"Opposition to quarry in California foothills aims to preserve land; Backers see boost to economy, no ill effect on reserve" by David Kelly, Los Angeles Times | July 28, 2008
LOS ANGELES - For nearly half a century, a pristine world of rock and water high in the foothills above Temecula, Calif., has been a laboratory for scientists and a rare wildlife corridor linking the mountains to the sea.
The Santa Margarita River, the last fully protected free-flowing waterway in Southern California, tumbles over boulders and down a steep gorge as it rushes toward Camp Pendleton and into the Pacific.
"This is what Southern California looked like 100 years ago," said Matt Rahn, director of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, as his SUV bumped down a rocky road toward the river bottom. "There have been so many changes to this area, but this place has stayed the same."
What's wong with that picture, huh?
Yet that too may change. Barely a mile away, plans are afoot for an enormous gravel quarry, nearly 1,000 feet deep and almost a mile long. It would be one of the largest operations of its kind in the state, producing 5 million tons of gravel a year and annual revenue of about $60 million. About 1,400 trucks would enter and leave the site daily.
Supporters insist that despite the digging, blasting, and trucking, Liberty Quarry would have no ill effect on the reserve, Temecula or communities in northern San Diego County. They say it would be a boon to the region - adding 100 jobs, reducing truck traffic to quarries farther south and getting gravel closer to fast-growing Riverside County.
They always promise the moon, don't they?
Liberty Quarry's assertions about the project and its aggressive three-year public relations campaign to win local support have frustrated opponents, who believe it would not only damage the reserve but also pollute the air and scar the landscape.
"They say our air will be even cleaner," said Kathleen Hamilton, president of Save Our Southwest Hills, which opposes the quarry. "We don't have enough properties like this in the world to sacrifice for this kind of thing."
For its part, Temecula is trying to annex nearly 5,000 acres, including the 415-acre quarry site, to protect the reserve and preserve open space. Hamilton has led demonstrations at which hundreds of people have carried letters spelling out "No Quarry!"
"Nobody in their right mind wants a rock quarry in their backyard," said Bill Schork of Temecula, who attended a recent protest. "There is no benefit to us. Facts don't matter. Statistics don't matter. Go to any of these houses and ask them, and they'll tell you nobody wants a rock quarry in their town."
He has a point there.
Not everyone opposes the project, however.
"We need the business, we need the jobs and that's a positive, especially when you have a company that wants to work with you," said San Bernardino County Supervisor Gary Ovitt, who also sits on the board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. "I am hopeful that all the other issues can be mitigated."
Yeah, city father's beholden to corporations never have a problem with it, especially when $$$ is involved!
To hell with the environment then, right?
Rick Reiss lives in southern Temecula, a few miles from the quarry site. "If people keep saying no, no, no to everything, what are we going to do when we need new parks and schools?" he asked.
"This stuff isn't made of matchsticks. It requires building material like concrete. I'm willing to give them a shot."
--MORE--"
