Friday, October 31, 2008

Jewish Terrorist Attacks Christian Church

Maybe Muslims and Christians have MUCH MORE in COMMON than the Zionist-controlled, agenda-pushing, war-promoting AmeriKan MSM lets on, hmmm?

Also see:
Palestine's Kristallknacht

"Jewish Terrorist attacks Church of the Holy Sepulcher

by Kawther Salam
• Oct 31st, 2008

In the night of Wednesday, October 29, an extremist orthodox Jew - chosen by God, invaded the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in the old city of Jerusalem. The Jewish terrorist tried to harm three monks who were worshiping God in the church. The monks saw the terrorist Jew and escaped from his attack, but then the terrorist left the Church and went on to vandalize several Palestinian shops nearby the Church. He broke many wooden crosses before the Palestinians shop owners called the Israeli Police.

The Palestinian eyewitnesses said that personnel from the Israeli border Police present near the Church saw the terrorist when he entered the Church and also when he vandalized the Palestinian shops nearby, but they did nothing to stop his criminal actions.

The Israeli police, who arrived to protect the extremist Jew, forced the Palestinian shop owners who gathered after the terrorist attack of the Jew to leave the area. The police used force against the Palestinians, because, according to them, their presence would create confrontation with the orthodox

The extremist Jewish attack against the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem was not the first one and it will not be the last one. On October 23, 2007, Jewish orthodox terrorists burnt the Baptist Church on Narkis Street in a wealthy Jerusalem neighborhood. The Jewish terrorists set the fire in the building; the floor was severely burnt and many chairs were destroyed, but luckily no one was in the building at the time. This neighborhood belonged to Palestinians before 1967 and was stolen wholesale by the Jewish terrorist and criminal invaders from USA, Europe and elsewhere.

Several years ago, a fire bomb was thrown by Jewish terrorists into the bookstore of the Baptist Church. In 1982, the same Church was burned down by a group of Jewish terrorists who called themselves “Nationalist group of Jews”. The Church was rehabilitated after this terror action.

On 5 March 2006, an orthodox Jewish man and two extremist Jewish women attacked the Church of Nazareth in the north of Israel. They threw firecrackers inside the Church.

The pitiable and deluded Jewish terrorists believe that Christians and Muslims should not have a presence in Jerusalem, because supposedly God gave it only to them. Jerusalem should be open to the adherents of the three Abrahamic religions with the only proviso that Jerusalem should be off-limits to the extremists of these three religions. And the occupying Jews have shown their inability to assume responsibility for Jerusalem, a heritage which belongs to all humanity.

Since it is the Jews who are the only ones who resort to terrorism and all sort of criminality to assert their supposed “chooseness” and “right” to Jerusalem, it is entirely possible that God never gave or even promised them anything at all, and that it is only a matter of time before they are forced by this same God who abandoned them, to leave not only Jerusalem, but all my country, for good.


Israel Violates International Law, Fires on Palestinian Fishing Boats

I knew it was too good to last:

"Palestinian Fishing Boats Attacked by Israeli gunboats

At 10:00 am Cyprus time, three Israeli gunboats attacked Palestinian fishing boats in the territorial waters of Gaza. Eleven internationals have accompanied the fishermen on five of the boats. The internationals were from the Free Gaza Movement and had landed on the shores of Gaza on October 29 aboard the SS DIGNITY.

According to David Schermerhorn, one of the internationals on board, "Three naval vessels attacked us with machine gun fire and water cannons. All three boats have machine guns on board, one of them has a huge water cannon. The water from the cannon was so fierce, it blasted a lot of the equipment overboard as well as my GPS locator. At the time of the attack, we were about 9 miles offshore fishing. Several of us got on the radio to the Israeli navy and shouted, "We are human rights watchers. We are unarmed internationals, and we are recording everything you are doing. They completely ignored us and continued menacing all of the boats."

As David was talking to us, one of the gunboats came back to within 45 meters, shearing the water and making it difficult for the small boat to steer its course.


Freedom Riders on the Sea

"Freedom Riders on the sea

Ramzi Kysia writing from occupied Gaza Strip

Live from Palestine, 30 October 2008

This morning I walked to the Indian Ocean and made salt in defiance of the British Occupation of India. This morning I marched in Selma, I stood down tanks in Tiananmen Square, and I helped tear down the Berlin Wall. This morning I became a Freedom Rider.

The Freedom Riders of the 21st Century are sailing small boats into the Gaza Strip in open defiance of the Israeli occupation and blockade. This morning I arrived in Gaza aboard the SS Dignity, part of a Free Gaza Movement delegation of 27 doctors, lawyers, teachers, and human rights activists from across the world, including Mairead Maguire, the 1976 Nobel Peace Prize laureate.

When I close my eyes, I still hear the crash of ocean waves, I still feel the warm sun on my face, and I still taste salt from the sea spray. When I close my eyes, I can still see the Israeli warship that tried to intimidate us when we reached the 20-mile line outside Gaza, and I can still see a thousand cheering people crowding around our ship when we refused to be intimidated and finally reached port in Gaza City. Today, there is no prouder boat, crew or passengers than the SS Dignity.

Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, an independent member of the Palestinian Legislative Council, sailed aboard the Dignity, along with six other Palestinians from the West Bank, Israel, and countries in Europe. What should have been a 90-minute drive from Ramallah to Gaza City became a three day odyssey as he traveled from the West Bank to Jordan, then flew to Cyprus, before finally coming onboard the 15-hour sea voyage to Gaza.

"We're challenging Israel in a manner that is unprecedented," said Dr. Barghouti. "Israel has prevented me from visiting Gaza for more than two years now. I am so pleased that we managed to defy Israel's injustice so that I can see all the people I love and work with in Gaza. Israel's measures are meant to divide us, but it is our defiance and resistance which unite us."

This is a resistance which can and should light the fire of all our imaginations, and bring hope not just to Palestinians, but to peoples suffering the terrible tides of oppression and injustice the world around.

After watching the Dignity's arrival, Fida Qishta, the local coordinator for the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) in the Gaza Strip, said "If Gaza is free then it's our right to invite whomsoever we wish to visit us. It's our land and it's our sea. Now more groups must come, not only by sea, but also the crossings at Erez and Rafah must be opened. This second breaking of the siege means a lot, actually. It's the second time in two months that people have come to Gaza without Israel's permission, and that tells us that Gaza will be free."

For over 40 years, Israel has occupied the Gaza Strip. Despite the so-called "disengagement" in 2005, when they dismantled their illegal settlements here, Israel still maintains absolute control over Gaza's borders and airspace, severely limiting the free movement of goods, services, and travel. Israel is still an occupying power.

For over two years, Israel has maintained a brutal blockade of Gaza. Compared to 2005, less than 20 percent of the supplies needed are allowed in. This has forced 95 percent of local industries to shut down, resulting in massive increases in unemployment and poverty rates. Childhood malnutrition has skyrocketed, and 80 percent of families are now dependent on international food aid just to be able to eat. An hour after we arrived, I watched as a teenage boy dug through the garbage looking for something he could use.

Israel's siege isn't simply illegal -- it's intolerable.

Renowned human rights activist Caoimhe Butterly also sailed aboard the Dignity, and will remain in Gaza for several weeks as project coordinator for the Free Gaza Movement. But, said Butterly, "My feelings are bittersweet. Although we're overjoyed at reaching Gaza a second time, that joy is tempered by the fact that the conscience of the world has been reduced to a small boat and 27 seasick activists. This mission is a reminder of not only the efficacy of non-violent direct action, but also of the deafening silence of the international community."

The first voyage of any international ship to Gaza in over forty years in August demonstrated that it was possible to freely travel. This second voyage shows that it is repeatable, and sets a precedent: The siege of Gaza can be overcome through non-violent resistance and direct action.

Today, the Free Gaza Movement has a simple message for the rest of the world: What are you waiting for?

Ramzi Kysia is an Arab-American writer and activist, and one of the organizers of the Free Gaza Movement. To find out more about Free Gaza and what you can do to help support their work, please visit


The People Manufacturing the News

I alter this fabulous and perceptive author's titles not out of disrespect, but respect at the unexpected and prescient phrases and ideas that catch my eye.

Be sure to read his full essay, as the last paragraph is the most powerful and poignant.

"Putting Eye Shadow on a Reptile

by Visible

I’ve been thinking about this for awhile but a comment from one of the Smoking Mirrors readers made it even more clear in my mind. I’m going to try to sketch this out in my limited fashion and hope that you will give me your thoughts about this.

To a certain degree it makes a great deal of sense and it’s come into my mind over the recent months… glaringly… up close… fine German lens-like… “crystal” as I like to say, either when understanding someone’s negative attention …or when I had to impress someone with their need to understand me in ways that I , thankfully, don’t encounter that much anymore but which residence in the former United States used to make necessary on occasion. Except we’re not talking about negative attention here and “crystal” only gets said in reply so… never mind.

Some of you may be familiar with the game of “Risk”. I had that game around for awhile but it was never easy to find enough people to play it with because it requires getting several really smart and informed people into the same room to do it and that’s a commodity that is increasingly rare as time passes. It’s a little like Chess but… I think you get the idea and you can google it if you don’t. It might help to encourage you to look at the way Napoleon liked to wage war. Even though he was one of history’s biggest losers he was also one of the great military tacticians of all time. He revolutionized certain facets of combat.

