We just got through a dose of bullshit propaganda, and here the NYT is at it again.
What an absolute shit rag the Times is!
Also see: Taking Apart the New York Times
"Nuclear Agency Wants More From Iran" by ARIANE BERNARD and ELAINE SCIOLINO
VIENNA, Nov. 22 — Iran is making progress in resolving suspicions about past nuclear activities but must do more before the International Atomic Energy Agency can verify important aspects of the country’s nuclear program, the agency’s director said Thursday.
The director, Mohamed ElBaradei, also said that the agency’s knowledge of Iran’s current nuclear activities was diminishing and that he could not declare with certainty whether Iran’s program was peaceful or intended to make weapons.
I get tired of the absolute lies in the fucking shit NYT!!!!!!!!
Dr. ElBaradei told a meeting of the agency’s 35-country board:
“The agency has so far not been able to verify some important aspects of Iran’s nuclear program. [Outstanding issues include] those relevant to the scope and nature of Iran’s centrifuge enrichment activities, as well as those relevant to alleged studies and other activities that could have military applications. [The result is that the agency is] unable to provide credible assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities.”
One wonders how badly these stink reporters for that stink newspaper misquoted or mis-contextualized him!
The United Nations Security Council imposed sanctions on Iran after its refusal to suspend its production of enriched uranium, which can be used in nuclear power plants or to fuel a nuclear weapon.
Western powers, including the United States, are highly suspicious of Iran’s nuclear program, and their reaction to Dr. ElBaradei’s remarks was predictably negative.
No mention of Israel's role, huh?
Gregory L. Schulte, the American ambassador to the nuclear agency, in a statement to the board, denounced what he called Iran’s delay tactics:
“We fear that the next few weeks will not yield much more from Iran than we’ve seen in the last few months or, for that matter, the last five years.”
The French ambassador to the agency, François-Xavier Deniau, speaking on behalf of France as well as Britain and Germany:
“We’re disappointed that cooperation by Iran is only partial and reactive. [The Security Council should consider tougher sanctions]. Waiting is not an option. Under these conditions, we believe it is necessary to set a deadline to the process and that that deadline be in a few weeks, as proposed by the director general.”
Why? The Iranian Threat: Coming in 2015
Iran insists its program is peaceful and strictly geared toward the civilian aim of producing electricity, which is its right as a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
Unlike U.S. friends and allies Pakistan, India and ISRAEL, but, you know, that's AmeriKan exceptionalism for you!
In his address to the nuclear agency’s board, Dr. ElBaradei spoke of a “crucial” need for Iran to “restore confidence” in its nuclear program in light of its history of undeclared activity. He urged Iran to “take all the confidence-building measures called for by the Security Council, including the suspension of enrichment related activities.”
But he also praised the “good progress” made on some questions Iran had long refused to address, like how it had obtained material to build enrichment centrifuges from the black market.
Yeah, soft-sell the "good" part of the report, you shitbags at the Times!
What a GARBAGE FUCKING PAPER!
THEY are the ones making me ANGRY with their GOD-DAMNED LIES DAY AFTER DAY!
Under terms of a “work plan” concluded by Iran and the nuclear agency last summer, Iran was to have met a series of deadlines to resolve all unanswered questions about suspicious nuclear activities dating back two decades.
How about crawling up lying, law-breaking Israel's ass, huh?
In announcing the work plan in August, Dr. ElBaradei said its deadlines proved that the plan was “not an open-ended invitation to dallying with the agency or a ruse to prolong negotiations and avoid sanctions.”
Pfffffttt!
The agreed timeline set November as a target date for Iran to answer all outstanding agency questions about the history of its program to build centrifuges — the tall, thin machines that spin rapidly to enrich, or concentrate, uranium 235, which can fuel nuclear reactors and at highly enriched levels, atom bombs.
On the day that the report was released to the agency board last week, one senior official linked to the nuclear agency said that he would not call the centrifuge file “closed.”
But according to Dr. ElBaradei’s remarks on Thursday, Iran’s agreement with the agency “is proceeding according to schedule.”
Oh, three-quarter's of the way through, the NYT can cut a little fart mist of truth, huh?
What a LYING SHIT RAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then NO WAR GROUNDS, huh, NYT?
Yet the target date of completing the verification work is fluid. Although Dr. ElBaradei has said that the goal of the work plan was to wrap up nuclear issues under investigation for four years by December, Iranian and other agency officials acknowledge that it may take several more months.
Isn't this the bullshit we were sold about Iraq?
The "verification work is fluid?"
So we can claim they aren't complying like Iraq, right?
All over SEVERAL MORE MONTHS?!
Well, then, I AIN'T GOING TO WAR for the fucking stink Israelis over A FEW MONTHS!!!
Just like in IRAQ!!!!!!!
So FUCK YOU, WAR-MONGERING SHITTERS!!!!!!!!!!!!
Iran, meanwhile, cast Dr. ElBaradei’s statements in a positive light, saying that they prove the country’s good will and cooperation.
