Is it any surprise that the AmeriKan MSM slights and disparages Ron Paul, readers?
Is it?
So this is how the MSM is going to SELL the LIE of New Hampshire to us, huh?
"Clock ticking in N.H., candidates target undecided; Hopefuls sharpen messages, attacks as primary nears" by Scott Helman and Michael Levenson, Globe Staff | January 6, 2008
MANCHESTER, N.H. - With campaign crowds swelling and time running out before Tuesday's New Hampshire primary, presidential contenders sought yesterday to score with the state's elusive undecided voters.
Several tracking polls released yesterday indicated McCain slightly ahead of Romney. He led 33 percent to 27 percent in a CNN/WMUR poll, 31 percent to 26 percent in a Rasmussen Reports poll, and 32 percent to 30 percent in a Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby survey. Huckabee was fourth in the CNN and Rasmussen surveys with 11 percent, behind Rudy Giuliani in CNN's and Ron Paul in Rasmussen's, and third in Zogby's with 12 percent.
Huckabee, like Romney, has retooled his message for New Hampshire, shedding some of his overt appeals to the social conservatives and evangelicals that powered his Iowa win and talking instead about freedom and liberty.
This just INSULTING, readers.
Those are RON PAUL'S ISSUES!!!!!!!!!
In the Democratic race, Obama and Clinton both drew large crowds yesterday as polls gave a conflicting snapshot of the race. The CNN/WMUR survey had them tied at 33 percent, with Edwards at 20 percent.
The Zogby survey suggested Clinton hanging on to her lead over Obama, 32 percent to 28 percent, with Edwards at 20 percent. But the Rasmussen poll indicated Obama with momentum out of Iowa, leapfrogging Clinton to grab a 10 percentage-point lead, 37 percent to 27 percent, with Edwards at 19 percent.
Obama and Clinton took markedly different approaches on the trail yesterday. While Obama played it safe by delivering more or less his standard speech, urging supporters to stay the course, and taking no questions, Clinton departed from her typical practice and entertained audience queries for almost two hours at a rally in Penacook. The move seemed designed to address past criticism that she is inaccessible to voters.
Clinton issued fresh warnings about Obama, implicitly linking his pitch with that of George W. Bush before the 2000 election.
Oh, she is fucking SHAMELESS!!!!!
Is there NO DEPTH the SCUMBAG CLINTONS won't STOOP TO?
Clinton, in Penacook, suggested it would be dangerous if voters again fell for a candidate who relies more on intuition and a unifying message than experience:
"He was going to bring people together and end partisanship, he was going to have people working together, that he didn't need a lot of experience because of his intuition, he understood people, he was going to go meet with world leaders, look into their eyes and their souls and solve our problems! Remember that?"
So why is your fat-fuck, mass-murdering, baby-killing husband all buddy-buddy with the dad, you lying globalist bitch?
As for remembering things, what I remember about you and your child-killing husband are the first WTC attack, Oklahoma City (about 16 minutes in, run time 30 mins), Waco and HER DAMN WAR VOTE on Iraq!!!!!!!!!
She also held a roundtable with 18-to-25-year-olds with her daughter, Chelsea, talked to undecided college-age students near the University of New Hampshire in Durham, and unveiled a new "Ask Hillary" feature on her website aimed at Facebook users.
And Time magazine obtained what it said was a new Clinton ad that her campaign has not yet aired. The ad, posted on Time's website, shows Clinton talking directly into the camera and citing her readiness to lead.
Now this part was cut from the web version. Why?
As the candidates competed on TV for the attention of voters, armies of campaign staffers and volunteers fanned out across the state in a town-by-town, block-by-block struggle to get out the vote for what is expected to be a record turnout on Tuesday.
And then the powers that be will decide how to apportion such votes.
At Clinton's headquarters in downtown Manchester, where phone bank volunteers are urged to "dial like a champion," officials are accommodating 1,000 additional volunteers from out of the state, including bus loads from Worcester, Boston and Springfield, and a plane load from Arkansas. This weekend, the campaign hopes to knock on 100,000 doors, more than a quarter of the campaign total.
Now why would the Globe censor that?
Can you also see Hitlery being the "Comeback Queen?"
Back to the web/paper version, reader:
Edwards, campaigning in Lebanon, effectively conceded he would not win New Hampshire."
Edwards is already conceding before a vote is cast?
I guess that's why the Globe is promoting Hitlery then, huh, readers?