Those of you who have been paying attention… and I suggest that that is about as many people as are available to play “Risk”, or who understand how “Go” works have probably noticed a most curious thing. To illustrate this, I have to take you back a little. Remember how over the last eight years, the collective media was in a mosh-pit… “Going out of business!!!” frenzy at a major department store/ $200.00 laptop, CLOSEOUT! …customer trampling mood to stick their snouts up Bush’s ass when there was only one hole, first come first served’ kind of a thing? And… they assisted in selling the 9/11 ‘bend over and wait’ scenario and gave that big time ‘reach around’ when The Supremes were showing us how it is that you do that thing… beforehand down in Florida? And… how they packaged all those wars and did all that “no knock” on the economy and shoehorned all those legislators into their Peter Principle follow the leader slots?

Did you notice how, no matter what the offense was… no matter how criminal or treasonous the act was… that is was okay and “Can I have another Sir!” You saw that… right? And… have you seen how all the odious sleaze balls who used the blood of dead Iraqi’s and Palestinians; Papuans, Afghanis and sundry as printer’s ink suddenly did a one eighty and now are hanging mistletoe over Obama’s ass? Have you seen how every McCain misstep is screaming in ten foot letters from your TV set? Have you not wondered at the crucifixion of Palin and the strange affair of the hundred and fifty thousand dollar wardrobe and not wondered who was directing all of these photo-ops?

I’ve been wondering about this… see, the way I remember it… the people manufacturing the news and delivering it to you were some of the worst, low to the ground shit-weasels that I’ve ever seen and integrity and anything virtuous… if it got anywhere near any of these people… there would have been cases of spontaneous combustion going off like it was a Chinese New Year… now… step by step… all of a sudden… now you see it now you don’t… here today… washed in the blood tomorrow… these whores and their pimps have found themselves a new Teflon angel?

How come… after eight years of “Please… please screw me in every unnatural way in front of a live audience and then give me a Golden Shower so I can go home to my wife.” reporting… all of a sudden… but step by step… we’re seeing the new Camelot bondage apparatus machine go on sale everywhere when it wasn’t even around in the first place to begin with? Don’t try to understand that sentence, you’ll just hurt yourself. Oh… wait a minute… maybe that’s the point. Maybe somebody did go down to Compton and find themselves some pipe swinging Calypso singers to get medieval on your ass.

Oh… trust me… that wasn’t a racial slur it was just me at “the spinning wheel, baby.” doing the “Hip Ghand” by way of Lord Buckley and the Zionists are going to love it cause as much as “the lady doth protest too much.” they are creaming in their blood-stained jeans over this.

You notice how Obama banana dana is starting to look like that South American dance craze that I can’t even remember the name of right now but that I even saw happening in baseball stadiums during it’s brief illustrious career? Man… didn’t the video feature a couple of old white guys demonstrating it? You can look for Brzezinski on Dancing with the Stars right around Valentine’s Day.

This isn’t to say that Obama isn’t or wasn’t or couldn’t have been one of the good guys if he had opted for something else while he was being fast-tracked to one more betrayal of the human race… everyone has a little Raskalnikov in them even if it is after the fact. Yeah, people… haven’t you noticed how Obama has more money behind him than the last cat that wailed in the alley on your miserable, “I can endure this.” ass? …which followed another “I can’t Believe this isn’t Hugh Masakela” …and no… that’s not a sax …playing cocaine snorting Bush (Daddy Bush) Buddy? Tell me you saw that. Tell me you’ve been watching. Or at least tell me you want to come to my house for a little informal game of Backgammon for money.

I don’t know how many times they are going to play the ‘bait and switch’ game on you before you wake up. I do believe you like it. That’s been my mistake all this time. I thought you were like me… a little twisted but strictly Vanilla… as the ads in the sex personals go… Don’t tell me you like it. I can’t take losing my dog and losing you at the same time.

(The author raises a fantastic point here, and one I had been privately worrying about: the lying MSM's swing over the last week to being truth-teller on the election. Perhaps it is the bloggers and the fact that the route is too big to steal; however, when has that ever stopped the MSM from its lying agenda-pushing? And the money...)

I’ve said it before and I will say it again. I wouldn’t care all that much what these nasty reptiles get up to if it weren’t for all the dead body’s stinking in our foreign dump sites. Sure… it’s karma and the people dying are quite possibly the people who were doing it last time but… as it goes… when you keep on playing “an eye for an eye’ you wind up with a lot of blind people gumming each other to death.

I’ve got a point… and that point would be you. Level the playing field or wind up as part of the pavement. It’s too late this go around but I hope it won’t be too late in 2012. Let what should be a lesson actually be a lesson for once. Realize that… if they had wanted it that way that everything being said about McCain and Palin could just as easily have been said about Obama. All it would take is a change in the lighting and the staging. If they had wanted it that way then Obama would look like one more John Kerry and McCain would be Reagan like it had eyes all over again.

It doesn’t matter in respect of my life and… as I said… I wouldn’t maybe care that much except that I know they are using real people and destroying real lives and I’ve got this problem… I’ve got this terrible problem that’s like a bad tooth in Calcutta. I can’t block out the screams and the grief and the suffering hearts. They are part of my own heart and the truth is that I would not have a heart if I could not feel these things and you are all responsible for turning your head and playing make-believe in a real world. It’s one thing when you see it on TV. It’s another thing when it happens to you and it will. Mark my words. It will.


The AmeriKam MSM Vote-Rigging Continues

"14 percent, can't decide, or back a candidate but might switch"

I guess that is how they are going to sell the steal now, huh?

"AP poll: 1 in 7 voters still persuadable

WASHINGTON — A stubborn wedge of people who, somehow, are still making up their minds about who should be president. One in seven, or 14 percent, can't decide, or back a candidate but might switch, according to an Associated Press-Yahoo News poll of likely voters released Friday.

Who are they? They look a lot like the voters who've already locked onto a candidate, though they're more likely to be white and less likely to be liberal. And they disproportionately backed Hillary Rodham Clinton's failed run for the Democratic nomination. For now, their indecision remains intact.

Election Day is Tuesday. The survey found Obama leading McCain among all likely voters, 51 percent to 43 percent, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Almost four in 10 persuadables lean toward McCain, and about as many are considering backing Obama, while the rest are either undecided or lean toward other candidates.

Persuadable voters could be especially fertile hunting ground for McCain in the closing days of a contest in which most polls show him trailing. These people trust Obama less than decided voters do to handle the economy, the Iraq war and terrorism.

The rest of the article is the AP BACKTRACKING on the BULLSHIT, folks!!


Also see:

Stolen Elections: 2000

Stolen Elections: 2004

Stolen Elections: 2006

How to Rig the 2008 Presidential Election

Election Poll Update

AP Prepares Election Theft Narrative

Amerikan MSM Admits Polls are Made Up

We ain't standing for another stolen election -- and judging from some other
blog posts, we won't have to -- not that it matters.

A Third Motion for Nader

Also see: Another Nader Voter

"Making Excuses for Obama; The mythology of good intentions

by Justin Raimondo

Every time I write about Barack Obama I get a lot of letters, and the most typical goes something like this:

Dear Justin,

I read your column regularly, and generally agree with what you have to say, but I think you've got Barack Obama all wrong. Yes, I know, he went before AIPAC and kowtowed; he pledged to do "anything – and I mean anything" to stop Iran's nuclear program. He acts "tough" and says he's going to invade Pakistan; he gets in Russia's face. But that's all a show: you see, he has to do this stuff or else he won't get elected. Once he's safely in office, he'll do the right thing.


John Q. Reader

This is an amalgam, but true to the spirit of the many pro-Obama missives I've received. They express a sentiment that is very widespread, so much so that it doesn't seem to matter, much, what Obama says he's going to do, because, in any case, his fans and supporters will simply insist on projecting their own hopes, desires, and views onto him. This, by the way, is a feature of most all successful populist insurgent candidates: they are blank slates merely waiting to be written on by anxious voters, who know only that they are sick of what is, and pine for what ought to be.

As much as I hate to be the bearer of bad news, in this instance – because we've certainly been through the mill these past eight years, and deserve some relief – I have to say that this attitude is profoundly irrational. After all, why shouldn't we take Obama at his word? If he says he's going to "curb Russian aggression" – you know, like one might curb one's rather-too-aggressive dog – and get up in Putin's face, is he lying? When he solemnly pledges to go after the Iranians if they insist on deterring Israel's nukes with an arsenal of their own, is he speaking in Pig-Latin?

The common assumption of these letter-writers is that Obama is just trying to "pass," so to speak, as a warmonger. Once he's in office, peace will break out all over. What evidence do we have for this? None whatsoever.

Now, it's true that the Obama campaign didn't really take off until he made known his antiwar views on the Iraq question, and a lot of his street cred is due to this early stance. He was against the war from the beginning – and made sure the voters of Iowa knew it. His chief rival, Hillary Clinton, took a rather more equivocal stance, and he beat her over the head with this relentlessly. This was encouraging, but hardly definitive.

At the time, I warned that Obama's refusal to take war with Iran "off the table" – as the Important People invariably put it – did not bode well, and, given his development over the course of the campaign it turned out I was – unfortunately – right. It isn't just a pedantic intellectual desire for consistency, or just to give me something to write about, that motivates me to criticize the inconsistencies of ostensibly "antiwar" politicians. Ideas have consequences, as the conservatives used to say, and if Obama makes it to the White House we're sure to experience some conceptual "blowback."

Obama lied – people died! How long before we see that slogan emblazoned on a placard at a rather sparsely-attended antiwar rally?

