Monday, March 31, 2008

Using the Tool

A few more additions from a piece that exposed the lying MSM yet again:

"Debate and Protest at Spy Program’s Inception"

".... In making its case to Congress for broadened spy powers, the White House has emphasized the firm legal foundations of the program conducted after the Sept. 11 attacks.... "

Ummm, yeah, except
Bush's Wiretapping Began BEFORE 9/11!! and the New York Times Admits Bush Administration Spying Began in December of 2000... BEFORE TAKING OFFICE!

Quick comment:

"The media which has printed these lies and presented the horrors of the day according to the angle desired by those who operate it have become their own worst enemy. They are daily providing the evidence that they lie. Truth tellers on the internet are turning over every rock they tried to bury the truth beneath."

Here's the interesting additions
:

"In one previously undisclosed episode, Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson refused to sign off on any of the secret wiretapping requests that grew out of the program because of the secrecy and legal uncertainties surrounding it, the officials said. With the veil of secrecy around the program, Mr. Thompson was not given access to details of the N.S.A. operation, and he was so uncomfortable with the idea of approving this new breed of wiretap applications that he had a top adviser write a memorandum assessing the legal ramifications. The adviser warned him not to sign the warrant applications because it was unclear where the wiretaps were coming from.

Inside the Federal Bureau of Investigation, meanwhile, technicians stumbled onto the N.S.A.’s program accidentally within 12 hours of its inception....

At the outset of the program in October 2001
, John Ashcroft, the attorney general, signed off on the surveillance program at the direction of the White House with little in the way of a formal legal review, the official said.

How often do they have to keep lying about the start of the spying, readers, and for how long?

COVER-UP of CRIMES, but WHY New York Times?


Mr. Ashcroft complained to associates at the time that the White House, in getting his signature for the surveillance program, “just shoved it in front of me and told me to sign it.”

Who would have believed that years later, after Gonzalez and Mukasey, Ashcroft would look like a hero (remember the hospital bed thing)?

.... The nervousness among Justice Department officials led the administration to secure a formal opinion from John Yoo, a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel....

You know, the guy who wrote the TORTURE MEMOS!!


The opinion itself remains classified and has not been made public. It was apparently written in late 2001 or early 2002, but it was revised in 2004 by a new cast of senior lawyers at the Justice Department, who found the earlier opinion incomplete and somewhat shoddy, leaving out important case law on presidential powers. Mr. Yoo declined to discuss the issue. Even after the final legal opinions were written, lawyers at the National Security Agency were not allowed to see them, officials said....

At the insistence of Vice President Dick Cheney, knowledge of the program was restricted to a tight circle of top officials and Congressional briefings were unusually limited. But several current and former officials involved in the program said they believed the intense secrecy was to blame for much of the early nervousness among other senior officials who had integral roles in intelligence operations yet were not allowed to know the full details of what was happening...."

Yup, as usual it is DOGSHIT DICK at the bottom of what this secretive and criminal administration is up to!!!

Think Rice is over there discussing Israeli-Palestinian peace like the Zionist-controlled AmeriKan MSM cover story says?

No, she is there for COORDINATION PURPOSES because of the UPCOMING ATTACK on IRAN!!!

Less than a WEEK now, and I expect some sort of flag CIA/Mossad false-flag EVENT in IRAQ to be the catalyst!!!!!

You heard right here, this day, this time, readers!