"Quietly, Chelsea offers her support as mom runs for the White House"
Romney, who needs a strong showing in New Hampshire after a distant second-place finish in Thursday's Iowa caucuses, sharpened his campaign message, making several references to what he called the "old faces" in Washington, whom he compared to "a broken-down automobile clunker that you have to push in the station and say, 'Can you fix this for me?' "
Romney came under sustained attack in the GOP debate as Huckabee and McCain highlighted, sometimes acidly, his shifts on major issues.
The Democratic candidates spent the bulk of their debate arguing over the central question of their race: what change means, and who represents it. Obama said his Iowa victory was evidence people are "hungry for change."
Senator Hillary Clinton suggested her opponents were "raising the false hopes" of Americans by promising change they were unprepared to deliver, angrily replying that she had spent her career working for change, not just talking about it:
"I embody change."
Oh, she is something else! What a LYING WITCH!
So WHO are these undecideds that will decide New Hampshire, and why can't the Globe find even ONE Ron Paul supporter?
I think we ALL KNOW WHY, readers!
"Field wide open for the undeclared; Many in N.H. still deciding as primary nears" by Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff | January 6, 2008
HOOKSETT, N.H. - Undeclared voters like Joe Arnold are the holy grail of presidential candidates on both sides of the aisle. But they are not at all easy to pin down.
Pausing to chat in the lobby of the Hooksett post office yesterday, Arnold, a veteran, said he is a big fan of John McCain, a Vietnam War hero who presents himself as a friend of the military. But the 41-year-old drywaller from Londonderry also worries about his son-in-law, who cannot afford health insurance for his wife and baby. So he is increasingly leaning toward Hillary Clinton, who he believes might be able to fix the country's healthcare system.
"I would probably say it's time for change," he said.
Now, he said, as he spat chewing tobacco into a Dunkin' Donuts cup, he just has to check Clinton's record on gun owners' rights.
Undeclared voters represent 44 percent of the electorate, New Hampshire's largest single voting bloc, and can vote in either party's primary Tuesday, so they are widely considered the key to victory for candidates in both parties. But they're a key with some unusual edges.
In New Hampshire, true independents tend to have a libertarian streak, a penchant for mavericks, and a distaste for politicians who avoid answering questions.
Yeah, but RON PAUL can't win, even though he is THEIR CANDIDATE!!!
Seriously, readers, this type of "journalism" is INSULTING!!!!
No wonder I let the expletives fly, huh?
Divorced from party machinery and comfortable with playing the field, they tend to enjoy shopping around. This weekend, they are swarming political events across the state in hopes of settling on a candidate.
Yup, but RON PAUL won't be found in this piece of shit article!!!
To be sure, some voters label themselves undeclared but in practice regularly vote either Democratic or Republican. But others, like Arnold, are listening carefully to candidates on both sides of the aisle. For them, the choice is not just between Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee or between Barack Obama or Clinton, but also between Democrat or Republican, Obama or McCain, for instance.
Obama, who won the Democratic caucuses in Iowa with heavy support from independents, and McCain, who won the 2000 New Hampshire primary with their support, are particularly eager to win over this group. A Rasmussen tracking poll yesterday suggests that independents could make up 40 percent of the Democratic electorate and 32 percent of the Republican electorate in this year's primary.
One big question is whether the wave of independents that carried McCain to victory eight years ago will turn out in such great numbers this time.
Kristen Sweet, a 34-year-old undeclared voter from Londonderry who was bowling with her husband, a mechanic in the Air Force, in Manchester the other night, said she had enthusiastically supported McCain in 2000, and she still considers him a strong, charismatic leader.
But life has changed since then. Healthcare has become a big issue. With changes in military benefits, her family now has to help pay for health insurance. In addition, Sweet spends hours on the phone with Medicare agents helping to deal with problems in her mother's coverage. Gas prices have shot up, greatly increasing the cost of her husband's 100-mile round-trip commute to the Seacoast region each day.
Most importantly, Sweet's husband has deployed repeatedly to Iraq and Afghanistan, and she desperately wants the war to end. "Enough is enough," she said.
Sounds like a RON PAUL supporter, right?
WRONG!!
Sweet is still considering McCain, but his strong support for the war worries her. She went to see Democrat John Edwards and loved his message on universal healthcare, but his plan to force Congress to pass it by threatening to withhold Congress's healthcare seems unrealistic to her. She hasn't closed the books yet on Clinton, and she plans to check out Obama today.
"We just want somebody to grab us and make us feel like, 'OK, this one can really do it.' You want this person to inspire you - to give you the sense that everything may not be perfect but there's a chance that some things could change and make life better."
RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Diana Osgood, 60, of Concord, an assistant to a financial planner, made a decision after hearing Clinton speak at Merrimack Valley High School in Penacook yesterday morning:
"I was very interested in McCain, but I think he's a little too old to be doing this right now. I will watch the debate tonight, but right now I'm 99 percent sure Hillary will have my vote."
That's an UNDECIDED?
Political analysts are betting that independents in New Hampshire are more likely to vote Democratic this year than in 2000 because of dissatisfaction with the Bush administration, the war, and the economy.
Yeah, but RON PAUL doesn't have any support, according to these shit pieces of PROPAGANDA!!!!!!!!!!!
Richard Boucher, 63, an independent from Hooksett, voted for President Bush in 2000, and he initially supported his decision to go to war in Iraq, but this year said he will vote in the Democratic primary:
"I think we should have gotten out of there right away. All the money we spent there should have been spent for our people. Billions and billions have been wasted."
Never heard of Ron Paul, huh?
Does the MSM just MAKE THESE PEOPLE UP, readers, or do they just LIE ABOUT WHAT THEY SAID?!?
He likes Clinton, whose husband he voted for twice, but he said she has not won him over entirely yet. Obama, he said, "seems to be pretty smart, he's well educated, and he comes out really strong," but Boucher isn't sure about him, either. The debates, he said, could determine his vote.
Joan Follansbee, 37, of Hopkinton, as she watched her 4-year-old, Maddy, take an ice skating lesson at the Everett Arena in Concord yesterday, said she, too, definitely plans to vote Democratic because she is opposed to the war and objects to the No Child Left Behind law.
I mean,, is this just reaching the point of INSULTING INJURY or what, readers?!
Yeah, I won't be buying the Jew papers tomorrow!
Her union is supporting Clinton, but she said she is nervous about having a woman president - "too emotional," she said, though she added that Clinton had racked up significant experience with her husband in the White House.
Oh, look at this: A SEXIST WOMAN!
Obama's big win in Iowa, she said, had made her reconsider him. A friend, she said, was volunteering for the Obama campaign and had called earlier to ask for her support.
"I think I will probably call her and ask her what he stands for and why she's supporting him," she said.
Many of those interviewed said they will wait until the very last minute to make up their minds. Robert Reese, who said he was one of the first New Hampshire voters to register as an independent nearly 40 years ago, was still hunting for a candidate with his wife, Emily, and 5-year-old daughter when they came to see former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani speak at the American Legion Hall in Salem on Friday.
He said he probably will not decide until Tuesday who he will vote for and could give his support to either a Democrat or a Republican
"There are so many good candidates, you lock in on one, and then lock in on another," he said."
Yup, no Ron Paul, which FITS a PATTERN with the MSM!
"In This Race, Independents Are the Prize"
But NO MENTION of RON PAUL!
"Looking for the GOP change agent in N.H."
But NO MENTION of RON PAUL!
"Income tax: Can we kiss it goodbye?"
But NO MENTION of RON PAUL!
They even mention another guy whom ISN'T EVEN RUNNING YET!!!
"Scratch an Independent Bloomberg and Get a Democrat, Positions Show"
And when they do print his name, they acn't even get the stories right:
"After spending in N.H., Iowa, money may be tight"
"On the GOP side, McCain has spent about $3.6 million on New Hampshire ads; former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, about $2.4 million; Texas Representative Ron Paul, $625,000; and Huckabee, $175,000.
Paul, who reported raising $19.5 million in the fourth quarter in part through record-breaking one-day takes on the Internet, has also bought time on Michigan radio."
That's all the print Ron Paul received in that huge article?
In the last three paragraphs?
Pfffffffffttt!
And here is the MSM's NEW DARLING!
Just read the articles that fawn all over him, readers.
I would be surprised if the MSM wasn't sucking his shit-covered cock-- but good!
"McCain Mixes It Up on a Town-Hall Tour" by MARC SANTORA
DERRY, N.H. — Senator John McCain was resting his chin on the microphone as a man with a full white beard in the corner of the opera house in Derry laid into him for his continuing support for the war in Iraq.
Mr. McCain responded, but then did something few other candidates do with regularity: let his critic have another go at him. They went back and forth until the man was at least satisfied that they had traded viewpoints.
The 10-minute exchange was a small slice of the singular piece of American political theater that is a John McCain town-hall-style meeting in New Hampshire.
Don't GAG yourselves, Times!
Tellingly, it was on Thursday night, during the Iowa caucuses 1,000 miles away. Mr. McCain had all but ignored the Iowa contest, where he finished in a near tie for third with Fred D. Thompson, choosing instead to stake his campaign on New Hampshire.
