But the DemocraPs claim it's real!
They gotta take a look back and start investigating, readers!
"Bush seeks cuts in Homeland Security grants; Drastic trims seen in budget documents" by Eileen Sullivan and Devlin Barrett/Associated Press December 1, 2007
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration intends to slash counterterrorism funding for police, firefighters, and rescue departments across the country by more than half next year, according to budget documents obtained by the Associated Press.
The Department of Homeland Security has given $23 billion to states and local communities to fight terrorism since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks but the administration is not convinced that the money has been well spent and thinks the nation's highest-risk cities have largely satisfied their security needs.
Or they know it is all a government-perpetuated, CIA-fiction!
"Al-CIA-Duh" indeed!
The department wanted to provide $3.2 billion to help states and cities protect against terrorist attacks in 2009, but the White House said it would ask Congress for less than half - $1.4 billion, according to a Nov. 26 document. The plan calls for the elimination of programs for port security, transit security, and local emergency management operations in the next budget year. This is President Bush's last budget, and the new administration would have to operate with the funding decisions between Jan. 20 and Sept. 30, 2009.
The proposal to drastically cut Homeland Security grants is at odds with some of the administration's policies. For example, the White House recently promised continued funding for state and regional intelligence "fusion centers" - information-sharing centers the administration deems critical in preventing another terrorist attack. Cutting the grants would limit money available for the centers.
Those "centers" are about nothing but MONITORING US!
The White House's plan to eliminate the port, transit, and other grants, which are popular with state and local officials, would not go into effect until Sept. 30, 2008. Congress is unlikely to support the cuts and will ultimately decide the fate of the programs and the funding levels when it hashes out the department's 2009 budget next year. The White House routinely seeks to cut the budget requests of federal departments, but the cuts proposed for 2009 Homeland Security grants are far deeper than the norm. Congress has yet to approve the department's 2008 plan.
Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, was particularly incensed about the proposal to end money for port security - a big concern on the West Coast:
"This budget proposal is dead on arrival. This administration runs around the country scaring people and then when it comes to putting their money where their mouth is, they say, 'Sorry, the bank is closed.' California's ports carry over 47 percent of all goods imported into the United States. A terrorist attack at any of California's ports could shut down our nation's port system and result in a mind-boggling loss for our nation's economy."
There go the stinkfucking DemocraPs playing FOOLEYS again!
And ANY "TERRORIST" attack will be ANOTHER FALSE-FLAG, BLACK-OP INSIDE JOB!!!!!!
Only difference is WE WON'T BE FOOLED AGAIN!!!!
Bipartisan opposition to deep cuts emerged from New York, another state that would be hard hit.
Senator Charles Schumer, Democrat of New York:
"To zero out essential Homeland Security programs which have more to do with protecting Americans and fighting the war on terror than much of the money spent in Iraq shows how warped and out of touch this administration's priorities are."
Representative Peter King, Republican of New York:
"[The proposal] goes totally in the wrong direction. This would be a very grave mistake, and I will do all I can to stop it."
"Terror" is all about PORK-BARREL LARGESSE, folks!
