Wednesday, November 14, 2007

DemocraPs To Fund Wars Anyway

Despite what you heard.

Meanwhile, nothing about Bush vetoing the Health and Education Bill!

Bush vetoes health and education bill

WTF, hey?

"Reid says Iraq funds tied to troop pullout" by Anne Flaherty/Associated Press November 14, 2007

WASHINGTON - By the end of the week, the House and Senate planned to vote on a $50 billion measure for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. If Democrats refuse to send Bush the $50 billion, the military would have to drain its annual budget to keep the wars afloat.

Oh, so even if they don't have the money, the military can move money around and cover it.

Must be nice to have money just floating around, huh, Amurkns?

They take your home, yet? You ain't sick, are ya?


Last week, Congress approved a $471 billion budget for the military that pays mostly for nonwar-related projects, such as depot maintenance and weapons development.

The tactic stops short of outright blocking money from being used on the war, but forcing the Pentagon into a painful budget dance spares Democrats from having to write a blank check for the unpopular Iraq war.

ALL POLITICS!!! They ain't stopping shit, those damn DemocraPs!!!!


House Democratic leader Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland:

"We will and we must pay for whatever cost to protect the American people."

Thanks, Steny! How does fighting Israel's wars protect us?

And I need health care, man!


In a recent letter to Congress, Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England warned that the Army was on track to run out of money by February.

Run out of money? THEY JUST GOT $471 BILLION!?!

WTF?! I AM SICK of the fucking WARFARE STATE!!!!

Looters and Robbers, all over a pack of lies!

Question: Why would the web Globe remove the next passages from the article.


England also said that without more money the military would eventually have to close facilities, layoff civilian workers, and defer contracts. Also, the budget delay could disrupt training of Iraqi security forces and efforts to protect troops against roadside bombs.

England wrote in a Nov. 8 letter: "The successes they [the troops] have achieved in recent months will be short-lived without appropriate resources to continue their good work."

Now why would the Globe censor that?

And HOW FUCKING GOD-DAMN SHAMELESS of this fucking stink War Pig?

Hasn't the military gotten enough, what with the looting and the costs?

And yeah, that Dem report isn't in the paper either, you know, the $1.6 trillion price tag.

WTF is with theses shit papers hey?

And WTF? Is the surge "success" that tenuous?

Then IT WASN'T A SUCCESS AT ALL!!!!!!!


Bush, in a speech in Indiana yesterday, said Congress should not leave for Christmas recess without passing a clean war-spending bill:

"We don't need members of Congress telling our military commanders what to do. We need our military commanders telling us what to do so we can win the war against these extremists and radicals."

I'm sick of this shithole liar, and if I had one wish it would be that he is gone!

And he just vetoed what we want, so FUCK HIM and HIS LYING WARS!!!!!!!


Congressional Republicans said they would back the president. Senator Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona:

"It's very clear the that the Amerucan people want us to succeed. They would like for our troops to be able to come home, but not in a losing cause."

Kyl, we want them home no matter what! We want the WARS to END!!!!!!

And wtf? how could we even be losing after all the surge success?

Unless we are being lied to YET AGAIN?!!!!!!!!!


The House was expected to vote as early as today, with the Senate following suit by the end of the week. The bill is similar to one that Bush rejected in May. Democrats stripped the timetable from the $95 billion bill and approved the war money without restrictions."

And they will do the same again, just watch them!"