My problem is I only buy the local on Sunday; imagine what the Globe is hiding every day. The thought gives me the chills; it's all garbage in the Globe!
It shouldn't be an epiphany anymore, but it is: it proves to me just exactly how much the Boston Globe is a pure agenda-pushing piece of propagandist garbage.
Observe:
The first thing that grabbed my eye was a page two brief:
"NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A large fuel spill that has shut down 100 miles of the Mississippi River for four days has had a limited impact on wildlife so far, but officials are worried about fragile wetlands downstream.
Almost 800 cleanup workers used containment booms, vacuum skimmers and other equipment Saturday to continue scrubbing oil-coated riverbanks along the nation's busiest inland waterway.
A tanker and a barge collided early Wednesday, spilling about 419,000 gallons of fuel oil from the barge, closing the river from New Orleans to the Gulf of Mexico and temporarily idling some 200 oil supertankers, grain barges and other ships.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had reports of almost 60 animals coated with oil, mostly ducks and wading birds, regional spokesman Tom MacKenzie said Saturday."
All right. I've documented the Globe's negligence in their environmental coverage, so no biggie, right?
Flip.
"Lobbyists gave $181,500 to the campaign committee for Senate Democrats, nearly three times the amount reported in donations to the Senate Republican committee. Lobbyists have reported $108,000 in contributions to the campaign committee for House Democrats, about 20 percent more than they reported giving to the House Republican committee.
Among the more generous contributors is Henry M. Gandy, a vice president of the Duberstein Group who has registered to lobby for companies like Amgen, Fannie Mae and Goldman Sachs. Mr. Gandy, a veteran of the Reagan White House, reported that he had made 23 contributions totaling $41,500 to Congressional candidates in the last six months."
Kind of interesting that the Globe printed the brief, but neglected to pick up that part of the NYT piece (my local has a lot of NYT pick-ups on Sundays).
Question: Does it matter which party controls Congress when the LOBBYISTS CONTROL THEM?!
Flip.
"The trip was designed by the campaign to show Obama on an international stage in a way that aides hoped would reassure voters who have doubts about his ability to become commander in chief or chart a course for American foreign policy. Jews at home were an audience of particular concern.
Obama's final day in Europe included meetings with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown at the official residence at 10 Downing Street and with Conservative Party Leader David Cameron in the opposition party's offices in Parliament. Brown's government is unpopular, and his party recently lost a local election that underscored its weakness.
Still, Obama said he had no advice for Brown. ``You are always more popular before you are actually in charge of things. And then, you know, once you are responsible then you are going to make some people unhappy, and that is just the nature of politics,'' he said.
He also breakfasted with former Prime Minister Tony Blair, now a Middle East envoy."
Ugh!!! Yes, the JEWS are of PARTICULAR CONCERN, of course!
And please tell me Obama did NOT have breakfast with the war criminal Bliar.
Sigh!
I can see why the Boston Globe doesn't want you to know these things!
I can also see the disparities between the account they provided as opposed to the local pick up.
"GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) - Hamas security arrested about 200 supporters of the rival Fatah group, hurled grenades at the home of a Fatah leader and set up checkpoints across Gaza on Saturday after a mysterious beachside blast that killed five Hamas members and a 6-year-old girl.
The blast went off underneath a car parked near a crowded Gaza City beach on Friday evening, Hamas officials said. At the time, a group of Hamas activists was picnicking on the beach, Hamas said. The blast shattered the windows of the white sedan and damaged its doors.
Three Hamas members and the girl were killed immediately."First of all, the Globe pick up only says a girl.
Why wouldn't they want you to know she was a 6-year-old (this attack gets more suspicious as each moment passes)?
And notice that the AP man simply calls the killed "members," while the Globe reported five "gunmen." Globe says nothing about picnicking, nothing about "activists."
Readers, those aren't "militants" or "gunmen," those are Democrats or Republicans if you want an analogy you can understand -- members of a political party!!!!
Sadly, the Globe is EXPOSED for the TRUE ZIONIST SHIT RAG it is!!!
Flip.
And truthfully, folks, I don't get the rewrites and censorship, I really don't (actually, I do, and it is called censorship by the Zionist media, but...):
"Modi said that the attacks appeared to be masterminded by a group or groups who ``are using a similar modus operandi all over the country.''
