First is the political bric-a-crap roundup:
"His big regret: not acting in Rwanda" by Scott Helman/Boston Globe
December 11, 2007
NEWTON, Iowa - The question to Bill Clinton was a good one: What decisions that you made as president did Hillary Clinton disagree with?
At first, the former president, stumping for his wife before several hundred people at an YMCA yesterday, talked about mistakes on healthcare and briefly discussed welfare reform. And then, in a more somber tone, he explained that she had wanted the United States to intervene in Rwanda in 1994, when hundreds of thousands of people died in a genocide that lasted just a few months.
Clinton has talked repeatedly about how not acting in Rwanda was one of his biggest regrets, but said had he listened to his wife, history might have been different:
"I believe if I had moved we might have saved at least a third of those lives. I think she clearly would have done that."
What a shit liar!
Globalists like Clinton wanted the Africans to die, otherwise they would have done something!
And as for Mrs. C, this foretells the cover her aggressive use of America's military will fly under when she is president!
HUMANITARIAN WARS, yaaaaaayy!
"Husband says Clinton is hardly calculating" by Marcella Bombardieri/
Boston Globe December 11, 2007
AMES, Iowa - At an earlier appearance yesterday, Bill Clinton harkened back to the days when he and Hillary were dating to make the case that she's not a calculating politician who has had her eye on the presidency for years.
When they met at Yale Law School and started "going together," Clinton said he recognized his new girlfriend as one of the great talents of their generation. He told her to "dump me," and then go work at a big law firm in New York or Chicago as a springboard to run for office.
Mr. Clinton, before several hundred people at Iowa State University, recounted that the young Hillary Rodham laughed and answered:
"Oh, first I love you and second I'm never going to run for anything."
What a couple of disgusting and slimy liars they both are!
Mr. Clinton, recalling when she eventually moved to Arkansas and married him:
"I was a defeated candidate for Congress with a $26,000 salary and $42,000 campaign debt. Now if she were half as calculating as some people have said, that's a really bad way to run for president."
Fucking shameless! The guy is fucking absolutely shameless!
The version of their romance Hillary Clinton described in her autobiography, "Living History," is actually rather different. She describes how she turned down his marriage proposals countless times, because she was confused about her future, and scared of commitment in general "and of Bill's intensity in particular."
The Clintons can't but help tell lies, can they? They LIE about EVERYTHING!!!!
"CNN cancels Boston Democratic debate" by Foon Rhee/Boston Globe December 11, 2007
CNN confirmed yesterday it has canceled a Democratic debate next Monday in Boston. So if you're a fan of presidential debates, best get your fill this week.
The back-to-back face-offs in Iowa sponsored by The Des Moines Register - the Republicans tomorrow and the Democrats on Thursday - will be the last ones before the Jan. 3 caucuses, barring one miraculously materializing.
I will be watching C(IA)NN at 2 p.m. tomorrow because Ron Paul will be there!
Otherwise, I would not watch!
The planned forum, also sponsored by Politico and the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, was called off "due to the early scheduling of the Iowa caucuses," CNN said.
And the "polls?"
"Polls indicate Huckabee, Obama are gaining ground" by Foon Rhee/
Boston Globe December 11, 2007
Two new polls out last night generally agree on the state of the presidential race nationally.
Mike Huckabee, continuing his remarkable rise, is in a statistical tie with Rudy Giuliani on the Republican side. And Barack Obama is closing in on Hillary Clinton on the Democratic side.
In the CNN/Opinion Research survey, Giuliani has 24 percent, Huckabee 22 percent, Mitt Romney 16 percent, John McCain 13 percent, and Fred Thompson 10 percent.
In the New York Times/CBS News poll, Giuliani has 22 percent, Huckabee 21 percent, Romney 16 percent, and McCain and Thompson 7 percent each.
Among Democrats, CNN's survey puts Clinton at 40 percent, Obama at 30 percent, and John Edwards at 14 percent. The Times/CBS poll has Clinton at 44 percent, Obama at 27 percent, and Edwards at 11 percent.
One interesting finding in the Times survey: while 44 percent of Democrats said Bill Clinton's involvement made it more likely they would support his wife, only 1 percent said they would be swayed by Oprah Winfrey's support for Obama, despite the thousands who showed up for rallies over the weekend."
I told you about Oprah, readers!
Starting to believe in me now?
Even though the Globe has the gall to run this:
"Independent groups poised to play big role in presidential race"
Well, helloooooooooo!!
The New York Times is no better with its unbelievable shit poll on the front-page!
"Poll Finds G.O.P. Field Isn’t Touching Voters"
Yeah, and Ron Paul didn't make it because the Times EXCLUDED HIM from their poll, right?
You trust an AGENDA-PUSHING New York Times poll, readers?
Then you never saw the Times polls on immigration amnesty!
According to the Times, 66% of Americans were in favor of amnesty for illegal immigrants this past summer!
That's when I stopped believing New York Times' polls!
And yet conservative columnist David Brooks -- whom I rarely ever read -- has the temerity to put this out on the ops page?
"American voters are coming out of the shells constructed after Sept. 11th and are looking for a new normalcy. They’re looking for something entirely different."
We are NOT LOOKING, we have FOUND HIM!!!!!
And his name is RON PAUL!!!!!
That's it!!
I'm done with the MSM for today!
They suck!
