"This a story about manipulations, telling the truth, then lying about it and keeping the Holocaust™ spin doctors busy, very, very busy. And it all starts with a column by Patrick Buchanan and a place called "The Holocaust History Project", which is supposedly dedicated to fighting Holocaust-denial (or "revisionism"), whether based on a hatred of Jews or a desire to rehabilitate the discredited philosophy of National Socialism.
Notice they don't allow for mere questions to be raised about the Holocaust™. No, you're either a denier or secretly long for the return of National Socialism.
They purport to print a March 17, 1990 New York Post column by Patrick Buchanan. Except they rearrange the way the story was printed, by moving the original title "Ivan the Terrible-More Doubts" to the top of the page and leaving the title of Buchanan's regular column, 'Dividing Line', with the byline, making one think that was the original title of the story.
Not much you say? Maybe, but when reading this column, keep in mind the phrase used, "Holocaust Survivor Syndrome" and the number associated with that term.
(Note: I searched the Post for the original copy, but alas, for some reason, it is no longer available. There are other places on the web where this story is available, so they were used to cross-check)
Patrick Buchanan, "Dividing Line," New York Post, March 17, 1990.
This May, Israel's Supreme Court will decide whether John Demjanjuk, the Cleveland auto worker convicted of being "Ivan the Terrible," the butcher of Treblinka who operated the gas chamber, follows Adolph Eichmann to the gallows.
Oddly, the closer Demjanjuk comes to death, the more certain his innocence appears. Had we known in 1980, when he was stripped of U.S. citizenship, what we know today, he would have walked out of his Cleveland courtroom a free man.
Just weeks ago, CBS' "60 Minutes" discovered Marianna Dudek in a village near Treblinkia. Did she remember "Ivan the Terrble"? Indeed she did: she had slept with him for the gold Ivan ha taken from the Jews, she said; his real name was Ivan Marchenko.
At the War Crimes Commission in Warsaw, CBS was shown a list of guards from Treblinka. Marchenko's name was on it; Demjanjuk's was not.
The only hard evidecnne against Demjanjuk remains the I.D. card from Trawniki training camp, which puts Demjanjuk in a different camp, Sobibor.
Late in the Jerusalem trial, we learned that the U.S. Justice Department had withheld evidence, dating to 1979, that another guard, Danilchenko, also recalled Demjanjuk at Sobibor in the same months Demjanjuk's accusers swear he was at Treblinka.
Now, a U. S. researcher has finished an exhaustive study of the I.D. card, and three like it from Soviet archives, delivered to Israel by Armand Hammer. All four are patent forgeries.
Demjanjuk's card, supposedly issued in mid-1942, is validated with the seal of SS-Brigadefuehrer Odilo Globocnik. But Himmler himself dismissed Globocnik in March of '42, while Demjanjuk was still in the Red Army.
Three of the cards, including Demjanjuk's, carry the stamp of the Waffen SS; but the Waffen SS did not take over Trawniki until 1943, a year after Demjanjuk supposedly departed.
On guard Juchnowoskij's card, his picture is reversed (buttons are on the left side of the blouse) while the numbers on the blouse are not reversed, proof the picture was composed in a lab.
One card bears the signature of a Corporal Teufel; Teufel had been promoted to sergeant three months before. The same card bears the signature of Capt. Hoefle; Hoefle had already been promoted to Major to carry out the deportation of the Warsaw Jews.
Moreover, graphic elements of the seals are grossly misaligned; the SS thunderbolts are wrongly printed in the Roman script; one stamp is upside down.
Nazi documents have been copied professionally for years; why, then, such clumsy forgeries? Simple: The KGB forgers had no authentic Trawniki card to work from.
But what about the eyewitnesses?
Well, among the atrocities for which Demjanjuk must hang is using a drill to bore into the rectum of prisoner Finkelstein. Only, in his 1945 sworn testimony, Finkelstein did not mention this.
Moreover, S. Reizman, the leader of the Treblinka prisoners, never mentioned any Ivan in his list of the Ukrainian personnel at Treblinka, compiled at meetings of survivors in Lodz on Nov 5, 1945.
Another witness at Demjanjuk's trial swore in 1945 and 1947 that he'd killed Ivan in 1943.
Is this collective perjury? No, something else. Since the war, 1,600 medical papers have been written on "The Psychological and Medical Effects of the Concentration Camps on Holocaust Survivors."
This so-called "Holocaust Survivor Syndrome" involves "group fantasies of martyrdom and heroics." Reportedly, half of the 20,000 survivor testimonies in Yad Vashem memorial in Jerusalem are considered "unreliable," not to be used in trials.