But of course he didn't lie, and isn't lying now. He's telling us he wants to confront Russia and Iran. He's telling us he wants to increase a military budget already larger than the total military expenditures of all other nations combined. He says he won't hesitate to invade Pakistan – and, presumably, any nation anywhere – if we have some reason to believe Osama bin Laden and his cohorts are in the vicinity. I think he's telling the truth – and I challenge the Obamaoids, especially the ones who claim to be sick of eight years of constant warfare, to prove otherwise. If Obama is indeed giving us the real story, and if he actually implements his foreign policy proposals, we are in a world of trouble.

Joe Biden rightly said that, within six months of his election, Obama would be "tested." This was generally taken to mean tested by America's enemies – al-Qaeda, the Iranians, possibly the Russkies – but I took it in quite a different way.

Yes, he will be tested, and has been repeatedly tested – by the War Party. So far, he's passed with flying colors. For evidence of this, just look at all that money he's raised from some of the biggest players in the game of Empire. The high-rollers aren't placing their bets on Obama for nothing. You don't spend $45 million on a single infomercial if you're financing your campaign with small contributions. I've written about Obama's bigtime Wall Street backers at length, here.

In any case, I hardly think Obama is going to abolish the very Empire that polices the world on behalf of his Wall Street backers. Nor did I ever expect him to, even when I was more favorably inclined to his candidacy. Back in those halcyon days, afflicted as I was by an irrational exuberance due to rising antiwar sentiment, I did expect he wouldn't get us into any fresh wars, even if he didn't quite wind up the ones we're already fighting.

I'm afraid, however, I was quite wrong, In this regard, an interesting bit of reporting appeared in last week's [Oct. 22] New York Times, where we learn:

"Mr. Obama, the candidate who has expressed far more willingness to sit down and negotiate with the Iranians, said in an e-mail message passed on by an aide that in any final deal he would not allow Iran to produce uranium on Iranian soil, the same hard-line view enunciated by the Bush administration."

The writer, David Sanger, goes on to point out that the stereotypes of warmonger and peacenik in this race are not only off, they are way off:

"Consider the delicate issue of Pakistan, where it is Mr. Obama who has been far more willing than Mr. McCain to threaten sending in American troops on ground raids. Mr. McCain, by contrast, argues that Pakistan must control its territory. ‘I don't think the American people today are ready to commit troops to Waziristan,' he said, months before Mr. Bush signed secret orders this summer authorizing ground raids in Pakistan, including the violent sanctuaries of North and South Waziristan."

Interesting – not that it means McCain is the real peacenik, just that Obama is, potentially, even more reckless than Mad John. Don't let that calm demeanor fool you. President Obama is no hyperventilating arm-waving interventionist, for sure, but that's just a question of style. He'll no doubt cultivate his own signature brand: Zen interventionism, if you will.

What's unnerving, however, is that Obama's foreign policy views have gone largely unarticulated, except in the most general terms. He's a man of mystery, a characteristic that lets his supporters project their own views onto him, and yet this failure to be more forthcoming is what I find particularly ominous. As Sanger reports:

"Mr. McCain, now the Republican nominee, agreed to an interview during the primary campaign. Obama aides answered questions at length, but Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee, citing the pressures of time in the campaign, declined requests dating to June to be interviewed in detail on how he would handle potential confrontations beyond Iraq that could face the next president."

During that interminable infomercial, a total of less than two minutes was devoted to the issue of war and peace. And those two minutes were filled with renewed vows to increase the military budget – with the added fillip of "curbing Russian aggression."

This should comfort all those "Obama-cons," alleged conservatives who are jumping on the bandwagon now that his election seems imminent – because we seem to be going back in time, back to the "good old days" of the cold war. In Obama World, the Russians are coming -- again! Soon we'll be hearing dire warnings that if we don't stop them in South Ossetia, before you know it they'll be in South Carolina. Hollywood – a bastion of Obama-mania – will do a remake of Red Dawn. Schoolchildren will be subjected to "duck and cover" sessions, and Fox News will do an updated revival of "I Led Three Lives."

Okay, enough with Obama, because it's not really about him, personally, or even politically. People need hope: they need to know that they aren't, ultimately, powerless, that they can make an impact on what we do as a nation -- that is, what the government does in our name. They not only like to believe it, they have to believe it, because to not believe it is to fall victim to despair. It is the democratic faith, which one devoutly hopes is not a pretty fiction.

Yet the electoral process is rigged, in this country: the system permits only two political parties. All others must overcome enormous obstacles to achieve ballot status. This give the War Party maximum elbow room to manipulate the political process behind the scenes, and allows them to exercise their dictatorship in a "democratic" fashion. The two-party monopoly gives the War Party a strategic advantage: it merely has to split itself in two, amoeba-like, so that both officially-recognized "major" parties" simply become the "right" and "left" wings of a single party – the War Party.

This limits the political options of the peace movement, and makes it harder to have an impact even at the primary level: the gigantism of the system, with its two monolithic party organizations, is biased against insurgents. It is also more amenable to the advantages of money, large sums of it, which Obama has had access to throughout this campaign.

Political action is fine, and necessary, but there are other, more important tasks for those who want to bring about a real change in American foreign policy – by which I mean a complete turnaround. Such ambition requires a longer view.

America has been an emerging empire for the past half century or so, and now that we're the semi-official world's policeman – the "hyperpower," as the French put it – a good many Americans are beginning to question the value and the morality of playing such a role. The Iraq war, however popular it appeared to be at first, is today asunpopular than the President who started it, he whose polls have hit historic lows. The next President will have to contend with a war-weary public, with very little patience for new interventions.

But – and I hate to tell you this, but somebody has to -- the politics of fear and deception have not been patented by the Republicans. Look for the Democrats to add their own ingredient to this bipartisan recipe for overseas disasters: the politics of guilt. White liberal guilt, to be sure. We'll be smack dab in the middle of Africa's feuding tribes faster than you can say "Samantha Power."

And that's the best case scenario. In the worst case, the Dennis Ross faction of Obama's emerging foreign policy movers and shakers will maneuver us into a confrontation with Iran, and relations with Russia will deteriorate to a new low as NATO escalates its eastward expansion. In any case, those who are working to effect a fundamental change in American foreign policy have a duty to take Obama at his word -- hoping for the best, but preparing for the worst.


Okay, you ask, so who are you voting for? That's another letter I'll get, due to this column, and so I'll answer it preemptively, so to speak, here.


The McBamaBush Administration

"The Bush-Obama-McCain Administration

Morton Skorodin
World Prout Assembly

The period we're living in now is the Bush-Obama-McCain Administration.

Bush obligingly initiated Obama's bombing campaign on Pakistan. The three of them colluded on the recent wealth transfer (about $840 billion) from the American people to Wall St.

The 24 hr/7 days/wk media Wurlitzer distracts us from looking at these white elephants too closely. The circus is so loud and visually entraining that it hides the deeper structure of society. The U.S. is a military dictatorship with scientific public relations. Part of this scientific PR is the careful cultivation of and trumpeting of America's democratic trappings. The important thing to remember is that McCain and Obama were carefully vetted by the moneyed rulers and this is not particularly a secret. It's called "campaign contributions". After that, we the people get to choose from two approved candidates.

The fix is in. McCain's a patsy. Obama's repeatedly been anointed sovereign on the cover of Time (That's of Time-Warner, the media conglomerate he won't break up.)

There's no left to speak of in the US. There are material reasons for this- weak unions, few strikes. (The reasons why unions are weak are beyond the scope of this discussion.) So left-wing stars like Ralph Nader and Amy Goodman are tethered to nothing, like bloated Macy parade balloons that have floated up and become more bloated. So their efforts, however well-intentioned, don't have force behind them and are sometimes completely ineffective.

The Society of the Spectacle meets the neo-totalitarian total information awareness society. The state has technology for and has commandeered the resources to spy upon everyone with 16 or 18 "intelligence" agencies and control us as much as possible with the media of five corporations that are pretty well unified as to how and how much the populace is "informed". On the other hand, the populace is atomized (deprived of meaningful ties to others); the only major non corporate-government) institutions are the cooptable churches.

The handsome prince and his foil, the wicked, but comely, queen. They're comic book superheroes- perfect for TV, the key instrument of oppression and ignorance. (Notice the immense effort to make sure everybody has digital TV by next Feb. I wish they cared that much to give water to our brethren in New Orleans.)

Barack Obama and Sarah Palin are too good to be true:

Barack Obama- that name is foreign beyond foreign, mother a hippy who had a black's child, an actual African (gasp). This sounds as scary to many whites as the orchestrated excesses of the police state such as the Daarth Vader outfitted police with their North Korea style truncheons at the Republican convention seem to anxious liberals and righteous activists.

Sarah Palin - superhero mom, she'll serve milk and cookies for you while on the way to running and ruining the world. She's not regular pro-gun, church, etc. She is the cartoon version- actually shoots wolves from helicopters; associates with, to put it a little too politely, "white nationalists".

This dichotomy serves only the rulers. What the vast majority on both sides need are exactly the same things: peace, economic relief, and freedom from the intrusive state.

Divide and conquer. The rulers have been promoting race war as a counter to class struggle since the 1600s. They are very good at it.

After the election the economy may get still worse and there will be further military adventures. As things unravel the game will be: blame the Black guy. This process has already started.

As far as U.S. military planners go, the election cycle and the public's feelings are only a factor in determining the timing and announcement of aggressive actions, kind of like taking into account the weather for an optimal time for the Normandy landing in WW2.

It's a military dictatorship with Handsome Presidents. The election is a joke, but more importantly, a waste of the people's time (except, perhaps some local races). Get over it. Think and find effective ways to rebel.


An Obama Voter?

