Sunday, October 14, 2007

How Zionists See the World

Great post!

Thanks,
blogger!

"Sunday, October 14, 2007 New book exposes how zionists really see us

Zionists say the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a hoax.

Is it?

Well, how about another book (published in 2006 by a Jew) that is far more outrageous? A book legitimized by wikipedia, and available at Amazon.com? A book that terrifies zionists, because it exposes how zionists really see the world? A book which, according to its author, had the comments section at Amazon.com shut down because of its explosive nature?

First, a background comment…

Leon Trotsky wanted to spread Communism across the world. Stalin opposed him, and wanted to concentrate on Russia.

Likewise, Ze'ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky wanted to spread Jewish Supremacism across the world, while people like Ben Gurion and Chaim Weizmann wanted to focus on Palestine.

Jabotinsky’s views became known as “revisionist zionism.” (For Jabotinsky's involvement in the Armenian genocide, see awakenedgoyim's post immediately above this one, titled, "The Armenian Holocaust Of 1915.")

A new book by Shoher Obadiah champions the Jabotinsky approach, and explains how it can be effective in destroying the enemies of radical zionism.

You can download the book for free at http://www.samsonblinded.org/service/download.htm

I thought I’d quote a few passages that address Zionist “asymmetrical warfare” against the rest of us. The book mainly focuses on Muslims, but its words can be applied to the entire world.

Note to my Arab Muslim brothers and sister who read WUFYS. Do not become angry as you see the material below. Remember, it is the product of an extremely sick mind.

samson_blinded_book.jpg

Here are some quotes…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To say that Arab hostility to the United States is a result of American foreign policy rationalizes Arab xenophobia and jealousy.

Arabs observe the West on satellite TV channels, the internet, and movies, and cannot fail to see the contrasts to their own world. Arab hatred of the West is not related to religion. It is related to envy. When Indian Hindus and Indian Muslims quarrel, they burn each other’s temples and mosques. The Arabs, however, attacked not the Vatican, but New York on 9/11, and not New York churches, but two skyscrapers devoted to international trade, the essence of the new world order.

The 9/11 attack offered a rationalization for anti-Semitism. Arabs suggested that the evil Israelis arranged the attack and blamed it on Osama bin Laden. Muslims know that Osama masterminded the attack, not Israelis. Arabs always rationalize their hatred of everything foreign. This is typical of ambitious but lagging nations.

The antidote to the problem of anti-Israeli sentiment is clear: Arabs must be converted to Western secular ideology.

During the Cold War, the West used many propaganda tools against the communist bloc, from radio broadcasts and open support of dissidents, to jazz and jeans. This was designed to undermine Communist ideology and the will to fight. The same must be done in the Arab countries. The ultimate weapon is not nuclear bombs, but Israeli culture. Western political machines engineer popular consent to get their way, and Israel should use those skills on the Arabs. Atatürk forced secularization on Turkey and marginalized religious leaders. Anwar Sadat exterminated anti-Israeli elements with police methods that developed societies recently declared off-limits, but which are unavoidable in societies that do not obey the kind of law Israel wants.

Israeli Westernizing ideological pressure must be constant. The Turks made the mistake of resting on the laurels of Atatürk’s reforms, believing secularization was irreversible. That proved wrong. In Turkey, an influx of rural people into the cities, an increase of the population with the least education, and toleration of religious propaganda came to fruition in the 1990s and brought Islamist parties to power with 34% of the vote in 2002—a higher percentage even than in Pakistan.

Israel must discredit Islamic culture by making superficial aspects of Western culture available to Arabs. By this we mean everything from jeans, to CDs, to TV programming, to offshore ship-based nightlife and gambling facilities. To Arabs, these are symbols of foreign and Israeli pleasure. They are glimpses of the other world’s attractions, which are entirely unlike the dull world of the hypocritically austere Islamic ulema. The Islamic world means fruitless exhaustive work that does not buy the equivalent of a house in California with a Cadillac in the garage and a Hollywood blonde in the bedroom.

