Thursday, October 18, 2007

Mr. Hu or Mr. Bush?

Well, I would never expect a Zionist-controlled shit rag to self-reflect, so...

"What Hu Jintao really meant" Editorial/Boston Globe October 18, 2007

THE SPEECH by China's president, Hu Jintao, to the Communist Party Congress on Monday was a reminder of how much the world misses George Orwell. Hu's touting of "scientific development" - a doctrine that is now to be enshrined along with Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong-thought as a guiding concept for China - would have been recognized by the author of "1984" as a familiar example of linguistic deceit.

There has been rapid and dramatic economic growth in China since Mao's death three decades ago. But there is nothing scientific about development that is poisoning the air, contaminating the water, and turning China's farmers into indentured servants working for corrupt local party officials....

For the 73 million members of the Chinese CP - and particularly for the plutocratic happy few who control some of China's biggest corporations as well as the levers of political power.

[Are they talking about China or AmeriKa?

I mean, that is the GLOBALIST'S PLANS!!!]


Of course, the comrades also understood that the vestiges of socialism have long since vanished from China under the communists. The unregulated free-market economy of China is in many ways the envy of conservative ideologues in the United States.

[So much so that they shipped all the jobs over there!]

The party sees to it there are no pesky trade unions to annoy the captains of industry, and the Spartan benefits such as free nurseries, healthcare, education, and pensions that workers received from their workplace in the Maoist era are no longer provided by the state.

[So we are different from the Chinese how?]


Hu promised to do something about the obscene disparities of wealth in China today, the degradation of the environment, and corruption. But none of his promises can be kept without an independent judiciary, a free press, and a genuine multiparty democracy. Not socialist democracy, but the real thing."

[Right, like we HAVE THAT HERE!

Where you been, Globe? Don't you read your own paper?]