"White Like Me...Barack Obama Our 44th President

I interrupt my long self imposed silence to watch our economy collapse to make the following announcement. Yes Obama I have your number. Don't you think it is some what shameless to try to pass yourself as black just to secure 20 percent of the vote in this country? You are of course as white as I am. I am not the least bit fooled by your exterior. Hell your Grandmother even looks like mine did about 30 years ago. And now that I am aware you are truly a socialist interested in spreading the wealth perhaps you will have my vote. I do admit though that I am concerned about your cavorting with terrorists. Your seemingly blind support for the terrorist State of Apartheid Israel is alarming. But your reported association with respected scholar Rashid Khalidi gives me hope that your blind support of Israel is a charade just like the illusion that you are really black. Good luck Mr. President. And don't disappoint me.


I know the feeling:
John McCain Hates Israel

Critiquing Obama's Infomercial

I humbly come before you with this post, readers. I'm embarrassed that I was taken in somewhat. I guess those image-makers and -manipulators are really good. Thank God I'm not watching much tv anymore.

"Critique of the Obama infomercial

Critique of the Obama infomercial


Obama opens with a gas pump filling up an oversized SUV. This is the image he chooses to start the discussion. No hint that gas-guzzling behemoths (and those who buy them) are part of the problem, just that the "middle class" is struggling.

Obama's obsession with the "middle class" is pure Clintonian "triangulation."

In his pandering to the "middle class" voters he is nearly shameless. No mention of the poor. And he goes one further, he literally says that:

"Ten years ago, she bought a house outside the city so that she could send her children to good schools."

What about inside the city, Barack? The bad schools? Not even an acknowledgement. * Shameless pandering it is.

Moving to "the economy," it's "eight years of failed policies" which allegedly caused the recent collapse in the financial industry. But, Barack, what about going back another couple of years to how Clinton changed the regulation of the industry by repealing Glass-Steagall?

Another glossed over, cheesy political point replaces a true understanding of the problem: the bi-partisan nature of the beast.

Regarding foreclosures, Obama promises the "help" of "freezing foreclosures" for those trying to pay, "for 90 days."

What about 91 days, Barack? What about restructuring the loans so they can pay them? This band-aid solution will not have much effect on real foreclosed upon families, but it sounds like he cares, I suppose.

In a more outrageous bonding session with the working man, an elderly gentleman describes how $19 Million of his company's pension fund was stolen by the company on their way to bankruptcy, Enron style.

Obama's response, time and time, companies are: "shedding those obligations."

No, Barack: They stole it. This was a crime. This is a crime that should be investigated, punished, and the money recovered on behalf of the injured parties.

Finishing up, Obama says: "Those (pensions) aren't idle promises, they are promises that should have the force of law."

They don't? There's no regulation or oversight of pension money? These pension funds were robbed. Why isn't it a crime, the same as robbing a convenience store? Why isn't there some legitimate outrage on Obama's part, no call for investigations, nothing, just another photo op.

In the medical segment that follows, it sounds a lot like the woman is taking 12 different drugs for "arthritis," and going broke as a result. I've got to say that the problem might be the doctor(s). This counts as a pretty poor example, fitting in mostly because of their "middle class" economic situation, rather than as an indictment of the ridiculously dysfunctional medical establishment (which Obama has no plan to substantially alter).

Obama should have taken a hint from Michael Moore's Sicko -- or perhaps that's all he took, a hint.

"Clean coal" and the "domestic production of oil" get plugs in the energy plan. That's expected.

Then the big subject of Iraq is brought center stage. How does Barack tackle this massive war crime with over one million murdered Iraqis, countless injured and maimed, including a substantial number of American troops, all who were sold a bill of goods by the lies of the Bush gang (and Obama VP pick Joe Biden, too).

I felt a bit nauseous, for here is "Iraq" as per Obama:

"We're currently spending $10 Billion dollars a month in Iraq when they have a $79 billion surplus."

It's all about the money. No morality enters the equation.

Does "they" refer to the Iraqis, who have wanted our invading armies out for the last 5 years (excepting the puppet regime we installed)?

What is the implication? Is this the neocon argument about making the Iraqis pay for their own imperial subjugation?

Obama does, to his credit, say that the "war" should "close." That's a step, but does it mean removing the invading armies, air force, navy and mercenaries from their country completely? Hmmm. If this is a position change, he hasn't spelled it out as clearly as he claimed he would at the beginning.

Obama highlights some faux populism next, but he does it in such an obviously subservient manner:

"So, I'm not worried about CEOs, I'm not worried about corporate lobbyists, I'm not worried about the drug companies or the oil companies or the insurance companies. They'll be fine, they can look out for themselves."

Oh, better than fine, Barack. As a corporate stooge you fully understand how they're doing, and how you ought not disturb the business as usual. "Corporate lobbyists?" Not a word about changing the culture where "corporate lobbyists" create corrupt legislation to ram down our collective throats. The "insurance companies?" Your health plan evidently wants to enroll more uninsured on the corporate, privatised medical insurance rolls, with US government graft. "CEO's?" The fraudsters of wall street won't need your attention, send them another $700 billion of our money if they complain. The "drug companies" which use public research and development funds to create private patents on new drugs? Why bother looking into that, Barack?

The dismissiveness is smooth and fluent now. And the coded triangulation is clearly in play. Is this the best America could hope for? Willful deception?

And now the shocker:

Barack Obama is seductive, is clearly not on the level of John McCain or Sarah Palin in terms of psychotic malevolence.

You can almost believe his naive attitude about the wars in the Middle East.

Perhaps Obama truly does not know the backstory about Al Qaeda, those intelligence assets created by our "allies" such as Saudi Arabia, and Musharaf's Pakistan. He may be completely ignorant as to what the CIA and Mossad and MI6 have been playing at for the last few decades. He may have good intentions, as he presents, and on day one of Obama's presidency, he may find out there is no Santa Claus.

What then?

More to the point, should I reconsider my vote, and throw it Obama's way despite a long list of reasons to withold it? What if my state really is in danger of flipping for McCain?

What if my vote actually does matter this time?

These are weighty questions.

Seeing how the third parties have no chance of winning the 2008 presidency, whatsoever, is the risk worth it? Could the McCain/Palin wrecking crew start a nuclear holocaust?

* Obama's later school proposals, vaguely mentioned, did include "all" schools, and were not solely directed at the middle class areas. Several key issues were just vague and without substance, contrary to his introductory claim.

For a balanced perspective on Obama's ties to the Washington establishment, and his shoddy record to date, see:

Twelve Reasons to Reject Obama and Support Nader/McKinney
- by Prof. James Petras

What Do They Have to Do to Lose Your Vote?
The Trail of Broken Promises


Ted Stevens in Denial

Ummm, Ted, you were there!!!

"Sen. Stevens: I'm innocent and not convicted

(CNN) -- Despite his felony conviction this week for filing false U.S. Senate financial disclosure forms, Republican Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska insisted he was innocent and vowed not to step down.

"I have not been convicted of anything," he maintained during a Thursday night debate in Anchorage, only days before Tuesday's election. "I'm not going to step down. I have not been convicted. I have a case pending against me, and probably the worse case of prosecutorial ... misconduct by the prosecutors that is known," Stevens said.

--MORE --"

The U.S. Ice Age

Also see AmeriKan MSM Admits Global Warming/Cooling Occuring Naturally and related links therein, readers.

"NOAA: U.S. breaks or ties 115 cold and sets 63 new snowfall records

Of course many of you that live in this weather already know this, but there is an early start to winter this year, not only in the USA, but also in London, where it snowed in October for the first time in over 70 years.

Yeah, I'm
aware of how cold it is here.

So far, no mention of this broadly distributed U.S. record event in the mainstream media. There are a few individual mentions or record lows in Florida. See this Google News search.

Yes, I'm aware of that, too.

Here, from NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), is a list of these new or tied records for October 29th, 2008.

I find the -25 below in Alaska interesting, since it bested the old record by 4 degrees.

Here are the 115 new or tied low temperature records:


Texas Mormons Never Abused Kids

Type "Texas" and "Mormons" into my blog search and scroll down for more, readers.

"Polygamist child custody case winds down in Texas

SAN ANTONIO — The custody case that swept 439 children from a polygamist sect's western Texas ranch into foster care has largely evaporated, with state authorities dropping all but a few dozen cases against parents.


All but 37 children from the Yearning For Zion Ranch in Eldorado have been released from court oversight after Child Protective Services found they had not been abused. CPS spokesman Patrick Crimmins said the agency is pleased with the case dismissals, because they mean the children can safely remain with their parents and that questions about their safety have been resolved.

"CPS has taken a lot of criticism for this operation since April, but we've been doing everything we can to work with these families to ensure positive outcomes," he said. "If they're safe to the point where court oversight is no longer necessary, that's great news."


FLDS spokesman Willie Jessop said the dismissal of the cases proves what the church has said all along: that the children were not abused.

And you SURE DIDN'T get that impression from the MSM, did you?

In fact, WHERE is CNN NOW? This isn't BREAKING NEWS?

(Of course, I wouldn't know; the tv is off)

While the parents and children may legally return to the ranch, few have, Jessop said. With almost no one working over the spring and summer in the sprawling garden and dairy used to feed the community, the ranch doesn't have the supply of food and resources it once did.

Oh, so EITHER WAY their COMMUNITY was DESTROYED!! Mission accomplished, 'eh, state of Texas?!!

FLDS communities hold much of their goods in common, and members have work duties within the community. That lifestyle was disrupted by the state when parents moved to individual homes around Texas in an effort to get their children back, Jessop said.

"They disrupted the community and its ability to function as it was," he said, noting community members may have to seek public assistance they never needed when the garden and dairy were fully operational.

