Keeping the New Yorker Alive

Just what I would expect from my Zionist-controlled War Daily.

That's why the cover was printed in the first place.

Also see: The Terrorist Presidency

"Satirical New Yorker cover not a big deal, Obama says

In his first extensive comments on a controversial New Yorker cover, Barack Obama defended the magazine's right to print it, but said it furthered misconceptions about him.

The cover showed Obama dressed in Muslim garb and fist-bumping his wife in the Oval Office while the American flag burned in the fireplace. The magazine's editors said it was an attempt to show how Obama's foes were resorting to the politics of fear.

Obama, in an interview that aired last night on CNN's "Larry King Live," said he was not personally hurt by the cover:

"Well, I know it was The New Yorker's attempt at satire. I don't think they were entirely successful with it. But you know what? It's a cartoon, Larry, and that's why we've got the First Amendment. One of the things when you're running for president for almost two years is, you get a pretty thick skin. And, you know, I've seen and heard worse. I do think that, you know, in attempting to satirize something, they probably fueled some misconceptions about me instead."

Oh, I AGREE with him on the First Amendment, don't get me wrong, but when I see Zionist racism I'm going to holler fish loud and clear!!!!

And WHO is fueling misconceptions about him?

ZIONISTS, that's who!!!

Of course, all this crap is bullshit fooleys!

Obama has been fighting Internet-fueled rumors that he is Muslim, created a website devoted to debunking untruths, and in the CNN interview said:

"[The e-mails are] actually an insult against Muslim-Americans, something that we don't spend a lot of time talking about. And sometimes I've been derelict in pointing that out (Boston Globe)."

Considering who runs the jewsmedia, that is understandable.

Of course, the issue is so serious it needs an editorial:

"Fist-bump fury July 16, 2008

A FRESH ROUND of campaign offend-o-rama has been triggered by a New Yorker magazine cover that mocks right-wing slanders of Barack and Michelle Obama. The couple, he in Muslim garb, she in camo with automatic weapon, stand in the Oval Office knuckle-bumping under a portrait of Osama bin Laden and in front of a flag-burning fireplace. A host of commentators has decried Barry Blitt's cartoon as offensive, and Obama and John McCain have denounced it.

The flap stands out because the decriers (mostly liberals) aren't decrying on their own behalf but on behalf of the less insightful. They get the joke, they say, but worry that others won't and that the cartoon will reinforce the lies it seeks to mock. The subtext of their objections seems to be: "What if this piece of arch Manhattan irony were to find its way into the rough hands of red state rubes?"

The drawing collects a lot of unease in one small room - race, religion, and terror. It's a law of cartooning that the more radioactive the subject, the more literal the reader reaction. Out of their comfort zone, people suddenly lose their irony receptors.

In this case, Democratic partisans already fret that the dark forces of reaction will find a way to make their sinister smears stick.

Perhaps they, candidate included, should relax and allow themselves a laugh at their enemies' expense.

Yeah, this coming from an author who penned this: An Offensive Cartoon

I'm sick of the Zionist AmeriKan jewsmedia, folks, can you tell?

They could also show a little more faith in the public's sophistication. People seem to understand, for instance, that Stephen Colbert is not really a right-wing talk-show host.

How can you tell these days?

I watched him last night and he had a lady from the Council on Foreign Relations to talk about what a demon Chavez is!!

Those who miss that distinction, or who read Blitt's cartoon as a blast at Barack, are unlikely Obama voters in the first place.

DAN WASSERMAN

--MORE--"

Sorry, Dan (Jewish), but I'd already given up on him -- and I WAS STILL OFFENDED!!!

Not that I would expect Zionist propaganda pushers like Wasserman here to understand.

They have inculcated the propaganda so much its a part of them now.