But you would never know that from the barrage of ZIONIST GARBAGE coming across the television today!
Talk about condemning hate: I'm looking at HATERS condemning HATE!!!
What NaZionist shit fucks!!!
"Lines harden over Iran leader's visit to US; Candidates view Tehran as a test in foreign policy" by Sasha Issenberg/Boston Globe September 24, 2007
WASHINGTON - As details of the visit by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran to the United Nations this week began to spread, a pair of presidential candidates presented themselves as a de facto welcoming committee, albeit with two distinctly different postures.
Democratic Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut suggested in a press release that it is time to send a special envoy to Iran, while Mitt Romney, the former Republican governor of Massachusetts, declared that Ahmadinejad should be denied an entry visa to the United States and handed instead an indictment for genocide.
[Indictment for genocide of who, Mitt?
It is NOT Ahmadinejad who has KILLED 1.2 MILLION IRAQIS with and AGGRESSIVE INVASION!!!
If you want charges of genocide, Mitt, DRAW THEM UP FOR BUSH!!!!!
Or better yet, that SHITHOLE GOVERNMENT in ISRAEL for it's MASS-MURDERING, LAND-STEALING GENOCIDAL OCCUPATION of PALESTINE!]
Now, as Ahmadinejad prepares to address Columbia University today and the UN General Assembly tomorrow, Iran has taken center stage in the US presidential campaign.
Like Dodd and Romney, other candidates have chosen to make Iran and its alleged nuclear ambitions, interference in Iraq, and often hostile president a test case for their differing approaches to dealing with hostile nations.
[Of course, the U.S. is NEVER HOSTILE to any nation!
Just go ask Saddam Hussein.
Oh, that's right, you can't because he was KILLED before he could SPILL SECRETS about U.S. covert involvement in Iraq during the 1960's, '70s, and '80s!
But the U.S. never showed any hostility towards Iraq.
It just INVADED and OCCUPIED the PLACE!]
The result appears to be a hardening of positions on the two extremes, with an emphasis on heightened diplomatic outreach among many Democrats, and belligerent talk and confrontation from many Republicans.
The Bush administration's current approach, as explained by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice Wednesday, employs both "a set of incentives and a set of teeth."
Morris Amitay, a lobbyist and former director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee:
"My sense in general is that the Democrats are seeking more engagement with Iran, which is something we're doing already to some degree. The Republicans want more of a threat of the use of force, which is something we're also doing to some degree."
[WHO the FUCK is "WE," Morris?
Still think AIPAC and SHIT NaZionist Israel ain't calling the shots, reader?
Then you are a FOOLISH ZIONIST STOOGE!!!
Truth hurts, don't it?!?!]
As the lessons of Iraq have become obscured by failures in execution, candidates have latched on to the Iranian crisis as an opportunity to display their foreign-policy values. Yet the Iran debate has also served as a venue to relitigate the run-up to a war already underway: to either stand by a doctrine of preemptive force or to insist on diplomacy as an alternative path.
Republicans have moved gingerly in assessing the Bush administration's current approach to Iran, but their policy recommendations are loaded with implicit criticisms of the White House. Former mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York has repeatedly emphasized that Washington should be more clear - "Ronald Reagan-like clear," he stressed recently - in its warnings to Tehran.
Giuliani said Wednesday in London: "The policy of the United States of America should be very, very clear that we will use any option we believe is in our best interest to stop them from becoming a nuclear power. And that we're not going to allow that to happen."
[That's why he is Jew-liani!!!
Gonna NUKE 'EM if George don't, 'eh, you WORSE than BUSH shitter?!!!]
"[The United States and its allies should confront Iran with the] absolute assurance that we will - if they get to the point where they are going to become a nuclear power - we will prevent them or we'll set them back five or 10 years. And that is not said as a threat. That should be said as a promise."
[War-Mongering, Fascist Rudy at the helm?
Good-bye, World!]
Giuliani's "promise" was a bold one from a would-be commander-in-chief. It came shortly after the release of "World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism," a new book by Giuliani's senior foreign-policy adviser Norman Podhoretz in which the proto-neoconservative scholar argues for a preemptive military strike against Iran.
[GO ahead, assholes, and BRING THIS EMPIRE DOWN!!!
Think China and Russia are just going to stand by?]
After Ahmadinejad announced his plans to visit New York, Romney wrote to the United Nations imploring the body to shut out him out - the type of swagger more likely to be practiced by a candidate than a sitting president.
