Friday, April 4, 2008

The Lying New York Times

It's incredible; they do it every day, every day, every day!!

They are a LYING, WAR-PROMOTING AGENDA-PUSHER, no doubt about it!!

Here's a brief example, readers.

I'm only linking the stories; I don't want this Zionist war-propaganda garbage cluttering up my site.

"More Than 1,000 in Iraq’s Forces Quit Basra Fight"

"More than 1,000 Iraqi soldiers and policemen either refused to fight or simply abandoned their posts during the inconclusive assault against Shiite militias in Basra last week, a senior Iraqi government official said Thursday....

Mr. Sadr, who asked his followers to stop fighting on Sunday, called Thursday for a million Iraqis to march to the Shiite holy city of Najaf next week to protest what he called the American occupation. He also issued a veiled threat against Mr. Maliki’s forces, whom he accused of violating the terms of an agreement with the Iraqi government to stand down....

Which the Iraqi government has not done! Sigh!

Most of the deserters were not officers. The American military official said, “From what we understand, the bulk of these were from fairly fresh troops who had only just gotten out of basic training and were probably pushed into the fight too soon.”

“There were obviously others who elected to not fight their fellow Shia,” the official said, but added that the coalition did not see the failures as a “major issue,” especially if the Iraqi government dealt firmly with them....

What are they going to do to them -- fire 'em?

Pfffftttt!

Are you tired of AmeriKa's military liars yet, 'murkn?

Government raids
on Mahdi Army units — something Mr. Sadr had said must stop — have if anything become more frequent in Basra and Baghdad....

And here the Times and therest of the AmeriKan MSM are telling us things are calming down!

Case fucking closed on AmeriKa's LYING FUCKING MSM!!!!


American support for Iraqi government forces has also continued, and on Thursday the American military said it had carried out two airstrikes on Wednesday in Basra, one “to destroy an enemy structure housing a sniper engaging Iraqi security forces in Basra” and another to destroy a machine gun nest.

The Iraqi police said one of the strikes leveled a two-story house in Basra’s Kibla neighborhood, killing three people and wounding three, all in the same family. The police made no mention of hostile activity...."

For a second look at the editing and writing style of those paragraphs, take a quick look at this, readers.

Can I close my case?

"Chinese Rights Activist Is Jailed"

No comment needed re:
China and the AmeriKan MSM.

"Obama’s Support Softens, Poll Shows"

Yeah, even as it was just reported that Obama's lead is
WIDENING!!!

There's your LYING, AGENDA-PUSHING, PRO-CLINTON Jew York Times for you, readers!

That's why all their polls are self-serving pieces of steaming, symmetrically-wound, soft-serve shit!


"Rising Leader for Next Phase of Al Qaeda’s War"

Oh, the NEW bin-Laden!!!! Gimme a fucking break!

Well, they needed a NEW ONE since the old one is
DEAD!!!!

Yup, the NEXT PHASE of "Al-CIA-Duh's" War, huh, Times?

Pffffffffftttt!


Also see:
Prop 101: Al-CIA-Duh and the OSI

Prop 101: Al-CIA-Duh's Greatest Hits


Prop 101: The "Terrorism" Business


That's enough! I can't take anymore lies, folks. Can you?

Looks like I won't be purchasing any War Dailies again today.

I wouldn't purchase the Times under any circumstances.

I don't even like touching it at the newsstand anymore.

And I don't think I'm going to visit the Times web site unless the blogs turn up something.

Good night, readers.