As icons represent religion, consumer symbols represent capitalism. Theological and ideological theories are irrelevant. What matters are external features. Ideological battles are merely a quest for fancier idols. In the 1990s, many Russians and Arabs rejected Western capitalism, but longed for the consumer perks it offered. The idols and ceremonies of the free market—commodities and shopping--won the Leninists over, and would also outperform mosques and jihad-inspired suicide. Muslim scorn of Western culture is mere posturing. Muslims watch Western TV, read Western magazines, and listen to Western music. They are envious of Israel. They admire the Jewish state.

Muslim polls are biased, because people indulge in radicalism when questioned about their attitude to Israel and the USA, especially after crises like 9/11. This bias misrepresents Muslim envy as animosity. Soviet people also had a love-hate relationship with America. They loved jazz and Coke, but they hated imperialist warmongers. Coke won. In mass religions, idols always win.

Atatürk converted the world’s most Islamic country to secularism in only about fifteen years. The West should identify and support Islamic leadership, and work to open up Islamic countries to ideas that are acceptable to Israel.

The West cannot reach an agreement with Muslims, because Muslims believe differently. To Muslims, freedom and economic well-being are insignificant compared to ideology. Israel must induce Muslims to accept Western values.

Muslims often clothe their grievances in hatred. They demonize the perpetrators, and attribute evil intentions to them wrongly. Muslim popular leaders exploit that hatred, setting irrational goals, and threatening irrational war, while adhering to rational war tactics. Islamists know they must be rational to come to terms with their enemies, or be exterminated. Islamic civilization’s inferiority to the West is real and rational. Blaming its failures on some Israeli conspiracy is irrational, but Islamic terrorists channel that belief rationally. The jihad’s proclaimed objective is irrational. The Islamic nationalist agenda is rational.

Israeli weapons are no good against unreason unless they crush it. Israel should use propaganda to make Muslims have rational concerns, which can be discussed and settled with Israel, not fought over. The more rational Muslims become, they more they can be persuaded by military threats.

Once Muslims become rational, they can be defeated or subdued. For example, Osama’s goals are pragmatic: getting the United States out of the Muslim world. He sought to change American habits. Osama would likely settle for something tangible, like military withdrawal and withholding Western support for Israel. However, since his goals are rational, they do not appeal to other Islamic terrorists.

A coherent, aggressive ideology like Islamism is powerful and can hardly be overcome except by eliminating its followers or discrediting it. Israel and other modern communication-based societies might find the latter more attractive.

Islamic communalism, typical of poor societies, urges all Muslims to oppose Israel. Promoting a more individualist culture among Arabs would help Israel. Individualism comes with increased wealth and consumerism. Education promotes diversity. Fostering Islamic protestantism would reduce the role of mosques, which are a major communal institution in the Islamic world. Groups need enemies; individuals fear enemies.

Sex is the most potent ingredient of pop culture for young Muslims. They would eagerly accept Israel pornography and sex culture. Worldly desires would divert them from Islam and from Arab nationalism. Israel should set up Las Vegas-like enclaves in permissive Lebanon and Israeli-controlled West Bank settlements. Muslims who visited those Israeli outfits would tell others immensely attractive stories.

More than half of Muslim populations are under twenty. Muslim youths are perfect Israeli targets for internet propaganda promoting Western culture. Access from legitimate sites of Western governments and media can bypass Islamic governments’ blocking of hostile Israeli sites. More sensitive receivers, and small indoor satellite dishes developed by Israel would beat restrictions on viewing satellite TV from Israel and the West.

Israel could ask America to fund Western cultural expansionism, subsidizing items such as DVDs and tickets to Hollywood movies, supporting Arab dissidents and publishing their books, distributing free Western magazines. All these means were used during the Cold War. They would be expensive, but they are war expenses. The cost would run into the billions, but these costs should be measured on the scale of war expenditures. Spending money this way would more likely pacify the Islamic world than buying new weapons.

Israeli propagandists must learn to address Muslims in their language. For Muslims, freedom and democracy are foreign concepts. Therefore Israelis must package these values in Islamic terms. Style is important: the concise Western style of Israeli pronouncements offends Muslims, who are used to long-winded eloquence.

Israel must take complete control of Palestinian education. Instead of tolerating anti-Israeli texts, Israel should monitor Palestinian education programs, hire and fire the teachers, and substitute Israeli designed systems. Western powers must not allow the dissemination of Islamist hatred under the umbrella of religious freedom. Freedom of religion does not extend to urging massacring people who do not share the faith.