[Swagger?
How about taking a look down south at D.C. for that kind of arrogant shitstink?!?!
Hell, Amurka is PROUD of its MASS-MURDERING, SWAGGERING, commander-decider guy!]
Peter Rodman, a former assistant secretary of defense under President Bush: "I don't think any administration would actually go ahead with that."
Attempting to manage Ahmadinejad's itinerary in New York this week has become a preoccupation of Republican candidates.
After reports that the Iranian president had asked to visit the World Trade Center site, Romney - joined subsequently by his rivals - called upon local officials to deny him access to the site. When Columbia University invited Ahmadinejad to speak there, Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona asked the institution to rescind the offer.
McCain: "A man who is directing the maiming and killing of Americans troops should not be given an invitation to speak at an American university."
Senator Hillary Clinton of New York, who has said that "no option should be taken off the table" in stopping Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons, joined the crowd opposed to a World Trade Center visit.
[See, reader?
She will be NO DIFFERENT than BUSH and the Neo-Cons!!
And yet the Amurkn public is going to buy the "Clinton is change" BOWL of SHIT!!!
EAT UP, Amurka!!!!!]
As the Iraq war has lost popularity, the foreign-policy philosophies it reflected - an aggressive posture toward states allegedly developing nuclear weapons or supporting terrorists, and a willingness to attack them preemptively - has lost popularity, as well.
A November 2006 poll conducted by WorldPublicOpinion.org indicated that 65 percent of Americans thought the Bush administration has been too quick to use military force. That figure was about twice the percentage agreeing with a similar question asked by a CBS News/New York Times poll in April 2003.
Skepticism over the use of force varies by party, according to a survey in December by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland.
When asked whether the United States should deal with Iran by building better relations or implied threats of force, 88 percent of Democrats selected diplomacy, compared with 56 percent of Republicans. Forty percent of Republicans chose the military option.
[So only 40 percent of REPUBLICANS support an attack on Iran, huh?!?!
THIS COUNTRY DOES NOT WANT ANY MORE BUSH WARS, and we want the CURRENT ONES TO END RIGHT NOW!!!!!
Get it through your heads, shit media and its NaZionist masters!!!!
The AMERICAN PEOPLE are FED UP with your MASS-MURDERING, GENOCIDAL WARS, and WE ARE AGAINST ANY ATTACK on IRAN!!!!
By an OVERWHELMING MARGIN!!!!
Therefore, GO AHEAD, Neo-Con shits, because WE WILL THEN WIPE YOU OFF the HISTORY PAGES for ALL TIME!!!!!
BUSH-CHENEY-RICE will be IMPEACHED and CONVICTED!!!!!
AMERICA WILL DEMAND IT!!!!!!]
Here is a further continuation of the shit Zionist mass-media coverage:
"Ahmadinejad arrives in N.Y. amid protests" by Karen Matthews/Associated Press September 24, 2007
NEW YORK - President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran arrived in New York yesterday as critics protested his planned speech at Columbia University, and the hard-line leader denied that his country is building a nuclear weapon.
Ahmadinejad said in a "60 Minutes" interview broadcast last night:
"In political relations right now, the nuclear bomb is of no use. If it was useful it would have prevented the downfall of the Soviet Union. If it was useful it would resolved the problem the Americans have in Iraq. The time of the bomb is passed."
[Ahmadinejad also asked what kind of religious man invades and occupies several countries and kills its people when Pelle asked him what he admired about Bush.
Pelle cut him off, but Ahmadinejad said that he did admire the American people.
Didn't get to see that reported, did ya, MSM shit-eaters?]
Ahmadinejad said Iran does not need nuclear weapons and his country is not heading toward war with the United States:
"You have to appreciate we don't need a nuclear bomb. . . . What need do we have for a bomb?"
The interview with CBS reporter Scott Pelley was taped Thursday in Tehran.
Ahmadinejad's planned speeches this week at Columbia and the United Nations have drawn heavy opposition.
Protesters rallied yesterday outside the university, where Ahmadinejad is scheduled to speak today. Demonstrations also were planned today near Columbia and at the UN headquarters, where the Iranian president is to address the General Assembly tomorrow.
Several elected officials and civic leaders joined the Columbia demonstration.
City Councilor David Weprin: "This invitation is a slap in the face to all New Yorkers and especially to those families who lost loved ones on Sept. 11 right here in New York City."
