"Spain sees growing terrorist threat"
You can waste your time if you want to, readers.
I'm tired of refuting the "Al-CIA-Duh" cover story of LIES!!!!!!
Just building the case for the cover-up to come!!!
We were warned, right?!
Turning over to the Times website, you get a full dose of anti-Muslim, Zionist propaganda.
Observe:
"Joint Chiefs Chairman and Musharraf Discuss Terror Threat"
".... Mullen, speaking after meeting top military officials here on Saturday, said Pakistan faced an escalating terrorist threat that could affect the United States, but he also underscored the limitations of what Washington could do about it....
Admiral Mullen said he believed the next terrorist attack on the United States would probably be started by Qaeda terrorists operating from the Pakistani tribal areas....
United States Special Operations forces are training Pakistan’s elite Special Service Group at a site near Peshawar, the capital of North-West Frontier Province, which abuts the tribal areas.
In an indication of how politically delicate a visible American presence is in Pakistan, fewer than 100 Americans were involved in that training, according to Mike Vickers, the assistant secretary of defense for special operations. The goal was to double the size of the Special Service Group to about 5,000...."
Read more about Vickers here: Charlie Wilson's Warrior Directing the New World Order
Meanwhile, back in the Globe, Gates also gets into the act while visiting Europe:"Gates voices optimism about talks with Moscow on security, Kosovo"
".... Gates and Ivanov met during a break in an international security conference. Both were scheduled to deliver speeches today. Gates said his would focus on the challenge of stabilizing Afghanistan and would emphasize that Islamic extremism in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region is a serious threat to Europe.
So is that were the CIA/Mossad FALSE-FLAG OPERATION is to take place, readers?
You know, the one Mullens is warning about?
The NEXT one?
Gates said he and Ivanov did not discuss Kosovo, but did talk about other issues, including the US plan for placing missile interceptors in Poland and tracking radar in the Czech Republic.
This past week, Russian Foreign minister Sergey Lavrov criticized the missile defense proposal. He said in an interview published in a Polish newspaper that the US was expanding its missile defense system from American territory to northeast Asia and now to European nations close to Russia.
This, he said, amounted to an American attempt to encircle its former Cold War adversary.
"All of it is concentrating around our borders," Lavrov was quoted as saying....
That's been the plan since 1945, dude!
Encircle, then strangle, then kill!
Then WHAT is with the WAR RHETORIC?!
WTF?!!!!!
You also get this beaut, too, readers.
Just the MSM paving the groundwork for the cover story:
"Improved security technology slow to reach US airports"
"by Del Quentin Wilber, Washington Post | February 10, 2008
WASHINGTON - In the months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, government officials, and industry leaders talked excitedly about how they expected technology to plug many of the gaps in airport security.
They envisioned machines that would quickly detect explosives hidden in luggage, spot plastic explosives or other weapons through people's clothing, identify a flicker in the eye of a suspicious character.
But six years later, little has changed at airport checkpoints.
That's because the WAR on "TERROR" is BOGUS!
And the powers-that-be KNOW IT!
And the MSM lied again!
The GROPING and ANAL PROBE was different!
Screeners still use X-ray machines to scan carry-on bags, and passengers still pass through magnetometers that cannot detect plastic or liquid explosives. The Transportation Security Administration has yet to deploy a machine that can efficiently detect liquid bombs, forcing millions of air passengers to check bags or pare down their toiletries to three-ounce containers in carry-on baggies.
Why would you worry about a threat that is a self-generated ruse, people?
The sluggish pace of technological innovation and deployment has left holes in checkpoint security that could easily be exploited by terrorists, according to government officials and outside specialists. Congressional investigators reported last year that they were able to smuggle bomb components through checkpoints despite new security measures. Other investigative reports questioned the government's efforts to get emerging technology into the field.
Groundwork lain!!!!
"The snail's pace of deploying new technology is unacceptable," said Representative Bennie Thompson, Democrat of Mississippi, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. "We remain vulnerable because we have not kept up with technological innovation."
The TSA in coming months is expected to begin the government's first substantial investment in new checkpoint security technology since the 1970s, according to officials at the TSA, which plans to spend about $250 million on new devices, up from about $89 million last fiscal year. The machines include upgraded X-ray equipment that will provide multiple views of bags and hand-held scanners that can detect liquid explosives in bottles after they are identified by screeners.
Just upgrading now?
What happened to all that airport security money lo these many years?
Still, TSA officials say it will take years for much of the new technology - some of which isn't really so new - to reach checkpoints across the nation. And they are not sure whether the upgrades will allow them to lift nettlesome restrictions on gels and liquids in carry-on luggage.
You know, just forget about -- we don't want it.
I'll never fly again.
Lawmakers, government officials, and independent analysts point to myriad reasons for the slow deployment of technology at checkpoints.
Those guys sure are great at making excuses!
Top TSA officials blame limited private investment in security development. The security industry blames a lack of federal funding and criticizes the difficulty of navigating a bureaucratic approval process that one executive described as "a maze." They also say frequent turnover in the top ranks of the TSA has sent mixed messages. Congressional investigators have raised concerns about the TSA's strategic vision. And top government security officials remain skittish about quickly deploying technology before they believe it has been fully reviewed.
The problems started before the 2001 terrorist attacks, when there were few security or technology companies investing much money in such equipment, government officials said.
Even after the attacks, there was no surge in investment, and the TSA was given two mandates by Congress that had little to do with upgrading technology at checkpoints: hire tens of thousands of screeners to take over security from private firms, and buy hundreds of machines to inspect checked bags for explosives.
Security experts had long worried about how easy it would be for a terrorist to smuggle a bomb onto a plane in checked luggage.
Your NEXT FALSE-FLAGGER?
A U.S. plane shot down, er, I mean, BLOWN OUT of the sky?
The government spent more than $5 billion over the years to buy, maintain, and install explosive-detection systems, which basically scan bags using medical imaging technology, according to government records.
Translation: The government assisted WAR PROFITEERING!
Meanwhile, the government spent only a fraction of that amount - about $600 million from 2001 to 2007 - on technology to be used at checkpoints, including upgrades of X-ray machines and devices that can analyze a swab taken of passengers' clothing for traces of explosives.
That include the machine that can see me naked?
As am I!
Scrap the police state!!!!
ESPECIALLY if it FAILS AGAIN and "Al-CIA-Duh" attacks us!
