your FRONT-PAGE PROP PUSH from the Globe:
"Interest grows for international Iran atom plant; Compromise plan from MIT" by Farah Stockman, Globe Staff | June 10, 2008
WASHINGTON - A deeply controversial plan put forth by MIT scientists to end the standoff over Iran's nuclear program is getting increased interest from senior members of both parties in Congress and nonproliferation specialists.
Because Israel is against it.
The plan, which was rejected three years ago by the Bush administration, argues for a dramatic shift in US policy: Rather than trying to halt Iran's efforts to enrich uranium, the United States should help build an internationally run enrichment facility inside Iran to replace Iran's current facilities.
Supporters argue that such a program would fulfill Iran's insistence on enriching uranium on its own soil, while preventing the dangerous material from being diverted to weapons.
Three years ago, when the proposal was first advanced, it was widely considered unthinkable. Administration officials argued that tougher sanctions and the threat of military strikes would force Iran to stop its program to enrich uranium, a process that uses thousands of spinning centrifuges to create fuel out of rare uranium isotopes that can be used for nuclear power or weapons.
WRONG AGAIN, assholes!!!!!!
But now, as Iran appears on the verge of mastering enrichment technology, the call to try to internationalize Iran's facilities is getting more attention on Capitol Hill and from nonproliferation specialists as a face-saving compromise.
At this point, if I were Iran, I would tell the Zionist U.S. Congress to FUCK OFF!!!!!
And notice the LIE about Iran and nuclear weapons is accepted as a given in the AmeriKan press, readers? Case closed.
Iranian officials proposed building an international enrichment plant inside Iran in a letter they submitted to the United Nations last month, but declined to say whether such a plant would be in addition to or a replacement for their own facilities.
Yeah, and WHAT ABOUT ISRAEL'S DIMONA NUCLEAR WEAPONS PLANT?
In an interview last month, Iran's ambassador to the UN, Mohammad Khazaee, said the details should be negotiated.
Thomas Pickering, the US ambassador to the United Nations under President George H.W. Bush, endorsed the idea in a March article in the New York Review of Books that was co-authored by Jim Walsh, a nonproliferation specialist at MIT, and William Luers, president of the United Nations Association, which organizes meetings with Iranian officials. The three have spent more than a year in informal talks with officials from Iran's foreign ministry and Atomic Energy Organization.
WTF? G.W. Bush's FATHER'S GUYS talking to "TERRORISTS?"
John Thomson, a former British ambassador to the United Nations who is now at MIT, and Geoffrey Forden, an MIT physicist and former weapons inspector in Iraq, have spent more than two years on separate research into the technology needed to safeguard such an international facility, including equipment that would prevent Iranian scientists from taking control of it or learning how it works.
So even when we are "being nice" we are trying to fuck people up the ass!
No wonder NO ONE BELIEVES in AmeriKa anymore!
Just a SLAVE for Iz-ray-HELL!!!!
Senators Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, and Chuck Hagel, a Nebraska Republican, have said publicly that the plan should be explored.
Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat, went further, calling the plan "a creative, thoughtful, and productive potential solution."
Presidential candidates John McCain, the presumptive GOP nominee, and Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, have both endorsed using international consortiums to produce nuclear fuel as a way to take production out of the hands of unpredictable states, but neither has said he would consider placing such a facility inside Iran. McCain's campaign said an Iran-based plant would not be "subject to transparent and accountable international safeguards." But advisers to Obama did not rule the option out.
"This is nobody's first choice, but it may be the compromise we end up with," said Joseph Cirincione, a nonproliferation specialist who serves informally as an adviser to Obama's campaign. Cirincione is president of the Ploughshares Fund, a nonproliferation organization based in San Francisco that provided funding for talks that Pickering and his associates held with Iranian officials.
International consortiums to make fuel for nuclear power plants have been around for decades. In 1973, France, Belgium, Spain, and Sweden formed a joint enrichment company called EURODIF, and a year later the shah of Iran lent $1 billion to the project in exchange for a 10 percent share in the venture. But after the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran, the deal was canceled and the loan frozen. The United States, fearing that Iran's radical regime was secretly pursuing a nuclear weapon, pressured the rest of the world to cease all nuclear cooperation with Iran.
Ahem! See: How Israel Got the Nuclear Bomb
For the next 20 years, Iranian scientists worked in secret to construct their own enrichment facility using items purchased on the black market, violating the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which mandates that nuclear work be monitored by the UN.
Ahem! See: How Israel Got the Nuclear Bomb
In 2002, an Iranian exile group exposed the existence of the facility, prompting the UN Security Council to demand that Iran halt all enrichment efforts.
Russia has offered to supply Iran's reactor with enriched uranium under a deal that would ensure that no fuel is diverted to weapons. But so far, Iranian officials have refused, saying they can't rely on outsiders.
Of course, if the Israeli Zionists say that, NO PROBLEM, right, Zionist-controlled AmeriKan MSM?
In early 2005, officials from the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency studied the idea of placing a facility inside Iran. Later that year, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran gave a speech at the UN inviting other countries to join in Iran's enrichment facility. US officials dismissed it as insincere.
That summer at MIT, Forden began researching how to design a plant in a way that would prevent Iran from taking control of it.
Iranians are smarter than Amurkns: We butt-prop right away.