[WTF did Iran have to do with Sept. 11?
The Iranians were one of the firsts out there with the candlelight vigils!!!
Of course, given AmeriKa's shit Zionist media, it is no wonder Amurkns are so dumb-fuck stoo-pid!!!!]
Ahmadinejad has called the Holocaust "a myth" and called for Israel to be "wiped off the map." The White House has said Iran sponsors terrorism and is trying to develop nuclear weapons, while Iran insists that its atomic activities are aimed at producing energy.
[See how the shit NaZionist press repeats the same MISTRANSLATED LIES!!!
But do they ever say, in articles on Iraq, that George W. Bush lied the nation into war with false WMD and terrorist claims about Iraq?
Are the articles ever written like this:
"President George W. Bush, who knowingly and falsely asserted that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and terrorist ties, contended yesterday that the situation is improving despite the failure to locate the alleged weapons, and the disproving of terrorist ties to Al-Qaeda.
Mr. Bush repeatedly insisted that, despite numerous studies to the contrary, that violence in Iraq was declining and a stable democratic government was being formed."
Case closed, reader!]
Columbia has said Ahmadinejad has agreed to take questions and will be challenged to discuss his views on the Holocaust, Iran's nuclear ambitions, and other issues.
Through a spokesman, Columbia president Lee Bollinger said the university's commitment to "understanding the world as it is and as it might be" required engagement at times with "offensive and even odious" beliefs.
Bollinger: "It is a critical premise of freedom of speech that we do not honor the dishonorable when we open a public forum to their expressions. To hold otherwise would make vigorous debate impossible."
[Alas, as the skewed MSM coverage shows (also think Moveon and Puke-tray-us), FREE THOUGHT, FREE DEBATE, and FREE SPEECH are being CLOSED DOWN in the FASCIST TOTALITARIAN STATE known to the world as the U.S. of A(ssholes)!!!!
How about judging him for yourself, reader.
I've read the full transcripts and interview, and I suggest you do as well!
"Monday, September 24, 2007 Full Interview With Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Video And Transcript Of Scott Pelley's Interview With The Iranian President Sept. 23, 2007
Read Pelley's 60 Minutes story Full interview transcript, part 1 Full interview transcript, part 2
Watch the full interview Part 1: The World Trade CenterAhmadinejad says his proposed visit to ground zero was intended as a way to pay respect and wonders how his visit would be insulting.
Part 2: Iranian Weapons In IraqAhmadinejad denies claims Iranian weapons are being used against American soldiers in Iraq, saying, "If they accuse us 1,000 times, the truth will not change."
Part 3: Iran And The War In IraqSaying Iran is very much "opposed to war," Ahmadinejad maintains there are no Iranian forces in Iraq but says his country is doing everything in their power to provide security.
Part 4: Ahmadinejad On IsraelWhile Ahmadinejad says his nation likes the Israeli people "because they are victims as well," he says, "Israel is not a nation."
Part 5: Ahmadinejad On Nuclear WeaponsAhmadinejad claims Iran's nuclear is very transparent and that his nation has no plans to build a bomb, saying, "We don't need a nuclear bomb."
Part 6: More On Nuclear WeaponsAhmadinejad says he thinks it is wrong to assume the U.S. and Iran are on a path toward war. He also reasserts his claim that Iran's nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.
Part 7: Ahmadinejad On BushAsked if he likes President George W. Bush, Ahmadinejad says he's not familiar with Bush's private life and that he bases his opinion on the U.S. leader's public life.
Part 8: Inside IranAhmadinejad says Iran's people are "free" and denies that the regime is repressive. Asked about the 1979 hostage crisis, he says, "Let's have our sights towards the future."
Part 9: Nuclear SanctionsAhmadinejad says anyone imposing sanctions on his nation over the nuclear program would be "trapping themselves."
Part 10: Truth And TerrorismAhmadinejad says his nation has been a victim of terrorism throughout its history and hints at who might be behind various terror organizations.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
"The article reflects more about the mind of aristocratic Britain in 1938 -- well known to have given Hitler the benefit of the doubt -- than it does about the magazine itself. Even the American press noted the beauty of Hitler's compound, including The New York Times, which on Sept. 18, 1938, wrote that the chalet was ''simple in its appointments'' and that it commanded ''a magnificent highland panorama.''
Just thought you should know.
Have a good day, readers!
(And thanks for voting in my poll)]
