"Report: Olmert sets forth conditions for a ceasefire deal with Palestinians"
"AL-Watan pointed out that Olmert expressed Israel's readiness to fix a ceasefire deal with the Palestinians, provided that such a deal be confined to the Gaza Strip, stressing that the Palestinian authority should take control of Gaza's crossings. In the meantime, Olmert warned of any escalation from the Gaza Strip against Israel, saying that Israel's response then will be unprecedented."
"Translation: look for a number of shelling attacks which fall upon empty fields to be directed toward Israel, which will become the justification of a major Israeli attack upon Gaza." -- Mike Rivero of whatreallyhappened.com
"Israeli Foot Patrol Violates South Lebanon"
Looks like Israel is trying to play the same game again." -- Mike Rivero of whatreallyhappened.com
In fact, Israel is the threat!!!
"Israel threatening world security"
"Ali Asghar Soltaniyeh told Press TV that over 100 countries in the general conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency have condemned Israel for not cooperating with the IAEA.
The Zionist regime has refused to sign the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and it is believed that the regime has about 200 nuclear warheads capable of being mounted on long-range missiles and a stockpile of chemical and biological weapons."
How come the Zionist-controlled AmeriKan media never raises a ruckus over ISRAEL'S WMD?!
".... If you ask Olmert, he will strenuously deny that he has no agenda. He has a perfect agenda: to make peace (which is nowadays called "permanent status"). And not just any peace, but a peace based on "Two States for Two Peoples". Without such a peace, Olmert has pronounced, "the State is finished".
In that case, why is there no negotiation, only a farcical pretense? Why does the massive building activity go on, even in the settlements east of the Wall, well within the area that government spokespersons propose for the Palestinian state? Why does the government carry out dozens of military and civilian actions daily that push peace even further away?
According to the government itself, and contrary to what it said at the beginning, it has no intention of achieving peace in 2008. At most, perhaps, maybe, there will be a "shelf agreement". That is an original Israeli invention, meaning an agreement that would be put on the shelf "until conditions are ripe". In other words, meaningless negotiations for a meaningless agreement. Now they say that there is no chance even for that, not in 2008, not in the foreseeable future.
There is no escape from the inevitable conclusion: the government is not working for peace. It does not want peace. And, also, that there is no effective parliamentary opposition pressing for peace, nor any pressure from the media.
What does all this mean? That there is no agenda? No, it means that behind the fictitious agenda, which appears in the media, there hides another agenda that does not meet the eye.
The hidden agenda is opposed to peace....--MORE--"