Later, Walsh and Pickering began their talks with Iranian officials. "I think that there are parts of the Iranian establishment, and more parts than not, that are open" to it, Walsh said.
What are G.W.'s FATHER'S PEOPLE doing TALKING to "terrorists?"
Unless that is more BULLSHIT FOOLEYS from the AmeriKan MSM!
But Forden and Walsh initially got a cold reaction from US officials and other nuclear experts. At the time, Iran had only 164 centrifuges and seemed far from being able to enrich enough uranium for a bomb. But now, as Iran ramps up to more than 3,500 centrifuges, despite international sanctions and pressure, the idea is getting a second look, they said.
"When we first talked about it, people in Congress were openly hostile," said Forden. Now, he said, it is easier to get meetings on Capitol Hill. "People are starting to take it much more seriously," he said.
That's because ISRAEL CONTROLS the U.S. Congress!!!
Cirincione initially opposed the idea, but now says it is "worth exploring."
"The preferred option is no centrifuges in Iran, but that horse has left the barn," he said. "Their position has gotten stronger and ours has gotten weaker. The longer that deal isn't made, the higher the price goes."
Still, many remain deeply skeptical. Stephen Rademaker, who recently served as the State Department's assistant secretary for nonproliferation, said the plan rewards Iran's bad behavior and does not guarantee that Iran will not try to secretly reproduce the international equipment on its own. "We would be standing up a far more capable facility on Iranian soil than they would ever stand up on their own," he said.
Ahem! See: How Israel Got the Nuclear Bomb
But others say the MIT plan may eventually become the best policy choice, if the current strategy fails. Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, said it is too early to give up on trying to persuade Iran to halt its enrichment program. "But in the long run, it may not be possible," he said. "In which case, this proposal may be the best available option."
Excuse me, but if you have been reading the Zionist-controlled press lately, you will see that they consider the BEST OPTION to be BOMBING!!!!
And just in case the nuke lies don't convince you, 'murkn shit-eater, then there is always Iran's "interfering" in Iraq (leading the World coverage!).
(Did they go half-way around the world to invade anyone, readers?)
"Iran's supreme leader opposes US-Iraq deal" by Ali Akbar Dareini and Qassim Abdul-Zahra, Associated Press Writers | June 9, 2008
TEHRAN, Iran --Iraq's prime minister made little headway in easing Iranian opposition to a U.S.-Iraqi security pact, as Iran's supreme leader told him Monday that American troops must leave the country.
The deal, which is still under negotiation, could lay the groundwork for a long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq. The Iranians fear the deal would solidify U.S. influence in Iraq and give American forces a launching pad for military action against them.
No reason the Iranians should fear something like that -- even if the Zionist neo-cons wrote that down as part of their world domination scheme.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki met over three days with Iranian leaders in Tehran, trying to ease the neighboring country's opposition to the agreement -- apparently hoping to stop Iranian denunciations while assuring the Iranians that a deal would pose no threat to their security.
But in talks Monday, Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made clear his rejection of any agreement. He said "occupiers who interfere in Iraq's affairs through their military and security might" are the main cause of Iraq's problems and the "main obstacle in the way of the Iraqi nation's progress and prosperity."
YUP!!!!
He told al-Maliki that Iraqis must "think of a solution to free" the country from the U.S. military, and he vowed that "America's dream for Iraq will not come true," according to state-run television. Al-Maliki returned to Iraq later Monday, ending his second trip to Tehran in a year....
Yeah, Maliki says he won't allow the U.S. to use Iraq as a launching pad.
A) How's he going to stop them, and B) U.S. has so much Navy firepower in Gulf it won't need to use Iraq material to attack.
Iranian officials and pro-government newspapers have accused Washington of trying to control Iraq through the security deal. The proposed pact is also facing widespread opposition among Iraqi politicians.
Oh, so it is NOT just Iran!! Looking more and more like the ONLY IRAQIS for PERMANENT OCCUPATION are AmeriKa's STOOGES!
Sure isn't the tone of this Zionist-controlled War Daily report though, is it?
Many fear Washington has plans to keep permanent bases, despite a denial of any such plan written into the proposal. Iraqis say the drafts submitted by the Americans thus far would infringe on Iraq's sovereignty by giving U.S. forces too much freedom to operate.
Would you believe U.S. denials from these liars anymore. No, we haven't decided to invade Iraq, blah, blah..... In one ear, out the other, liars!!!!
The latest proposed American draft, put forward Sunday, seeks to address some of those concerns. It adds an explicit promise that U.S. forces in Iraq will not attack neighboring countries and that Iraqi authorities will be notified in advance of any action by U.S. ground forces, according to two Iraqi lawmakers familiar with the draft. While the proposal gives U.S. forces the power to arrest suspects, it says any detainees would be handed over to Iraqi authorities, said the lawmakers, Mahmoud Othman and Iman al-Asadi....
Promises, promises.... pfffffftttt!!!!
The draft is the fourth put forward by the Americans, and earlier versions have been rejected by parties across Iraq's political spectrum...."
But the Iraqis want us there -- or so the Zionist-controlled, agenda-pushing MSM infer.
They have LIED from the START about Iraq and have NEVER QUIT LYING, readers. And now they are doing it about IRAN!!!
How's that MSM shit taste, 'murkns?