Oh, well, now I am not feeling so bd since it will COST the STATE a penny or two!!!


Hat Tip of the Day

Goes to this fantastic blogger. The site alerted me to several of the mirror posts you see above (as well as several I read but chose not to mirror), and any expressed gratitude is not enough. The reason I mirror post here is in case the articles are "mysteriously" taken down or lost, there is another record somewhere. Think of it as preservation of information.

RAND Calls For World War to Save U.S. Economy

"RAND Lobbies Pentagon: Start War To Save U.S. Economy

EXCLUSIVE: Shocking proposal urges military leaders to attack major foreign power

by Paul Joseph Watson & Yihan Dai
Thursday, October 30, 2008

According to reports out of top Chinese mainstream news outlets, the RAND Corporation recently presented a shocking proposal to the Pentagon in which it lobbied for a war to be started with a major foreign power in an attempt to stimulate the American economy and prevent a recession.

A fierce debate has now ensued in China about who that foreign power may be, with China itself as well as Russia and even Japan suspected to be the targets of aggression.

The reports cite French media news sources as having uncovered the proposal, in which RAND suggested that the $700 billion dollars that has been earmarked to bailout Wall Street and failing banks instead be used to finance a new war which would in turn re-invigorate the flagging stock markets.

The RAND Corporation is a notoriously powerful NGO with deep ties to the U.S. military-industrial complex as well as interlocking connections with the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations.

Current directors of RAND include Frank Charles Carlucci III, former Defense Secretary and Deputy Director of the CIA, Ronald L. Olson, Council on Foreign Relations luminary and former Secretary of Labor, and Carl Bildt, top Bilderberg member and former Swedish Prime Minister.

Carlucci was chairman of the Carlyle Group from 1989-2005 and oversaw gargantuan profits the defense contractor made in the aftermath of 9/11 following the invasion of Afghanistan. The Carlyle Group has also received investment money from the Bin Laden family.

Reportedly, the RAND proposal brazenly urged that a new war could be launched to benefit the economy, but stressed that the target country would have to be a major influential power, and not a smaller country on the scale of Afghanistan or Iraq.

The reports have prompted a surge of public debate and tension in China about the possibility that a new global conflict is on the horizon.

China’s biggest media outlet,, speculated that the target of the new war would probably be China or Russia, but that it could also be Iran or another middle eastern country. Japan was also mentioned as a potential target for the reason that Japan holds the most U.S. debt.

North Korea was considered as a target but ruled out because the scale of such a war would not be large enough for RAND’s requirements.

The reported RAND proposal dovetails with recent comments made by Joe Biden, Colin Powell, Madeleine Albright and others, concerning the “guarantee” that Barack Obama will face a major “international crisis” soon after taking office.

It also arrives following a warning from Michael Bayer, chairman of a key Pentagon advisory panel, who echoed the statement that the next administration will face an international crisis within months of taking office.

One would hope that good people, or at least sane people who don’t wish to start a global nuclear war, will oppose the RAND proposal, such as top the military generals who threatened to quit if Bush ordered an attack on Iran. Admiral William Fallon, the head of US Central Command, quit in March last year as a result of his opposition to Bush administration policy on Iran.

--MORE --"

Thursday, October 30, 2008

What is Zionism?

Rabbi Yisorel Dovid Weiss from the Naturei Karta movement (which means 'Protectors of the City', meaning Jerusalem) explains the history of Zionism and how the religious rabbis were almost all anti-Zionist.

Watch video: What Is Zionism?...


Cleric Says CIA Behind Bali Bombing

"Cleric blames CIA for Bali bombing

An Indonesian Islamic cleric linked to the three extremists awaiting execution for the Bali bombings said the 2002 attack which killed more than 200 people, including 88 Australians, was the work of the CIA.

Abu Bakar Bashir says the US intelligence agency had fired a nuclear missile at the Bali tourist strip from a ship off the coast. "It has been mentioned as being a micro-nuclear bomb, not a regular bomb... The bomb was made by the CIA, it could be no one else," he said in his house at the Al-Mukmin Islamic boarding school on Indonesia's Java island.

He said the attack was a conspiracy between "America, Australia and the Jews" and the three convicted bombers - Amrozi, Imam Samudra and Ali Ghufron - had been framed. Amrozi had been "used by the CIA in coordination with America, Australia and the Jews. The police and the prosecutors aren't brave enough to prove it."

The coordinated October 12, 2002 bomb attacks ripped through packed nightspots on the holiday island's main tourist strip and killed 202 people, mostly foreign visitors including 88 Australians.


FEMA's Coffins


Exxon Eclipses Earnings Record

Look at how much they took in last QUARTER!

"Exxon Mobil posts biggest US quarterly profit ever

HOUSTON - Exxon Mobil Corp., the world's largest publicly traded oil company, reported income Thursday that shattered its own record for the biggest profit from operations by a U.S. corporation, earning $14.83 billion in the third quarter.

The Irving, Texas-based company has reported unprecedented back-to-back quarters. The previous record for U.S. corporate profit was set in the last quarter, when Exxon Mobil earned $11.68 billion.


How did you do last quarter, America?

American Express Severs 7,000 Employees

"American Express to cut 7,000 jobs, save $1.8 billion

NEW YORK — American Express said on Thursday that it would cut 7,000 jobs, lower compensations, reduce operating costs and scale back investments to save $1.8 billion in 2009 as it struggles with the worst financial crisis in decades. --more--"

AmeriKan Press Says Don't Believe the Polls

And get ready for a STOLEN ELECTION on Tuesday!

"Are polls accurate in presidential race?

WASHINGTON — With the U.S. presidential election less than a week away, Democrat Barack Obama holds a steady lead over rival Republican John McCain in opinion polls, leading many pundits to say McCain is effectively finished.

Could the polls be wrong? They have misled before. Polls showed Obama ahead of Democratic rival Hillary Clinton in the January New Hampshire primary by an average of 8 percentage points. Clinton won.

That's because SHE

lso see:

Stolen Elections: 2000

Stolen Elections: 2004

Stolen Elections: 2006

How to Rig the 2008 Presidential Election

Election Poll Update

AP Prepares Election Theft Narrative

McCain's campaign thinks it could happen again on November 4. "All signs say we are headed to an election that may easily be too close to call by next Tuesday," McCain pollster Bill McInturff wrote in a memo released on Tuesday.

See: What the Electoral Map Looks Like in a Fair Election

Pollsters can't simply tally up the results of their telephone surveys but must make educated guesses about who will actually show up to vote. These "likely voter" models vary from poll to poll, leading to results that can vary as well.

Amerikan MSM Admits Polls are Made Up

Another question is the "Bradley Effect" -- the notion that white voters fearful of being labeled racist overstate their support of black candidates in polls. That theory, named for a black 1982 California gubernatorial candidate who narrowly lost to a white opponent after leading in opinion polls, has been widely discounted.

Despite these concerns, pollsters say they're confident in their work. After all, it's hard to overlook the fact that major polls have lined up closely with the actual vote in every presidential election since 1980. --more--"

Well, except for 2004!!
Which makes you wonder about the MSM because here they are reporting 2004 as if it were legit!

Can't have it both ways, guys!!!
Obama better win then!!

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Combating The Zionist Network

"Zionist Neo-Nazis Engineer US, Canadian, and Global Fascism

Combating The Zionist Network ­ Part 1
Exclusive to
By Ted Lang

Just as we, the informed of America, have correctly anticipated the horrors of the USA PATRIOT Act with its almost total abolition of the Bill of Rights, and just as we have anticipated the Military Compensation Act, which abolishes habeas corpus, we all know what's coming next: -- the unanimous passage by our Congress of "hate crimes" legislation to silence critics exposing the total control Israel has over our government. This will be followed by legislative bans to effect the complete shut down of the Internet to block independent websites that cannot be controlled by Zionist gatekeepers and Hillary Clinton.

This "legislation" is, of course, all totally illegal. Articles of the United States Constitution cannot be set aside by federal statute; neither can Amendments. Articles can be amended and undesired Amendments must be repealed. The latter procedures require input from the joint and several states comprising the United States of America. The criminal Bush regime's adeptness in circumventing constitutional law obtains legitimacy via our nation's "state of war." That war was created not only by the lies from the criminal Bush regime, but required as well the planned and manufactured "terrorism" of 9/11. Bush is therefore a "war powers" president based upon an act of deliberate sabotage engineered to launch the Iraqi War. It was not a random and astonishingly well-coordinated and successful random act of luck and terror executed by rank amateurs. The present American government's legitimacy is based upon a war that isn't a war because Congress hasn't declared it.

But the US invasion that has destroyed Iraq, and the Israeli invasion that has destroyed Lebanon, as well as the planned and intended military incursions to be continued to engulf Iran and the entire Middle East in endless wars, will facilitate the unfettered construction of oil and gas pipelines through Afghanistan and Iraq. This will serve to provide total control by the US of these major energy sources for the West. Another purpose for the illegal invasions serves also the never-ending quest for imperialistic expansion by Israel.

The Bush regime's imperialistic war and planned future wars serve these two ends. Such multiple purpose planning patterns used by the criminal regimes can be seen in the triple motive of crashing planes into the WTC and Pentagon, and the former's controlled demolition ensuring the total collapse of the WTC buildings. The public outrage and anger on the part of the American people was used to pressure our witless and immoral Congress to support Bush's unjust invasion of Iraq and the huge $7 billion insurance policy payout to Larry Silverstein. It is indeed the 9/11 "act of terrorism" that is the only source of the Bush regime's power.