Ali Asghar Soltaniyeh, Iran’s ambassador to the agency, told reporters in Vienna after Dr. ElBaradei’s address:
“We will continue our work plan, the issue will be resolved soon and Iran has shown and will show utmost cooperation, proactive cooperation with the I.A.E.A..”
I feel bad for the Iranians because they are doing nothing wrong, but it doesn't matter to lying fucking USrael!!!!!!!!!
Javier Solana, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, at a conference in Paris on Thursday said Iran’s stated ambitions concerning its enriched uranium output was inconsistent with its acquisition of the civilian nuclear technology that would justify it:
“It is a bit like if you were trying to make your own fuel before having purchased a car and learned how to drive."
Mr. Solana represents the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany in talks with Iran. He is scheduled to report by the end of November whether Iran is continuing to refuse to suspend its enrichment of uranium."
Oh, I'm sure that will be an unbiased, fair report! What SHIT!!!!!!!!
Need more slander?
Just remember that the source of the article is a Zionist-controlled, war-promoting AmeriKan War Daily, 'kay, reader?
"Critique of Iranian Leader Reveals Political Rift" by NAZILA FATHI
TEHRAN, Nov. 22 — An influential hard-line newspaper has made a rare direct attack on President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad over his recent harsh accusations against veteran politicians before parliamentary elections in March.
The daily, Jomhouri Eslami, criticized Mr. Ahmadinejad for calling a former nuclear negotiator, Hossein Mousavian, a nuclear spy and saying that influential politicians were using their power to have him cleared of those charges. Mr. Mousavian was a close aide to a former president, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani.
The newspaper wrote in a front-page editorial on Wednesday:
“Lately, defaming political rivals has become common in the country and has replaced lawful behavior. We want to reject this kind of behavior as immoral, illegal, illogical and un-Islamic, and remind wise figures that such a trend is dangerous for the country.”
Mr. Ahmadinejad has proven a divisive leader, with both hard-line conservative and reformist opponents finding fault with his economic programs and his harsh anti-Western rhetoric. But the criticism is often indirect, to avoid political repercussions. Jomhouri Eslami, however, is so established — the current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was once the managing editor — that it is unlikely to be closed down or censored.
Oh, the Supreme Leader -- who really runs things -- put the ed out in his paper, huh?
Aren't you sick of Zionist lies, readers?
Just the tone of this piece is shit.
And if Ahmadinejad is such a dictator as these shit Zionist War Dailies suggest, WTF is with the opposition?
The real dictatorship is in AmeriKa, despite what the NYT shits out in its disingenuous editorials!
Bridgers Against Bush
With parliamentary elections scheduled for March 2008 and presidential elections in spring 2009, Mr. Ahmadinejad and his rivals are stepping up their political positioning. His comments about Mr. Mousavian’s case appear to be part of his efforts to discredit his political rivals as the West is increasing its pressure on Iran over its defiance to halt uranium enrichment activities.
Oh, ELECTIONS are coming up, too? Better bomb quick, USrael!
Before your propaganda argument runs out!
Mr. Ahmadinejad has started a second round of trips to the provinces around the country since his election over two years ago. He often speaks about development for deprived areas and about the country’s nuclear program, which appeals to nationalists. He has argued that former leaders have compromised over the program, and he has dismissed the idea that his confrontational policies could put the country in the face of a crisis. He has declared those who criticize his nuclear policy “traitors.”
Yeah, we wouldn't know anything about calling political opponents traitors here in Bush's AmeriKa, thank God!
Unlike when the Iraq war began, right, bridgers?
But his political opponents have become more vocal in their criticism of him and have warned that his nuclear agenda can have dangerous consequences. Two former presidents, Mr. Rafsanjani and Mohammad Khatami, have warned that the country faces serious threats from foreign governments worried that the nuclear program is meant to create weapons, not energy, as Mr. Ahmadinejad portrays it.
France and the United States say they have not dismissed military action against Iran if it does not halt its uranium enrichment program.
The former head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, Mohsen Rezai, and Mayor Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf of Tehran, both influential hard-line figures, also expressed concerns over foreign threats this month.
And Hassan Rowhani, a former nuclear negotiator and a close aide to Mr. Rafsanjani, urged the government to distance itself from tension with the West.
Mr. Rowhani, according to newspapers:
“We must not give excuse to the enemy and provoke it with unwise statements.”
And if any "attack" occurs, we all know it will be a false-flag set-up by AmeriKa or Israel!
In addition, Rassoul Montajabnia, the deputy head of the reformist party Etemad Melli, warned that underestimating the threats was naïve.
Mr. Montajabnia, according to a news Web site, Aftab:
“We have to be realistic about the issues surrounding the nuclear file. The government does not see the threats and thinks the case is closed. This is very naïve and means fooling people.”
Despite dismissing the threats, the authorities have also warned against any attacks on Iran."
That's because they know what crazy, evil men rule in Tel Aviv and Washington!
The Zio-prop slam jobs on Ahmadinejad become tiresome as well, readers!
