Thursday, April 24, 2008

Gates: Military Option Open on Iran

Already called it, so I'm not going to belabor the point!

It is an "at-the-end" stick-in, which is where the American people are going to get it when these maniacs carry out their plans!!!

Also see
: Clean Break/PNAC

P.S. I didn't like Gates from the get-go!!

"Petraeus promotion keeps nation on its war course"

"by Robert Burns, AP Military Writer | April 24, 2008

WASHINGTON --President Bush is promoting his top Iraq commander, Army Gen. David Petraeus, and replacing him with the general's recent deputy, keeping the U.S. on its war course and handing the next president a pair of combat-tested commanders who have relentlessly defended Bush's strategies.

Bush will nominate Petraeus to replace Navy Adm. William J. Fallon as chief of U.S. Central Command, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced Wednesday. The command's area of responsibility features some of the most vexing military and foreign policy problems facing this administration and its successor -- including Iran, Pakistan, Lebanon, parts of Africa and Afghanistan in addition to Iraq.

Fallon resigned last month, saying news reports that he was at odds with the White House over Iran policy had become a distraction. He was the first Navy officer to lead Central Command; the Petraeus choice represents a return to the more common practice of making it an Army slot.

Petraeus would be succeeded at a pivotal time in Baghdad by Army Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno, who was the No. 2 commander in Iraq for 15 months. He has been credited by many with deftly managing security gains that Petraeus told Congress this month have opened a pathway for potential political progress in the country.

I get so tired of the lie promotion, readers, as well as the war promotion!

Fuck the Zionist-controlled AmeriKan media!

Fuck them straight to hell!!!

Gates said he hoped the Senate would act on both nominations by next month and expected Petraeus to switch to the Central Command job, which is based in Tampa, Fla., by late summer or early fall.

That is the point at which Petraeus is likely to make an initial recommendation to Gates and to Bush on whether conditions in Iraq are stable enough to permit a further reduction in U.S. troop levels.

The United States has about 160,000 troops in Iraq and about 28,000 in Afghanistan. The strain of those wars has taken a heavy toll on U.S. ground forces.

Then BRING THEM HOME!!!

Otherwise, I'm tired of fucking hearing about the strain on US imperial forces.

I DIDN'T SEND THEM THERE by PROMOTING LIES on MY FRONT PAGES!!!!

Among the politically sensitive questions Petraeus would face as head of Central Command is whether the military focus on Iraq is limiting what U.S. and allied forces can accomplish in Afghanistan. And he would be pressed on the matter of using military force against Iran.

The next president taking office in January would not be compelled to keep either Petraeus or Odierno, but normally the lineup of senior commanders -- as well as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff -- is not changed with administrations.

"There is no precedent in U.S. tradition for a new president changing these kinds of officers," said Stephen Biddle, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and an occasional adviser to Petraeus. "For an incoming president to change them (in 2009) would be a real statement."

Many Republicans, including all-but-certain presidential nominee John McCain, are enthusiastic Petraeus supporters. Democrats on Capitol Hill are not expected to oppose either Petraeus or Odierno....

Just as they have OPPOSED NOTHING from this administration on Iraq!!!!

At a Pentagon news conference, Gates said he did not foresee that the new lineup at Central Command and in Iraq would mean any changes in the way the U.S. is approaching the issue of Iranian influence in Iraq. Petraeus and Odierno have both accused Iran of aiding rebels opposing U.S. troops.

"It's my belief that General Odierno and General Petraeus and Admiral Fallon were all in exactly the same position when it came to their views of Iranian interference inside Iraq," Gates said. "And it is a hard position. Because what the Iranians are doing is killing American service men and women inside Iraq."

Aren't you glad you got Gates instead of Rumsfeld, America?!

Of course, there is no difference, but who cares?

Petraeus will face broader aspects of the Iran issue if he is confirmed as Fallon's replacement. A number of U.S. officials, including Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have asserted that Iran also is supplying arms or otherwise supporting the Taliban rebels in Afghanistan.

Yeah, right, Iran is supplying SUNNI MILITANTS they almost went to war with in the late 1990s, and by extension, funding "Al-CIA-Duh."

This after "Al-CIA-Duh" declared Iran an enemy!!!!

Hey, why isn't America friends with "Al-CIA-Duh" -- you know, enemy of my enemy?

ARE YOU SICK of the BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA YET, shit-chewing 'murkn?!?!

Ready for a WORLD WAR?!?!

Earlier this week, Gates said that while war with Iran would be "disastrous on a number of levels," the military option cannot be abandoned so long as the Iranians remain a potential nuclear threat...."

Do I need to translate that for you, readers, or you got it?