I expected nothing less from the shitty New York Times!!!
They couldn't even use a picture where he was smiling, the assholes!
"Flush With New Millions, Underdog Vies to Compete" by JULIE BOSMAN
WASHINGTON, Oct. 25 — If media muscle is any measure of a candidate, Representative Ron Paul of Texas is getting ready to flex his.
[WTF? Haven't seen him in your pages much, assholes!]
In the last two weeks, Mr. Paul — a Republican presidential candidate — has spent nearly a half-million dollars on radio advertisements in four early primary states, the first major media investment of his campaign. On Tuesday night, he will take a seat opposite Jay Leno.
And on Monday, a campaign spokesman said, he will roll out his first major television advertising campaign, spending $1.1 million on five new commercials to be shown in the New Hampshire market for the next six weeks. (In contrast, Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former mayor of New York and a rival for the Republican nomination, has yet to commit to any spending for television advertisements.)
[But Rudy's polling higher and all that shit.
I don't know if I'll be able to get through this piece without raging!]
Mr. Paul’s commercials are intended to introduce him to voters in New Hampshire, where independents can vote in either primary and where a libertarian streak could give Mr. Paul a chance to translate his quirky popularity into votes.
[Yeah, he's "quirky."
You tell us to go to the web, then you diss us.
FUCK YOU, assholes!!!
At least he's not a mass-murdering war criminal like the rest of the prospective candidates for the job!!
And YOU HOMERS put the two most offensive candidates on the front page constantly!]
After raising a surprising $5 million in the third quarter, Mr. Paul has found himself with a significant pile of cash; he has $5.4 million on hand.
[Surprising to you stinkfucks, not the American people!
We gave him that money, and some of it is mine!
Notice how they don't tell you he has more $$$ than McCain?
But the Times isn't BIASED or anything!]
His campaign says it is just the beginning: it has set fund-raising goals of $3 million in October, $4 million in November and $5 million in December, marks campaign managers say are within reach. In two days last week, Mr. Paul raised $438,000.
[RAKING IT IN, isn't he? And you fuckers CAN'T STAND IT, can ya?]
Mr. Paul places no restrictions on who can donate to his campaign, but most of his money comes through the Internet. His campaign said 78 percent of the $5 million in contributions from the third quarter was collected online.
[As if that is a bad thing! As if he's illegitimate because of it.
Well, he's getting his money from the American people because they want to give -- not because he is WHORING for AIPAC and the CORPORATIONS, like the favorite candidates of this shit rag I got the article from!!!!!!!]
Jesse Benton, a spokesman for Mr. Paul: “It’s time to spend it.”
It is a decidedly traditional strategy for a campaign that has been run largely by an army of enthusiastic volunteers (Mr. Paul’s circle of paid staff members has been small, but will grow, he said), and fervent supporters on the Internet, who have promoted their candidate on blogs and other online forums.
[And you guys can't stand it because YOU ARE LOSING and the BLOGS are WINNING!!!!!]
Mr. Benton said the television campaign would be geared toward introducing Mr. Paul to a greater audience — not to attacking fellow Republicans.
[Awesome!!!! A POSITIVE MESSAGE!!!!
Which is why the MSM will LIE to us, and tell us it didn't work because it wasn't negative.
Well, FUCK MSM coverage of politics then!!!!!]
In the first commercial, shot last week in New Hampshire, voters present some of the themes of Mr. Paul’s candidacy, including his opposition to the Iraq war and his past as a doctor in a small Texas town.
[You know, you guys can lie about him and try to stop him, but that is a GREAT STORY!!!
Like the Man from Hope!
You guys should be loving this campaign, shitters!
What an ALL-AMERICAN STORY!!]
Mr. Paul, 72, may speak like an outsider but he has represented conservative Republican districts in Texas for 10 terms, and he was the Libertarian candidate for president in 1988.
[They just can't keep from ripping him, huh?
Yeah, he's pretending to be an outsider when he's not, according to the Times.
Pffffftttt!
He's about as OUTSIDE as you can get, Times.
If he was any more outside, he'd be falling off the planet!]
Still, in the Republican debates, he has stood out with his emphatic antiwar, low-tax, anti-immigration, small-government views — the kind of positions that could appeal to people in a state like New Hampshire, where independent voters make up 45 percent of the electorate.
[And EVERYWHERE ELSE, assholes!!!!]
Dante J. Scala, an associate professor of political science at the University of New Hampshire, said that if the advertisement campaign was effective, it could convince more independents, libertarians and even moderate Republicans to vote for Mr. Paul. According to a recent Marist College poll, about 15 percent of likely Republican voters in the state were undecided.
[They will tell us it wasn't, even if it is!!!!]
A poll released Thursday by the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at St. Anselm College in Manchester, put Mr. Paul in fourth place in New Hampshire with 7 percent of the vote, behind Senator John McCain of Arizona (15 percent), Mr. Giuliani (22 percent) and Mitt Romney (32 percent), the former governor of Massachusetts.
