Here is the spy part (guess which country he spied for, reader)?
Strange how you NEVER HEAR about the Israeli Spy Scandal, huh?
And here is the PROPAGANDA:
"US links Iranian leaders to bombs; Official sharpens attack on Tehran" by Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times | October 24, 2007
WASHINGTON - A senior State Department official, toughening the administration's line on Iran, said yesterday there was no doubt the top leaders in Tehran were directing Iranian forces that the administration is holding responsible for the deaths of hundreds of US troops in Iraq.
Senior Iraq adviser David Satterfield said "there is no question in our minds whatsoever" that Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps troops "are very much under the direction and command of the most senior levels of the Iranian government."
The administration repeatedly has charged that Iranian troops and agents are shipping sophisticated explosives into Iraq, training Iraqi militants, and taking other actions counter to American goals. However, US military officials have released no conclusive evidence that Iranian weapons and training were supplied by top authorities in Tehran and have been careful not to say whether they believe senior or lower-level government officials are involved.
Iran has denied providing military aid to combatants in Iraq.
Satterfield's comments to reporters at a media breakfast come as senior administration officials have been speaking out forcefully on Iran. President Bush warned last week that World War III was possible if Tehran acquired the capability to build a nuclear weapon, and Vice President Dick Cheney said Sunday that the United States and its allies would not allow Iran to build a bomb.
Bruce Riedel, a former CIA and White House official, said Satterfield's comments reflected "the growing frustration the administration is feeling about this" because officials believe Tehran has not heeded warnings to scale back its alleged activities in Iraq.
[And what do you do when frustrated? Lash out?!?!]
Riedel added that he believed Satterfield was correct in stating that the senior Iranian leadership is directing the operations in Iraq."
[So Reidel is a Zionist agent, too, huh?]
The administration and military officers have largely stood by that view."
[Clear now, readers?
WWIII ON DECK!!!]
And just for good measure, Satty took on the Kurds, too:
"U.S. Officials Upbraid Kurds for Failing to Halt Guerrillas" by RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr. and SABRINA TAVERNISE
BAGHDAD, Oct. 23 — The State Department’s senior Iraq adviser, David M. Satterfield, laid some blame at the door of Kurdish leaders, who have been the staunchest supporters of the American military occupation of Iraq.
Mr. Satterfield told reporters in Washington:
“We are not pleased with the lack of action.”
[Pushing the Clean Break plan, are ya?!]
He did not call on Kurdish leaders to take direct military action against the guerrilla group, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party. But he said they must take responsibility for dealing with the guerrilla threat."
[Well, at least you know who he is now, readers!
But Zionists aren't running this government or anything
Hello, Google monitor. :-(
Yeah, the Kurds must take responsibility -- after the United States smashed the country to bits and started all this!
HOW FUCKING ARROGANT!
"Turkey launches diplomatic offensive" by Christopher Torchia/Associated Press Writers | October 24, 2007
"David Satterfield, the State Department's top Iraq adviser, did not directly call on the Kurdish Regional Government in northern Iraq to use military force against the PKK, but said Iraqi Kurds must cut off the rebel movement's local means of support.
Satterfield, of Iraqi Kurd leaders: "They are inactive. They must become active."
[That enough of a scolding to get you moving on it, Kurd?
Kill your brother, your uncle, your friend?]