Anti-Zionism is not anti-Judaism; it is not anti-Semitism. Zionism was, at one time, definable as being the motive and method behind the establishment and justification of a Jewish state. In fact, that was the title of alleged Zionist founder Theodor Herzl's book written in the late 1800s. Zionism is manifested in the Jewish state of Israel. Criticism of Israel is no more a "hate crime" than is criticism of the Roman Catholic Church a slur upon Italy. Even a legitimate "hate crime" targeting Catholicism cannot in fact be "elevated" as anti-Italian merely because of the Vatican's location within its borders.

And criticism of the Catholic Church for its problems involving pedophilic homosexual priests is no reflection on either the Church or Italy because the Church is termed "Roman Catholic." Yet, neither the Roman Catholic Church nor the nation-state of Italy maintains a privileged tax-exempt lobby such as is the case with the "American" Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC. And certainly neither the Catholic Church nor the nation of Italy has been exposed as either spying on our nation or engaging in espionage against US. Italy and the Church have not stolen our nuclear military secrets nor sold them to Communist China as Israel has. AIPAC is an American government-sanctioned tax-exempt agent of a foreign government that spies on US and engages in espionage against America.

In a September 25, 2004 press release from renowned pollsters Zogby International, an opinion poll conducted by them posed this question in its narrative summary: "A tax-exempt organization that lobbies Congress on behalf of Israel, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (also known as AIPAC), has been under investigation by the FBI for allegedly receiving classified information from a Pentagon official and using this information on behalf of the government of Israel. In view of this investigation, do you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree that AIPAC should be asked to register as an agent of a foreign government and lose its tax-exempt status?"

This, at least insofar as I am aware, represents the first "official" type exposure and inquiry into this glaring injustice, an injustice that gives monumental, towering and all-encompassing power to a tiny nation-state, not a religion, over the entire government of the United States of America. If examples of this total and unlimited power over our government are needed, here are just three that can be considered. First, every one of the over sixty U.N. resolutions condemning Israel for its horrific and egregious crimes against the Palestinians in the form of mass murders, public executions, mass slaughter of young Palestinian children on their way to schools, the burning and destruction of olive groves and farms, the bulldozing of private homes while Palestinian residents were still inside and were mercilessly crushed to death, the murder of Rachel Corrie, the attempted sinking of the U.S.S. Liberty and the murders of 34 of our sailors, and other Hitlerean and Stalin-like acts of terrorism that were all international indictments of the Nazi-like regime of Israel, were neutered by the United States votes against ALL of these resolutions.

Two more examples are: 1) the lopsided vote supporting Bush's authorization launching the mass slaughter and carpet-bombing of Lebanon by Israel and supported by the United States Congress voting 410 to 8. The majority of innocent civilians murdered by Bush and his and Israeli bosses were Christians. And 2), the vote in 2004 when the Congress voted 407 to 9 to allow Israel to basically steal whatever land they pleased from their rightful owners in Palestine. Is really more evidence needed to demonstrate the total domination that tiny Israel has over the government of the United States of America? The Jewish state has a population only three fourths that of the tiny state of New Jersey,

The Zogby Poll indicated that 61 percent of those voters polled agree that AIPAC should be registered as agents of a foreign state and lose their tax-exempt status. Those that strongly disagreed numbered six percent, as did those that somewhat disagreed. The numbers become more relevant by merely offering that 61 percent agreed that AIPAC should be registered as a foreign agent, and that 12 percent did not support this action. But as impressive as these numbers are, they are not nearly as impressive as the percentage attributable to the "walking dead" with "no opinion." A whopping 27 percent weighed in as "not sure." Why is this number so significant? Let's drop the "dead" vote! Now the "for" percentage becomes 83.6 percent and the vote against AIPAC to allow the continuation of their inordinate power becomes only 16.4 percent! That translates to five out of six Americans wanting AIPAC registered as agents of a foreign country and loss of their tax-exempt status.

Think of the poll results you have read in the past. Has the number of brain-dead zombies and ignorati ever been more than two to five percent? Why such a whopping number of uninformed in this poll? The reason is simple. As the Reverend Ted Pike has offered, "Face the forbidden truth: the media speaks with a Jewish voice." And this "Jewish voice" is not limited only to the mainstream media, but Internet websites that support the Christian Fundamentalist lunacy embraced by more than twenty million "Americans" that believe that modern Israel connects completely and unswervingly to the teachings in the Bible and the wishes of God. Nonsense!

Zionism has more connections to Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto than to the Holy Scriptures. And just consider the many "holy" acts that Israel has perpetrated against the hapless Palestinians. If their crimes against humanity cannot be compared to what Professor Kevin MacDonald describes as the product of Jewish intellectualism, namely communism, perhaps we can draw a better analogy to the behavior of Hitler and his Nazis towards the Jews before and during World War II. As they scream "never again," they are viciously engaging in precisely the same thing in both Palestine and Lebanon.

It was Israel that first introduced undeclared war acts of terrorism against civilians in the 20th century in perpetrating the King David Hotel bombing and the massacre at Deir Yassin. Yet, with all the UN resolutions against Israel and quashed by its captive and enabling giant, US, and all the news releases that could have been possible and could have been offered in an unbiased manner, remember "our" media speaks with a "Jewish voice." Isn't it easy to see how 27 percent of our voting population is so uninformed? Yet, more astonishingly, a further breakdown by Zogby in the results obtained shows that 59 percent of those "not sure" were Jewish! This too is significant, because whether they are or are not sure, they didn't blindly support Israel!

Zionism can no longer be defined as merely the establishment of the modern Jewish state of Israel. That tiny nation-state cannot exist without the taxpayer support of the American people to the tune of three-plus billion dollars a year in foreign aid. And in addition, American taxpayers are made to support one fifth of Israel military "defense" budget. And Israeli corporations and businesses enjoy virtually unlimited "specially sanctioned and protected" contracts from our government, specifically in communications. The vast array of transgressions against the United States perpetrated by "our friends" in Israel, as well as their transgressions against humanity especially in the Middle East, has earned them worldwide contempt and hatred for both them and US as well.

The definition of Zionism can now be expanded to include the planned and total destruction of our nation and our American way of life. Israel's puppet, G. Bush, tyrant, is bankrupting our nation and devaluing our money with his illegally launched Iraqi quagmire all now agree is destroying US. The only remaining beneficiary is clearly Israel. The turmoil and distraction in Iraq gives Israel breathing room to follow through on its plan to launch a war with Iran requiring once again our total involvement. Israel has stolen our nuclear secrets, sold them to other nations who are potentially our enemies, has refused to sign the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty while probably being the world's fourth nuclear power, and continues to deny even recently its nuclear capability. Its chief defense is the employment of a highly vitriolic accusatory rhetoric supported by a former international guilt complex based upon the Holocaust.

Accusatory tactics are Israel's and Zionism's greatest weapons. As Hitler offered, no one challenges the winner in war. And as Zionism continues to prove, no one challenges an accuser with Chutzpah! Israel has first accused Iraq, and we now know falsely and obviously deliberately, for their own narrow advantage. What about Israel and Zionism's gratitude for the wealth and protection the American people have given them? That is now being summarily dismissed! What have we done for Israel lately?

The destruction of the United States of America by Israel and Zionism is directly supported by the White House and Congress. The American people are being neutralized by the Zionist press that "speaks with a Jewish voice." Yet, academic intellectuals, including John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt in their Harvard School of Government report, attempted to warn America about the dangers of the powerful Zionist lobby. Additionally, Jewish academics, loyal to their faith but also loyal politically to America, have all been attacked and silenced by the Zionist traitors in Abraham Foxman's Anti-Defamation League and other elements of "organized Judaism." The term "organized Jews" was originally conveyed to me by a rabbi from a Torah-based Jewish religious group. Obviously, traitors like Foxman would smear these Jews as "self-hating Jews" thereby marginalizing both their academic achievements as well as their loyalty to our once-great nation.

The Zionist network is not just well organized ­ it should be considered as one of the Wonders of the World. After all, how can a tiny nation and a tiny religious minority translate to such massive power that it now totally controls the power of the United States of America? The organization is comprised of many organizations, independently structured and domiciled, but all connected by one powerful overarching intellectual agenda: namely, Zionism. It is the total power that Zionism commands that should immediately send up warning flags that our nation, as well as the entire world, is in grave danger. What was formerly offered by another agenda offering the battle cry of "Workers of the world unite!" is now replaced by the charge: "Israel has a right to exist!" and "Your fight is our fight!" Neither is true.

As to Israel's right to exist, Wikipedia- The Free Encyclopedia offers this assessment of the Balfour Declaration: "By the standards of international diplomacy, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 is an amazing document, succinctly summarized by Arthur Koestler who wrote that the declaration amounted to 'one nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third.'" How do the arrangements between World War I Zionists, the British government, the Council on Foreign Relations, Herzl, Rothschild and Palestine date back to biblical times? Britain proclaimed Balfour after capturing Palestinian teritories previously held in colonial cativity by the losing Ottoman Turkish Empire as spoils of World War I. The Turks were allies of Germany, which, along with the Austria-Hungary Empire, comprised the Central Power beligerents of World War I. And the Rothschild-prescribed Versailles treaty favoring the "Jewish banker" proxies [Warburg] were indeed reality, even if denied by that great author, journalist and "expert," William L. Shirer.

