Friday, March 28, 2008

Occupation Iraq: Bush's Basra Blunder

It's not me saying it, it is the editorial staff of the Boston Globe:

"Bush's risky mission to Basra"

"THE UNITED STATES lent air power and political backing as the Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki took on rival forces in the port city of Basra. But US support for this assault is a dangerous venture. President Bush risks repeating the sort of missteps that have haunted America's occupation of Iraq for the past five years.

Idiot asshole never fucking learns, does he?

Bush and his advisers may be wrong in thinking their Iraqi clients can achieve the aims of the present operation, even with help from American and British air power....

An irony Bush may or may not comprehend is that he has put himself in the position of backing rivals of Sadr - Maliki's Dawa party and the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq - that are intimately entwined with the Iranian regime.

Pffffttt!


Nice going, Georgie!

Now stop the war-mongering with Iran, since they are ON OUR SIDE!!

And here the Zionist-controlled MSM was telling me Sadr was getting help from Iran.


They would benefit enormously
by taking over completely the lucrative port and oil pipelines of Basra and crushing the Mahdi Army before next October's provincial elections.

So IRAN's allies in Iraq would benefit from this "positive" development?!

Is Bush just a liar, or is he fucking INSANE, readers?

I'm hoping he's just a lying fuck, because the alternative is frightening as hell!


In short, Bush may be pursuing goals he would be wiser not to pursue.

Thanks for standing on the sidelines again, AmeriKan MSM!

I guess that's why the blogs are exploding.

I got 15 profile clicks myself yesterday, readers.

I usually average about 4 in a given day.


The picture he paints of events in Iraq suggests either that he is confused about the players and issues in Iraqi politics or that he fails to understand the impact of his policies.

Probably BOTH!!!!

When Bush talks of defeating the enemy in Iraq, he obscures a crucial reality: that at least three major power struggles are going on in Iraq, and America serves primarily as paymaster and muscle-bound enforcer for one side or the other. The sooner a US president forges a political and regional resolution of those conflicts, the better."

We have a MENTALLY-DERANGED PRESIDENT here in AmeriKa, and EVEN the Boston Globe knows it.

This will be my lone post from AmeriKa's fine War Dailies today.

I already previewed them on line, and I will not be purchasing a Boston Globe today.

Of course, it goes without saying that I won't and will never again purchase the New York Times.

Those days are LONG GONE, folks!

NEVER AGAIN!!

Have a good day, readers.