Tuesday, July 22, 2008

The New World Order's Actress

The title is just an IN-YOUR-FACE type of thing, isn't it?

"
She was vilified in 2005 for making controversial comments about the 9/11 attacks, saying that America was "responsible in some way" for what happened.

FORGET ABOUT SOME WAY: THEY DID IT, as we now know!!!!

"I was shocked and so upset and scared. I wish I'd said what I'd said in a way for people who didn't believe what I did to understand. I was young, and I was upset. I learned so much from that."
--Gyllenhaal said of the response to her remarks.

Translation: She learned NOT TO SPEAK 9/11 TRUTH to the ZIONIST CONTROLLERS of our society, and that IF YOU DO, you are VILLIFIED and DESTROYED!!!


"Finding her place in a new world order; A shift in roles on and off screen" by Rebecca DiLiberto, Globe Correspondent | July 22, 2008

LOS ANGELES - This attitude belies the way Gyllenhaal is often portrayed in the press, as opinionated, private, and unconcerned with others' opinions. She was vilified in 2005 for making controversial comments about the 9/11 attacks, saying that America was "responsible in some way" for what happened.

"I was shocked and so upset and scared," Gyllenhaal said of the response to her remarks. "I wish I'd said what I'd said in a way for people who didn't believe what I did to understand. I was young, and I was upset. I learned so much from that."

"The Dark Knight" presents a bleak vision of urban America, where citizens have become inured to the terrorism of a sadistic nihilist (Heath Ledger's Joker).

Or the U.S.A. under the rule of George W. Bush.

After all, what is the difference?

There are many parallels between Gotham's fictional society and our own, but Gyllenhaal was very careful to position the dark film - and herself - as "hopeful." She seemed rehearsed, sticking to a few talking points: good mother, hopeful movie, incredible cast, real acting.

Oh, so she's NESTING NOW, huh?!

Just like Oprah advised after 9/11!!!

Remember Oprah going down the throat of the young lady who questioned George W. Bush's and the government's integrity regarding the accusations against Iraq?

A clip from a clip from Bill Moyers’s “Buying the War”:

This moment from a pre-Iraq War “Oprah” show is found about 49 minutes into the Moyers program. He introduces it as an episode featuring “liberal hawk Kenneth Pollack” and “the right hand man to Ahmed Challabi.”

Oprah, it seems, was no more willing to listen to war critics (even extremely genial ones) than they were.

Audience member: “I hope it doesn’t offend you… I just don’t know what to believe with the media.”

Oprah: “We’re not trying to propagandize, show you propaganda. We’re just showing you what is.”

Audience member: “I understand that, I’m saying —”

Oprah cuts her off.

Oprah: “OK, but, OK, you have a right to your opinion.”

In retrospect, I guess Bill Clinton was right. Apparently, we do need to define what “is” is."

Yup, GO NEST, AmeriKa!!!!!

The difference between Gyllenhaal's indie and blockbuster personas is palpable. While one can't help but assume her repeated use of the word "change" is an oblique reference to the upcoming election, it's also a signal that Gyllenhaal is pointedly recrafting her image, from edgy artist to mother and leading lady.

Oh, OPRAH would be SO PROUD!!!!

--MORE--"