Distraught relatives of the wounded crowded the city's hospitals and television channels showed video footage of police officers and sniffer dogs scouring the areas that were hit."
(Blogger just shaking his head at the word games rewrite. WTF?)
Flip.
Finding this made me wonder why the Globe didn't pick up the NYT piece -- especially when they had a flag-draped coffin roll by!
"4000 US Combat Deaths, and Just a Handful of Images
BAGHDAD — The case of a freelance photographer in Iraq who was barred from covering the Marines after he posted photos on the Internet of several of them dead has underscored what some journalists say is a growing effort by the American military to control graphic images from the war.
Zoriah Miller, the photographer who took images of marines killed in a June 26 suicide attack and posted them on his Web site, was subsequently forbidden to work in Marine Corps-controlled areas of the country. Maj. Gen. John Kelly, the Marine commander in Iraq, is now seeking to have Mr. Miller barred from all United States military facilities throughout the world. Mr. Miller has since left Iraq.
If the conflict in Vietnam was notable for open access given to journalists — too much, many critics said, as the war played out nightly in bloody newscasts — the Iraq war may mark an opposite extreme: after five years and more than 4,000 American combat deaths, searches and interviews turned up fewer than a half-dozen graphic photographs of dead American soldiers.
It is a complex issue, with competing claims often difficult to weigh in an age of instant communication around the globe via the Internet, in which such images can add to the immediate grief of families and the anger of comrades still in the field.
While the Bush administration faced criticism for overt political manipulation in not permitting photos of flag-draped coffins, the issue is more emotional on the battlefield: local military commanders worry about security in publishing images of the American dead as well as an affront to the dignity of fallen comrades. Most newspapers refuse to publish such pictures as a matter of policy.
But opponents of the war, civil liberties advocates and journalists argue that the public portrayal of the war is being sanitized and that Americans who choose to do so have the right to see — in whatever medium — the human cost of a war that polls consistently show is unpopular with Americans.
Journalists say it is now harder, or harder than in the earlier years, to accompany troops in Iraq on combat missions. Even memorial services for killed soldiers, once routinely open, are increasingly off limits. Detainees were widely photographed in the early years of the war, but the Department of Defense, citing prisoners’ rights, has recently stopped that practice as well.
And while publishing photos of American dead is not barred under the “embed” rules in which journalists travel with military units, the Miller case underscores what is apparently one reality of the Iraq war: that doing so, even under the rules, can result in expulsion from covering the war with the military.
“It is absolutely censorship,” Mr. Miller said. “I took pictures of something they didn’t like, and they removed me. Deciding what I can and cannot document, I don’t see a clearer definition of censorship.”
Yup, my LOCAL will pick that up, but not the great BG!!!
Flip.
Then my heart truly sank as I had already reported.
I actually read the prop piece, and it is filled with the most disgusting racism and outright disingenuousness that it was tough and painful for me to read and report.
"Analysis: US now winning Iraq war that seemed lost
Shiite militias, notably the Mahdi Army of radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, have lost their power bases in Baghdad, Basra and other major cities. An important step was the routing of Shiite extremists in the Sadr City slums of eastern Baghdad this spring — now a quiet though not fully secure district."
Oh, at the time we were told a peace deal stopped the fighting, etc, etc, but now the government routed the Mahdis.
You know, when you consider that "sectarianism" and "suiciders" are the tools of western intel false-flag operations and promoted by agenda-pushing Zionist media propagandists, it's easy to see why there has been a drop in violence (just like there is always an increase when it would help. Coincidence?).
And here is another thought: What is happening to all the Sadrists Maliki is arresting and jailing?
Don't see that in your Zionist War Daily that is claiming a victory in Iraq -- so Bush can leave on a high note, huh?
No, instead we get more garbage propaganda:
Iraq still faces a mountain of problems: sectarian rivalries, power struggles within the Sunni and Shiite communities, Kurdish-Arab tensions, corruption. Any one of those could rekindle widespread fighting.
Oh. So despite the great headline, things ain't all that great!
Systematic sectarian killings have all but ended in the capital, in large part because of tight security and a strategy of walling off neighborhoods purged of minorities in 2006.
That has helped establish a sense of normalcy in the streets of the capital.Seriously, can you GET ANY MORE OFFENSIVE and RACIST in a "news analysis," readers?!
Yeah, the WALLING OFF of PURGED NEIGHBORHOODS is reestablishing a "SENSE of NORMALCY!"
