Thursday, January 31, 2008

Clinton's Losing the Establishment?

"The Clintons Begin to Lose the Establishment"

"
With the Obama endorsement of Ted Kennedy following in the footsteps of endorsements from party luminaries such as Claire McCaskill, Janet Napolitano, and Kent Conrad, it's clear that Hillary Clinton is not getting the support of some of the establishment Democrats she might have been counting on. This is an important development that is not just about campaign momentum. "Party luminaries" comprise about 800 of the delegates to the Democratic convention -- approximately 20% of the total. Up until now, it has been widely assumed that the party establishment would rally heavily to the establishment candidate, namely Clinton, providing her a necessary boost of delegates should the race remain close.

With a general revulsion to the Clinton's campaign tactics now settling in, that assumption is now questionable. Moreover, even if Clinton should ultimately prevail in a close contest, she and her husband have so alienated a significant number of Democrats that there is likely to be a significant swath of delegates on the floor in Denver who are going to need a lot of persuading to keep them from embarrassing Clinton in her moment of triumph.

It is a truism but it's not worth winning the battle if by doing it you're going to lose the war.

To read Steven Stark's complete "Presidential Tote Board" blog, go to www.thephoenix.com/toteboard/"

Oh, he only meant the DemocraPs; with the globalists on her side, the Bliderberger Queen Hitlery shouldn't have anything to worry about -- especially with a subservient MSM that already has the 2008 presidential script in hand.

They already know who is going to be "selected" the next president!

It is their job to shovel this shit and sell it to stoo-pid 'murkns!!!!!