[I don't buy that poll, because they are all rigged and many of them don't include his name; however, 7% is better than I thought he would get!
This is GOOD NEWS!!!!!!
Unless the vote is tampered with, Ron Paul will DO WELL in N.H.!]
Mr. Scala: “It’s striking to me that he’s at 7 percent without running a single TV ad in New Hampshire. If he starts to attract significant support among independents, then he could start to hurt Giuliani or McCain.”
[They'll have to mess with the vote, because Ron is already hurting those candidates.
In a FAIR election, he will do well!]
Mr. Paul’s Republican rivals may already be taking notice of his newfound purchasing power.
[Yeah, they ignored him in the last "debate," and he still won!]
During the Oct. 21 Republican debate in Florida, the other candidates treated him more gently than in previous debates, like the one in May when Mr. Giuliani admonished him for suggesting that the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, were spurred by American policies in the Middle East.
Nick Gillespie, the editor in chief of Reason, the monthly libertarian magazine, called Mr. Paul “a fly in the ointment” in the Republican race:
[Pffffftttt!
Now he is a disgusting fly in the ointment?
Perfect, since the AMERICAN PEOPLE are the FLY in the GLOBALIST'S OINTMENT!]
“Just by being out there and pushing a strict constitutional line, I think he’s making them sweat a lot. He’s highlighting the fact that they will say anything to get elected. Or at least to get through the primary.”
[And what, pray tell, is WRONG with the CONSTITUTION?]
But even as Mr. Paul tries to push into the mainstream, he brings with him an assortment of supporters — Libertarians, independents, socially conservative Democrats, and, less desirable for the campaign, white supremacists and 9/11 conspiracy theorists — who have their own ideas about what his message should be and how he should project it.
[Pfffft!!! There they go!!!!!
Lumping him in with the RACISTS and the "conspiracy" theorists!!!
You know what the BIGGEST "CONSPIRACY THEORY EVER is, reader?
19 Arab hijackers getting NORAD to STAND DOWN so they could drop two 110-story towers at free-fall speed, and a 47-story office building (WTC7) that was never hit by an airplane.
A "conspiracy" theory the Times just happens to be COMPLICIT and COLLABORATIVE in PUSHING the BULLSHIT GOVERNMENT VERSION!!!!
Well, fuck you, you shit-spewing Zionist shit rag!]
Many have been active on the Internet, voicing their thoughts about free markets, the war, taxes and which of those issues they want him to emphasize. Some of his supporters were banned this week by RedState.com, a popular Web site for conservative commentary, from posting comments about Mr. Paul, on the argument that they were liberals masquerading as conservatives.
[Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!
I am FAR from a LIBERAL!!!! More BULLSHIT from the shitrag!
I fucking HATE LIBERALS, assholes!!!! And I USED to BE ONE!!!!
Liberals are the most craven cowardly, and spineless creatures on the face of the planet.
Lower than slime, they are!
Liberals are a bunch of BABY-MURDERING KILLERS!!!!
And seeing as I am now a PRO-LIFE PERSON who stands AGAINST the MASS INSTITUTIONALIZATION of MURDER!!!
Why, I always wonder, do "liberals" want to stand with the SOVIETS on the abortion issue?
They are the ones who turned abortion into an INDUSTRY under the guise of "women's rights" -- and DESTROYING the FAMILY in the process!!!!!
Is it just a coincidence, then, reader, that abortion also fulfills the Globalist's dream of population reduction?
It is a BADGE of HONOR to be banned by those Fascistas at RedState.
In fact, why aren't you joining us, Christian conservatives?
Ron Paul is ANTI-ABORTION!!!
In an interview as he drove from Washington to his home in Virginia last week — fresh from filming television advertisements that morning — Mr. Paul said his supporters were “making signs and meeting and writing and waving signs and doing all these things.”
Mr. Paul: “Sometimes we sit around and figure out, ‘I wonder how much value there is from that?’ They’re totally out of our control.”
[Pffffttt! What shitbags at the Times!!!!
This HAS to be a MISQUOTE!!!!!!
Yeah, Ron thinks what he is doing is a WASTE of TIME, sure he does!!!!
Yup, Ron doesn't even know WHAT'S GOIN' ON!!!!
Well, FUCK OFF, you shitty fucking excuse for a newspaper!!!!
THIS is the reason YOUR CIRCULATIONS are FALLING!!!!!
Why your READERSHIP is DROPPING!!!!!
Why your ADD REVENUES are NOSEDIVING!!!!!!!
Why you had to SCRAP Times Select (because people don't want to pay $5 for SHIT)!!!!!
And why the BLOGS are KICKING YOUR ASS!!!!!!!
Because you SHITFUCK STINKFUCKS print NOTHING but BULLSHIT LIES!!!!!!