Are YOU EFFIN' CRAPPIN' ME?!?!?!
This is OFFENSIVE and BLATANT PROPAGANDA and we are going to get SIX MORE MONTHS of this BULL CRAP!!!!
NOT EVEN Saddam had WALLED OFF the city!!!
But, that's "Bush's liberation!"
Now get ready for some REAL OUTRAGE:
Beyond that, there is something in the air in Iraq this summer.
Oh, there is SOMETHING in the AIR -- and it SMELLS LIKE 100% Zionist Bovine Excretement!!!
In Baghdad, parks are filled every weekend with families playing and picnicking with their children. That was unthinkable only a year ago, when the first, barely visible signs of a turnaround emerged.
Well, at least a car bomb didn't explode like in Gaza!
And if this is true, then why did the New York Times spend the last five years publishing pictures along this vein?
Think I forgot?
Now a moment has arrived for the Iraqis to try to take those positive threads and weave them into a lasting stability.
Yup, George W. Bush and his "surge" fixed things, so now it is UP to the the IRAQIS to take advantage of this golden opportunity!!!!!
After Bush has leveled their nation and uprooted nearly 5 million people, as well as having killed about 2 million by now!
The PROPAGANDA at this point is just GOD-DAMN OFFENSIVE!!!!!!!!!!!
The questions facing both Americans and Iraqis are: What kinds of help will the country need from the U.S. military, and for how long? The questions will take on greater importance as the U.S. presidential election nears, with one candidate pledging a troop withdrawal and the other insisting on staying.
They both want to leave forces behind, so WTF?
I'm near tears at the damn propaganda, folks!
Iraqi authorities have grown dependent on the U.S. military after more than five years of war. While they are aiming for full sovereignty with no foreign troops on their soil, they do not want to rush."
Oh, right, the Iraqis are in NO HURRY to see us leave because they are DEPENDENT on the U.S. military!
This after we have been told the Iraqis are standing up, blah, blah, blah, blah!
Yes, readers and world, I AM SICK of the SHIT ZIONIST AMERIKAN MSM and their GOD-DAMN LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!
How can you tell?
Flip.
"Starishevsky, a mother of two children herself, decided she was going to write a children's book to help parents and kids deal with sexual abuse. The result, "My Body," is in the process of being published and should be in stores by the end of the year. Starishevsky has a waiting list already on her Web site.
Child sex abuse is a bigger problem than most parents would like to think. At least 60 million people claim they were molested as children, but only one in 10 children ever reports the crime, according to national statistics compiled by the advocacy group Stop the Silence.
All right. Stop right there. I'm smelling an agenda-push! If those numbers are correct, then 1 in 5 Americans are being sexually abused! I'm just not buying it.
I mean, this woman is trying to sell a book and the group is pushing an agenda.
Anyhow, I'll give them a chance but when the authorities are worse than the parents.
Starishevsky's book is a 22-line rhyme geared toward children ages 3 to 8 that tells the story of a child who is molested by an uncle's friend and tells a parent. Illustrations show an androgynous child, so it will appeal to both boys and girls, she said.
Geared towards THREE YEAR OLDS?!?!
I'm sorry, but this is perverted right here!!!!
WTF is with these STATE SICKIES, readers?
And why won't the USSC let us execute the kiddie pervs?
She shopped the idea around and got a warm reception. Several publishing houses were interested, but they all wanted her to drop one line in the book _ the line where the child in the story is actually abused. The reason? The book would be too hard to market to parents.
"They wanted to just take it out. Take it out? If I take it out, why am I writing it?" Starishevsky said.
She decided to publish the book as is, by herself."Hey, wait a minute: Who is bankrolling that?!
It AIN'T CHEAP to get a book published!!!
Don't tell me she cleaned up on a prosecutor's salary.
So where's my book offer. I can call it "Blog Thoughts."
Flip.
"Literacy Debate: Online, RU Really Reading?
BEREA, Ohio — Books are not Nadia Konyk’s thing. Her mother, hoping to entice her, brings them home from the library, but Nadia rarely shows an interest.
Instead, like so many other teenagers, Nadia, 15, is addicted to the Internet. She regularly spends at least six hours a day in front of the computer here in this suburb southwest of Cleveland.
Oh, so if you aren't reading books or the shitty NYT I guess you are "addicted" to the internet!
