Sunday, April 20, 2008

The Pennsylvania Fix Is In

My prognostication: St. Hitlery will win by 15-percent.

Also see:
Racist and Sexist Pennsylvania

Why Hitlery Wins Pennsylvania by Double-Digits

This is how the AmeriKan MSM creates the groundwork for the cover story and fix!

"For Democrats, worrisome divide along class lines"

"by Peter S. Canellos, Globe Staff | April 20, 2008

PITTSBURGH - .... The class issue looms the largest in Pennsylvania, which will go to the polls on Tuesday. And party leaders - including roughly 300 undecided "superdelegates" nationwide who will probably provide the winning margin for either candidate - will be looking at more than who wins and who loses: They will look for whether either candidate can penetrate a class barrier that has seen lower-income white Democrats go for Clinton while higher-income voters generally prefer Obama....

In this case, the American public deserves the shit they get for supper!

C'mon, working-class; what's in that lunch bucket of yours?

Supporters of Obama, who has generated strong enthusiasm among younger voters, blacks, and people with negative views of Washington, have countered that his backers won't necessarily come out for Clinton....

Here is one of them, right here (you are reading me)!!!

Actually, I'll probably write in Ron Paul anyway!

Obama, whose comments about the "bitter" feelings of working-class voters dominated campaign news last week, could make the superdelegates' decision easier by winning a large share of Pennsylvania's blue-collar voters on Tuesday.

Yeah, I wonder why that was! :-)

A stronger-than-expected performance by Obama among lower-income whites would go a long way to shoring up his support among superdelegates, analysts said....

Which is why I'm expecting a Hitlery fix!

Scott Keeter, director of survey research for the Pew Research Center, who has conducted a detailed analysis of the "traits and values" of different Democratic constituencies and why they're lining up with either Clinton or Obama.

Keeter pointed out that white Democrats without a college education have voted overwhelmingly for Clinton in most states - sometimes by margins of 20 and even as high as 40 points.

They must really, really like eating shit!!!!! :-(

"It's clear that there are reservations on the part of some socially conservative voters about Obama," Keeter said.

The Pew survey suggested that racial attitudes may play a role: Democrats who said they objected to interracial dating or felt civil rights laws had gone too far were far more likely to say they'd consider supporting McCain over Obama in November, should Obama defeat Clinton.

Translation: AmeriKa is a bunch of racists -- at least, that's one excuse the MSM will fall back on to proclaim a President McCain!

But not everyone is writing off Obama's chances with working-class voters.

Bill Green, a public relations consultant and local political analyst in Pittsburgh, said he believes Obama's controversial comments - suggesting working-class voters are bitter about their economic plight, and thus cast their votes based on religious values or gun ownership - might actually help him with Pennsylvania's blue-collar voters, who are indeed frustrated.

"I'm not sure he was so far off the mark," said Green. "I don't think that was a misstep for him."

Added Green: "The only people who have tried to make those comments an issue are Washington people. I think he hit on something here. These citizens have been bypassed since the steel mills went down in the '70s."

YUP!!!!!!!!! The ZIONIST MEDIA!!!!!

In Lawrenceville, once a community of factory workers for the steel mills that lined the Allegheny River, there remains a large working-class population of multiple races, existing alongside a growing artistic community that has attracted fine restaurants and music clubs.

Working-class people in Lawrenceville had mixed reactions to Obama, with blacks in particular standing by him.

"Most of us are hoping and praying that he can make a change for everyone - every type of individual in the United States," said Loretta Millender, an African-American waitress at the lunch counter at Starr Discount store. "We need a young president that has different thoughts than the old presidents have."

And one that is NOT BEHOLDEN to Israel!!!!!

At the front counter of Starr Discount, however, Donna Blakely, who is white, expressed a preference for Clinton: "She's smart. She knows what she's doing. She's going to help the people and she's not for the war."

Excuse me, dumbshit whitey? Go back to your bowl of shit!!!!

Blakely said she just doesn't get Obama. "I don't know what he's talking about," she said quietly. "He just doesn't make any sense to me."

Not all working-class whites agreed. Some men, in particular, seemed receptive to Obama's anti-Washington message.

"They're all a den of thieves, so you go with the boy who hasn't been there so long," said Bill Deeley, a 62-year-old retiree. "He's not a senior member of the [Washington] club."

Not like the Zionist media wouldn't want to push the divisive race issue, right?

This an accurate quote?

Few white working-class women agreed. Several expressed open suspicion about Obama, with beautician Barbara Kelly, 57, saying, "I just don't trust him. That's my own feeling. That's the bottom line. It's just my feeling. More will come out. We all have our feelings, right?"

He's just all flash, right (see below)?

And Kelly, like other working-class women who were interviewed, approved of the harder edge that Clinton has been showing recently.

"She's a good strong woman," Kelly said.

Racist shit bags!!!!

The preference was largely reversed among more upscale voters, who tended to find Clinton too harsh and Obama a breath of fresh air.

Bill Barron, a developer who is renovating two houses in Lawrenceville, said, "I'm an Obama supporter. I believe that he may have the ability to unite the country in a way it hasn't been for a long time, and we need to be united."

