Wednesday, December 26, 2007

What the MSM Won't Tell You About Iraq

More Than 250 Iraqi Torture Victims Come Forward to Sue CACI for Participating in Conspiracy to Torture

"WASHINGTON, Dec. 18 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Hundreds of innocent torture victims came forward and filed a complaint late Monday in Washington federal court against CACI, the private military contractor involved in torturing and abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib and other prisons in Iraq.

The complaint in "Saleh et al. v. CACI et al" alleges that these victims were repeatedly sodomized, threatened with rape and harm to their family members, stripped naked, kept naked in their cells, chained and handcuffed to the bars of their cells, forced to wear women's panties on their heads and bodies, subjected to electric shock, subjected to extreme heat and cold, attacked by unmuzzled dogs, subjected to serious pain inflicted on sensitive body parts, and kicked, beaten and struck.

CACI employees did not play a limited, passive, or secondary role in this torture, according to the complaint. Rather, two CACI interrogators -- Stephen Stefanowicz (known as "Big Steve") and Daniel Johnson (known as "DJ") -- were viewed as among the most aggressive. These two men were responsible for directing former U.S. military personnel Charles Graner, Ivan Frederick, and others to torture and abuse prisoners. Indeed, CACI employees Big Steve and DJ directed such harsh torture that both Graner and Frederick, who were convicted and sentenced, respectively, to 10 and 8 years in prison for abusing prisoners, refused to follow the CACI directives to torture prisoners.

The complaint sets out how Stefanowicz and Johnson and other CACI employees directed soldiers to give prisoners the "special treatment," which was code for making naked prisoners to crawl back and forth over rough concrete until they were bloodied and unable to move. The complaint also alleges CACI, working with others, wrongfully killed Ibrahiem Neisef Jassem, Hussain Ali Abid Salin, and Ahmed Satar Khamass.

Michael Ratner, President of the Center for Constitutional Rights:

"These private military contractors cannot act with impunity outside the reach of the law -- CACI must be held accountable for its participation in the atrocities at Abu Ghraib and other facilities."

Susan L. Burke of Burke O'Neil LLC:

"CACI employees conspired with Graner, Frederick and others who have already been convicted and sentenced. Yet CACI employees have evaded accountability, and CACI itself made millions of dollars from the United States. Is this conduct our taxpayer dollars should be paying for?"

Shereef Akeel of Akeel & Valentine, PLC:

"The men and women we represent have been seeking justice for the nightmares they lived at the hands of their torturers. This civil action will bring much needed accountability to the rogue defense contractor willing to torture and abuse innocent persons."

The victims in the case are represented by Susan L. Burke, William T. O'Neil, Elizabeth M. Burke, and Katherine R. Hawkins of Burke O'Neil LLC, of Philadelphia; Michael Ratner and Katherine Gallagher of the Center for Constitutional Rights; and Shereef Hadi Akeel, of Akeel & Valentine, PLC, of Birmingham, Michigan. This is the same legal team that recently sued Blackwater for killing civilians in Nisoor Square in Baghdad this September.

The case is "Saleh et al. v. CACI et al," in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Case No. 05-cv-1165 JR).

Media Contacts: Erin Powers, Powers MediaWorks LLC, for Burke O'Neil LLC and Akeel & Valentine, PLC, (281) 703-6000 or (281) 362-1411; Jen Nessel, the Center for Constitutional Rights, (212) 614-6449; and David Lerner, Riptide Communications, for the Center for Constitutional Rights, (212) 260-5000.

www.uruknet.info?p=39343

Link: sev.prnewswire.com/legal/20071218/LATU08318122007-1.html
"

Iraq to slash food rations

"Up to eight million Iraqis still require immediate emergency aid, with nearly half this number living in "absolute poverty" according to Oxfam [GALLO/GETTY]

Iraq plans to cut food rations and subsidies by almost 50 per cent as part of its overall 2008 budget because of insufficient funds and spiralling inflation.

The move the will further undermine the deteriorating rationing system, with critics warning of social unrest if measures are not taken to address rising poverty and unemployment.

Mohammed Hanoun, the Iraqi trade minister's chief of staff, told Al Jazeera that a request for $7.2 billion to cover 10 basic items currently rationed and subsidised by the government was rejected.

"In 2007, we asked for $3.2 billion for rationing basic foodstuffs. But since the prices of imported food stuff doubled in the past year, we requested $7.2 billion for this year. That request was denied."