The network supporting Zionism includes the "free and independent" American press and such Christian Fundamentalist websites as Joe Farah's WorldNetDaily. Farah always rails against the ACLU as subverting the very religion he is supposedly so devoted to. But the ACLU is just another Zionist organization along with Foxman's ADL, B'nai B'rth, the Jewish Defense League, and many other organized "Jewish" organizations simply too numerous to list. Zionist propaganda promulgated by our press spikes the truth concerning Israeli attrocities against the Palestinians and blows out of proportion retaliatory acts by outgunned and outmanned Palestinian terror groups. Terror groups should not be limited to underarmed minority populations, but also to the full-blown military terrorist operations such as those of Israel and the United States in Fallujah.

The Zionist network is not limited to only the American press and the powerfully structured and heavily funded domestic Zionist organizations. It includes smaller Jewish religious groups, and more commonly, outspoken, arrogant individuals that can be, but do not necessarily have to be, Jewish. These individuals take advantage of the fact that their power can be magnified thousands of times over by stating an argument or citing an incident and then seeking the assistance of the in-place Zionist organizations who are more than willing to lend power, support and might to the accusors. Making accusations is what it's all about. The accusations don't have to be true or accurate ­ they need only be considered, even remotely, as "anti-Semitic." Zionists are always the ones who accuse ­ they are never the ones to be questioned, or refuted, or cross examined for the accuracy of their protestations and outrage. Truth is never considered when they launch their attacks; nor are their qualifications ever examined when smearing those challenging Israel.

In the next segment, we will examine some actual situations wherein the purveyors of America-destroying Zionism, and not "liberalism," spread their accusatory venom and hatred.


Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.


Combating The Zionist Network ­ Part 2

Note : Zionist apartheid requires US / Canadian fascism.

Exclusive to
By Ted Lang

Increasingly, the wall of continuous propaganda engineered by the journalistic control that is exercised over the so-called "American" free and independent press by Zionist America and Israel, is beginning to crumble and fall away. As Israel-first Jews and Christian Fundamentalists continue their campaigns of misinformation, disinformation, and no information at all, their un-American bias as well as their un-American agenda are being recognized and reviled. Revealed and reviled ­ Zionism is being exposed for the threat it is not only to America, but to the security and well-being of the entire world as well.

As I offered in the preceding segment, Zionism is no longer manifested by the Jewish state alone; it now includes the parasitic and ever-ongoing destruction of our once very free and very wealthy nation. We are a nation that is rapidly deteriorating on both counts. Israel, America's parasite, continues to suck the lifeblood out of our once-great nation in the form of foreign aid, additional financial support for its military, and in terms of maneuvering American politicians to deploy our youth and nation's future fighting wars dictated by Israel. But to criticize Israel is the height of treason insofar as fraudulent "Americans" are concerned, "Americans" who identify with either Christian Fundamentalism or "Jewish" Zionism. To be sure, there are many Jewish people both here and in Israel who oppose Israel's aggressive and terrorist-based militaristic imperialism.

William L. Shirer offered that the German people, prior to World War II, embraced Hitler and his Nazis because they were "unorganized and unarmed." Of course, the primary driver used to terrorize and persuade Germans and Jews to be subjugated by Nazi authoritarianism was the hijacking of the "Jewish media" by the Nazis to brainwash the populace. The German media had formerly been dominated by "Jewish" interests that supported communism. Hitler quickly marginalized the German press to press forward with his agenda of National Socialism. He transformed the German press away from its former form of "Jewish intellectualism" [Professor Kevin MacDonald] to his own propaganda machine. This too, however, was clearly an abuse of journalism, Shirer's chosen vocation. And it parallels the current condition identifiable to the "American" press today.

How conveniently Shirer failed to either observe or trumpet these glaring journalistic anomalies. But the other two failures of a society about to be enslaved by authoritarian, despotic government are almost of equal importance, especially the failure assured by a disorganized approach. To be sure, since heavy Zionist funding played a central role in financing Hitler and his Nazis, isn't it now ironic that no one agonizes more about the atrocities perpetrated by the Nazis against the Jews than highly organized Zionists themselves? And can there be any louder protest and hand wringing than that from Abraham Foxman and his Anti-Defamation League? I'm not sure that contributions to the ADL are tax-deductible, but certainly contributions to AIPAC and the ACLU are! These are the high-powered tips of the powerful Zionist iceberg, an iceberg poised to sink our ship of state every bit as much as the Israeli-intended sinking of the U.S.S. Liberty.

These are highly effective, disciplined and structured "Jewish" organizations are better described as being, in reality, Zionist organizations. It was an orthodox rabbi that described these entities to me as "organized Jewry." And these Zionist organizations are very generously funded, even by such means as American taxpayer dollars channeled back from Israel to fund the lobbying of American politicians, providing funding to Israel-sympathetic politicians' campaigns, and to launch marketing and other campaigns and events favorable to Israel. Zionists also obtain funding from tax-sheltered foundations and from highly successful yet misguided wealthy Jews who understandably wish to support the nation that most aggressively asserts their Jewish faith.

Some of American taxpayer funds transferred to Israel, the number one nation receiving our American foreign aid, even provide direct financial aid in support of synagogues and other "Jewish" religious institutions. In combination with the Zionist control of the news and entertainment media, any form of meaningful opposition to organized Zionism is virtually futile. Our nation is being sacrificed for the Zionist agenda that is Israel and its immoral territorial expansion. The resultant destruction of both our society and our nation is part and parcel of that Zionist agenda.

American foreign policy is, of course, not solely based upon the financial and military support of Israel. It combines with the quest for total control of the world's richest oil and gas deposits. The establishment of the state of Israel serves both American and British interests and plants a solid Western footprint in the Middle East. This was the obvious initial intention. Israel was to be the West's Middle East outpost and justification assuring British and American hegemony to prevent Cold War communism from intruding in that part of the world. My, how far we've digressed from our original intentions regarding Israel. Our present day obeisance to Israel is a total reversal of the very interests that gave Israel birth. This is now more of a factor than is the observation that defines our non-representatives in government as merely being idiots.

As Justin Raimondo points out ["Israel, Alone"], the neoconservative/Zionist "Clean Break" agenda was developed and implemented by members of the White House and Pentagon to give the Zionist state total freedom from domination by the West. Raimondo makes clear that Israeli Prime Minister Olmert's slip of the tongue acknowledging for the first time officially that Israel has nuclear capability, and coming after denying that very same capability only a week earlier, can clearly be interpreted as a "hands off!" threat to the West. As with our own politicians, anything Israeli politicians say initially should also be written off as lies. First deny, then justify when caught!

But whether it is Israel that is under attack, or our own corrupt politicians that always support Israeli atrocities against the Palestinians, criticism of either is always vigorously and ruthlessly blocked by the astonishing power of the Zionist network. Even former President Jimmy Carter has now been targeted by the network, along with Professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. Zionist smear-and-slime artist and Harvard shyster, Alan Dershowitz, postured himself once again in his Israel-first/America-last stance by attacking the former President of the United States for daring to question Israel and its Zionist network's key lobbying organization. Dershowitz has once again crawled out from underneath his slimy rock after smearing Mearsheimer and Walt for daring to discuss the most powerful lobby in America, AIPAC, and has now attacked former President Carter for his new book calling for a more balanced approach towards the Middle Eastconundrum of our own creation..

Until one personally experiences the smear and accusation of "anti-Semite," nothing will bring you closer to appreciating Hester Prynne's agony and anguish than Zionism's designated scarlet letter "A." You become marked, and no one will invest too much time and effort to examine whether or not the charges are fact-based or true. The brand converts you as an "untouchable"; you become a pariah. You do not wish to challenge your accusers, for the more you defend yourself, the more you become stuck to the "tar baby." Clearly, I speak from experience.

Any individual that believes they are observing "anti-Semitic" behavior, is, of course, encouraged to contact the ADL. After all, that is their sole role and function: defaming any and all who question the foreign nation-state of Israel. Their methods are indignation, outrage, and then accusation. No one questions either their sources or qualifications when such accusations are being made. It explains why Rush Limbaugh and other so-called "conservatives" including Hannity, Coulter and Guy Smiley O'Reilly, continue to be terrified of "liberals." There's a "bad guy" out there somewhere, but we can't mention his real name. They all need a scapegoat for Bush's insane policies, so the enemy is "liberal" and the "liberal" media. To them, even a tiny hint of criticism directed at the criminal Bush regime by the media ignores totally the fabulous support and protection the corporate establishment mainstreamers provide to the Bush crime machine. The term "Zionist" simply isn't in their vocabulary!

In yet another incident in my life that can be attributed to an eerie redundancy of inexplicable synchronicity, the editor in my local paper advised me of the severe restrictions to be placed upon my weekly column. It coincided and dovetailed into a similar incident in which Professor Anthony Judt was targeted and successfully silenced by the Zionist network. In his October 9, 2006 article entitled, "In N.Y., Sparks Fly Over Israel," Michael Powell, writing for the Washington Post, begins, "Two major American Jewish organizations helped block a prominent New York University historian from speaking at the Polish consulate here last week, saying that the academic was too critical of Israel and American Jewry."

"Too critical?" "Israel and American Jewry?" Are we being advised that Judaism and Israel are one and the same thing? I'm not buying any of that for a moment. As I've mentioned earlier, I happen to know that there are many Jews both here and in Israel that oppose the horrors the Israeli government is imposing on Arabs, Muslims, Palestinians and Christians. And before ever hearing Professor Judt's speech, and before ever allowing him to comment, the Zionist network struck and silenced him. And who gets to decide what is "too critical?" Would that be the Sultan of Smear, Abraham the Foxman, or is it Dirty Dershowitz?