Until recently, Democrats seemed to think that this campaign, between people seeking to be the first black or first woman president, could elevate the party to new heights. But in the nearly four months since the Iowa caucuses, voting patterns have become more predictable, and analysts can only wonder if people's views are hardening in a negative way as well.

"There certainly are recognizable patterns in who is supporting whom, and those patterns keep reappearing, whether you're talking about polls or the actual voting in states," said Keeter, of the Pew Research Center, citing in particular Obama's big support among blacks and young people, and Clinton's support among the white working class.

Asked if he would expect any big changes in the pattern in Pennsylvania, Keeter sighed and concluded, "No, I really wouldn't."

Hillary by double-digits then! The fix is in!


"Rails offer Obama a new platform"

"Clinton urges Pa. voters to examine the big picture"

WEST CHESTER, Pa. - Hillary Clinton implored Pennsylvanians yesterday to think about the nation's trade and debt burdens, the growth of China, and the restive Middle East when they vote in the state's pivotal primary, perhaps her last chance to stall Barack Obama's reach for the Democratic nomination.

Her implication was clear - Obama is flash, she is substance (AP)."

She is something all right!

More groundwork laid...

"In Pa., late deciders could lift Clinton"

"by Scott Helman, Globe Staff | April 20, 2008

PHILADELPHIA - Despite wall-to-wall media coverage, inescapable TV ads, and impassioned pleas from friends and family, thousands of Pennsylvania voters still cannot make up their minds about whom to support in Tuesday's Democratic primary.

Unmoved by all the pressures and the candidates' nearly daily visits, they tell pollsters that, though they plan to vote, they are not quite ready to declare their choice, postponing their decision until the waning hours, or even until they're in the voting booth.

If the pattern of previous primaries and caucuses holds, the biggest procrastinators - those who make up their minds on Tuesday - will probably break for Senator Hillary Clinton. If they side with her again in Pennsylvania, it may help Clinton hold off Senator Barack Obama with a big-enough victory to save her candidacy, again.

In three polls conducted last week in Pennsylvania, which showed Clinton holding single-digit leads, 9 to 13 percent of voters said they were undecided.

Through 27 contests where exit polling on late deciders is available, Clinton has won those voters in 20. Combined, she has a median showing of 50 percent among voters who decided on the last day, compared with 43 percent for Obama. Such voters have, on average, made up about 13 percent of the Democratic electorate in each state, the exit polls show....

Exit polls count except for president in 2004? WTF?!

They didn't seem to matter much in New Hampshire!

David E. Johnson, a Republican strategist who heads the polling firm Strategic Vision, said there has been a similar trend in many states: Clinton starts out with a large lead in polls; Obama, as he holds rallies and airs ads, closes the gap to the point where he looks positioned for a possible win; and then Clinton, buoyed by late-deciding voters, pulls out a larger-than-expected victory....

Heads up, readers! Heard it here first!

Clinton's campaign says undecided voters realize in the end that they trust the New York senator more to keep the country safe and turn the economy around.

"When people get into the polling place and think about who they really want in the Oval Office, they choose Hillary because they have confidence in her ability to run the economy and protect our national security," spokesman Phil Singer said in an e-mail.

Making a similar case Tuesday at a campaign stop in Easton, Pa., however, Bill Clinton overstated his wife's success among late- deciding voters.

Oh no! That BRAIN-DAMAGED FUCK LYING AGAIN?!?!

The former president said that despite Obama's success in a slew of February contests, Hillary Clinton was "normally" winning voters - even by a "60-40" margin - who made up their minds at the end because they thought hard about who would be the "best president."

In fact, in the four contests between Super Tuesday on Feb. 5 and March 4 in which voters were asked when they had made up their minds - Louisiana, Maryland, Virginia, and Wisconsin - Clinton beat Obama among voters who decided on the last day only in Maryland, and she won them 48 percent to 41 percent.

Pfffffffttt! What a lying shit bag he is!!!!

And so is the MSM and its conventional wisdom relayed by this shit scribe Helman!!!!

Does the MSM deception never end?

Although Clinton tends to dominate among voters who decide on the final day, Obama does slightly better than Clinton among the approximately one-third of voters who make their pick during the full week before primaries and caucuses, a median of 49 percent to 47 percent.

At times, Obama has performed better in states among voters who decided in the last week than he did in those states overall - beating Clinton, for example, 38 percent to 35 percent among this group in New Hampshire, even though she won the primary there....

STINK!!!!!!!!!!

Clinton appears to have helped herself by airing a TV ad in the last few days that implicitly questioned whether Obama would be prepared as president to handle a world crisis at 3 a.m....

Seeing how many excuses they can throw at the wall for Clinton winning, and seeing how many stick!

Paul Manuel, executive director of the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at St. Anselm College, said that many voters believe that Obama could bring huge change and has lots of potential, but are struggling with whether his relative inexperience makes him a riskier choice.

"You see that he could be a transformative figure in American politics," Manuel said. But he added that voters are wondering "is he electable" and would they prefer "the consistency and reliable hand of Hillary Clinton."

Then Americans DESERVE the BOWL of SHIT they heartily munch on!!!!!

Is this going to be the theme Tuesday night, as calls for Obama to drop out begin in earnest from the MSM press?