Despite this president's lying and law-breaking (not to mention the inside job that is 9/11), the democraPs will RALLY 'ROUND, yet again.
The democraPs are going to be CHEERING and SUPPORTIVE of MARTIAL LAW, folks!
It has come to the people vs. the AIPAC-controlled establishment.
Whose gonna win? WE ARE!!
"Clinton words on terror surprise some"
CONCORD, N.H. -- Hillary Clinton is raising some eyebrows with her comments at a house party in which she raised the specter of another terrorist attack before the presidential election.
Clinton told about 100 people Thursday:
"It's a horrible prospect to ask yourself, 'What if? What if?' But if certain things happen between now and the election, particularly with respect to terrorism, that will automatically give the Republicans an advantage again, no matter how badly they have mishandled it, no matter how much more dangerous they have made the world. I think I'm the best of the Democrats to deal with that as well."
Yesterday, some commentators and rival campaigns said her remarks appeared to conflict with her past criticism of Republicans who use the "terror card" for political gain.
Rival John Edwards said: "If we're talking about America being attacked, the last thing we should do is be engaged in political calculation (Boston Globe August 25, 2007)."
"Edwards, during a stop on a bus tour across New Hampshire, said he "strongly" disagrees with her comments, which were read aloud to him.
Edwards said:
"If we're talking about America being attacked, the last thing we should be engaged in is political calculation. I believe it is the responsibility of a serious presidential candidate and a president of the United States, when you're talking about something as serious as the potential of America being attacked, to be focused on what's good for America, not politics."
[If you guys aren't going to touch 9/11, then what good are you?
Answer: No good to anyone.
Buying into the lie promotes the lie, and democraPs will STAND TALL with Bush after the next "terror" event and the imposition of MARTIAL LAW!]
Dodd, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who is far behind in the polls, charged Clinton with being crass:
"Frankly, I find it tasteless to discuss political implications when talking about a potential terrorist attack on the United States."
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson criticized her for ceding ground to the Republicans.
Richardson said in a statement:
"[I am] prepared to stand up to the GOP on national security because I've been there and done it. We shouldn't be thinking about terrorism in terms of its domestic political consequences, we should be protecting the country from terrorists. Senator Clinton seems to think that President Bush has made this country safer. I disagree with her. Our failed policy in Iraq is making us less safe. Our ports are less safe. Our cities are less safe. Our transportation systems are less safe (Washington Post August 25, 2007)."
[We are ALL LESS SAFE with any of these candidates, as long as they knuckle under to Bush and push the cultural myth about 9/11]
