New York Times Retracts Smear Against Ron Paul
"The New York Times has just issued a retraction to their piece a few days ago attemting to link Ron Paul to white supremacists. They admit that the piece "should not have been published."
I hope their retraction gets as much attention as their original post did."
And a comment from the linked site:
The retraction is a start, but it just reeks. First, the content is still up there and all they are doing is apologizing for not verifying it . It should be yanked online. Second, calling Ron Paul a Nazi even if you hide behind gossip as your source is a pretty heavy libel for a rag like the NYT. Virginia should be fired over this. I see also that the comments have 36 comments now and have been closed for further comments. That is impossible because the dates of the comments range from the 24th through 26th and I know this smear got a lot of attention on other sites. I tried to comment on the 25th and at that time it was showing as 0 comments, and my comment is not among those displayed. I bet there were hundreds or thousands of disgusted people who attempted to comment. This whole episode is shameful."
I would expect nothing less from the New York Times.
Just fits in with where the Times has been headed!
This last assault on Ron Paul confirms what a shit sheet they are!
I'm not buying them today!
Also see:
Pre-Emptive Apology
The Arrogant New York Times
New York Times' Public Editor Admits Times is Rigging the Presidential Campaign
It's Official: New York Times Now a Tabloid
The New York Times' Pussy Pages
Pakistan's Nukes and N.Y. Times Censorship
Israel Writes The New York Times News Pages
AmeriKa's MSM Reporters Work for Government
Everyone Knows About the New York Times