Israel should sue the madrassas for defamation and insurrection, and blow up the offices of hostile Palestinian media outlets.

Islam is only a thin shell on the surface of Arab society. The umma is overregulated with unnatural prohibitions. Arabs abroad enjoy alcohol, gambling, and pornography. They used legal legerdemain to reintroduce usury. A small wedge of Westernization in the 1920s broke up the Islamic Ottoman Empire, which had endured for almost over six centuries. Decades later, Westernization brought down Communism. Westernization can slip past taboos in Arab culture.

Israel must exploit the Prophet’s explicit encouragement of trade. Israel and the West must establish economic contacts with Muslims by circumventing the current monopolistic arrangements in most Islamic countries. Western governments should subsidize Western companies to find and deal with small businesses in Muslim countries. China supplies more consumer goods to Muslims than does the West. Since the profit margin on wholesale in low-end items is minuscule, Western incentives could induce Muslims to deal with Western agents of Chinese factories. The Israeli goal should be to engage as many businesses in Islamic countries in economic relations with the West as possible.

Atheism disguised as liberal interpretation of Islam would prevent extremist religious groups from assuming community leadership, as happens in an ideological vacuum. Atheism can also be spread by ridiculing both Islam and the uneducated mullahs. In order to bewilder intellectual Muslims, Israel should sponsor the publishing of opinions that contradict Muslim scholars on important subjects.

Atheism will remove the otherworldly incentive for suicide Islamic terrorism targeting Israel, though suicide terrorism does not depend only on belief in the afterlife. In World War II, Soviet soldiers carried out suicide missions regardless of religious convictions. Kamikazes need only the belief in some high ideal worth dying for. For Palestinians, that ideal is political, namely the defeat of Israel. Israel must either crush her enemies or discredit the anti-Israeli political ideas behind them—in particular, by discrediting the leaders of anti-Israeli jihad.

Soldiers go to war because people habitually obey governments. Therefore Israel must de-legitimize Arab rulers. The West must publicize -- through media not affiliated with Israel --information about the illegitimacy and corruption of Arab leaders, especially their private lives, their departure from Islamic values, and their violation of sharia point by point, with many examples. Not only do Arab leaders violate sharia, but they also lack the status of caliphs. That and their un-Islamic behavior could drive a wedge between them and the Arab people. Israel must also appeal to the old Islamic view that working for a government is indecent. Islamist radicals criticize their governments. By usurping that critique and flooding the media with it, Israel and the West would turn radicals into copycats.

Arabs are extraverted. Their religious consciousness is communal, with little emphasis on personal piety. They are prone to seek praise and rewards. The Arab boycott of Naguib Mahfouz of Egypt for Mahfouz’ subtle overtures to Israel turned into a wave of acclaim and fame after Mahfouz won the 1988 Nobel Prize for literature.

Arabs envy the West and perceive themselves as despised. One way to counteract this inferiority is to invite mullahs to theological conferences with Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, and others. By co-opting Arabs, the West would make Arabs look to the West for the respect they know they cannot get otherwise. Showering Muslims with international honors would be a source of pride. We must corrupt Arab opinion-makers. Invite them to the world’s capitals. Let them meet high-ranking officials. Give them mass-media attention. That worked with American hippies, and it would work with Arab nationalists. Muslims would sell their countries for perks.

If Israel cannot root out Islamic terrorist organizations, then the next best option is to co-opt them and manage them. Israel should force Palestinians to admit the radical factions to the Israeli parliament, where Palestinians would be bureaucratized, corrupted, and discredited. Of course this game is dangerous: if Israel and the West stop showing respect to Muslims, then Muslim terrorists would turn for respect to their citizens.

A Palestinian state is simply not viable. Palestinians depend on other countries for sustenance and protection. Thus Palestinians are necessarily open even to Israel. By flirting with Islamic rulers, the West can have many opportunities to further its cultural influence in the world of Islam.

Radicals often lose their zeal when they come to power. Fiery revolutionaries become impotent functionaries. Hamas supporters are mostly rural types. They can be corrupted through Israeli red-carpet welcomes, cocktail parties, and photo opportunities. Step by step, Islamic terrorists would drop their disgusting violence, since violent resistance would be unfashionable with their new Israeli colleagues. Arabs would change their traditional dress for Versace suits. Thus, instead of negotiating with Arabs as military commanders, Israel should first turn them into corrupt politicians.

