If anyone doubted the Zionist-controlled War Dailies ability to frame the debate in AmeriKa, you can rest easy.
This article totally disproves that thesis!
So received lies from the government become printed truths in the papers, huh?
Good thing I'm not buying MSM bullshit anymore! Can smell it mile away!
"As Democrats See Security Gains in Iraq, Tone Shifts" by PATRICK HEALY
As violence declines in Baghdad, the leading Democratic presidential candidates are undertaking a new and challenging balancing act on Iraq: acknowledging that success, trying to shift the focus to the lack of political progress there, and highlighting more domestic concerns like health care and the economy.
Advisers to Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama say that the candidates have watched security conditions improve after the troop escalation in Iraq and concluded that it would be folly not to acknowledge those gains.
Just like it would be folly to vote against authorizing the war, right, Hillary?
At the same time, they are arguing that American casualties are still too high, that a quick withdrawal is the only way to end the war and that the so-called surge in additional troops has not paid off in political progress in Iraq.
Which is all true, but carries no weight since the MSM press has helped sell the lie of surge success!
A lie the DemocraPs are willing to believe!
But the changing situation suggests for the first time that the politics of the war could shift in the general election next year, particularly if the gains continue. While the Democratic candidates are continuing to assail the war — a popular position with many of the party’s primary voters — they run the risk that Republicans will use those critiques to attack the party’s nominee in the election as defeatist and lacking faith in the American military.
So the war is going to be a POSITIVE in the CAMPAIGN, readers?!
CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS SHIT-SHOVELING?!?!
FUCKING GOD-DAMN NY TIMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is what they are going to shovel to us in 2008: That the WAR WAS WON and that the ANTIWAR position will be a HANDICAP next year!
UN-FUCKING-BELIEVABLE!!!
Bush could win all his wars now, and the American people would not care!
WE ARE TIRED OF THE LYING and the WARS NO MATTER WHAT!!!!!
I AM SO OUTRAGED at this fucking shitrag of a paper right now!!!!!!!!!!
FUCKING GOD-DAMN LIARS!!!!!!!!!!!
If security continues to improve, President Bush could become less of a drag on his party, too, and Republicans may have an easier time zeroing in on other issues, such as how the Democrats have proposed raising taxes in difficult economic times.
ARE THEY FUCKING SHITTING US OR WHAT?!
WE HATE HIM NO MATTER WHAT, stinkfuck Times!!!
Did the White House write this fucking piece for you?!
They certainly were happy to give you permission to publish it, too, right?
Michael E. O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who is a supporter of Mrs. Clinton’s and a proponent of the military buildup:
Yeah, this is areal objective neo-con, huh? That's the expert they are quoting?
A PRO-WAR NEO-CON?!
The Times FUCKING STINKS!!!!!!!!!!
“The politics of Iraq are going to change dramatically in the general election, assuming Iraq continues to show some hopefulness. If Iraq looks at least partly salvageable, it will be important to explain as a candidate how you would salvage it — how you would get our troops out and not lose the war. The Democrats need to be very careful with what they say and not hem themselves in.”
That does it!! FUCK OFF, shitters!!!!!!
And guess what? Here is the TURN-IN!
At the same time, there is no assurance that the ebbing of violence is more than a respite or represents a real trend that could lead to lasting political stability or coax those who have fled the capital to return to their homes. Past military successes have faded with new rounds of car bombings and kidnappings, like the market bombing that killed at least eight on Friday in Baghdad.
Oh, man, am I ever TIRED OFF THE FUCKING NEW YORK TIMES and THEIR FRONT-PAGE, STINK-FUCK PROPAGANDA!!!!!!!!!
WHAT A SHIT PAPER!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lately, as the killing in Baghdad and other areas has declined, the Democratic candidates have been dwelling less on the results of the troop escalation than on the lack of new government accords in Iraq — a tonal shift from last summer and fall when American military commanders were preparing to testify before Congress asking for more time to allow the surge to show results.
Yup, ALL WITH HELP FROM LYING SHIT BAG PROPAGANDISTS LIKE THIS SHIT BAG PAPER I'M LOOKING AT!!!!
I AM FUCKING OUTRAGED at these SHIT HOLE FUCKING LIES!!!!!!!!!!!
This is a delicate matter. By saying the effects of the troop escalation have not led to a healthier political environment, the candidates are tacitly acknowledging that the additional troops have, in fact, made a difference on the ground — a viewpoint many Democratic voters might not embrace.
Too bad I'm not a DemocraP! I'm a ROCK-RIBBED CONSERVATIVE!!!
So the Times is caught LYING AGAIN!
And as far as the difference in Iraq -- that is only according to YOU LYING SHITTERS, which I have PROVEN WRONG DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY!!!!!
So, FUCK OFF, LIARS!!!!!!!!!!!
While the war remains a top issue for many Democratic voters, the candidates are also turning to pocketbook concerns with new intensity as the nominating contests approach in January.
Yup, even though the wars are the ONE and ONLY ISSUE, the fucking stink papers are going to tell us it's a whole bunch of other stuff!
WRONG, LIARS!!!!! This is why I am raging right now!
BECAUSE OF THIS LYING STINK MEDIA!!!!!!!!!!!
Mr. Obama, meanwhile, is increasingly highlighting other concerns.
Bye-bye, Obama, you fucking tool!
Mr. Obama told a crowd on a recent evening in Allison, Iowa:
“We’ve never seen gas above $3 in November. People are working harder for less. Folks are maxing out on their credit cards, trying to stay afloat. People are struggling. And it doesn’t seem like Washington is listening.”
And neither they or you still aren't!
Mr. Obama’s spokesman, Bill Burton, said that the reduction of violence in Iraq was “welcome news,” but he also noted that a record number of troops had been killed this year and that political differences among the Iraqis had not been bridged.
Sort of like half-hearted criticism, wishing the whole issue would remain invisible -- since the WAR is NOW A REPUBLICAN STRENGTH!
Or so the NYT tells me this Sunday morning!
Former Senator John Edwards regularly brings up Iraq, but his focus is less on the troop escalation and more on his opponents’ judgment, especially Mrs. Clinton’s. He frequently lumps her in with Mr. Bush by noting her Senate votes supporting both the Iraq war and a recent resolution designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization.
Mr. Edwards says about Iraq and Iran: “We’ve seen this movie before; we know how it ends.”
That's why Edwards never scores over 155 in the Zionist-conducted polls!
Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., a Democratic candidate who has been praised by his rivals as a thoughtful voice on Iraq, agreed in a statement that there had been “real progress on security” in Iraq. On the campaign trail, though, he frames discussions of the troop escalation around his plan to create strong regional governments in Iraq.
I'm surprised Biden doesn't do better since he is up with the AIPAC/Clean Break/PNAC PLAN!
Any wonder why the NYT fills me with rage now, readers?
They just shovel shit!
