Now read:
"Iraq arms claim not in British dossier"
"by David Stringer, Associated Press | February 19, 2008
LONDON - An early version of a British dossier of prewar intelligence on Iraq did not include a key claim about weapons of mass destruction that became vital to Tony Blair's case for war, the newly published document showed yesterday.
The 2002 document insisted Saddam Hussein's regime had acquired uranium and had equipment necessary for chemical weapons, but does not contain a claim that Iraq could launch weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes - an allegation crucial to Blair's push to back the 2003 US-led invasion. The allegation was eventually discredited.
Campaigners allege that the 45-minute claim was inserted into later drafts of the document on the orders of Blair's press advisers, who were seeking to strengthen the case for invasion....
A second document, published in February 2003 - which became known as the "dodgy dossier" - was found to have repeated verbatim parts of an academic study on Iraq's supposed concealment of weapons of mass destruction.
Yeah, it was some college kid's research paper from the EARLY 1990s!!!!
Isn't that PLAGIARISM?
Limey LIARS!!!
Hans Blix, the former UN chief weapons inspector, said last year he believed Blair had replaced "question marks with exclamation marks" in intelligence dossiers to justify the decision to invade Iraq....
Government weapons scientist David Kelly killed himself in 2003 after he was exposed as the source of a British Broadcasting Corp. report that accused Blair's Downing Street office of "sexing up" intelligence to make a stronger case for war."
Dr. David Kelly was MURDERED!!!
LIES sure are expensive in terms of LIVES, aren't they, readers?
And since the MSM was and is CONSTANTLY LYING about IRAQ, how can we believe them over anything?
Answer: We can't!
Do some research, readers.
You have this wonderful website and blogosphere, so have at it!!!!