Israel should divide and corrupt Arabs by bestowing honors on them that, on the surface, do not seem related to politics. Israel can provide scholarships and grants for study in Israel. It can publish Arab scholarly works through Israeli foundations, and support Arab charities. Israeli awards should be arbitrary, so that all Muslims will aspire to them, and losers will suspect beneficiaries of collaboration of Israel.

Fundamentalism is the desperate claim to esteem in societies lacking other achievements. Muslims, unable to claim esteem on their own culture, will champion Israeli Western or Asian civilization. By approaching them with a pretense of respect, Israel will draw Muslims into its orbit.

When the Soviets attacked religion, they offered communist ideology as an alternative. Likewise, Israel should offer the Arabs Western culture: music and movies, and sexual revolution. Israeli clandestine operations should distribute DVDs and adult magazines. Israel should offer Arab women education in Western proxy schools. Israeli agencies in traditionally Arab-friendly countries like France could promote Western values through Israeli-manipulated education and various Israeli cultural programs.

Saudi Arabia disseminates Wahhabism through free education. Israel must also offer free education, and apply pressure on other governments to close Saudi-sponsored fundamentalist schools. Israel could invite poor Muslim families to send their children to Western-sponsored schools with free tuition and a small stipend. Perhaps it would be best for Israel to stick to technical education of Arabs, since Palestinian universities and colleges teach mostly liberal arts and sciences, which are the breeding ground of radical resistance. Arabs with technical education but without good jobs lead the jihad, so it is important that Israel teaches no more students than Arab economies can accommodate. Israeli education is not an end, but a means to indoctrinate young Muslims with Western values acceptable to Israel.

Osama received fame because of 9/11. Israel should have robbed him of his laurels by attributing 9/11 to an imaginary group. Disinformation is a potent weapon. Websites, e-mail lists, and online chat rooms let Islamic terrorists show their ideas to the public. Israel could do the same. Israel should set up bogus Islamic terrorist websites, spread phony news, and subtly defame Islamic terrorist leaders. Israeli agencies should collect the e-mail addresses of people who visit Islamic terrorist and fundamentalist sites, or who support bogus Islamist charities.

Uneducated Muslims trust their politicians and the Islamic terrorist leaders. Israel should exploit their gullibility. For example, the United States wants to help, but the corrupt local Arab regimes oppose this help in order to continue their autocratic rule. The USA has aired commercials that emphasized shared values, but the creators of these commercials assumed that the Islamic masses have analytical skills. The commercials did not bring rapprochement. Israel must saturate Muslims with assertions, true or not. Persistent lies are believable. Massive advertising can sell anything.

Israel should systematically assassinate Islamic terrorist leaders to shorten the queue of willing successors. There were few ancient Christian martyrs, and modern people are averse to suffering. If eliminating the Islamic terrorists as soon as they take office is troublesome for Israel, or prohibitively expensive, then Israel should grant them public immunity and go after the rank-and-file supporters, who will resent their bosses’ Israeli immunity.

Israel should hold Arab and Islamic civilizations up to judgment before world opinion. Many mistakenly believe that Arabs built the pyramids, that science flourished under Islam, and that Islamic empires were peaceful and tolerant. In fact they were generally cruel, religiously intolerant, xenophobic, culturally vapid, and economically irrelevant. Israel should protest the way Egypt handles archeological remains, which belong to all humanity, drilling tunnels in pyramids, flooding relics at Aswan, and damaging artifacts. Israelis might rethink their rejection of the likely roots of Judaism with Akhenaton and the heritage of Heliopolis, the pyramid builders.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That’s enough. There’s a whole lot more, but I’m sure you’re already nauseous -- or (hopefully) laughing.

If you wish to wallow in more of this filth, just go to http://www.samsonblinded.org

In the meantime, I hope to see all of you at the festival….

festival_of_cleansing.jpg

(The above poster is a hoax, but the book is not. Or is it? The book is available at Amazon.com, and is cited in the wikipedia article about revisionist zionism.)

Posted in

against zionism's blog