Here's Powell again: "The historian, Tony Judt, is Jewish and directs New York University's Remarque Institute, which promotes the study of Europe. Judt was scheduled to talk on Oct. 4 to a nonprofit organization that rents space from the consulate. Judt's subject was the Israel lobby in the United States, and he planned to argue that this lobby has often stifled honest debate." Ironic, no? The subject of Jewish Professor Judt's presentation was amply proven to be true by this very incident. But is it merely a lobby that stifles speech, or was it the powerful and heavily funded Zionist network?

Along with the attacks and smears upon former President Jimmy Carter, Professors Mearsheimer and Walt for their paper written under the auspices of the Harvard School of Government, we now have a Jewish historian and scholar smeared by "two American (sic) Jewish organizations." The organizations are [the envelope, please!] the Fox Man's ADL and the "American" Jewish Committee. My goodness, these gangsters, fascists, and/or communists seem to have no problem getting their chance to speak seeking redress of alleged grievances. When do real Americans like Judt get a chance for their day in a public forum? As they stifle everyone else's freedom of speech and expression, they reserve those God-given rights for only themselves. They are demonstrating for all to see the fact-based accuracy of the points made as concerns the stifling of open, honest and balanced debate as pointed out by the smears against Carter, Mearsheimer, Walt and now Judt.

In response to an "inquiring photographer" type column in my local paper, a woman queried as to her opinion on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict offered that she was completely uninformed about it. It was my decision to disallow any reader of a paper I write for to be uninformed, especially when the dumbing-down of such people originates with the media division of the Zionist network. I was brutally frank and employed fact-based input and cited credible references, including the article cited by the Reverend Ted Pike from National Geographic. I had in fact written a previous article concerning Israel when the fascist nation-state attackedLebanon and murdered innocent Christian civilians there. The article I wrote to answer the woman was structured as a two-part column like this one.

The first solitary column came under immediate attack by a member/user of the Zionist network. The individual felt sufficiently superior "to go it alone." No escalation may even have been attempted in enlisting the power of the higher echelons of the Zionist network. The individual threatened my editor by offering to "pull" advertising from the paper ­ the individual didn't have any advertising space in the paper and my editor knew it. But after the two-part column motivated by and responding to an uninformed reader, the Zionist gang swung into action. In all probability, my Zionist attacker was acting alone; but, there's always the feeling and realization that somewhere in the background lurk the higher echelons of the Zionist network ready to pounce and smear and destroy. The attacker seemingly forwarded to my newspaper's publisher a copy of an e-mail he had originally sent to me.

The Zionist smearer ostensibly magnified his efficacy by not only sending copies of his nasty e-mail to the newspaper's publisher, but also to the mayor, a councilman, a civic leader, a police officer, and a list of other group "IDs" to indicate a wide distribution of the aggrieved condition which I had caused him by writing the truth. Perhaps the Zionist only indicated wide distribution, but then copied no one! Perhaps he did AND threatened to sue using the vast and unlimited resources of the higher echelons of the Zionist network. It is easy to see how the publisher would just simply inform my editor to cease and desist in allowing me to write articles of an international, national, state and county nature, and stick to local township issues as the Zionist slime ball dictated and offering this only "if I was qualified."

When on a previous occasion, having opened up and launched a website, I wrote on Israel, another Zionist called my webmaster and threatened him and his wife. The poor computer techie was very concerned, considering the threats the cowardly creep made to him and his wife using foul and obscene language. The attacker found my associate's name and address from the website registration. The couple has three small children. I sent nasty e-mails back to the creep and notified the police.

I will never rise to the stature of such notables as Carter, Mearsheimer, Walt or Judt; but my personal experience must be documented. I know that it has happened to others at my level who dared to speak out against Israel and the Zionist network organized to advance only the interests of Israel and to silence and stifle criticism of that fascist nation's continued atrocities against Mankind. I had been in a quandary as to what to do ­ the accusation and smear, as unfounded and loathsome as its originator, was nevertheless, a very hurtful experience for me. I have contacted my lawyer.

Again, considering the more elevated amongst US that have been smeared and defamed as "anti-Semitic," there is yet another case as was reported on onNovember 24th. It involved a Professor David Noble of York University. The article, entitled, "Jewish Prof Sues Organized Jewry," [ ] relates how Professor Noble initiated "a $25 million suit against various Jewish organizations for defamation for labeling him an 'anti Semite.'"

Wait a minute ­ run this by me again! A Jewish professor has been marginalized once again by the Zionist network, but this time being accused directly as being an "anti-Semite." If "anti-Semitism," acknowledging its inherently incorrect racist inference when used to smear those of other than the Jewish faith and described basically as "Untermenchen" by the Talmud, is now being deployed to smear those of the Jewish faith as well, why shouldn't a Jew be allowed to sue for defamation of character? For that matter, why shouldn't anyone be allowed to sue AND SUCCEED against this horrific disabling defamation perpetrated to silence criticism and opposition to a foreign nation-state that has proven itself an enemy of our society and our national interests? Why should freedom of speech and thought be denied to anyone who doesn't accept the Zionist agenda? Way to go Professor Noble! Perhaps Professor Judt should do the same!

In fact, it is my belief that in all likelihood, thousands, and perhaps even tens of thousands of Americans, have been sandbagged, intimidated and smeared by the secret criminal Zionist network. It's time to not only hold them accountable, but to take them to court and to get our American taxpayer dollars back into American hands once again. They've certainly got deep enough pockets!

Lawsuits would serve to provide an even more beneficial service: that of exposing the Zionists secretive and back room/closed door back-stabbing and bring it into the sun-bleached daylight of public awareness. The Zionist network and its vile ranks attack and smear publicly, but when challenged, desire always to make amends in the darkness of secrecy. Think of an errant loudmouth who publicly accuses you of wrongdoing at a town hall meeting, but after challenge in that venue, apologizes and tries to settle differences quietly and privately. That describes Zionists to a tee!

After smearing Professor Judt, Foxman invited Judt, and fellow academics who protested his treatment, to his office for a "private" meeting. This is the Network's method: accuse and smear publicly, apologize and smooth things out privately and quietly. But finally, about 100 academics have had enough of the ADL'sterrorist tactics and then went public with a letter of rebuke sent to Foxman. The entire letter and signatures can be found at [ ]. The last two paragraphs in the academics' letter of protest says it all: "In a democracy, there is only one appropriate response to a lecture, article, or book one does not agree with. It is to give another lecture, write another article, or publish another book. For much of its hundred-year history your organization worked side by side with other Americans who wanted to guarantee that freedom for all, and your mission statement still declares: 'the goal remains the same: to stand up for the core values of America against those who seek to undermine them through word or deed.'

Though we, the undersigned, have many disagreements about political matters, foreign and domestic, we are united in believing that a climate of intimidation is inconsistent with fundamental principles of debate in a democracy. The Polish Consulate is not obliged to promote free speech. But the rules of the game inAmerica oblige citizens to encourage rather than stifle public debate. We who have signed this letter are dismayed that the ADL did not choose to play a more constructive role in promoting liberty."

As the academics point out, Foxman and his ADL have violated their own organization's primary reason for its creation, and continue to violate the reasons the American people formed this government; namely, to escape religious repression and to acquire and enjoy freedom of speech and thought. My detractor, considering his well written letter, could have challenged me in a letter to the editor, or by simply writing a guest article opposing my viewpoint. Foxman could have allowed Judt to speak, and then afterwards could have written an article, given an opposing speech, or challenged him to a debate. As the academics pointed out, this is the "democratic way." Obviously, this is not the way of the underhanded Zionist network.

And apparently Professor David Noble is onto their act as well! In initiating his lawsuit, the article continues: "Defendants include the private corporate entity York University Foundation, pro-Israel lobbying and fundraising organizations, Hillel of Greater Toronto, the United Jewish Appeal Federation of Greater Toronto, and the Canadian Jewish Congress, Ontario, and their agents.

They are accused of trying to intimate Noble because of his critical investigation into external influences on Canada's third-largest public university. In 2004, he distributed a short report entitled 'The Tail that Wags the Dog' which showed the connections between members of the York Foundation, a fundraising body, and pro-Israel lobbyists.

As a result Jewish student activists red flagged him for implying 'Jews controlled York University' and singling out fundraisers by their racial identity." The article ends saying, "Noble, an expert in the History of Technology, says he has lost family in the Holocaust and finds the charge of 'anti Semitism' both 'hurtful and offensive.' Earlier this year a Jewish York University grad student was suspended for three years for protesting the death of Rachel Corrie. He has sued the university for $850.000."

It is within the power of all Americans smeared by the agents and proxies of a foreign government to seek protection and legal relief through the courts. Yes, the Zionist network is rich and powerful, but they are also very wrong and vulnerable. My Zionist antagonist can continue to enjoy the power and invulnerability of anonymity, but only until that point in time that it can be proven that I have a case. And if and when a lawsuit can be initiated, the advantage of anonymity will evaporate and public exposure of the underhanded methods of the Zionist network will be exposed.

If members/users and leaders/principals of the Zionist network use their freedom of speech and thought to silence the freedom of speech and thought of others, how can their actions in any way, shape or form conform to the American ideals of democracy and freedom we so cherish? Why do our so-called elected representatives kowtow to such un-American organizations as AIPAC and the ADL? Why does AIPAC, which initiates espionage against our government and nation, continue to enjoy tax-exempt status? And why is this exemption allowed to continue even after a Zogby poll offered that over 80 percent of Americans want AIPAC's tax-exempt status yanked? And where does "our" Congress stand on this, and where are they on all the other critical problems confronting our nation, the most critical of which were caused primarily by the Israel lobby that Dershowitz and Foxman don't want US to question? When will America be restored to the American people? llll