The trade ministry is now set to slash the list of subsidised items by half to five basic food items, "namely, flour, sugar, rice, oil, and infant milk," Hanoun said.

Gulf War rationing

The ration system dates back to the 1991 Gulf War, when the UN Security Council imposed economic sanctions on Iraq after its August 2, 1990 invasion of Kuwait.

Almost 10 million Iraqis rely
on the rationing system [EPA]
The system allowed Iraqis to buy subsidised sugar, flour, rice, powdered milk, cooking oil, tea, beans, baby milk, soap and detergent.

The ration cards also helped track population displacement due to the invasion as people are forced to re-register for new cards when they move.

Though the ration system continued even after the fall of the Saddam Hussein government in 2003, there have been calls to eliminate or limit its scope.

Iraqi officials have resisted scrapping the programme altogether for fear of a public backlash. Instead, they have opted for a gradual decrease in subsidised food items.

Abud Falah al-Sudani, Iraq's trade minister, warned that even a limited move to scrap the system would significantly increase the hardship for the majority of Iraqis who still depend heavily on the Saddam Hussein-era programme.

"Absolute poverty"

The impending move will affect the nearly 10 million who depend on the already fragile rationing system.

Food rationing in Iraq

The rationing system was implemented by the Saddam Hussein government in 1991 in response to the UN economic sanctions on Iraq.

In 1995, the World Health Organization said over 50 per cent hospitalised children under the age of five in Iraq were suffering from malnutrition.

The 1996 UN Oil for Food programme provided Iraq with increased food supplies for its rationing system.

The system benifited all residents, including expatriates during the period 1991-2003.

It was halted briefly after the March 2003 US-led invasion but resumed on June 1, 2003 with 45,000 distributors across the country.

In 2003, the trade ministry’s rationing bill stood at $1.85 billion.

Sarmed Abdel-Rahman, 39, a father of three and an unemployed Baghdad resident, is one of those Iraqis.

He told Al Jazeera that his family depended heavily on the food ration system after he lost his job one year ago.

"Reducing the number of subsidised items will turn my sons into malnourished children and put us into a level of poverty much worse than we have seen," he said.

Ibraheem Abdullah, a professor and social affairs analyst at Baghdad University, said the government has inadequately measured the alarming rise in poverty since the March 2003 US-led invasion.

"Urgent measures should be taken to prevent the possible chaos that will lead to worsening conditions in the lives of millions of Iraqis when the food ration is reduced," he said.

"The government should give priority to this issue. Where do they expect unemployed families to find the means to purchase food now?"

Dependency

Apart from the cut in subsidies, Baghdad also wants to reduce by June the number of people dependent on the rationing system by five million.

Yet, up to eight million Iraqis still require immediate emergency aid, with nearly half this number living in "absolute poverty", according to the latest report by Oxfam and a coalition of Iraqi groups, including the NGO Coordination Committee of Iraq.

Najet Muhammad, 27, a mother of two and a Baghdad resident, said baby milk was unavailable for three months because the distribution system had fallen into the hands of rival militias.

She said her already impoverished family was forced to divert money meant for house rent to buy milk at market prices.

"If they reduce the quantity of the ration we will be displaced as the money to pay bills will have to be used for food," Najet said.

"If we are considered a poor family today, tomorrow, we will be considered absolutely desperate."

www.uruknet.info?p=39332

Link: english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/F80EB18B-84C5-4939-9250-004F6697D8F2.htm
"

All Iraqi Groups Blame US Invasion For Discord, St...

"All Iraqi groups blame U.S. for discord

See departure of 'occupying forces' as key to reconciliation, study shows

By Karen DeYoung

The Washington Post
updated 1:12 a.m. MT, Wed., Dec. 19, 2007

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraqis of all sectarian and ethnic groups believe that the U.S. military invasion is the primary root of the violent differences among them, and see the departure of "occupying forces" as the key to national reconciliation, according to focus groups conducted for the U.S. military last month.

That is good news, according to a military analysis of the results. At the very least, analysts optimistically concluded, the findings indicate that Iraqis hold some "shared beliefs" that may eventually allow them to surmount the divisions that have led to a civil war.

Conducting the focus groups, in 19 separate sessions organized by outside contractors in five cities, is among the ways in which Multi-National Force-Iraq assesses conditions in the country beyond counting insurgent attacks, casualties and weapons caches. The command, led by Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, devotes more time and resources than any other government or independent entity to measuring various matters, including electricity, satisfaction with trash collection and what Iraqis think it will take for them to get along.

