Thanks to TV News Lies for the heads up.
I don't like the New York Times anymore, and haven't been visiting their web site. And as I've said before (I never miss an opportunity to say it), I will NEVER purchase a New York Times again -- NEVER!!!!
I don't even like the sight of one, let alone actually touching it (and I was a DECADES-LONG purchaser and reader).
"States Chafing at U.S. Focus on Terrorism"
"Juliette N. Kayyem, the Massachusetts homeland security adviser, was in her office in early February when an aide brought her startling news. To qualify for its full allotment of federal money, Massachusetts had to come up with a plan to protect the state from an almost unheard-of threat: improvised explosive devices, known as I.E.D.’s. More openly than at any time since the Sept. 11 attacks, state and local authorities have begun to complain that the federal financing for domestic security is being too closely tied to combating potential terrorist threats, at a time when they say they have more urgent priorities.And you can thank the New York Times for helping to push the lie of "terrorism," readers -- all a GOVERNMENT-FINANCED and -DIRECTED OPERATION!!!
Here's some more from the Times link:
"The demand for plans to guard against improvised explosives is being cited by state and local officials as the latest example that their concerns are not being heard, and that federal officials continue to push them to spend money on a terrorism threat that is often vague. Some $23 billion in domestic security financing has flowed to the states from the federal government since the Sept. 11 attacks, but authorities in many states and cities say they have seen little or no intelligence that Al Qaeda, or any of its potential homegrown offshoots, has concrete plans for an attack.
Local officials do not dismiss the terrorist threat, but many are trying to retool counterterrorism programs so that they focus more directly on combating gun violence, narcotics trafficking and gangs — while arguing that these programs, too, should qualify for federal financing, on the theory that terrorists may engage in criminal activity as a precursor to an attack....
Most of the $23 billion in federal grants has been spent shoring up local efforts to prevent, prepare for and ferret out a possible attack. Because official post-9/11 critiques found huge gaps in communication and coordination, billions of dollars have been spent linking federal law enforcement and intelligence authorities to the country’s more than 750,000 police officers, sheriffs and highway patrol officers. Many Homeland Security-financed “fusion centers,” designed to collect and analyze data to deter terrorist attacks, have evolved into what are known as “all-crimes” or “all-hazards” operations, branching out from terrorism to focus on violent crime and natural disasters.
Intelligence officials assert that Al Qaeda remains intent on striking inside the United States....this year’s focus on improvised explosives, the main killer of American troops in Iraq, Homeland Security officials say the attention to the domestic threat stems from a classified strategy that President Bush approved last year that is designed to help the country to deter and defeat I.E.D.’s before terrorists can detonate them here...."
Sort of setting up the next "9/11-type event," huh, readers?
Please see: The 9/11 Car Bombs
Oh, and I am sick and tired of the "Al-CIA-Duh" boogeyman, too!
Not gonna be fooleyed by that one again!