Something stinks about both, and all I can think of is the bigger the lies, the more who will believe.
"Wing Inspections for Boeing 737s... Federal regulators ordered inspections of the wing slats on all newer Boeing 737 jets based on findings about a fire that destroyed a China Airlines 737 last week in Japan. The order applies to the owners and operators of 783 United States airplanes, but it will probably be imposed by other countries on the entire worldwide fleet of 2,287 newer 737s, said Les Dorr, a spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration. Investigators in Japan found that a bolt from a wing slat had pierced the fuel tank of the jet, which caught fire after landing. All 165 people aboard left safely just before the plane exploded (AP)."
[A screw punctured a fuel tank?
That's what created the exploding fireballs?
Pffffftttttt!!!
Better not fly at all, anymore!]
"3 Disciplined Over Fatal Fire at Bank Tower" by Al Baker/New York Times August 28, 2007
The mayor and fire officials said that there was strong evidence that careless smoking by workers on the upper floors caused the fire, and that an electrical cause had been ruled out. Smoking was prohibited in the building. The officials stopped short of outlining whether people would face criminal charges in the case, which is being investigated by Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morganthau."
[A cigarette started that blaze? Tossed by a worker? Pffft!
This incident was obviously sabotage, the reason being to keep 9/11, fires, and collapsed buildings in people's minds.
That's all it is; people make the connection to the 9/11 cover story, whether they know it or not.
They incorporate it internally, even if they think they are not listening.
A great technique for mind control. Buzzwords, I believe they are called.
Otherwise, why did the media select this story to cover for days, while leaving so many others uncovered?]
