Saturday, November 17, 2007

The New York Times is Hearing Voices

They must have good hearing to pick up whispers!

"Democrats Find Their Voice" November 17, 2007

It has been two long months since Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, cowed Congressional Democrats into silence, championing President Bush’s misguided course on the war. We’re pleased to see that the effects of his briefing are finally wearing off.

Unbelievable!


After the NYT fawned all over him at the time, and berated Democrats?

I READ YOUR COVERAGE, assholes!

Read it for yourself, readers:

Read this review by the Times' tv reporter on the Petraeus hearing.

"It turned out that the military was not on trial on television, but the Democrats were."

That was one of the pieces that I have logged and saved somewhere.


I am so sick of the fucking HYPOCRITICAL, BRAIN-DEAD NYT thinking they have fooled everyone with their editorial stance.

Then WHY DID YOU and JUDY MILLER SELL THIS FUCKING WAR FRO THEM?!

WHY ARE YOU PUSHING US TO WAR WITH IRAN, ASSHOLE NAZIONIST FUCKS?!!!!

WHAT A STINK FUCKING "PAPER!"


The bad news, as ever, is that Mr. Bush and his Republican allies continue to resist reason.

Pfffft!
Think I take this seriously from this shitrag?

After all the cover-ups, ommissions, and lies they have told to protect that mass-murdering war-monger and the whole globalist crowd?

They coverage shows it day after day.

What DISINGENUOUS, SHIT NaZionist PUKES!


House Democrats distinguished themselves this week when they stood up to the White House’s latest military funding steamroller: approving only $50 million of the additional $196 million the president requested for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They also set conditions on the funding, including demands that troops start coming home from Iraq within 30 days and that the withdrawal be completed by mid-December 2008.

Senate Democrats quickly brought the House plan to the floor. But, ever the spoilers, Republicans blocked it, as they have other attempts to rein in Mr. Bush’s war-without-end in Iraq.

Oh, now its all the Republicans fault, as the shit NYT pushes the false paradigm of two parties.

It's ONE PARTY NOW, and YOU KNOW IT, Times.

You are PART OF IT!

It's the AIPAC-controlled MSM and WAR PARTY!

So fuck off with your false fucking choices!


Predictably, the White House — which always prefers fear-mongering to serious debate — accused Democrats of undermining the troops. Even Defense Secretary Robert Gates got into the act, threatening to direct the Army and Marine Corps to begin developing plans to lay off employees and terminate contracts next year unless Congress approves new funding within days.

Lawmakers, regardless of party, and the American people will always stand behind the brave men and women in the armed forces.

And Sig Heil when you say that!


The Nazis stood behind their boys to the end, too, ya know?

Congress has already approved some $800 billion in funding since Sept. 11, 2001, for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But that hardly measures the full cost in blood and treasure. More than 800 troops have been killed in Iraq in 2007 alone, making it the deadliest year yet for the American military there.

Yup, and YOU HELPED HIM SELL US THIS SHIT WAR, you fucking stinkfuck elite shitters!

What a garbage fucking paper, as if we forget everything they ever write!

Pffffffffftttt!


There have been some advances since President Bush sought to salvage his misadventure by sending even more troops into Iraq. Violence has declined and Al Qaeda in Iraq is said to be weaker. But Mr. Bush’s main argument for his escalation — that it would create political space for Iraqis to work together and achieve national reconciliation — has proved wrong.

Yeah, the surge worked -- even though it didn't!

But if the lying NYT told us that, then they would have to admit they tell lies.

Like 9/11.

Times can never get to the truth of that, since they were COMPLICIT and COLLABORATIVE in PUSHING THE GOVERNMENT SCRIPT that day and beyond.

That's why the NYT is now a shitrag!


Even Mr. Bush’s generals know that these gains are unlikely to last. The Washington Post’s Thomas Ricks reported this week that senior American commanders now see the intransigence of Iraq’s Shiite-dominated government as the key threat facing the American effort in Iraq — rather than Al Qaeda terrorists, Sunni insurgents or Iranian-backed militias.

Oh, so NOW the THREAT is the GOVERNMENT WE INSISTED UPON?!?!

The DEMOCRATICALLY-ELECTED IRAQI GOVERNMENT BUSH IS ALWAYS CROWING ABOUT?

THAT'S THE PROBLEM NOW, huh?

AREN'T YOU SICK of this Zionist diarrhea like me, readers?!

WHAT SHIT!!!!!

America can’t want peace and democracy for Iraq more than the Iraqis.

What a fucking god-damned stinkfuck RACIST COMMENT by theses shit NaZionist shitters !

Fuck off, Zionists, and your GOD-DAMNED ANTI-ARAB, ANTI-MUSLIM RACIST LIES!!!

FUCK YOU, you GOD-DAMNED PIECE OF SHIT!!!!!!!

And America never wanted peace and democracy for Iraqis!

In fact, if you check the papers of the fucking asshole Nazi fascists who are driving American policy, you'd see that this is JUST WHAT USrael wanted, so FUCK OFF, TIMES!!!!!!!!!!

Give 'em a look see yourself, reader!


AIPAC/Clean Break/PNAC/MSM

Democrats say they will continue to push the president and his Republican allies to concede their failed war policy and change course. They must keep at it. It’s far past time to begin a swift and orderly withdrawal of forces from Iraq’s civil war and to refocus on Afghanistan, where America’s win over the Taliban and Al Qaeda is in danger of being reversed."

Then WHY DID YOU SELL HIS SHIT WAR, assholes!!!

WHY DID YOU SELL HIS SURGE?

As for Afghanistan, we've already lost that place!

What a bunch of stoo-pid Zionist ignoramuses at the NYT!