I get sick of the shit sheet newspapers dogging the blogs, don't you, readers?
Of course, YOU are HERE, aren't you?
:-)
A slender, chatty blonde who wears black-framed plastic glasses, Nadia checks her e-mail and peruses myyearbook.com, a social networking site, reading messages or posting updates on her mood. She searches for music videos on YouTube and logs onto Gaia Online, a role-playing site where members fashion alternate identities as cutesy cartoon characters. But she spends most of her time on quizilla.com or fanfiction.net, reading and commenting on stories written by other users and based on books, television shows or movies.
Notice how they steer well clear of 9/11 Truth or sites like that?
Her mother, Deborah Konyk, would prefer that Nadia, who gets A’s and B’s at school, read books for a change. But at this point, Ms. Konyk said, “I’m just pleased that she reads something anymore.”
Children like Nadia lie at the heart of a passionate debate about just what it means to read in the digital age. The discussion is playing out among educational policy makers and reading experts around the world, and within groups like the National Council of Teachers of English and the International Reading Association.
As teenagers’ scores on standardized reading tests have declined or stagnated, some argue that the hours spent prowling the Internet are the enemy of reading — diminishing literacy, wrecking attention spans and destroying a precious common culture that exists only through the reading of books.
Well, I wasted a lot of time and money (not really a waste, except I can't play the video games so their isn't much to talk with my friends and co-acquaintances about) on books.
Yes, I did LEARN a lot, but at what social cost? Besides, BLOGS read like a BOOK if you surf correctly!
Besides, that's why I started reading newspapers, too, and look how that turned out!
Who can blame the kids?
Maybe they are the smart ones; after all, I'm the one reading the shit sheet papers!
But others say the Internet has created a new kind of reading, one that schools and society should not discount. The Web inspires a teenager like Nadia, who might otherwise spend most of her leisure time watching television, to read and write.
Even accomplished book readers like Zachary Sims, 18, of Old Greenwich, Conn., crave the ability to quickly find different points of view on a subject and converse with others online. Some children with dyslexia or other learning difficulties, like Hunter Gaudet, 16, of Somers, Conn., have found it far more comfortable to search and read online.
At least since the invention of television, critics have warned that electronic media would destroy reading.
It's not the medium, it is HOW it is USED!!!
What is different now, some literacy experts say, is that spending time on the Web, whether it is looking up something on Google or even britneyspears.org, entails some engagement with text. Few who believe in the potential of the Web deny the value of books. But they argue that it is unrealistic to expect all children to read “To Kill a Mockingbird” or “Pride and Prejudice” for fun.
Or "A New Pearl Harbor?"
And those who prefer staring at a television or mashing buttons on a game console, they say, can still benefit from reading on the Internet. In fact, some literacy experts say that online reading skills will help children fare better when they begin looking for digital-age jobs."
Yeah, so if I bought video games instead of books, I'd be O.K.!
Sigh!
And I really found the Globe's cut most revealing, readers:
"While federal prosecutors are primarily focusing on immigration charges, they may also be looking into labor violations. Search warrant documents filed in court before the raid, which was May 12, cited a report by an anonymous immigrant who was sent to work in the plant by immigration authorities as an undercover informant. The immigrant saw “a rabbi who was calling employees derogatory names and throwing meat at employees.” Jewish managers oversee the slaughtering and processing of meat at Agriprocessors to ensure kosher standards.
In another episode, the informant said a floor supervisor had blindfolded an immigrant with duct tape. “The floor supervisor then took one of the meat hooks and hit the Guatemalan with it.”
So far, 297 illegal immigrants from the May raid have been convicted of document fraud and other criminal charges, and most were sentenced to five months in prison, after which they will be deported."
Yeah, it is AMAZING that the ZIONIST GLOBE would CENSOR ZIONIST RACISM, isn't it?
The Globe (and Times) first left the impression of the poor immigrants (just like CBS' report this morning)!
Nothing about the JEWISH MASTERS of the plant!!!!
And these ILLEGAL Guatamaleans are going to be DEPORTED, just like all the ZIONIST SPIES here on 9/11 so that MORE JEWISH CRIMES are BURIED by the ZIONIST-CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT and its MSM LACKEYS!!!
Oh, we do see clearly now!!!!
Now the question is, do I go get the Boston Globe today?
See you in a few hours, readers.
:-(