Mr. McCain, a Republican from Arizona, has been holding these gatherings here for much of the last year, just as he did in the 2000 campaign, cultivating the supporters who are now driving him to the top of the polls in New Hampshire. The events are an extension of his unorthodox campaign, where he spends nearly every waking hour taking questions from anyone who shows up.
I am so insulted by these Zionist shit rags of propaganda, readers!
What SHIT AmeriKa's MS has become!!!!!!!!
It is his town-hall-type meetings here that have allowed voters to get to know him and have enabled Mr. McCain to establish the kind of direct contact that he hopes will blunt any assaults.
On Saturday in Peterborough, it was standing room only at his 100th town-hall meeting in New Hampshire, as hundreds of people packed into a building to hear him speak. The police had to seal the doors, keeping many supporters outside chanting Mr. McCain’s name.
The McCain events follow a pattern. There are the corny opening jokes and the recitation of the reasons he thinks he should be president, items he rushes through so rapidly that they are sometimes a bit garbled. But those are the mere preludes to the main event, his spirited exchanges with voters.
Suck, suck, suck, suck!!!!
Mr. McCain is so eager to mix it up that even when a supporter challenges him, he seems to look for ways to tell them things they do not want to hear.
If someone is critical of President Bush, he tells them where the president deserves credit: for his work on AIDS in Africa or for the fact that the United States has not been attacked since Sept. 11, 2001. But when another voter blames the news media or Democrats for the perception that the war in Iraq was mismanaged over its first four years, he will point to Donald H. Rumsfeld, the former secretary of defense, and Mr. Bush himself.
On climate change, an issue that he has fought long to address, he will tell an admirer that he will push for the expanded use of nuclear power, something many environmentalists oppose.
Yup, a GOOD GLOBAL ZIONIST!
Mr. McCain, after an event on Friday at a company that makes equipment for the military, chose to rail against the “military-industrial complex,” but said later:
“Sometimes I go too far.”
What, in BITING the WAR PROFITEERING HAND that FEEDS you and RIPPING OFF RON PAUL'S ISSUES, McShame?!?!
He said an angel on one shoulder begged him to pipe down while a devil on the other goaded him on. His best events are when the devil gets the better of him. He frequently tells voters that it was the town-hall format — inspired by one event in the 2000 campaign — that led him to grasp the threat of global warming.
This puff piece is DISGUSTING, and is NOT "journalism!" It's SHIT!!!!!!!!!
There is chance involved in these exchanges: when the questions are dull, it can sap the energy in the room. But on Thursday night, at the opera house in Derry, all the elements came together, including his confrontation with an opponent of the war and an emotional exchange with Allie Nault, 10. Allie, articulate for her age and adorable in her Red Star Twirler outfit, said pupils in her class had been asked to select a favorite presidential candidate.
She said she had chosen Mr. McCain. Allie made her way to the front and hugged the 71-year-old senator, tears in her eyes.
Gimme a fucking break!
Yup, the 10-year-old kid teared up at the old grandad, huh?
Pfffffftt!
Fuck the MSM and it's PROPAGANDA!!!!
With the audience in his hands at that point, Mr. McCain moved on to the man with the white beard in the corner of the room, calling on him by joking that he had not realized Ernest Hemingway was in the crowd. When the two were done sparring over Iraq, the man was won over enough to urge Mr. McCain to trounce Mitt Romney, his chief Republican rival."
And how surprising will it be when the MSM calls New Hampshire that exact way on Tuesday, readers?!
I'm glad I'm done for the day, and I DON'T TRUST ANY AMERIKAN ELECTIONS!!!!
Why should I?
Here's what the results will look like on Tuesday:
1st -- McCain (36%)
2nd -- Romney (21%)
3rd -- Giuliani (15%)
4th -- Paul (12%)
5th -- Huckabee (9%)
6th -- Thompson (5%)
The spin will be the re-emerging darling of New Hampshire John McCain; the flagging Romney campaign; Rudy's surprise repositioning (credited to advertisements and debate performance); Huckabee's historic and expected fade here (which will dry up what little money and press he's getting); Paul and Thompson will either be also-rans, or asked if they are dropping out.
As for the DemocraPs, I've already written about New Hampshire making Hitlery the "Comeback Queen." Now what bullshit numbers can the MSM sell AmeriKa?
1st -- Clinton (41%)
2nd -- Obama (36%)
3rd -- Edwards (16%)
4th -- Richardson (4%)
Heard it here first, folks!
