After this is all over, I want to see this man executed!
"US will not allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, Cheney says" by Matthew Barakat/Associated Press October 22, 2007
LEESBURG, Va. - The United States and other nations will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon, Vice President Dick Cheney said yesterday.
"Our country, and the entire international community, cannot stand by as a terror-supporting state fulfills its grandest ambitions," Cheney said in a speech to the Washington Institute for Near East Studies.
[Like he is a fine one to talk!]
He said Iran's efforts to pursue technology that would allow it to build a nuclear weapon are obvious and that "the regime continues to practice delay and deceit in an obvious effort to buy time."
[Oh, sort of like YOUR ADMINISTRATION, huh, Dogshit?]
If Iran continues on its current course, Cheney said the United States and other nations are "prepared to impose serious consequences."
"We will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon," he said. [
Cheney's words seemed to only escalate the US rhetoric against Iran over the past several days, including President Bush's warning that a nuclear Iran could lead to "World War III."
Cheney said the ultimate goal of the Iranian leadership is to establish itself as the hegemonic force in the Middle East and undermine a free Shi'ite-majority Iraq as a rival for influence in the Muslim world.
[Yeah, accuse others for wanting what you want to do!
Classic diversion tactic.
And that last charge is just simply ridiculous!]
Iran's government seeks "to keep Iraq in a state of weakness to ensure Baghdad does not pose a threat to Tehran," Cheney said.
[The only threat to Tehran is YOU and USrael, dogshit!]
While he was critical of that government and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, he offered praise and words of solidarity to the Iranian people. Iran "is a place of unlimited potential . . . and it has the right to be free of tyranny," Cheney said.
[So is and does America, too!]
Cheney accused Iran of having a direct role in the deaths of US soldiers in Iraq and said the government has "solidified its grip on the country" since coming to power in 1979.
On Thursday, the top officer in the US military said the United States has the resources to attack Iran if needed despite the strains of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
[So WE WILL! May God forgive us.]
Navy Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:
"There is more than enough reserve to respond [militarily if need be]."
[Really?
THAT TRUE, American soldier?
Is that what Mullen really said?]
"Cheney, Like President, Has a Warning for Iran" by SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
LANDSDOWNE, Va., Oct. 21 — Vice President Dick Cheney issued a pointed warning to Iran on Sunday, calling the government in Tehran “a growing obstacle to peace in the Middle East” and promising “serious consequences” if the government there does not abandon its nuclear program.
[You mean Israeli, right, dogshit?
No? Then you are LYING AGAIN, huh?]
The remarks, just days after President Bush suggested that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to “World War III,” amounted to Part II of a one-two punch from the administration.
Cheney, without specifying what they might be:
“The Iranian regime needs to know that if it stays on its present course, the international community is prepared to impose serious consequences. The United States joins other nations in sending a clear message: We will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon.”
[That's good, because THEY DON'T WANT ONE, and are NOT BUILDING ONE!
So what's the prob, dogshit?]
Mr. Cheney delivered his warnings during a wide-ranging foreign policy speech to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a research organization. During the 35-minute talk, he also took aim at Syria, accusing Damascus of using “bribery and intimidation” to influence the coming elections in Lebanon, and he presented the case for the administration’s muscular approach to investigating suspected terrorists.
[Yeah, ONLY WE can DO THAT!]
But Mr. Cheney reserved his harshest language for Iran. Calling it “the world’s most active state sponsor of terrorism,” he said, “our country, and the entire international community, cannot stand by as a terror-supporting state fulfills its most aggressive ambitions.”
[After USrael, that is!!!!!]
That language is not radically different from what Mr. Cheney has used in the past. But people at the conference said that, placed in the context of Mr. Bush’s remarks, it represented a significant step toward increasing pressure on Iran. The speech seemed to lay the groundwork for the threat of military action — either because the administration actually intends to use force or because it wants to use the threat of force to prod Europe into action.
[Will you be surprised when it happens, readers?
With these insane megalomaniacs?
I won't be; I'm waiting for it.
And then I will CONDEMN IT!!!]
“This week we heard a significant ratcheting up of the rhetoric,” said Dennis Ross, who served as a Middle East envoy for President Clinton and the first President Bush and is now a scholar at the Washington Institute. Repeating Mr. Cheney’s remark about serious consequences, he said those were “strong words” with “serious implications.”
[Whzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.... BOOM!!!!]
Mr. Bush has repeatedly said the administration would not “tolerate” a nuclear-armed Iran. But during a news conference on Wednesday, the president went further, saying of Iran: “If you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon.”
[Oooooh, now it is about the KNOWLEDGE, huh?
FUCKING GOD-DAMN MASS-MURDERING WAR CRIMINALS!!!!
So now it is not HAVING a weapon, it is just HAVING the KNOW-HOW and THOUGHT, huh?!
Yeah, right! FUCK OFF, NaZionist shit-scum!!!!!!!!!!]
That distinction — having the knowledge to make a nuclear weapon, as opposed to actually having a weapon — is one the administration has not made in the past. David Makovsky, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute who moderated a panel discussion before and after Mr. Cheney’s speech, said the vice president also seemed to draw a new red line when, instead of saying it is “not acceptable” for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, he said the world “will not allow” it.
Mr. Makovsky: “The first is a condition. The second is a commitment.”
[So strap yourselves in, Americans!
It's gonna be ONE HELL of a RIDE!]
The Bush administration, for its part, seems to be making an appeal directly to the Iranian people in the hope that they will rise up against the Ahmadinejad government. The White House wants to avoid any perception that it would use military force to bring about a change in government but has made clear that it would be only too happy if the Iranians brought it about themselves.
[Yeah, gonna make an appeal to the Iranians as Bush/Cheney threaten to obliterate their country.
My reaction would be an extended middle-finger if I were Iranian!
Yeah, WH worried about "perceptions."
Why?
AmeriKa's Zionist-controlled MSM will just cover it up for you anyway, shitters!
And you get the point of it all, don't you readers, and why there IS GOING to be an ATTACK on Iran?
REGIME CHANGE!!!!
I guess that's why we are sending terrorists into the country!
CUI BONO, readers?
And are you SICK of the LYING SHIT MEDIA, yet?]
Mr. Bush said Wednesday that he intended to continue to pursue a policy of isolating Iran with the hope that “at some point in time, somebody else shows up and says it’s not worth the isolation.”
[RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!]
Mr. Cheney echoed that theme:
“The spirit of freedom is stirring in Iran. America looks forward to the day when Iranians reclaim their destiny, the day that our two countries, as free and democratic nations, can be the closest of friends."
[Gee, the only way I see that happening is if ISRAEL GOES AWAY!
Otherwise, America will never be friends with the Iranians -- even though that would be in AMERICA'S BEST INTEREST!!!!!
Unfortunately, AmeriKa's government SERVES ISRAEL, not the American people!]