The results are analyzed and presented to Petraeus as part of the daily Battle Update Assessment or BUA (pronounced boo-ah). Some of the news has been unarguably good, including the sharply reduced number of roadside bombings and attacks on civilians. But bad news is often presented with a bright side, such as the focus-group results and a November poll, which found that 25 percent of Baghdad residents were satisfied with their local government and that 15 percent said they had enough fuel for heating and cooking.

The good news? Those numbers were higher than the figures of the previous month (18 percent and 9 percent, respectively).

And Iraqi complaints about matters other than security are seen as progress. Early this year, Maj. Fred Garcia, an MNF-I analyst, said that "a very large percentage of people would answer questions about security by saying 'I don't know.' Now, we get more griping because people feel freer."

Iraqi political reconciliation, quality-of-life issues and the economy are largely the responsibility of the State Department. But the military, to the occasional consternation of U.S. diplomats who feel vastly outnumbered, has its own "mirror agencies" in many areas. Officers in charge of civil-military operations, said senior Petraeus adviser Army Col. William E. Rapp, "can tell you how many markets are open in Baghdad, how many shops, how many banks are open. . . . We have a lot more people" on the ground.

On Iraqi politics, "we have four to six slides almost every morning on 'Where does the Iraqi government stand on de-Baathification legislation?' All these things are embassy things," Rapp said. But Petraeus is interested in "his 'feel' for a situation, and he gets that from a bunch of different data points," he added.

Polling in Iraq remains difficult
Even though members of the military "understand the limitations" of polling data, Rapp said, "subjective measures" are an important part of the mix. In July, the military signed a contract with Gallup for four public opinion polls a month in Iraq: three nationwide and one in Baghdad. Lincoln Group, which has conducted surveys for the military since shortly after the invasion, received a year-long contract in January to conduct focus groups.

Outside of the military, some of the most widespread polling in Iraq has been done by D3 Systems, a Virginia-based company that maintains offices in each of Iraq's 18 provinces. Its most recent publicly released surveys, conducted in September for several news media organizations, showed the same widespread Iraqi belief voiced by the military's focus groups: that a U.S. departure will make things better. A State Department poll in September 2006 reported a similar finding.

Matthew Warshaw, a senior research manager at D3, said that despite security improvements, polling in Iraq remains difficult. "While violence has gone down, one of the ways it has been achieved is by effectively separating people. That means mobility is limited, with roadblocks by the U.S. and Iraqi military or local militias," Warshaw said in an interview.

Most of the recent survey results he has seen about political reconciliation, Warshaw said, are "more about [Iraqis] reconciling with the United States within their own particular territory, like in Anbar. . . . But it doesn't say anything about how Sunni groups feel about Shiite groups in Baghdad."

Warshaw added: "In Iraq, I just don't hear statements that come from any of the Sunni, Shiite or Kurdish groups that say 'We recognize that we need to share power with the others, that we can't truly dominate.' "

'Shared beliefs'
According to a summary report of the focus-group findings obtained by The Washington Post, Iraqis have a number of "shared beliefs" about the current situation that cut across sectarian lines. Participants, in separate groups of men and women, were interviewed in Ramadi, Najaf, Irbil, Abu Ghraib and in Sunni and Shiite neighborhoods in Baghdad. The report does not mention how the participants were selected.

Dated December 2007, the report notes that "the Iraqi government has still made no significant progress toward its fundamental goal of national reconciliation." Asked to describe "the current situation in Iraq to a foreign visitor," some groups focused on positive aspects of the recent security improvements. But "most would describe the negative elements of life in Iraq beginning with the 'U.S. occupation' in March 2003," the report says.

Some participants also blamed Iranian meddling for Iraq's problems. While the United States was said to want to control Iraq's oil, Iran was seen as seeking to extend its political and religious agendas.

Few mentioned Saddam Hussein as a cause of their problems, which the report described as an important finding implying that "the current strife in Iraq seems to have totally eclipsed any agonies or grievances many Iraqis would have incurred from the past regime, which lasted for nearly four decades -- as opposed to the current conflict, which has lasted for five years."

Overall, the report said that "these findings may be expected to conclude that national reconciliation is neither anticipated nor possible. In reality, this survey provides very strong evidence that the opposite is true." A sense of "optimistic possibility permeated all focus groups . . . and far more commonalities than differences are found among these seemingly diverse groups of Iraqis."