Finally, the death engine. During the war, the underground government of the Warsaw Ghetto reported to London that the Jews of Treblinka were being electrocuted and steamed to death.
The Israeli court, however, concluded that the murder weapon for 850,000 was the diesel engine from a Soviet tank which drove its exhaust into the death chamber. All died in 20 minutes, Finkenstein swore in 1945.
The problem is: Diesel engines do not emit enough carbon monoxide to kill anybody. In 1988, 97 kids, trapped 400 feet underground in a Washington, DC tunnel while two locomotives spewed diesel exhaust into the car, emerged unharmed after 45 minutes.
Demjanjuk's weapon of mass murder cannot kill. The Soviet I.D. cards are patent forgeries. Polish witnesses say "Ivan" was another man; Israeli eyewitnesses contradict their own sworn statements, contradict one another, and are contradicted in turn.
And John Demjanjuk, bewildered and innocent, advances toward execution.
God help us. We are the Salem judges of our own time.
Source: Holocaust History.org
And from the people that brought and continue to bring you the Holocaust™, we have the following reply. The reader is to choose on their own which writer, Buchanan or Krakowski, is more believable. Notice that Krakowski refutes his own article:
Now let's turn to Buchanan's claims about unreliable testimony of Holocaust survivors. He writes:
..."Holocaust Survivor Syndrome" involves "group fantasies of martyrdom and heroics." Reportedly, half the 20,000 survivor testimonies in Jerusalem are considered "unreliable"...
There is no need to hunt for Buchanan's sources on these statements. They have been staples of Holocaust-denial for many years. The source is the Director of the Yad Vashem archives in Jerusalem, Shmuel Krakowski.
Krakowski was misquoted in an article in the Jerusalem Post on August 17, 1986. It read:
Over half of the 20,000 testimonies from Holocaust survivors on record at Yad Vashem are "unreliable" and have never been used as evidence in Nazi war crimes trials, Yad Vashem Archives director Shmuel Krakowski has told The Jerusalem Post.
"A large number of testimonies on file were later proved inaccurate when locations and dates could not pass an expert historian's appraisal," he said.
On the same day this article appeared, Krakowski sent a shocked protest, which appeared on August 22:
To the Editor of the Jerusalem Post
Sir, - I was deeply astonished to read Barbara Amouyal's front-page article of August 17, which is based in part on an interview with me.
Many hundreds of the 20,000 testimonies held in our archives were extensively used in Nazi war criminal trials, contrary to what Amouyal wrote.
I told Amouyal that survivors wrote their accounts for the record of history. I cannot understand why she made of it that survivors wanted "to be part of history".
I said there are some - fortunately very few - testimonies, which proved to be inaccurate. Why did Amouyal make them out to be a large number?
Regarding the final remark, I did not receive any "orders" not to discuss the Demjanjuk case. I simply refused to discuss it with Amouyal.
Shumel Krakowski,
Director,
Yad Vashem Archives
Jerusalem.
Misquoted? I believe Mr. Krakowski's original statement to the JPost that over half of the 20,000 Holocaust™ survivor testimony's are "UNRELIABLE."
Especially in light of the fact that the reporter, Barbara Amouyal, has a book out called "Taste of Passover Cookbook."
Good luck finding Amouyal's original article online in the JPost, entitled, “Doubts Over Evidence of Camp Survivors", since they no longer have that in their archives.
Does a reporter who writes a book about Passover meals sound like someone who is going to fudge facts when reporting on the Holocaust™?
This was an article printed in the JPost, one of the more strident Israeli papers when to comes to about anything relating to Zionism, Israel or the Holocaust™.
Looks like the TRUTH slipped out about the suspect testimonies of the Holocaust™ wanna-be's and the spin doctor made a house call.
One final note: It seems the New York Post does have an item about Mr. Demjanjuk, copied and pasted below. Looks like the Zionist hell hounds are still on his trail.
November 30, 2007 -- CINCINNATI - A lawyer for a former autoworker accused of being a Nazi death-camp guard yesterday challenged the right of the nation's chief immigration judge to order his deportation.
A federal appeals court heard arguments on accused guard John Demjanjuk's challenge to a deportation order issued in 2005. The federal government has been trying to deport him for three decades.
The three-judge panel didn't say when it would rule, but it's usually several months after arguments before the court issues a decision.
The arguments hinged on whether an immigration judge had the authority to order the removal of Demjanjuk, 87."
